Search

Objective: This study aim to quantify the differences in knee biomechanics during gait between knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients and healthy individuals. Methods: Twenty KOA patients (4 males and 16 females, 66.2 ± 7.7 years) and twenty controls (16 males and 4 females, 64.8 ± 5.4 years) were recruited for gait test using the motion capture system and force-platform system. The spatiotemporal parameters, knee kinematics and kinetics, and tibiofemoral contact force (TFCF) were calculated using an improved musculoskeletal model. Results: KOA patients walked with reduced speed (48.6 %), stride length (32.9 %), stride height (33.0 %), time proportions of single-support phases (19.2 %), increased gait cycle time (31.0 %), time proportions of stance (8.5 %) and double-support phases (57.7–75.9 %). KOA patients had significant smaller peak flexion angle (29.1 %), flexion ROM (50.6 %) and peak flexion moment (90.2 %), greater peak adduction moment (KAM) (40.7 %), peak rotation moments (KRM) (50.0 %), KAM impulse (106.2 %) and KRM impulse (126.0 %). In proximodistal direction, greater medial TFCF impulse (238 %), total and medial first-peak TFCF (9.6 % and 15.2 %), and smaller lateral peak TFCF (33.3 %) and TFCF impulse (38.4 %) were found in KOA patients. Besides, significant differences were found in the total, medial and lateral peak TFCFs and TFCF impulses in mediolateral direction, and the medial and lateral TFCFs and TFCF impulses in anteroposterior direction. Conclusions: Significant differences were found in the spatiotemporal parameters, knee kinematics and kinetics, and TFCF between the two groups. The results of this study have important implication for clinicians and rehabilitation physicians. These quantified biomechanical differences can provide data support for the personalized and quantified rehabilitation strategies, give suggestions for the exercises of KOA patients, help monitor disease, evaluate surgical treatment, and develop more effective preoperative planning and postoperative rehabilitation strategies.

This study aimed to investigate whether there is a causal relationship between educational attainment and delirium at the genetic level using the Mendelian randomization method, and provide new evidence for studies in this field. We found a causal relationship between educational attainment and delirium at the genetic level after excluding confounders using Mendelian randomization. The inverse variance weighting method of random effects was the main analysis method. The weighted median and Mendelian Randomization-Egger methods, as well as simple, and weighted modes were used as supplementary analysis methods. Additionally, horizontal pleiotropy tests were conducted, including the Mendelian Randomization-Egger intercept test and Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier. Cochran's Q statistic was used to assess the size of heterogeneity. We retrieved all second single nucleotide polymorphism features and performed multivariate Mendelian randomization to adjust for the effect of potential confounders on our results. The inverse variance weighting suggested a negative correlation between genetically predicted educational attainment and delirium (0.67[0.49–0.92], p = 0.013); Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (0.67[0.49–0.92], p = 0.013) and multivariate Mendelian randomization (0.52[0.33–0.82], p = 0.005) results were generally consistent with the inverse variance weighting method. The Mendelian Randomization-Egger, simple, and weighted mode results were consistent with the inverse variance weighting results. Our results were not affected by pleiotropy or heterogeneity (p > 0.05, for both pleiotropy and heterogeneity). In addition, the “leave-one-out” analysis showed that the results of our Mendelian randomization analysis were not influenced by individual single nucleotide polymorphisms. Studies have found a causal relationship between educational attainment and delirium at the genetic level; higher educational attainment may be a protective factor against delirium. Clinically, more attention should be paid to patients at a high risk of delirium with low educational attainment.

The ubiquity of refractory organic matter in aquatic environments necessitates innovative removal strategies. Sulfate radical-based advanced oxidation has emerged as an attractive solution, offering high selectivity, enduring efficacy, and anti-interference ability. Among many technologies, sulfite activation, leveraging its cost-effectiveness and lower toxicity compared to conventional persulfates, stands out. Yet, the activation process often relies on transition metals, suffering from low atom utilization. Here we introduce a series of single-atom catalysts (SACs) employing transition metals on g-C3N4 substrates, effectively activating sulfite for acetaminophen degradation. We highlight the superior performance of Fe/CN, which demonstrates a degradation rate constant significantly surpassing those of Ni/CN and Cu/CN. Our investigation into the electronic and spin polarization characteristics of these catalysts reveals their critical role in catalytic efficiency, with oxysulfur radical-mediated reactions predominating. Notably, under visible light, the catalytic activity is enhanced, attributed to an increased generation of oxysulfur radicals and a strengthened electron donation-back donation dynamic. The proximity of Fe/CN's d-band center to the Fermi level, alongside its high spin polarization, is shown to improve sulfite adsorption and reduce the HOMO-LUMO gap, thereby accelerating photo-assisted sulfite activation. This work advances the understanding of SACs in environmental applications and lays the groundwork for future water treatment technologies.