Search

Social determinants of health (SDH) play a crucial role in shaping health outcomes. Few studies have explored the impact of SDH in ocular oncology, looking at differences in disease presentation, treatment choices, and outcomes based on race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and insurance status. Retinoblastoma exhibits disparities in survival, with lower-income countries experiencing substantially lower rates compared to high-income countries. In the U.S., racial and SES disparities exist, impacting treatment choices and outcomes in children with retinoblastoma. Disparities in treatment modalities based on race and SES have been reported in uveal melanoma, with non-White and economically disadvantaged patients more likely to undergo primary enucleation. Ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) exhibits racial and socioeconomic disparities in treatment outcomes. Black patients with OSSN face higher mortality, independent of tumor size, eye laterality, or tumor behavior. Given the rarity, there is no data on disparities in vitreoretinal lymphoma management. When using primary central nervous system lymphoma as a surrogate, management and survival outcomes vary based on factors such as race, socioeconomic status, and insurance status. This article aims to review current literature on disparities in ocular oncology, highlighting the need for granular data to better understand existing gaps in care within ocular oncology., (Copyright © 2024 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Complications associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF therapies are reported inconsistently in the literature, thus limiting an accurate evaluation and comparison of safety between studies. This study aimed to develop a standardized classification system for anti-VEGF ocular complications using the Delphi consensus process., Design: Systematic review and Delphi consensus process., Participants: Twenty-five international retinal specialists participated in the Delphi consensus survey., Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify complications of intravitreal anti-VEGF agent administration based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-VEGF therapy. A comprehensive list of complications was derived from these studies, and this list was subjected to iterative Delphi consensus surveys involving international retinal specialists who voted on inclusion, exclusion, rephrasing, and addition of complications. Furthermore, surveys determined specifiers for the selected complications. This iterative process helped to refine the final classification system., Main Outcome Measures: The proportion of retinal specialists who choose to include or exclude complications associated with anti-VEGF administration., Results: After screening 18 229 articles, 130 complications were categorized from 145 included RCTs. Participant consensus via the Delphi method resulted in the inclusion of 91 complications (70%) after 3 rounds. After incorporating further modifications made based on participant suggestions, such as rewording certain phrases and combining similar terms, 24 redundant complications were removed, leaving a total of 67 complications (52%) in the final list. A total of 14 complications (11%) met exclusion thresholds and were eliminated by participants across both rounds. All other remaining complications not meeting inclusion or exclusion thresholds also were excluded from the final classification system after the Delphi process terminated. In addition, 47 of 75 proposed complication specifiers (63%) were included based on participant agreement., Conclusions: Using the Delphi consensus process, a comprehensive, standardized classification system consisting of 67 ocular complications and 47 unique specifiers was established for intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in clinical trials. The adoption of this system in future trials could improve consistency and quality of adverse event reporting, potentially facilitating more accurate risk-benefit analyses., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)