Search

Waste tires (WT) are produced in millions of tons per annum and their safe disposal is always a major environmental challenge because of fire hazards and the increasing cost of landfills. WT has high organic matter content that can be converted into fuels and chemicals if suitable technologies can be developed. Herein we report the in situ catalytic pyrolysis of WT using formulated red mud catalyst to produce low sulfur fuel that can be fractionated or can be used without fractionation. The in situ catalytic pyrolysis was conducted at 450–550 °C using formulated red mud catalyst. The yield of pyrolysis liquids ranged from 35 to 40 wt%. The liquid was very rich in limonene and long chain aliphatic hydrocarbons. The catalyst was effective in removing the sulfur compounds in the oil through reactive adsorption desulfurization mechanism. The sulfur species reacted with hematite, calcite, sodium hydroxide, and zinc oxide to form sulfides and were retained in the catalyst. The minimum sulfur content of the catalytic pyrolysis oil was 0.38 wt%. After catalyst regeneration in air through combustion, the catalyst activity was restored, and the catalyst was reused.

This study focuses on alternatives to the sustainable management of plastic wastes through the development of a pyrolyser model, adapted to the recycling of plastics into fuel. It is a batch reactor, fixed bed, designed and built for the extraction of pyrolysis oil that can be recycled into petrol or diesel. The pyrolyser consists of a reactor with a volume of 0.0424 m3 and a copper spiral condenser with 2.31 m length. The plastics used for this study were Low Density PolyEthylene (LDPE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). They were collected from surrounding companies, washed, sampled, cut and sieved. Two different sizes of pyrolysis material: 1–3 cm (G1) and 3–7 cm (G2) were obtained and tested. The pyrolysis reactor and the plastics entering at an ambient temperature of 25 °C were heated. Plastics were then melted at 110 °C and vaporised at 450 °C. The hot vapour produced circulated through a copper coil and condensed. The resulting liquid was called pyrolysis oil. The results of this study show that the pyrolysis of LDPE, PP and PS yields two liquids: the heavy and majority fraction which arelike the conventional diesel and the light fraction which is like gasoline. Yields of 6–12.4% for the light fraction and 43.2–63.8% corresponding to the heavy fraction are observed. PE has the highest yield, 63.8% for the heavy fraction and 12.4% for the light fraction. The study further underscores that the size of the pyrolysis material influences the yields, i.e. an increase of 12.5, 9.1 and 7 % for LDPE, PS and PP respectively when the size of the pyrolysis material is increased from G2 to G1. In contrast, the results of PET have shown a liquid that solidifies 46 s later. It was also noticed that 2061.34 kJ of energy was required to pyrolyse 1 kg of plastic and produce 0.762 l of fuel. The simple physico-chemical characterisation of the majority fraction shows a great similarity with diesel fuel, as the distillation went beyond 200 °C. Therefore, we can say that the diesel fraction is similar to diesel fuel. We equally observed a high cetane number (52.1–55.1) and a high calorific value (42.9–55.5 MJ/kg). Consequently, there are some points of non-conformity with the European 590 standard and Cameroonian specifications for diesel fuel. These include a low density (767.8–815.1 kg/m3) and a low viscosity at 40 °C (1.108–1.346 mm2/S). A thorough physico-chemical analysis will complete this study before any recommendation for appropriate use.

The conversion of waste streams into a useable material through a recycling process is a hot topic. Waste streams can originate from domestic and industrial sources and range from plastic waste to medical waste to various industrial waste streams, both solid and liquid. In addition to waste circularity, circularity for bio-based waste streams and renewable sources are also being investigated. To simplify this complexity, this article presents a case study evaluating the output from the feedstock recycling of plastic waste originating from municipal solid waste. Plastic waste entering the environment is undesired, and many initiatives are working towards a plastics circular economy. Once disposed of, ideally, plastic waste should be either re-used or recycled in order to avoid incineration or disposal in landfills. Recycling waste plastic can occur either via mechanical recycling or feedstock (chemical) recycling, where feedstock recycling can occur for example, through gasification or pyrolysis technologies. This article will focus only on the oils obtained from the pyrolysis of mixed waste plastic. The output from pyrolysis has a different composition than traditional fossil-based hydrocarbon streams, and therefore, must be evaluated to correctly process as feedstock. The authors have previously shown that gas chromatography coupled to vacuum ultraviolet detection (GC-VUV) provides accurate identification and quantification of the hydrocarbon composition (paraffins, isoparaffins, olefins, naphthenes, and aromatics - PIONA) of fossil-based liquid hydrocarbon streams. 1 Therefore, GC-VUV was evaluated for analysis of the pyrolysis oils from plastic waste. Using an in-house modified spectral library in combination with the PIONA+ software, accurate identification and quantification of the hydrocarbon composition of pyrolysis oils from C 4 through C 30+ was possible with a limit of detection of 0.1 wt.%. To the best of our knowledge, this article is the first example of accurate PIONA-type quantification of pyrolysis oils by GC-VUV., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: N/A, (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)