Search

Background: At the first interim analysis of the phase 3 ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 study, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemoradiotherapy provided a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. We report the overall survival results from the second interim analysis of this study., Methods: Eligible patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk (FIGO 2014 stage IB2-IIB with node-positive disease or stage III-IVA regardless of nodal status), locally advanced, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cervical cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive five cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, followed by 15 cycles of pembrolizumab (400 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks. Pembrolizumab or placebo and cisplatin were administered intravenously. Patients were stratified at randomisation by planned external beam radiotherapy type (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT] vs non-IMRT or non-VMAT), cervical cancer stage at screening (FIGO 2014 stage IB2-IIB node positive vs III-IVA), and planned total radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy) dose (<70 Gy vs ≥70 Gy [equivalent dose of 2 Gy]). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by investigator or by histopathological confirmation of suspected disease progression and overall survival defined as the time from randomisation to death due to any cause. Safety was a secondary endpoint., Findings: Between June 9, 2020, and Dec 15, 2022, 1060 patients at 176 sites in 30 countries across Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America were randomly assigned to treatment, with 529 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 531 patients in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. At the protocol-specified second interim analysis (data cutoff Jan 8, 2024), median follow-up was 29·9 months (IQR 23·3-34·3). Median overall survival was not reached in either group; 36-month overall survival was 82·6% (95% CI 78·4-86·1) in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 74·8% (70·1-78·8) in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. The hazard ratio for death was 0·67 (95% CI 0·50-0·90; p=0·0040), meeting the protocol-specified primary objective. 413 (78%) of 528 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 371 (70%) of 530 in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group had a grade 3 or higher adverse event, with anaemia, white blood cell count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased being the most common adverse events. Potentially immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 206 (39%) of 528 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 90 (17%) of 530 patients in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04221945., Interpretation: Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy significantly improved overall survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer These data, together with results from the first interim analysis, support this immuno-chemoradiotherapy strategy as a new standard of care for this population., Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DL, YX, KH, GS, ML, PR-E, AA, JC, LR, AJPdSG, FCM, LH, HA, J-YL, VS, FZ, LG, JS, ET, KL, NC, C-LC, MB, HZ, AO, MC, EP, TU, SP, and LRD received funding to their institutions from Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA (MSD) to support the study. DL reports grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Pharma&, Genmab, GSK, Immunogen, MSD, Pharmamar, Novartis, Seagen, Alkermes, Incyte, Roche, and Corcept; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Corcept, Clovis Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Genmab, GSK, Immunogen, MSD, Novartis, Oncoinvest, Novocure, Seagen, and Sutro; speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Corcept, Genmab, GSK, Immunogen, MSD, and Seagen; travel grants from AstraZeneca, Menarini, GSK, and MSD; advisory board participation for AstraZeneca, Corcept, Clovis Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Genmab, GSK, Immunogen, MSD, Oncoinvest, Novocure, Seagen, and Sutro; and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, for GCIG, MITO, and ENGOT. YX reports study funding, paid to the Peking Union Medical College Hospital, and support for attending meetings or travel from MSD. KH reports research contracts from Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, MSD, and Takeda; advisory board fees from Chugai, Eisai, Takeda, MSD, Roche, Genmab, Sanofi, GSK, and Zymeworks; honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eisai, Genmab, MSD, Takeda, Sanofi, Kyowa Kirin, Kaken, and GSK; and travel support from Regeneron and Seagen. GS reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Coviden AG (a Medtronic company), Johnson & Johnson, and TESARO Bio Italy; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or education events from Baxter Healthcare, Olympus Europa, Intuitive Surgical, GSK, and Clovis Oncology Italy. ML reports payment for expert testimony from MSD, support for attending meetings or travel from MSD and AstraZeneca; and other financial or non-financial interests from MSD, AstraZeneca, and Roche. PR-E reports honoraria for educational events from MSD, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Asofarma, Pfizer, and Roche; support for attending ESMO and ASCO meetings from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Asofarma; and honoraria for advisory boards from MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca, Asofarma, BMS and Novartis. LR reports medical writing support from Merck, institutional grants from Merck, Zentalis, Karyopharn, GOG Foundation, Regeneron, ImmunoGen, Acrivon, CanariaBio, Corcept Therapeutics, and Seagen; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Merck, GSK, Genmab, Seagen, GOG Foundation, Zentalis, ImmunoGen, Semline, Eisai, Caris, Nykode, and Clovis; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Seagen and Genmab; and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, from GOG Foundation. AJPdSG reports consulting fees and payment for expert testimony from Bayer, Astellas, and Janssen; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events for expert testimony from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Janssen; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Astellas, Bayer, and Janssen. FCM reports honoraria for presentations from MSD and BMS; support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca and MSD; and advisory board participation from Janssen and MSD. J-YL reports support for the present manuscript from MSD; grants or contracts from Advenchen, Ascendis Pharma, Alkermes, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BergenBio, BMS, CanariaBio, Corcept, Cellid, CKD, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Genmab, Genemedicine, GII, GSK, ImmunoGen, Janssen, Kelun, Merck, Mersana, MSD, Novartis, Onconic Therapeutics, ONO, Regeneron, Roche, Seagen, Sutro, Synthon, and Takeda; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, Roche, Takeda, and ONO; and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, for AstraZeneca, CanariaBio, Genmab, GII, ImmunoGen, Seagen, Merck, Sutro, Regeneron, and MSD. FZ reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events, consulting fees, support for attending meetings or travel, and data safety monitoring board and advisory board participation for AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Merck, Novartis, MSD, Pfizer, Genesis-Pharma, and Roche. LG reports institutional grants from IMV, Pfizer, Sutro Bio, Pharma, Merck Sharpe Dohme, Corcept Therapeutics, ImmunoGen, Shattuck Labs, Roche, Tesaro, K-Group, Beta Inc., GOG Foundation, GSK, AstraZeneca, OncoQuest Pharmaceuticals, Novocure, Alkermes, Espersas, and Mersana; consulting fees from Merck and GSK; payment or honoraria for lectures and presentations from Merck and GSK; support for attending meetings or travel from GSK, Merck, EndomERA, and Zentalis; and participation on advisory board meetings for GSK, Merck, Eisai, Novocure, Kora Health, Corcept, ImmunoGen, Canariabio, and Repare Therapeutics. JS reports grants or contracts from Roche, MSD, GSK, Tesaro, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Merck, and Novocure; consulting fees from Immunogen, Incyte, GSK, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Novocure, MSD, Eisai, and Merck; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Immunogen, Incyte, GSK, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Novocure, BMS, Eisai, and Novartis; support for attending meetings or travel from GSK, Astra Zeneca, Roche, Novocure, Immunogen, Incyte, MSD, and Eisei; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Immunogen, Incyte, GSK, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Novocure, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Merck, Bayer, and PharmaMar; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, for ENGAGE, ESGO, ASCO, ESGO, GCIG, Deutsche Stiftung Eierstockkrebs, and AGO; and medical writing assistance from MSD. ET reports honoraria for presentations and meeting travel support from Elektra. KL reports study funding from MSD; grants or contracts from GSK; lecture honoraria from Eisai and AstraZeneca; participation on a data safety monitoring board for Karyopharm; participation on an advisory board for Eisai, MSD, Nykode, AstraZeneca, and GSK; and serving as deputy medical director for the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology Clinical Trial Unit. NC reports institutional grants from AstraZeneca and Roche; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from GSK and MSD; payment for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, GSK, ImmunoGen, Mersana, MSD, Merck, Nuvation Bio, Onxerna, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Pieris, Roche, and Novocure; and non-remunerated