Search

We investigated 67 meningothelial tumors (20 benign meningiomas, 34 atypical meningiomas, and 13 anaplastic meningiomas) for losses of genetic information from chromosome arms 1p and 9p, as well as for deletion, mutation, and expression of the tumor suppressor genes CDKN2A (p16(INKa)/MTS1), p14(ARF), CDKN2B (p15(INK4b)/MTS2) (all located at 9p21) and CDKN2C (1p32). Comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis showed losses on 1p in 11 anaplastic meningiomas (85%), 23 atypical meningiomas (68%), and 5 benign meningiomas (25%). One atypical meningioma with loss of heterozygosity on 1p carried a somatic CDKN2C mutation (c.202C>T: R68X). Losses on 9p were found in five anaplastic meningiomas (38%), six atypical meningiomas (18%), and one benign meningioma (5%). Six anaplastic meningiomas (46%) and one atypical meningioma (3%) showed homozygous deletions of the CDKN2A, p14(ARF), and CDKN2B genes. Two anaplastic meningiomas carried somatic point mutations in CDKN2A (c.262G>T: E88X and c.262G>A: E88K) and p14(ARF) (c.305G>T: G102V and c.305G>A: G102E). One anaplastic meningioma, three atypical meningiomas, and one benign meningioma without a demonstrated homozygous deletion or mutation of CDKN2A, p14(ARF), or CDKN2B lacked detectable transcripts from at least one of these genes. Hypermethylation of CDKN2A, p14(ARF), and CDKN2B could be demonstrated in one of these cases. Taken together, our results indicate that CDKN2C is rarely altered in meningiomas. However, the majority of anaplastic meningiomas either show homozygous deletions of CDKN2A, p14(ARF), and CDKN2B, mutations in CDKN2A and p14(ARF), or lack of expression of one or more of these genes. Thus, inactivation of the G(1)/S-phase cell-cycle checkpoint is an important aberration in anaplastic meningiomas.

As data on the genomic alterations in hepatoblastoma (HB) are limited, 34 HB tumors and three HB cell lines were screened for DNA copy number changes by comparative genomic hybridization. The average number of chromosomal imbalances per tumor was 2.3 +/- 0.5 (mean +/- SEM) with gains sevenfold more frequent than losses. The most frequent gains of chromosomal material in HB tumors were on 2q (44%), 1q (41%), 2p (29%), 20 (24%), 22q (18%), 8q (15%), 8p and 12q (9% each), as well as 7q, 12p, and 17 (6% each) and the only recurrent loss was on 4q in 12% of cases. Highly amplified sequences were identified in four tumors and mapped to 2q24 in two cases, to 8q in two cases (once to 8q11.2-q13 and once to 8q11.2-q21.3) as well as to 10q24-q26 in one case. In one cell line, highly amplified DNA sequences were mapped to 7p and 8q. Comparison to previously published data on this series of HB revealed that the number of chromosomal imbalances was significantly higher in HB tumors with loss of heterozygosity on 11p (P = 0.03), whereas in five of 10 HB biopsies without chromosomal imbalances, beta-catenin gene mutations were found. HB patients were divided into a good (no evidence of disease) and a poor (died of disease) outcome group according to their clinical course after standard therapy. Two alterations were found to be significantly associated with poor outcome: gain on 8q (P = 0.007) and gain on 20 (P = 0.009). In summary, our analysis allowed the identification of gains on chromosomes 1q and 2 as hallmark DNA copy number changes in HB with 2q24 as a critical chromosomal band. Furthermore, this study provided evidence that gains on 8q and 20 play a role as markers of prognostic significance in HB.

Biopsies routinely performed for the histopathological diagnosis of oral epithelial lesions before treatment were screened for chromosomal imbalances by comparative genomic hybridization. Comparative genomic hybridization was performed on 12 oral premalignant lesions (OPLs; dysplasias and carcinomas in situ) and 14 oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs). Eight biopsies displayed areas of different histopathological appearance, so that OPLs and OSCCs from the same patient were analyzed. To avoid contamination with nonneoplastic cells, defined cell populations were isolated by micromanipulation with a glass needle. Before comparative genomic hybridization analysis, universal DNA amplification was performed using the DOP-polymerase chain reaction protocol. In the 14 OSCCs examined, the average number of chromosomal imbalances was significantly higher than in the 12 OPLs (mean +/- SEM: 11.9 +/- 1.9 versus 3.2 +/- 1.2; P = 0.003). The DNA copy number changes identified in more than one OPL were gains on 8q (3 of 12) and 16p (2 of 12), as well as losses on 3p (5 of 12); 5q (4 of 12); 13q (3 of 12); and 4q, 8p, and 9p (2 of 12 each). In more than 30% of OSCCs, gains of chromosomal material were identified on 20q (8 of 14); 8q, 11q, 22q (7 of 14 each); 3q, 15q, and 17p (6 of 14 each); and 14q, 17q, and 20p (5 of 14 each), and losses were identified on 3p and 4q (9 of 14 each), 5q (7 of 14), 13q (6 of 14), and 2q and 9p (5 of 14 each). These results were validated by positive and negative control comparative genomic hybridization experiments and microsatellite analysis for the detection of allelic loss. The vast majority of genomic alterations found in OPLs were again identified in OSCCs from the same biopsy, supporting the hypothesis that multiple lesions in the same patient are clonally related. In summary, we show that comprehensive information on the genomic alterations in oral epithelial lesions can be obtained from small biopsies. Such data may identify prognostic indicators that could eventually assist in designing therapeutic strategies.