Search

Inotropes aim at increasing cardiac output by enhancing cardiac contractility. They constitute the third pharmacological pillar in the treatment of patients with decompensated heart failure, the other two being diuretics and vasodilators. Three classes of parenterally administered inotropes are currently indicated for decompensated heart failure, (i) the beta adrenergic agonists, including dopamine and dobutamine and also the catecholamines epinephrine and norepinephrine, (ii) the phosphodiesterase III inhibitor milrinone and (iii) the calcium sensitizer levosimendan. These three families of drugs share some pharmacologic traits, but differ profoundly in many of their pleiotropic effects. Identifying the patients in need of inotropic support and selecting the proper inotrope in each case remain challenging. The present consensus, derived by a panel meeting of experts from 21 countries, aims at addressing this very issue in the setting of both acute and advanced heart failure., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Acute heart failure and/or cardiogenic shock are frequently triggered by ischemic coronary events. Yet, there is a paucity of randomized data on the management of patients with heart failure complicating acute coronary syndrome, as acute coronary syndrome and cardiogenic shock have frequently been defined as exclusion criteria in trials and registries. As a consequence, guideline recommendations are mostly driven by observational studies, even though these patients have a particularly poor prognosis compared to heart failure patients without signs of coronary artery disease. In acute heart failure, and especially in cardiogenic shock related to ischemic conditions, vasopressors and inotropes are used. However, both pathophysiological considerations and available clinical data suggest that these treatments may have disadvantageous effects. The inodilator levosimendan offers potential benefits due to a range of distinct effects including positive inotropy, restoration of ventriculo-arterial coupling, increases in tissue perfusion, and anti-stunning and anti-inflammatory effects. In clinical trials levosimendan improves symptoms, cardiac function, hemodynamics, and end-organ function. Adverse effects are generally less common than with other inotropic and vasoactive therapies, with the notable exception of hypotension. The decision to use levosimendan, in terms of timing and dosing, is influenced by the presence of pulmonary congestion, and blood pressure measurements. Levosimendan should be preferred over adrenergic inotropes as a first line therapy for all ACS-AHF patients who are under beta-blockade and/or when urinary output is insufficient after diuretics. Levosimendan can be used alone or in combination with other inotropic or vasopressor agents, but requires monitoring due to the risk of hypotension., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data on the outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) in patients developing ventricular arrhythmias are limited., Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes by heart rate in patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy trial., Methods: Slow VT was defined as VTs with heart rate < 200 beats/min. Fast VT with a heart rate ≥200 beats/min and VF (>250 beats/min) were considered as a combined category. Primary end point was heart failure (HF) or death. Secondary end point included all-cause mortality., Results: There were 228 (12.7%) patients with slow VT and 198 (11.1%) with fast VT/VF. In time-dependent analysis, slow VT was associated with an increased risk of HF/death in CRT-D patients with left branch bundle block (LBBB; hazard ratio [HR] 3.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83-5.55; P < .001), but not in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.52-2.19; P = .867; interaction P value = .017). CRT-D patients with LBBB and fast VT/VF doubled their risk of HF/death compared to ICD patients (interaction P value = .06). Slow VT events were also predictive of death in CRT-D patients with LBBB (HR 3.48; 95% CI 1.66-7.28; P < .001), but not in ICD patients (interaction P value = .06). Slow VTs were highly predictive of subsequent fast VT/VF (HR 4.33; 95% CI 3.01-6.24; P < .001)., Conclusions: Slow VT episodes are predictive of subsequent fast VT/VF. Slow VT and fast VT/VF episodes in CRT-D patients are associated with an increased risk of subsequent HF/death. CRT-D-treated LBBB patients with slow VTs have a significantly higher risk of mortality., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Despite technical advancements, implantation of coronary sinus (CS) leads may be challenging, and dislocation remains a relevant clinical problem., Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcome of stent implantation to anchor the lead to the wall of the CS side branch., Methods: Stenting of a CS side branch was performed in 312 patients. The procedure was performed because of postoperative lead dislocation in 16 patients and because of an intraoperative unstable lead position or phrenic nerve stimulation in 296 cases. A bare metal coronary stent was introduced over a second guide wire in the same CS sheath. The stent was deposited 5-35 mm proximal to the most proximal electrode. Mechanical damage of the CS side branch or pericardial effusion was not observed owing to stenting., Results: During follow-up (median 28.4, interquartile range 15-37, maximum 70 months), a clinically important increase in the left ventricular pacing threshold was found in four cases and reoperation was necessary in only two patients (0.6%). Phrenic nerve stimulation was observed in 18 instances, and repositioning with an ablation catheter was performed in seven cases. Impedance measurements did not suggest lead insulation failure. Three stented leads were extracted without complication after 3-49 months owing to infection, while four leads were extracted easily during heart transplantation after 7-27 months., Conclusion: Stent implantation to stabilize CS lead position seems to be an effective and safe procedure in prevention and treatment of CS lead dislocation in selected cases., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Endothelin-1 secretion and sympathetic activation may play important role in cardiovascular pathophysiology. In vivo interactions between these systems are not defined. We aimed to study the electrophysiological and haemodynamic effects of simultaneous intracoronary endothelin-1 and intravenous isoproterenol infusions. 18 anaesthetised open chest dogs were studied after AV-ablation. Mean arterial blood pressure, coronary blood flow, left ventricular contractility, standard electrocardiograms, right and left ventricular epi- and endocardial monophasic action potential (MAP) signals were recorded. Intracoronary endothelin-1 (30 pmol/min) was given to Group ET (n=6), intravenous isoproterenol (0.2 microg/kg/min) to Group ISO (n=6), both endothelin-1 and isoproterenol to Group ET+ISO (n=6) for 30 min. MAP duration increased in all studied regions of Group ET, decreased in all studied regions of Group ISO and ET+ISO (control vs. maximal changes of left ventricular epicardial MAP 90% duration, Group ET: 296+/-22 vs 369+/-20 ms, p<0.05, Group ISO: 298+/-18 vs 230+/-27 ms, p<0.01, Group ET+ISO: 302+/-18 vs 231+/-10 ms, p<0.01). In Group ET, early after depolarisations (3/6), polymorphic non-sustained ventricular tachycardias (6/6), and ventricular fibrillation (3/6) could be observed. In Group ISO, monomorphic non-sustained ventricular tachycardias (5/6) and atrial fibrillation (3/6) appeared. In Group ET+ISO, mono- and polymorphic non-sustained ventricular tachycardias occurred (5/6), neither ventricular fibrillation nor atrial fibrillation developed. An additive effect of endothelin-1 and isoproterenol on left ventricular contractility was observed. Isoproterenol treatment showed antagonistic effect against endothelin-1 induced MAP duration prolongation, early after depolarisation and ventricular fibrillation formation, while endothelin-1 showed protective effect against the development of isoproterenol induced atrial fibrillation.