leadership role as Chair of the Alleanza Contro il Tumore Ovarico Scientific Committee. MB reports honoraria for lectures and educational events from Roche, AstraZeneca, and GSK; and support for attending meetings from Roche, AstraZeneca, and Viatris. AO reports consulting fees from Agenus, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Corcept Therapeutics, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Daïichi Sankyo, Debiopharm International, Eisai, Exelisis, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genmab, GSK, ImmunoGen, Itheos, MSD, Mersana Therapeutics, Myriad Genetics, Novocure, OncoXerna Therapeutics, PharmaMar, Regeneron, Sattucklabs, Seagen–Pfizer, Sutro Biopharma, TORL Therapuetics, Zentalis, and Zymeworks; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from NSGO, Peerview, Peervoice, Medscape, Asociación Colombiada de Ginecológos Oncólogos, ESO, AstraZeneca, and GSK; support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, PharmaMar, and Roche; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Agenus, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Corcept Therapeutics, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Daïichi Sankyo, Debiopharm International, Eisai, Exelisis, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Genmab, GSK, ImmunoGen, Itheos, MSD, Mersana Therapeutics, Myriad Genetics, Novocure, OncoXerna Therapeutics, PharmaMar, Regeneron, Sattucklabs, Seagen–Pfizer, Sutro Biopharma, TORL Therapuetics, Zentalis, and Zymeworks; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, for Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup and European Society for Medical Oncology; and other financial or non-financial interests in Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup, European Society for Medical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Spanish Society of Medical Oncology, and GOG Foundation. EP reports provision of study material from MSD; honoraria for lectures, presentations, and educational events from MSD, Roche, GSK, and AstraZeneca; and receipt of investigational drug for study treatment from MSD. PL, KY, ST, and SMK are current or former full-time employees of MSD and hold stock or restricted stock units in the company. SP reports research funding from Roche, MSD, GSK, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, and GSK; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for GSK, MSD, Eisai, Biontech, and AstraZeneca. LRD reports institutional grants from Merck, Genentech, Roche, AbbVie, Acrivon, Advaxis, Aduro BioTech, Alkermes, Blueprint, Constellation, Eisai, GSK, Novartis, Immunogen, Inovio, Iovance, Karyopharm, KSQ Therapeutics, Lycera, Morab, MorphoTek, Naveris, Nurix, OncoQuest, Pfizer, Syndax, Tesaro, and Zentalis; royalties or licenses from UpToDate, Wiley, and ASCO; editing for ASCO Connection; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Advance Medical, CEA Group, and Clinical Care Options; participation on a data safety monitoring board for Innovia and Aegenus (payment to institution); and roles as Secretary Treasurer for SGO (unpaid) and on the Editorial Board of the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Over the past few decades, first-line therapy for treating advanced and metastatic HR+/HER2-breast cancer has transformed due to the introduction of adjuvant endocrine therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i). However, there is an unmet need for novel classes of endocrine therapy with superior efficacy to improve treatment outcomes and overcome CDK4/6i resistance. New generation selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), orally administered and with higher bioavailability, could potentially be the novel compounds to meet this emerging need. In this paper, we review accredited clinical studies on the combining effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors and oral SERDs, report efficacy of treatment data when available, and provide a framework for future research focusing on these promising agents., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest FZ has received honoraria for lectures and have served in an advisory role for Astra-Zeneca, Daiichi, Eli- Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Genesis- Pharma, Roche and Gilead. MAD has received research funding, honoraria and consulting fees from BMS, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda, and Beigene.The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pembrolizumab has shown efficacy in persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. The effect of chemoradiotherapy might be enhanced by immunotherapy. In this phase 3 trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of adding pembrolizumab to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer., Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 ENGOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18 clinical trial, adults (age ≥18 years) at 176 medical centres in 30 countries with newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive voice-response system with integrated web response to receive 5 cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks plus chemoradiotherapy, followed by 15 cycles of pembrolizumab (400 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by planned external beam radiotherapy type (intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs non-intensity-modulated radiotherapy or non-volumetric-modulated arc therapy), cervical cancer stage at screening (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2014 stage IB2-IIB node positive vs stage III-IVA), and planned total radiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy) dose (<70 Gy vs ≥70 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1-by investigator or by histopathologic confirmation of suspected disease progression-and overall survival. Primary analysis was conducted in the intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly allocated participants. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population, which included all randomly allocated patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04221945, and is closed to new participants., Findings: Between June 9, 2020, and Dec 15, 2022, 1060 participants were randomly assigned to treatment, with 529 assigned to the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 531 to the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. At data cutoff (Jan 9, 2023), median follow-up was 17·9 months (IQR 11·3-22·3) in both treatment groups. Median progression-free survival was not reached in either group; rates at 24 months were 68% in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group versus 57% in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group. The hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression or death was 0·70 (95% CI 0·55-0·89, p=0·0020), meeting the protocol-specified primary objective. Overall survival at 24 months was 87% in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 81% in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group (information fraction 42·9%). The HR for death was 0·73 (0·49-1·07); these data have not crossed the boundary of statistical significance. Grade 3 or higher adverse event rates were 75% in the pembrolizumab-chemoradiotherapy group and 69% in the placebo-chemoradiotherapy group., Interpretation: Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer., Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co (MSD)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DL, YX, KH, GS, ML, PR-E, AAc, VSu, NC, AJPdSG, FCM, AR, AAy, J-YL, VSa, FZ, LG, JS, ET, KLin, RLaz, C-LC, RLam, HZ, AO, MC, SPo, TU, SPi, and LRD received funding to their institutions from MSD to support the study. DL reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, GSK, MSD, ImmunoGen, Genmab, Seagen, Novartis, and PharmaMar; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, ImmunoGen, GSK, Seagen, and Genmab; support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, and GSK; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Oncoinvest, Corcept, Sutro, AstraZeneca, ImmunoGen, GSK, Seagen, Genmab, Clovis Oncology, GSK, MSD, and PharmaMar; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, for GCIG; receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Clovis Oncology, GSK, MSD, and PharmaMar; and other financial or non-financial interests in AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Genmab, GSK, ImmunoGen, Incyte, MSD, Roche, Seagen, and Novartis. YX reports participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for MSD. KH reports research contracts from Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, MSD, and Takeda; advisory board fees from Chugai, Eisai, Takeda, MSD, Roche, Genmab, and Sanofi; honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eisai, Genmab, MSD, Takeda, Sanofi, Kyowa Kirin, and Kaken; and support for attending meetings or travel from Regeneron. GS reports grants or contracts from MSD Italia; consulting fees from Tesaro and Johnson & Johnson; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Clovis Oncology Italy. ML reports grants or contracts from MSD, AstraZeneca, and Roche; speaker fees from AstraZeneca and Roche; and meeting support from Roche. PR-E reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from MSD, Asofarma, Novartis, Janssen, and AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings or travel from Roche, Novartis, Asofarma, and AstraZeneca; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Pfizer, Asofarma, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca. NC reports participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for GSK, Toray, Tarveda Therapeutics, Umoja, Kartos, Zentalis, Profound, and Novita Pharmaceuticals. AJPdSG reports consulting fees, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca, Astellas, Bayer, and Janssen; payment for expert testimony from Janssen; and