Search

Aims: We evaluated the relationship between the timing of insulin initiation and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) risk in Pennsylvania Medicaid enrollees with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: We included 17,873 enrollees (age 47.4 ± 10.3 years; range 18–64 years) initially treated with non-insulin glucose-lowering agents (GLAs) in 2008–2016. Based on clinical guidelines, we identified early (N = 1,158; 6%; insulin initiation ≤ 6 months after first-line GLAs), in-time (N = 569; 3%; 6–12 months), delayed (N = 2,761; 15%; >12 months), and non-insulin users (N = 13,385; 75%). The Prentice-Williams-Peterson (PWP) models with inverse probability weighting estimated CVD risk across the four groups and the change in risk after insulin initiation. Results: Regardless of time to insulin initiation, insulin users had higher CVD risks after first-line GLAs than non-insulin users (aHR: early: 2.0 [1.5–2.5], in-time: 1.8 [1.2–2.6], delayed: 1.9 [1.6–2.3]). However, we found only a borderline increase in CVD risk after insulin initiation vs. before in early (aHR: 1.4 [1.1–1.8]) and delayed users (aHR: 1.3 [1.0–1.7]), and no increase in in-time users (aHR: 1.3 [0.9–2.0]). Conclusions: We observed no gains in CVD benefits from insulin initiation in the early stages of pharmacotherapy possibly because CVD developed before insulin initiation. Additional management of hypertension and dyslipidemia may be important to reduce CVD risk in this young and middle-aged T2D cohort.

Aims: To systematically identify and describe models of injectable therapy initiation for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care. Methods: Eight electronic databases and the grey literature were searched. Studies examining models of injectable therapy initiation for adults with T2DM in primary care settings were included. Results: Successful models included: 1) Nurse-led one-to-one approach; 2) Nurse-led group sessions; and 3) Providing education to GPs and nurses. Conclusions: Few robust studies were found. Studied models were mainly in general practices, with limited evidence documented about starting people with T2DM on an injectable in the home setting.

