Search

Hemophilia A and B are hereditary bleeding disorders, characterized by factor VIII or IX deficiencies, respectively. For many decades, prophylaxis with coagulation factor concentrates (replacement therapy) was the standard-of-care approach in hemophilia. Since the 1950s, when prophylaxis started, factor concentrates have been improved with virus inactivation and molecule modification to extend its half-life. The past years have brought an intense revolution in hemophilia care, with the development of nonfactor therapy and gene therapy. Emicizumab is the first and only nonreplacement agent to be licensed for prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A, and real-world data show similar efficacy and safety from the pivotal studies. Other nonreplacement agents and gene therapy have ongoing studies with promising results. Innovative approaches, like subcutaneous factor VIII and lipid nanoparticles, are in the preclinical phase. These novel agents, such as extended half-life concentrates and emicizumab, have been available in resource-constrained countries through the constant efforts of the World Federation of Haemophilia Humanitarian Aid Program. Despite the wide range of new approaches and therapies, the main challenge remains the same: to guarantee treatment for all. In this article, we discuss the evolution of hemophilia care, global access to hemophilia treatment, and the current and future strategies that are now under development. Finally, we summarize relevant new data on this topic presented at the ISTH 2021 virtual congress., (© 2022 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH).)

Background: The optimum second-line treatment or best sequence of treatments for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are yet to be determined. Our institution has accumulated extensive experience regarding the use of dapsone as second-line therapy for ITP., Objectives: We aimed to assess the efficacy rate and safety of dapsone treatment in ITP patients., Patients/methods: Here we report our experience in a retrospective study, including 122 patients, with a median treatment duration with dapsone of 6 months and a median follow-up period of 3.4 years., Results: The overall response rate in this cohort was 66%, including 24% of complete responses. Among responders, in 24% a relapse occurred while on treatment. Therefore, a sustained response was observed in 51% of patients. Interestingly, 81% of the responders maintained the response after the interruption of treatment, for a median time of 26 months. Side effects were reported in 16% of the patients in this cohort and treatment was interrupted due to side effects in 11% of patients. The main cause in these cases was hemolytic anemia and methemoglobinemia. Reductions in hemoglobin levels during the use of dapsone were seen in 94% of the patients. Responders presented significantly greater reductions in their hemoglobin levels than nonresponders did: median hemoglobin drop of 1.9 g/dl vs. 1.2 g/dl (p = .004)., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that dapsone has adequate efficacy and is well tolerated. Although the mechanism of action is still unclear, our observation that the degree in the drop of hemoglobin is greater in responders suggest a possible role of the blockage of the reticuloendothelial system in the therapeutic effect of the drug., (© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)