support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen, MSD, and Bayer. FCM reports speaker fees from MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Eli Lilly, and BMS; payment for expert testimony from MSD, Janssen, GSK, Eli Lilly, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and meeting and travel support from MSD and Amgen. AR reports advisory board fees from MSD Israel. J-YL reports grants or contracts from Advenchen, Ascendis Pharma, Alkermes, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BerGenBio, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellid, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Genmab, GII, GSK, ImmunoGen, Janssen, Merck, Mersana, MSD, Novartis, Onconic Therapeutics, OncoQuest, Ono, Regeneron, Roche, Seagen, Sutro, Synthon, and Takeda; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, Roche, Takeda, and Ono. FZ reports grants or contracts, consulting fees, payment for expert testimony, support for attending meetings or travel, participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board, and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Novartis, Genesis Pharma, and Gilead. LG reports institutional grants from GSK, Pfizer, MSD, Karyopharm, Tesaro, IMV, Alkermes, Clovis Oncology, ImmunoGen, Roche, Mersana, and AstraZeneca; consulting fees from GSK, Merck, Eisai, and Novocure; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from GSK, Merck, Eisai, Novocure, and Corcept; and support for attending meetings or travel from Corcept, GSK, AstraZeneca, and Merck. JS reports grants or contracts from Roche, MSD, GSK, Tesaro, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Merck, and Novocure; consulting fees from ImmunoGen, Incyte, GSK, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Novocure, MSD, Eisai, and Merck; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from ImmunoGen, Incyte, GSK, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Novocure, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, and Novartis; support for attending meetings or travel from GSK, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novocure, ImmunoGen, Incyte, MSD, and Eisei; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for ImmunoGen, Incyte, GSK, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Novocure, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Merck, Bayer, and PharmaMar; and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, for ENGAGE, ESGO, ASCO, ESGO, GCIG, Deutsche Stiftung Eierstockkrebs, and AGO. KLin reports grants or contracts from GSK (paid to institution); payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Eisai; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Eisai, MSD, Nykode, AstraZeneca, and GSK. HZ reports contracted research and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events for MSD. AO reports grants or contracts from AbbVie Deutschland, Advaxis, Aeterna Zentaris, Amgen, Aprea Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Roche, ImmunoGen, MSD de España, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, PharmaMar, Regeneron, and Tesaro (paid to institution); consulting fees and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Agenus, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Corcept, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Exelixis, EMD Serono, Roche, Genmab, GSK, ImmunoGen, iTeos, MSD de España, Mersana, Novocure, OncXerna Therapeutics, PharmaMar, Regeneron, Sattucklabs, Seagen, and Sutro; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from NSGO, Peerview, Peervoice, Medscape, Asociación Colombiana de Ginecológos Oncólogos, ESO, AstraZeneca, and GSK; and support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, PharmaMar, and Roche. SPo reports consulting fees from MSD, AstraZeneca, GSK, and Eisai; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events, support for attending meetings or travel, and advisory board fees from MSD, AstraZeneca, and GSK; and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group for the Austrian Association of Gynecologic Oncology (unpaid). SPi reports research funding from Roche, MSD, AZ, Pfizer, and GSK; and honoraria from AZ, Roche, MSD, GSK, and PharmaMar. LRD reports research funding (paid to institution) from and acting as an expert advisor (unpaid) for Merck & Co; writing fees for expert content for UpToDate; participation on a scientific advisory board for Aadi Bioscience; and serving on the Editorial Board of the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. KLi, KY, ST, and SMK are full-time employees of MSD and hold stock or restricted stock units in the company., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Dose-dense sequential (dds) chemotherapy has changed the clinical outcome of patients with early breast cancer (BC). To investigate the impact of dose intensity (DI) in the adjuvant setting of BC, this observational trial (HE 10/10) was conducted assessing the long-term survival outcome, safety and toxicity of a currently widely used chemotherapeutic regimen. In addition, the prognostic significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and infiltrating CD8 + lymphocytes were also evaluated in the same cohort., Patients and Methods: Totally, 1054 patients were prospectively enrolled in the current study with 1024 patients being eligible, while adequate tissue was available for 596 of them. TILs, CD8 + lymphocytes in intratumoral areas in contact with malignant cells (iCD8), CD8 + lymphocytes in tumor stroma (sCD8) as well as the total number of CD8 + lymphocytes within the tumor area (total CD8) were assessed by immunohistochemistry., Results: Within a median follow-up of 125.18 months, a total of 200 disease-free survival (DFS) events (19.5%) were reported. Importantly, the 10-year DFS and OS rates were 78.4% (95% CI 75.0-81.5) and 81.7% (95% CI 79.0-84.1), respectively. Interestingly, higher CD8 + T cells as well as TILs in the tumor microenvironment were associated with an improved long-term survival outcome., Conclusions: In conclusion, this study confirms the significance of dds adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen in terms of long-term survival outcome, safety and toxicity as well as the prognostic significance of TILs and infiltrating CD8 + lymphocytes in BC patients with early-stage disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest GA: Advisory Boards: Novartis, BMS, Roche Hellas, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, Amgen, Genesis Pharma, Merck, Pfizer. DP: Advisory Role: Roche, MSD, Astellas. Honoraria: Roche, MSD, Astellas. AK: Speaker fees: Roche, MSD, Pfizer. Educational grant: Pfizer. Advisory Boards: ENETS. Adverse Events Monitoring: EOF. GR: Research funding: Tesaro, IQvia, ICON Clinical Research, MSD, PPD Global. Consulting fees: Roche, Pfizer, IQvia. Honoraria: Ipsen, MSD, Myriad. Travel: Pfizer, Merck, Sanofi, Astellas Pharma, MSD Oncology, Servier, AstraZeneca, ICON Clinical Research. FZ: Honoraria for lectures and have served in an advisory role for AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Eli- Lilly, Merck, Novartis, MSD, Pfizer, Genesis- Pharma, Roche and Gilead. GF: Advisory Board: Pfizer, Novartis. Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Novartis. Stock ownership: Genprex, Daiichi Sankyo, RFL Holdings, Formycon., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the single-arm, phase 2 DESTINY-Breast01 trial, trastuzumab deruxtecan showed robust activity in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who were refractory or resistant to trastuzumab emtansine; a population with scarce effective treatments. In DESTINY-Breast02, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan with treatment of physician's choice in this patient population., Methods: This randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial was conducted at 227 sites (hospitals, university hospitals, clinics, community centres, and private oncology centres) in North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, Brazil, Israel, and Türkiye. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had unresectable or HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, previously received trastuzumab emtansine, disease progression, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate renal and hepatic function. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (intravenously at 5·4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or treatment of physician's choice using block randomisation. Treatment of physician's choice was either capecitabine (1250 mg/m 2 ; orally twice per day on days 1-14) plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 then 6 mg/kg once per day) or capecitabine (1000 mg/m 2 ) plus lapatinib (1250 mg orally once per day on days 1-21), with a 21-day schedule. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival based on blinded independent central review in the full analysis set. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03523585., Findings: Between Sept 6, 2018, and Dec 31, 2020, 608 patients were randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (n=406; two did not receive treatment) or treatment of physician's choice (n=202; seven did not receive treatment). 608 (100%) patients were included in the full analysis set. The median age was 54·2 years (IQR 45·5-63·4) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and 54·7 years (48·0-63·0) in the treatment of physician's choice group. 384 (63%) patients were White, 603 (99%) were female, and five (<1%) were male. The median follow-up was 21·5 months (IQR 15·2-28·4) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and 18·6 months (8·8-26·0) in the treatment of physician's choice group. Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was 17·8 months (95% CI 14·3-20·8) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group versus 6·9 months (5·5-8·4) in the treatment of physician's choice group (HR 0·36 [0·28-0·45]; p<0·0001). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (293 [73%] of 404 with trastuzumab deruxtecan vs 73 [37%] of 195 with treatment of physician's choice), vomiting (152 [38%] vs 25 [13%]), alopecia (150 [37%] vs eight [4%]), fatigue (147 [36%] vs 52 [27%]), diarrhoea (109 [27%] vs 105 [54%]), and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (seven [2%] vs 100 [51%]). Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 213 (53%) patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan versus 86 (44%) receiving treatment of physician's choice; whereas drug-related interstitial lung disease occurred in 42 (10%; including two grade 5 death events) versus one (<1%)., Interpretation: DESTINY-Breast02 shows the favourable benefit-risk profile of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer, as previously reported in DESTINY-Breast01, and is the first randomised study to show that one antibody-drug conjugate can overcome resistance to a previous one., Funding: Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests FA reports grants or speaker compensation or advisory board participation for Sanofi, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, and Roche. YHP reports grants from MSD, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Roche; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Eisai, Lilly, Roche, Bixink, Daiichi Sankyo, Menarini, Everest, and Novartis; honoraria from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly, MSD, Roche, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Novartis; and advisory board participation for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, and Menarini. S-BK reports grants from Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Dongkook Pharmaceutical; payment for expert testimony from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Dae Hwa Pharmaceuticals, ISU Abxis, and Daiichi Sankyo; meeting or travel support (or both) from Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Lilly; advisory board participation for Novartis, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Daiichi Sankyo; and stock in Genopeaks and Neogene Therapeutics. TT reports honoraria for lectures from Daiichi Sankyo, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, and Celltrion Healthcare. S-AI reports grants from AstraZeneca, Eisai, Daewoong Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Roche, and Boryung Pharmaceutical; and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Hanmi, Eisai, Lilly, MSD, Idience, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, GSK, Daiichi Sankyo, and Bertis. JPL reports grants from MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Taiho, Janssen, Mink, Agenus, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Seagen; payment or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and Daiichi Sankyo; meeting or travel support (or both) from MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca; and stock in Janssen. SA reports honoraria and consulting compensation from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer. JGG reports payment or honoraria, meeting or travel support (or both), and advisory board participation for AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Roche, Lilly, Seagen, and Pfizer. MDL reports payment or honoraria, meeting or travel support (or both), and advisory board participation for AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, GSK, and Sanofi; and payment or honoraria from Celltrion and Organon. FPD reports grants from Fondation Belge Contre le Cancer; consulting fees from Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Pierre Fabre, Gilead Sciences, and Seagen; and meeting or travel support (or both) from Amgen, Roche, Teva, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, and AstraZeneca. GBi reports consulting fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Sanofi, and Seagen; payment or honoraria from Roche, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, MSD, Chugai, Eisai, Gilead, and Seagen; meeting or travel support (or both) from Roche, Pfizer, MSD, Chugai, Novartis, and AstraZeneca; and advisory board participation for Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, MSD, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Gilead, Seagen, Exact Science, and Agendia. RR reports grants from National Institute for Health and Care Research; consulting fees from IQVIA, Eli Lilly, G1 Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, and AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca; meeting or travel support (or both) from G1 Therapeutics, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and advisory board participation for Pfizer. YM reports grants from Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Chugai, MSD, Kyowa-Kirin, Eli Lilly, and Taiho; consulting fees from Daiichi Sankyo; and payment or honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Taiho, and Kyowa-Kirin. AA reports grants or contracts from AstraZeneca; meeting or travel support (or both) from MSD and Novartis; advisory board participation for MSD; a leadership role for the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Pregnancy and Breast Cancer Guidelines; and stock or stock options with AstraZeneca. EL reports consulting fees from Ellipses; speaker compensation from AstraZeneca, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, and Gilead; meeting or travel support (or both) from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Gilead; advisory board participation for AstraZeneca, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Gilead, and Eisai; leadership or fiduciary roles in the Breast Cancer Trials Scientific Advisory Board and University of New South Wales Medicine Faculty Advisory Board; and research support from Novartis and Pfizer. JE reports consulting fees, honoraria, meeting or travel support (or both), and advisory board participation for Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Gilead, Seagen, and AstraZeneca. RY reports a research grant from Roche; and consulting fees and honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Gilead, Medison, MSD, and AstraZeneca. FZ reports grants, consulting fees, payment or honoraria, advisory board participation for, research support, leadership or fiduciary roles, and stock or stock options in AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Genesis Pharmaceuticals, and Roche. TF reports advisory board participation for Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, MSD, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. CW was an employee of Daiichi Sankyo during the study. DG, JC, CC, and AE report employment by Daiichi Sankyo. AE reports stock in Daiichi Sankyo. IK reports grants from Pfizer, MacroGenics, Genentech (Roche); consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech (Roche), Bristol Myers Squibb, MacroGenics, Taiho Oncology, and Seagen; payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca; advisory board participation for Novartis and Merck; and leadership, fiduciary roles, and stock in Puretech. GBo, RS, and MRB declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Neurological paraneoplastic syndromes are a rare subgroup of diseases commonly related to neuroendocrine tumors. However, they have been associated with uterine malignancies (sarcomas, endometrial carcinomas, and neuroendocrine cancers). Their presentation often correlates with a cancer diagnosis or cancer recurrence underlining their clinical significance. The most common neurological paraneoplastic syndrome in uterine cancer is cerebral degeneration with a comprehensive clinical presentation of pancerebral dysfunction. However, other neurological syndromes present with various symptoms leading to delayed diagnosis. Less common paraneoplastic neurological syndromes associated with uterine cancer are encephalitis, encephalomyelitis, subacute sensory neuropathy, sensory-motor neuropathy, dermatomyositis, cancer-associated retinopathy, opsoclonus, Guillain-Barre syndrome, necrotizing myopathy, and stiff-person syndrome. Herein, we reviewed published cases of neurological paraneoplastic syndromes in uterine cancer in order to raise awareness of these rare syndromes. We recorded patients' clinical presentation, antibodies detected, treatment, and clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Over 50% of breast tumors harbor alterations in one or more genes of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway including PIK3CA mutations (31%), PTEN loss (34%), PTEN mutations (5%) and AKT1 mutations (3%). While PI3K and mTOR inhibitors are already approved in advanced breast cancer, AKT inhibitors have been recently developed as a new therapeutic approach. Capivasertib (AZD5363) is a novel, selective ATP-competitive pan-AKT kinase inhibitor that exerts similar activity against the three AKT isoforms, AKT1, AKT2, and AKT3. Preclinical studies demonstrated efficacy of capivasertib in breast cancer cell lines as a single agent or in combination with anti-HER2 agents and endocrine treatment, especially in tumors with PIK3CA or MTOR alterations. Phase I/II studies demonstrated greater efficacy when capivasertib was co-administered with paclitaxel, fulvestrant in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer or olaparib. The recommended phase II dose of capivasertib as monotherapy was 480 mg bid on a 4-days-on, 3-days-off dosing schedule. Toxicity profile proved to be manageable with hyperglycemia (20-24%), diarrhea (14-17%) and maculopapular rash (11-16%) being the most common grade ≥3 adverse events. Ongoing Phase III trials of capivasertib in combination with fulvestrant (CAPItello-291), CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (CAPItello-292) and paclitaxel (CAPItello- 290) will better clarify the therapeutic role of capivasertib in breast cancer., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Joint manifestations are ill-defined adverse events that were frequently reported of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer patients. The aim of this study is to describe the incidence and severity of joint manifestations among bevacizumab treated patients as well as their relation to clinical outcomes., Methods: Medical charts of all ovarian cancer patients that received bevacizumab from 2012 through 2017 were reviewed. Joint manifestations were staged. Kaplan-Meier Survival curves were generated; survival differences were estimated., Results: 76 Patients diagnosed with stage III or IV ovarian cancer were included. 