Aims: Initiation of insulin is usually delayed even when required. We aim to estimate the association between depressive symptoms on time to become insulin requiring and time to insulin initiation., Methods: 8-year follow-up of a cohort of newly diagnosed people with T2D recruited in south-east London, UK (2008-2012). Baseline depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Time to insulin-requiring was defined when optimal glycaemic levels were not achieved (HbA1c >58 mmol/mol) at least three months after the 2nd oral antidiabetic was prescribed, and time to insulin initiation was defined as first insulin prescription., Results: Seventy percent (n = 1166) of the baseline cohort was followed up. Median time to insulin requiring was 84 months (IQR 63-100) and to insulin initiation 93 months (IQR 79-105). Participants with depressive symptoms at baseline required insulin earlier (mean [SD] 73.64 [32.16] vs. 79.05 [29.07] months, p = 0.007) and were prescribed insulin sooner (82.53 [30.19] vs. 89.72 [22.02] months, p < 0.001). In Cox regression, depressive symptoms at baseline were not associated with time to insulin requiring (HR [95 % CI]; 1.16 [0.86-1.57], p = 0.34) nor to insulin initiation (HR = 1.00 [0.99-1.00], p = 0.49)., Conclusions: Depressive symptoms were not associated with time to insulin requiring and initiation after adjusting for potential confounding., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Real-world effectiveness of insulin therapy is affected by poor treatment persistence, often occurring soon after initiation. An international cross-sectional survey of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been conducted to describe reasons for non-persistence with insulin therapy., Methods: Responders to an online survey in 7 countries were classified as continuers (no gap of ≥7days), interrupters (interrupted therapy for ≥7days within first 6 months, then restarted), and discontinuers (terminated therapy for ≥7days within first 6 months, no restart before survey). We present the results from the United Kingdom (UK) cohort., Results: Of 942 global respondents, 131 were from the UK, having a mean age of 37years and a mean of 7years since first T2DM diagnosis. Reasons contributing to insulin continuation (n=50) were improved physical feeling (52.0%) and improved glycemic control (48.0%). Common reasons for interruption (n=50) or discontinuation (n=31), respectively were weight gain (50.0%, 48.4%) and hypoglycemia (38.0%, 25.8%). Most important reason for possible re-initiation for interrupters and discontinuers, respectively was persuasion by physician/healthcare professional (74.0%, 64.5%)., Conclusion: The benefits of basal insulin therapy motivated continuers to persist with the treatment; experienced or anticipated side effects contributed to interruption and discontinuation., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Aims: To describe primary care physicians' (PCPs) perceptions of patient reactions and concerns about insulin initiation and identify opportunities for increased support., Methods: Cross-sectional, online survey of PCPs prescribing basal insulin to adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). PCPs were identified from administrative claims of a large commercial health plan and descriptive results of PCP responses were reported., Results: PCPs (N=100) treated an average of 17 patients receiving insulin during a typical week. More than 85% of insulin initiation recommendations originated with PCPs. Most offered glucose monitoring instructions (96%) and advice on diet, exercise, and diabetes management (96%); 35% provided insulin titration algorithms; 93% reported that patients often or always took their insulin daily within 3 months of initiation; 31% of PCPs reported monthly office contacts with patients for the first 3 months; 16% reported no outreach efforts; fewer than 20% connected patients with support groups. When starting basal insulin, PCPs reported patients feeling personal failure regarding their diabetes treatment (33% often/always) and lacking confidence in their ability to manage insulin therapy (38% often/always)., Conclusions: Study results identify additional opportunities for assisting patients in making the transition to insulin, including more frequent direct outreach to monitor insulin usage., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To compare persistence and its predictors in type 2 diabetes patients in primary care, initiating either basal supported oral therapy (BOT) or intensified conventional therapy (ICT) with glargine, detemir, or NPH insulin., Methods: In the BOT cohort, 1398 glargine (mean age: 68 years), 292 detemir (66 years), and 874 NPH (65 years) users from 918 practices were retrospectively analyzed (Disease Analyzer, Germany: 2008-2012). The ICT group incorporated 866 glargine (64 years), 512 detemir (60 years), and 1794 NPH (64 years) new users. Persistence was defined as proportion of patients remaining on the initial basal insulin (glargine, detemir and NPH insulin) over 2 years. Persistence was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves (log-rank tests) and Cox regression adjusting for age, sex, diabetes duration, antidiabetic co-therapy, comorbidities, specialist care, and private health insurance., Results: In BOT, two-year persistence was 65%, 53%, and 59% in glargine, detemir, and NPH users, respectively (p<0.001). In ICT, persistence was higher without differences between groups: 84%, 85%, 86% in glargine, detemir, and NPH, respectively (p=0.536). In BOT, detemir and NPH users were more likely to discontinue basal insulin compared with glargine (detemir vs. glargine: adjusted Hazard Ratio; 95% CI: 1.56; 1.31-1.87; NPH vs. glargine: 1.22; 1.07-1.38). Heart failure (1.39; 1.16-1.67) was another predictor of non-persistence, whereas higher age (per year: 0.99; 0.98-0.99), metformin (0.61; 0.54-0.69), and sulfonylurea co-medication (0.86; 0.77-0.97) were associated with lower discontinuation., Conclusions: In BOT, treatment persistence among type 2 diabetes patients initiating basal insulin is influenced by type of insulin, antidiabetic co-medication, and patient characteristics., (Copyright © 2015 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To develop and pilot-test the feasibility and effectiveness of an interactive DVD about misconceptions within South Asian communities regarding insulin treatment in type 2 diabetes, for educating patients and community members and training healthcare providers., Methods: The project setting was a South Asian (mainly Indian) community in Leicester, UK. Qualitative evidence from our previous studies was used to inform the content of the DVD script and accompanying resources. The intervention involved three components: facilitating DVD viewings for people with/without diabetes in community settings; training healthcare providers involved in managing South Asian patients with diabetes in primary care; and using the DVD and resources in primary care patient consultations. Evaluation involved a range of approaches including face-to-face interviews, telephone feedback and questionnaires., Results: Analysis of questionnaires and qualitative feedback from community participants showed some significant changes in attitudes and understanding about insulin and high acceptability of the DVD. Healthcare providers who attended the training found it informative and perceived the DVD and visual resources as potentially useful for facilitating acceptance of insulin. Primary care patient recruitment was challenging, but participants described the DVD as an acceptable and informative way of learning about insulin therapy., Conclusion: The DVD intervention was effective and feasible at community and healthcare provider levels., Practice Implications: Although based on a small sample, at patient level our findings suggested that the DVD worked at different levels helping some to accept the need for insulin and others to consolidate a decision to commence this treatment. Consideration needs to be given to patient engagement strategies for implementation in primary care consultations., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)