Search

Background: Calcaneal fractures are uncommon and have a substantial impact on hindfoot function and quality of life. Several surgical treatment options are available; both in surgical approach and type of operation. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcome and quality of life following ORIF and primary arthrodesis. Furthermore, predictors of worse functional outcome were explored., Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional cohort study was performed in patients with surgical fixation of a calcaneal fracture with a minimum follow-up of 18 months. Patients received ORIF through the 1) Extended Lateral Approach (ELA), 2) Sinus Tarsi Approach (STA) or 3) primary arthrodesis via STA. Participants were presented a questionnaire containing demographics, the AOFAS hindfoot scale, Foot Function Index, SF-36, EQ-5D and patient satisfaction., Results: In total 95 patients participated in this study. The three groups were comparable regarding patient characteristics. A median score of 74.5 points on the AOFAS hindfoot scale and 11.9 on the FFI was found for the entire group. There were no statistically significant differences between patients with ORIF of primary arthrodesis. Patients scored a median of 49.0 on the Physical Component Scale of the SF-36 and 55.4 on the Mental Component Scale. On the EQ-5D patients scored a median of 0.8 points. Again no statistically significant differences were observed between the three subgroups. Socio-economic status was the only statistically significant predictor of worse functional outcome (β: 4.06, 95% CI: 0.50-7.62) after multivariable analysis., Interpretation: Good midterm outcomes following in terms of functional outcome and in quality of life are observed. We observed no statistical significant difference in functional outcome between patients with ORIF and patients with primary arthrodesis. The only predictor of worse functional outcome is a lower socio-economic status., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of intra-articular calcaneal fractures through an extended lateral approach is frequently accompanied by a high complication rate. However, ORIF currently provides the best long-term clinical results. The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to evaluate both mid- to long-term clinical and radiological results of a consecutive series treated by ORIF and (2) to determine the influence of short-term complications on long-term clinical outcome., Methods: Patients with a displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture, treated with ORIF, through an extended lateral approach, in a level-2 trauma centre between 1995 and 2008 were evaluated for the study. The long-term functional outcome (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) and radiographic results (e.g., Böhler and Gissane angle, height, width and joint reduction) were determined. Short- and long-term complications were documented., Results: A total of 57 patients matched the inclusion criteria, from which 39 patients agreed to participate in this study (68%). The median follow-up was 6.5 years (range 2-16 years). Based on the AOFAS hindfoot score, 74% of the patients had a good-to-excellent long-term clinical result. Radiological results were satisfying with a median postoperative Böhler angle of 26° and 25° at follow-up. Complications occurred in 32% of all patients; mainly wound-healing problems were noted. Short-term complications did not influence mid- to long-term clinical results (p>0.05). Anatomic reconstruction of the calcaneus was associated with improved long-term clinical results (p<0.05)., Conclusion: Despite the high complication rate following ORIF of a calcaneal fracture, complications do not affect mid- to long-term clinical outcome. Surgical treatment should focus on restoring the anatomy., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic level IV., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)