23 patients (30.3%) developed joint manifestations, 12 of them had Grade I, 4 Grade II and 7 Grade III. Only 3 patients developed arthritis. In 8 cases (34.8%) one joint was affected and in the remaining 15, multiple sites. Median number of bevacizumab cycles to arthralgia development was 7. 3 patients were managed with corticosteroids or methotrexate, all had grade 3 AEs. The remaining received common analgesics. Median duration of the AE was 4.8 months. 7 patients discontinued bevacizumab due to AE. In all but 3 patients AE was finally resolved. Median number of bevacizumab cycles received, frequency of treatment completion or treatment discontinuation due to disease progression did not differ significantly among patients that developed joint manifestations or not. Median PFS and median OS did not differ statistical significantly., Conclusion: Joint manifestations are common AEs in bevacizumab treated ovarian cancer patients and led to treatment discontinuation in 9% of the patients. However, this has not adversely affected the clinical outcome of the patients. Further research is needed for the appropriate management of these patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Undoubtedly, the development of COVID-19 vaccines displays a critical step towards ending this devastating pandemic, considering their protective benefits in the general population. Yet, data regarding their efficacy and safety in cancer patients are limited. Herein we provide the initial analysis of immune responses after the first dose of vaccination in 21 breast cancer patients receiving cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. The levels of neutralizing antibodies post vaccination were similar to the matched healthy controls, whereas no safety issues have been raised. Further exploration is needed to reduce the uncertainty of SARS-CoV-2 immunity among cancer patients under treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Paraneoplastic cerebellar ataxia is a rare immune-induced, non-metastatic neurologic syndrome, most frequently associated with gynecological cancers, which carries an abysmal prognosis. We report the case of a patient with advanced-stage uterine cancer, who developed severe pancerebellar ataxia, while in partial remission, after the completion of 3 cycles of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Swift initiation of immunosuppressive therapy with corticosteroids combined with plasmapheresis did not result in significant clinical benefit. Early recognition of this debilitating condition and standardization of its treatment strategy are prerequisites for both improved survival outcomes and quality of life in these patients. Further studies are warranted to clarify the immune-stimulating impact of effective cytotoxic chemotherapy and the occurence of autoimmune paraneoplastic neurological syndromes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The development of antibody-drug conjugates composed of a cytotoxic agent and a monoclonal antibody carrier offers an important alternative to classic chemotherapy strategies. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) is a next-generation antibody-drug conjugate composed of a monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody and a topoisomerase I inhibitor, an exatecan derivative (DX-8951f). DS-8201a resulted in favorable outcomes in HER2-positive heavily pretreated breast cancer patients and also had a promising efficacy in patients with HER2-negative/low-expressing disease, whose options are limited. Interestingly, a recently published phase 2 trial (NCT03248492) reported 60% overall response and 97% disease control in patients with HER2-positive disease previously treated with multiple regimens, including trastuzumab emtansine. On the basis of recent clinical trials, the US Food and Drug Administration granted accelerated approval to DS-8201a in advanced or unresectable HER2-positive breast cancer pretreated with at least two HER2-targeting treatment lines. We review all preclinical and clinical data of DS-8201a regarding breast cancer., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Obesity and high body mass index (BMI) are associated with increased incidence of multiple myeloma (MM). MM usually evolves from a precursor asymptomatic disease, namely monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). MGUS progresses to MM at a 1% annual rate; however, risk factors predisposing to MGUS are not completely understood. We conducted a systematic review to assess the relationship between obesity and high BMI with MGUS prevalence and progression to MM. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review evaluating the role of obesity in MGUS., Patients and Methods: We searched the Medline database and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies investigating BMI and obesity association with MGUS incidence and progression. The algorithm consisted of a predefined combination of the words "obesity," "obese," "body mass index," "overweight," "diet," "nutrition," "food," "dietary," "adiponectin," "monoclonal gammopathy," and "MGUS"., Results: Overall, 12 articles were retrieved, including 11 eligible articles and 1 clinical trial. More than 57,068 patients were evaluated in this systematic review. Discrepancies between the identified studies were noted. Multiple studies support the notion that obesity or high BMI are positively linked to MGUS prevalence and transition to MM. In contrast, other studies revealed no such association. Visceral adipose tissue metabolic activity and decreased adiponectin concentrations were identified as biomarkers of MGUS progression to MM., Conclusion: Obesity and increased BMI seem to be implicated both in MGUS development and progression to MM. Further studies should be designed to confirm this hypothesis., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) proteins are epigenetic molecules that regulate the expression of multiple genes involved in carcinogenesis. Breast cancer is an heterogenous disease emerging from aberrant gene expression and epigenetic alteration patterns. Amplification or overexpression of BET proteins has been identified in breast tumors highlighting their clinical significance. Development of BET inhibitors that disrupt BET protein binding to acetylated lysine residues of chromatin and suppress transcription of various oncogenes has shown promising results in breast cancer cells and xenograft models. Currently, Phase I/II clinical trials explore safety and efficacy of BET inhibitors in solid tumors and breast cancer. Treatment-emergent toxicities have been reported, including thrombocytopenia and gastrointestinal disorders. Preliminary results demonstrated greater response rates to BET inhibitors in combination with already approved anticancer agents. Consistently, BET inhibition sensitized breast tumors to chemotherapy drugs, hormone therapy and PI3K inhibitors in vitro. This article aims to review all existing preclinical and clinical evidence regarding BET inhibitors in breast cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest ML has received honoraria from Roche, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, MSD, Janssen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb and IPSEN. KK has received honoraria by Roche, BMS, MSD and IPSEN. MAD has received honoraria from participation in advisory boards from Amgen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda. FZ has received honoraria for lectures and has served in an advisory role for Astra-Zeneca, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Leptomeningeal Metastases (LM) is a turning point in terms of prognosis and quality of life of patients with breast cancer (BC). Intrathecal therapy is largely used for the treatment of breast cancer LM. In this metanalysis with meta-regression, we gathered data on intrathecal (IT) trastuzumab administration in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer with LM. A total of 24 articles (58 patients) were included in the study and intrathecal trastuzumab was used in all patients. The mean age at IT administration was 50.7 years (SD 11.4, range 24-80) and the mean total dose of IT trastuzumab was 711.9 mg (SD 634.9, median 450). IT trastuzumab was used both alone (n = 20) and in combination with systemic pharmacotherapy (n = 37). No serious adverse events were reported in 87.9% of cases. In this selected population a significant clinical improvement was observed in 55.0% of cases while stabilization was reported in 14% of cases. CSF response was observed in 55.6% of the cases. MRI was improved or stable in 70.8% of the cases. Interestingly, the CNS-PFS was 5.2 months and the median OS was 13.2 months. A clinical improvement (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.49) and CSF response (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.58) were associated with a longer CNS-PFS. The association of longer CNS-PFS with radio- or neurosurgery prior to the administration of IT trastuzumab did not reach statistical significance. This metanalysis with meta-regression indicates that IT trastuzumab in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer LM might be a safe and effective treatment, but further prospective studies are needed to definitively prove such a point., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [Zagouri F. has received honoraria for lectures and has served in an advisory role for