Search

Pierre-Robin Sequence (PRS) is a sequence of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction. There is no standardized consensus on the management of respiratory distress for patients with PRS, and operative interventions have associated complications. The purpose of this study is to identify all modalities of non-operative airway intervention for PRS infants. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, EMCARE, and Web of Science electronic databases were searched from 1992 to 2022 reporting on PRS infants under one year of age who were managed non-operatively. Publications with non-original research designs, an exclusive focus on surgical interventions, case reports, and non-English language articles were excluded. Analysis was performed using non-pooled and pooled proportions (PP). 3280 abstracts were screened, and 88 articles included. Retrospective methodologies were most common. Of the 60 studies where both operative and non-operative interventions were included, 2924 of 4708 PRS infants were administered a non-operative intervention (PP 65.8 % [95%CI 58.5, 72.7]). Reported definitive non-operative interventions, either alone or in combination with another non-operative intervention, included infant positioning (n = 1664), orthodontic appliances (n = 1299), nasopharyngeal tube insertion (n = 983), supplemental oxygen (n = 306), non-invasive ventilation (n = 290), oral airway (n = 46), endotracheal intubation (n = 36), and other (n = 40). The mean MINORS risk of bias score was 6.3 (range 1-12), indicating that the present review was limited by moderate methodological quality for included studies. This is the largest systematic review of non-operative interventions for PRS infants thus far. Most infants are managed non-operatively, with positioning, orthodontic appliances, and nasopharyngeal tubes being the most commonly reported modalities., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Guidelines on clinical margins for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) excisions were recently published, yet the ambiguity regarding the margin continues for surgeons and pathologists. The purpose of this study was to determine the incomplete excision rate of BCC, determine the factors associated with incomplete excision, and evaluate the completeness of reporting between surgeon and pathologist., Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on pathology reports from single excisions of BCC specimens between January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was the incomplete excision rate (positive margins) as reported by pathologist. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between incomplete excision rate and anatomical location, pathologist, and surgeon. The completeness of surgeon pathology requisition forms was evaluated qualitatively., Results: Seven hundred and fifty-six pathology reports were included. The incomplete excision rate was 12% (n = 94). The most common site of incomplete excision was head and neck (n = 87, 15%), followed by trunk (n = 5, 7%), and extremities (n = 2, 2%). Five hundred and seventy-nine specimens from 6 surgeons and 9 pathologists were included in the logistic regression analysis. The Wald test showed that the location was significantly associated with incomplete excision (p < 0.05), whereas surgeon and pathologist reports were not (p > 0.05). Regarding missing information, only 47 (6%) pathology reports included "excision" in the requisition form. Four hundred and three (53%) specimens had no clinical history., Conclusions: The incomplete excision rate found in this study falls within the report range in the literature. Neither surgeon nor pathologist had significant association with incomplete excision. Incomplete excision rate of BCC may be inflated owing to the lack of standardization in requisition form and pathology reporting., (Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)