Astra-Zeneca, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. Le Rhun E. reports grants from Mundipharma and Amgen, personal fees from Abbvie, Daiichi Sankyo, Mundipharma, Novartis, Tocagen outside the submitted work. Bartsch R. has received research support from Daiichi, Novartis, and Roche and lecture honoraria from Accord, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Sandoz; in addition, he has served in an advisory role for Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, and Samsung. Dimopoulos M.A. has received honoraria from participation in advisory boards from Amgen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda. Preusser M. has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dome, Tocagen. The following for-profit companies have supported clinical trials and contracted research conducted by MP with payments made to his institution: Böhringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Sharp & Dome, Novocure, GlaxoSmithKline, AbbVie. The remaining authors (Zoumpourlis P., Zografos E. and Apostolidou K.) declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.], (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: We evaluated real-world clinical outcomes and toxicity data and assessed treatment-related costs in patients with advanced breast cancer who received treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKi)., Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective-retrospective analysis of patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer who received a CDKi, in combination with endocrine therapy, at any line of treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Cost analysis was conducted from a public third-payer (National Organization for Healthcare Services Provision (EOPYY)) perspective, assessing only costs related to direct medical care, including drug therapy costs and adverse drug reaction (ADR)-related costs., Results: From July 2015 to October 2019, 365 women received endocrine therapy combined with CDKi; median age was 61 years, postmenopausal 290 (80.6%) patients. CDKi were administered as first-line treatment in 149 (40.9%) patients, second-line treatment in 96 (26.4%) and third-line treatment and beyond in 119 (32.7%) patients. The most common adverse events were neutropenia, anaemia, thrombocytopenia and fatigue. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 86 (23.6%) patients, whereas 8 (2.2%) patients permanently discontinued treatment due to toxicity. The median PFS for patients who received CDKi as first-line, second-line and third-line treatment and beyond was 18.7, 12 and 7.4 months, respectively. The median overall survival since the initiation of CDKi treatment was 29.9 months (95% CI: 23.0-not yet reached (NR)). The mean pharmaceutical therapy cost estimated per cycle was 2 724.12 € for each patient, whereas the main driver of the ADR-related costs was haematological adverse events., Conclusions: Treatment with CDKi was well tolerated, with a low drug discontinuation rate. Patients who received CDKi as first-line treatment had improved PFS and OS compared with second-line treatment and beyond. The main component of direct medical costs assessed in the cost analysis comprises CDKi pharmaceutical therapy costs., Trial Registration Number: NCT04133207., Competing Interests: Competing interests: EF: stock ownership: GENPREX INC, ARIAD and Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Travel grant: Merck, Pfizer and K.A.M Oncology/Hematology. Advisory: LEO Pharma. Speaker fees: Roche and Pfizer. AV: advisory boards: Angelini and Takeda. Speaker fees: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche and MSD. Training programmes: Astellas, Genesis Pharma, Pfizer, LEO, Abbvie and TEVAAN. Travel fees: Pfizer, Merck, Hospira, Sanofi, Roche, Astra Zeneca, Kyowa Kirin-Anabiosis and Rafarm. AB: advisory role and honorarium: Pfizer and Novartis. SK: consultation/advisory: Astra Zeneca and Roche. Research: Novartis and Roche. Speaker: Astra Zeneca, Novartis and Roche. IB: advisory board: Pfizer and Novartis. Educational grant: Pfizer. Research Fund: Novartis and Lilly. AN: advisory board and speaker fees: Pfizer and Novartis. GA: advisory boards: Novartis, BMS, Roche Hellas, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, Amgen, Genesis Pharma, Merck and Pfizer. AP: consultation fees: Amgen, Merck Serono, Roche, BMS, Astra Zeneca and MSD. Honoraria: Amgen, Merck Serono, Roche, BMS, Astra Zeneca and MSD. Research funds: BMS and Kura. AK: advisory role: Genesis Pharma. Honoraria: Pfizer. Speaker’s bureau: Roche. Research funding: Merck. Travel: MSD. Educational grants: Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Roche, BMS, MSD, Genesis and Ipsen. GM: honoraria/consultancy: Astra Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Boehringer, Merck, Novartis and Amgen. Travel fees: Astra Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Boehringer, Merck, Novartis, Astellas and Pierre Fabre. ER: consulting or advisory role: Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer. Research funding: Novartis, Demo Pharmaceutical, EORTC, Radius Pharmaceuticals, Tesaro, Parexel and Anabiosis Pharmaceuticals. Travel: Sanofi, Ipsen, Genesis Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, Merck, Roche and Genekor. GF: advisory board: Pfizer, Sanofi and Roche. Honoraria: Astra Zeneca. Stock ownership: ARIAD and GENPREX. The rest of the authors declare no conflict of interest., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Background: Chemokines, cytokines in the immune microenvironment of tumors, may be associated with patient outcome. We assessed the impact of CXCL13 and CXCL9 on disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS), in an attempt to retrospectively evaluate both T and B cell function in the microenvironment of primary tumors from patients with breast cancer., Materials and Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from patients with intermediate/high-risk, early breast cancer, treated with sequential adjuvant epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide methotrexate fluorouracil within a randomized trial, were tested for CXCL13 and CXCL9 messenger RNA expression; 557 patients with adequate tissue were eligible for the analysis., Results: CXCL13 was correlated with CXCL9 (rho = 0.52; P < .001). High-expressing CXL13 and CXCL9 tumors had higher Ki67 and tumor infiltrating lymphocyte density (P-values < .001). High CXCL9 expression was an unfavorable prognosticator for OS among all patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.73; P = .021), whereas it showed favorable significance for both DFS and OS in patients with triple negative disease (HR, 0.29; P = .027 and HR, 0.32; P = .045). High CXCL13 conferred longer DFS and OS among patients with luminal-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 disease (HR, 0.31; P = .013 and HR, 0.25; P = .005). Patients with low CXCL13 and high CXCL9 expression had shorter DFS and OS compared with those with high expression of both chemokines (HR, 1.63; P = .006 and HR, 1.61; P = .016)., Conclusions: Both biomarkers were associated with poor prognosis characteristics and with tumor infiltrating lymphocyte density. High CXCL9 conferred an improved prognosis in the triple negative subtype, whereas high CXCL13 was associated with improved outcome in the luminal-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 subtype. Chemokines can be associated with breast cancer subtype and outcome. These data should be evaluated prospectively., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignancies diagnosed during pregnancy. Taxanes administration has been established as theurapetic regimen in non pregrant women., Objectives: This systemic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize all available data from cervical cancer series in pregnant women and evaluate the efficacy and safety of taxanes during pregnancy., Search Strategy: Eligible articles were identified by a search of ClinicalTrial.gov and MEDLINE databases for the period 01/01/2000 up to 31/11/2017; The algorithm consisted of a predefined combination of the words "cervical", "cancer", "taxanes" and "pregnancy"., Selection Criteria: PRISMA guidelines were applied in this study. The literature search and data extraction from all studies that examined the efficacy and safety of taxanes in pregnancy, were done by two independent investigators. Quantitative synthesis of the published articles was performed., Data Collection and Analysis: Overall eight articles were retrieved. In all cases (14 pregnancies, 14 newborns) the use of taxanes in combination with platinum derivatives resulted in the birth of alive neonates, with not any miscarriage. The taxane derivative used in all cases was paclitaxel, combined with Cisplatin (13 pregnancies) and Carboplatin (one pregnancy)., Results: Complete and partial response was achieved in 7.2% and 92.9% of cervical cancer patients. In the majority of cases chemotherapy was well tolerated. The median progression-free survival was 48.5 months., Conclusion: Taxanes administration during the 2nd and 3rd trimester of pregnancy is a safe choice., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Phyllodes tumours of the breast are rare mesenchymal tumours with differential malignant potential. Treatment of choice is radical excision with negative margins. Radiation therapy has shown controversial results in small series. Chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting still remains a matter of debate. Doxorubicin-based chemotherapy is recommended for breast sarcomas' first-line treatment. Herein we present two cases of breast phyllodes tumour treated with the recent combination of doxorubicin and olaratumab., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MAD has received honoraria and advisory board participation from BMS, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda and Janssen. FZ has received honoraria from Roche, Novartis and Lilly.

The therapeutic landscape of advanced prostate cancer is continuously changing under the light of new available treatment options and the improved understanding of the molecular characteristics of the disease. The lack of high quality evidence regarding the sequencing of these treatments along with the earlier implementation of these therapeutic approaches during the course of the disease have created issues of dispute regarding the optimal treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of the existing guidelines and recent randomized trials not included in these guidelines, and present a comprehensive analysis of the available treatment options in each of the stages of advanced prostate cancer, as well as the supportive treatments available for these patients., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prognostic/predictive value of aberrant MYC gene copies and protein expression is not clear in breast cancer., Patients and Methods: Early breast cancer patients were treated with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy within 2 randomized adjuvant trials. MYC gene and centromere-8 status, as well as Myc protein expression were investigated on 1060 paraffin tumors with fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, respectively., Results: MYC amplification was present in 45% and polysomy-8 in 23% of the tumors. Cytoplasmic staining was observed in 60% and nuclear staining in 26% of the tumors, strongly correlating with each other but not with MYC gene status. MYC gene amplification in the absence of polysomy-8 was associated with adverse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), and remained as an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (Wald P = .022 for DFS; P = .032 for OS), whereas patients with MYC amplification and polysomy-8, with polysomy-8 only, and with normal MYC without polysomy-8 performed significantly better compared with those with MYC gene amplification only. Nuclear Myc protein expression benefitted patients treated with paclitaxel (interaction P = .052 for DFS; P = .049 for OS). This interaction remained independently significant in multivariate analysis for OS (overall P = .028)., Conclusion: The effect of MYC gene status on breast cancer patient outcome seems to depend on the underlying chromosomal instability and appears unfavorable for tumors with MYC amplification without polysomy. Nuclear Myc protein expression seems predictive for benefit from adjuvant paclitaxel. These data might aid in the interpretation of relevant findings from large clinical trials., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pregnancy-associated cancer constitutes an uncommon and difficult to manage clinical situation. It is defined as the cancer diagnosed from the first day of childbearing to 1 year post partum. Coexistence of cancer with pregnancy adds complexity to treatment recommendations, as both the mother and the fetus may be affected. The optimal therapeutic management of pregnant women with cancer diagnosis should take into account, apart from medical factors, a host of other parameters (ethical, psychological, religious, legal, etc). Unfortunately, this situation becomes more complex as more women delay childbearing, and consequently the incidence of cancer during pregnancy is constantly increasing. This manuscript summarises the general principles in managing pregnant patients with cancer and gives detailed instructions in the management of pregnant patients with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, melanoma, lymphoma, lung cancer, soft-tissue sarcoma and cervical cancer. Of note, management of pregnant women with cancer diagnosis should be performed in specialised centres with experience and all cases should be discussed in multidisciplinary meetings composed of multiple specialists (medical oncologists, obstetricians, surgeons, radiologists and paediatricians)., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

The epidemiology of multiple myeloma (MM) is an increasingly investigated field, with many controversies. This systematic review aims to synthesize meta-analyses examining risk factors for MM so as to provide a comprehensive, parsimonious summary of the current evidence. Eligible meta-analyses were sought in PubMed adopting a predefined algorithm, without any restriction of publication language; end-of-search date was October 10, 2014. The selection of eligible studies and data extraction were performed by working in pairs, independently and blindly to each other; in case of disagreement, consensus with the whole team was reached. Among the 22 ultimately included meta-analyses, 9 examined occupational factors, 4 assessed aspects of lifestyle (smoking, alcohol, body mass index), 5 evaluated the presence of other diseases, and 4 addressed genetic factors as potential risk factors of MM. A vast compendium of significant associations arose, including farming, occupation as a firefighter, occupation as a hairdresser, exposures to chemicals or pesticides, overweight and obesity, patterns of alcohol intake, pernicious anemia, ankylosing spondylitis, gene promoter methylation, and polymorphisms. In conclusion, MM is a multifactorial disease, encompassing a wide variety of risk factors that span numerous life aspects. Further accumulation of evidence through meta-analyses is anticipated in this rapidly growing field., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

An ever growing number of medical organizations, societies, working groups and governmental agencies issue algorithms i.e. guidelines, of decision making flowcharts in diagnosis and treatment in a variety of diseases. In the field of evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, a large number of guidelines are available both from medical associations and national health departments. Among the most appreciated and utilized comprehensive guides is the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Breast Cancer Guidelines and from the other side of the Atlantic the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines in Breast Cancer. Although there is much concordance between the guidelines from these two organizations, it is intriguing to locate their discrepancies also. The aim of this report is to present a number of different points between ESMO and NCCN in the whole spectrum of breast cancer management, from prevention and diagnosis to treatment and follow up. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines using a predefined search strategy and summarizes in detail, the differences between ESMO and NCCN guidelines regarding genetic risk evaluation and screening, surgery, chemotherapy, endocrine treatment, targeted biological agents, radiotherapy, pregnancy and fertility and follow-up., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prognostic utility of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) splice variants in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with bevacizumab has not been studied., Patients and Methods: A total of 111 patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with weekly docetaxel or ixabepilone without bevacizumab (cohort A) and 100 treated with weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab (cohort B) were studied. Formalin-fixed tumors were macrodissected for reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction relative quantification of VEGF-A165, -189, and -206 isoforms spliced at exon 8 proximal splice site (VEGF-Axxxa) and at exon 8 distal splice site (VEGF-Axxxb)., Results: For high VEGF-Axxxa, the hazard ratios (HRs) for progression were 1.08 (P = .71) in non-bevacizumab-treated patients (cohort A) and 0.66 (P = .22) in bevacizumab-treated patients (cohort B), and the HRs for death were 1.45 (P = .13) and 0.50 (P = .049), respectively. The interaction of VEGF-Axxxa with bevacizumab administration was significant (P = .011) for overall survival (OS). High tissue VEGF-Axxxb was not prognostic in cohort A but was predictive for bevacizumab benefit in cohort B (HR for progression, 0.57 [P = .04]; HR for death, 0.51 [P = .02]). Exploratory analyses done only in cohort B suggested that abundance of VEGFR1 messenger RNA (mRNA) in peripheral blood and low VEGFR2 mRNA in tissue correlated with poor outcome. In multivariate analysis, high tissue mRNA of angiogenic VEGF-Axxxa in the presence of bevacizumab therapy predicted for favorable progression-free survival (HR for progression, 0.39; P = .0227) and OS (HR for death, 0.32; P = .0140)., Conclusion: Tissue mRNA expression of angiogenic VEGF-Axxxa isoforms was retrospectively associated with adverse prognosis in the absence of bevacizumab and with favorable outcome when bevacizumab was administered in patients with advanced breast cancer., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Androgen Receptor (AR) is a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target in breast cancer. We evaluated AR protein expression in high-risk breast cancer treated in the adjuvant setting. Tumors were subtyped into luminal (ER+/PgR±/AR±), molecular apocrine (MAC, [ER-/PgR-/AR+]) and hormone receptor negative carcinomas (HR-negative, [ER-/PgR-/AR-]). Subtyping was evaluated with respect to prognosis and to taxane therapy. High histologic grade (p < 0.001) and increased proliferation (p = 0.001) more often appeared in MAC and HR-negative than in luminal tumors. Patients with MAC had outcome comparable to the luminal group, while patients with HR-negative disease had increased risk for relapse and death. MAC outcome was favorable upon taxane-containing treatment; this remained significant upon multivariate analysis for overall survival (HR 0.31, 95%CI 0.13-0.74, interaction p = 0.035) and as a trend for time to relapse (p = 0.15). In conclusion, AR-related subtyping of breast cancer may be prognostic and serve for selecting optimal treatment combinations., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Pertuzumab is a monoclonal antibody that represents the first among a new class of agents known as human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) dimerization inhibitors. This is the first systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to synthesize all available data of pertuzumab in breast cancer. The search strategy retrieved 11 studies that evaluated pertuzumab. One study was conducted in the neoadjuvant setting (417 patients), whereas all the others dealt with patients with recurrent, metastatic, or refractory disease (1023 patients). Six studies were conducted in HER2(+) breast cancer population (1354 patients), whereas 5 studies (86 patients) were conducted in HER2(-) (or unknown HER2 status) disease. Pertuzumab is the most recent agent approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in combination with trastuzumab and docetaxel for the treatment of patients with HER2(+) metastatic breast cancer who have not received prior anti-HER2 therapy or chemotherapy for metastatic disease. This approval has been based on data from a phase III Clinical Evaluation of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab (CLEOPATRA) study. The antitumor activity with the significant reduction in the risk of progression or death, as reflected upon the increase of 6.1 months in median progression-free survival, indicates that pertuzumab may provide an avenue for achieving additional benefit for patients with HER2(+). Moreover, pertuzumab seems to have a putative role in the management of patients with HER2 who are resistant to trastuzumab. The promising role of pertuzumab in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings remains to be further investigated and established in the future., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Pharmacological inhibition of Hsp90 shows great promise in breast cancer treatment. This is the first systematic review to synthesize all available data and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Hsp90 inhibitors in breast cancer., Methods: This study was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible articles were identified by a search of MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, using a predefined combination of the terms "breast", "cancer", "Hsp90", "inhibitors"., Results: Overall, 19 articles (190 patients) were eligible. The greatest clinical activity has been observed on the field of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. However, accumulating data suggest that Hsp90 inhibitors may play a significant role in the treatment of triple negative and aromatase inhibitor-resistant breast cancer., Conclusion: In the last decade, the development of Hsp90 inhibitors has moved forward rapidly; however, no phase III trials have been conducted and none agent has been approved for use in the clinical practice., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Landmark studies have established taxanes in the treatment of patients with breast cancer; however, recommendations regarding their administration during pregnancy are controversial. The present systematic review aims to synthesize all available data that stem exclusively from breast cancer case series to evaluate the efficacy and safety of taxanes during pregnancy. Overall, 16 studies (50 pregnancies) were eligible for the systematic review according to prisma guidelines. The mean age of patients with breast cancer at pregnancy was 34.6 years. The gestational age (GA) at chemotherapy administration varied from 12 to 36 weeks. The mean GA at delivery was 35.9 weeks. The mean weight of babies at delivery was 2380 g. In 76.7% of cases, a completely healthy neonate was born; in the remaining cases, a neonate who was dystrophic and premature, one with mild hydrocephalus, one with signs of bacterial sepsis, one with hyperbilirubinemia, one with apnea of prematurity, respiratory distress syndrome and gastroesophageal reflux, one with meconium-stained fluid, and another neonate with neutropenia and pyloric stenosis were reported. Ninety percent of children were completely healthy, with a median follow-up of 16 months; in the remaining cases, one child with recurrent otitis media, one with immunoglobulin A deficiency and mild constipation, and another child with delayed speech were reported. In conclusion, available data suggest that taxanes may potentially play a promising role in the optimal therapeutic strategy of patients with breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation may be an important event in tumor cell immune evasion. TLR2 and TLR4 gene polymorphisms have been related to increased susceptibility to cancer development in various organs. 261 patients and 480 health individuals were investigated for genotype and allelic frequencies of a 22-bp nucleotide deletion (-196 to -174del) in the promoter of TLR2 gene as well as two polymorphisms causing amino acid substitutions (Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile) in TLR4 gene. As far as (-196 to -174del) in TLR2 gene is concerned ins/del and del/del genotypes and del allele were significantly more frequent in breast cancer patients compared to healthy controls. Considering Asp299Gly replacement of TLR4 gene, Gly carriers (Asp/Gly & Gly/Gly genotype) and Gly allele were overrepresented among the breast cancer cases. The -174 to -196del of TLR2 gene and Asp299Gly of TLR4 gene polymorphisms may confer an increased susceptibility to breast cancer development., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer related-death. Most patients present with an advanced stage of disease that has a dismal outcome. Evidently, there is a clear need for the development of new agents with novel mechanisms of action in the treatment of this disease. A number of biological agents modulating different signal transduction pathways are currently in clinical development, such as angiogenesis inhibitors and agents targeting epidermal growth factor receptor, cell cycle, matrix metalloproteinases, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) or proteasome. This is the first systematic review of the literature to synthesize all available data coming from trials and evaluate the efficacy and safety of molecular targeted drugs in unresectable and metastatic gastric cancer. As knowledge accumulates on the molecular mechanisms underlying carcinogenesis in the stomach, the anticipated development and assessment of molecularly targeted agents may offer a promising perspective for a disease which, to date, remains incurable., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The involvement of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their tissue inhibitors (TIMPs) in breast cancer has been documented on palpable lesions. This study aims to assess serum MMP1, MMP-2, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 in atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), lobular neoplasia (LN), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) specifically in non-palpable mammographic breast lesions., Methods: On women with benign (n=65), precursor [ADH (n=18) and LN (n=15)], preinvasive [DCIS (n=32)] and invasive [IDC (n=28)] lesions the serum concentrations of MMP-1, MMP-2, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TPS, and TPA were determined with immunoenzymatic assays. All women had non-palpable mammographic breast lesions of less than 10mm in diameter, as estimated on the mammographic views. Statistical analysis followed., Results: TIMP-2 serum concentrations were positively associated with the severity of the lesion. On the contrary, MMP-2 levels were marginally negatively associated with severity; as evident, the MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratio significantly decreased along with severity. Regarding TIMP-1, TPS, TPA, and TIMP-1/TIMP-2, no significant associations were demonstrated. MMP-2 and the MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratio were significantly higher in the LN subgroup versus the ADH subgroup., Conclusion: TIMP-2 and MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratio may exhibit meaningful changes along with progression of lesions. Extracellular cell matrix remodeling in ductal and lobular lesions may follow distinct patterns., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a lethal cancer of the biliary epithelium, originating from the liver (intrahepatic), at the confluence of the right and left hepatic ducts (hilar) or in the extrahepatic bile ducts. It is a rare malignancy associated with poor prognosis., Data Sources: We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE database for relevant articles published from 1989 to 2008. The search terms used were related to "cholangiocarcinoma" and its "treatment". Although no language restrictions were imposed initially, for the full-text review and final analysis, our resources only permitted the review of articles published in English. This review deals with the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma, the principles and the current trends., Results: The risks and prognostic factors, symptoms and differential diagnosis are thoroughly discussed. In addition, the tools of preoperative diagnosis such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, digital image analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography are reviewed. Moreover, the treatment of CCA is discussed., Conclusions: The only curative treatment available is surgical management. Unfortunately, many patients present with unresectable tumors, the majority of whom die within a year of diagnosis. Surgical treatment involves major resections of the liver, pancreas and bile duct, with considerable mortality and morbidity. However, in selected cases and where indicated, appropriate management with aggressive surgery may achieve a good outcome with a prolonged survival expectancy.

This paper explores the potential of a computer-aided diagnosis system to discriminate the real benign microcalcifications among a specific subset of 109 patients with BIRADS 3 mammograms who had undergone biopsy, thus making it possible to downgrade them to BIRADS 2 category. The system detected and quantified critical features of microcalcifications and classified them on a risk percentage scale for malignancy. The system successfully detected all cancers. Nevertheless, it suggested biopsy for 11/15 atypical lesions. Finally, the system characterized as definitely benign (BIRADS 2) 29/88 benign lesions, previously assigned to BIRADS 3, and thus achieved a reduction of 33% in unnecessary biopsies., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: To assess the putative predictors that may be implicated in the pain experienced during stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB)., Materials and Methods: One hundred and thirty-five consecutive women with microcalcifications underwent VABB on the Fischer's table. The visual analogue scale was used to measure the degree of the "average pain" (AP)., Results: At the univariable analysis, the AP was positively associated with the duration of the procedure, the diagnosis of malignant/preinvasive lesions and the volume of blood lost. Although menopausal status was not associated with the AP, within the premenopausal subpopulation, luteal phase was associated with higher VAS score. These findings also persisted at the multivariable ordinal logistic regression model. However, the mean experienced pain was associated neither with the volume of tissue excised nor with the hematoma formation, nor with patients' age., Conclusion: The aforementioned factors were independent positive predictors of the mean experienced pain during VABB.

This study examines pain (visual analog scale 0-10) in women undergoing breast biopsy. Two hundred and twenty-seven patients with a palpable lesion underwent FNA (21G, n=85), core biopsy (14G, n=86) or open biopsy under local anesthesia (n=56). One hundred and twenty-six women presented with a non-palpable lesion, and underwent vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB, 11G) under mammographic guidance, prone position (n=72) or hook-wire localization followed by open surgery (n=54). The techniques sampling non-palpable lesions were the most painful: hook-wire (9.15+/-0.74) and VABB (4.35+/-1.70). Larger needle diameter was associated with more intense pain. Concerning VABB, an S-shape curve of pain (third-order pattern) was documented. A second dose of lidocaine just before the rapid increase phase was then adopted (n=61), and reduced the total/maximum pain. In conclusion, although VABB is less painful than hook-wire, the pain experienced in VABB is significant; however, it can be attenuated by a second dose of lidocaine.