Search

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient care must include confirming a diagnosis with postbronchodilator spirometry. Because of the clinical heterogeneity and the reality that airflow obstruction assessed by spirometry only partially reflects disease severity, a thorough clinical evaluation of the patient should include assessment of symptom burden and risk of exacerbations that permits the implementation of evidence-informed pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. This guideline provides recommendations from a comprehensive systematic review with a meta-analysis and expert-informed clinical remarks to optimize maintenance pharmacologic therapy for individuals with stable COPD, and a revised and practical treatment pathway based on new evidence since the 2019 update of the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) Guideline. The key clinical questions were developed using the Patients/Population (P), Intervention(s) (I), Comparison/Comparator (C), and Outcome (O) model for three questions that focuses on the outcomes of symptoms (dyspnea)/health status, acute exacerbations, and mortality. The evidence from this systematic review and meta-analysis leads to the recommendation that all symptomatic patients with spirometry-confirmed COPD should receive long-acting bronchodilator maintenance therapy. Those with moderate to severe dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council ≥ 2) and/or impaired health status (COPD Assessment Test ≥ 10) and a low risk of exacerbations should receive combination therapy with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting ẞ2-agonist (LAMA/LABA). For those with a moderate/severe dyspnea and/or impaired health status and a high risk of exacerbations should be prescribed triple combination therapy (LAMA/LABA/inhaled corticosteroids) azithromycin, roflumilast or N-acetylcysteine is recommended for specific populations; a recommendation against the use of theophylline, maintenance systemic oral corticosteroids such as prednisone and inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy is made for all COPD patients., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures Members of the CTS COPD Guideline Panel declared potential conflicts of interest at the time of appointment, and these were updated throughout the process in accordance with the CTS Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policy. J. B. reports grants from McGill University, the McGill University Health Centre Foundation, the Canadian Institute Health Research, Grifols, Novartis, Sanofi, and the Respiratory Health Network of the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec; grants and personal fees from Astra Zeneca Canada Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim Canada Ltd, GlaxoSmithKline Canada Ltd, and Trudell Canada Ltd; and personal fees from Pfizer Canada Ltd, and COVIS Pharma Canada Ltd, outside the submitted work. M. B. reports personal fees and grants outside the submitted work from AstraZeneca Canada Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim Canada Ltd, GlaxoSmithKline Canada Ltd, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, the Canadian Institute Health Research, CHEST, The Lung Association of Alberta, The University of Alberta Hospital Foundation, Alberta Innovates Health Solutions, Valeo, and Covis. P. H. reports grants from the Canadian Institute Health Research, the Lung Association of Nova Scotia, the Nova Scotia Health Authority Research Fund, Astra Zeneca Canada Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim Canada Ltd, Cyclomedica, Grifols, Respivant, and Vertex; and personal fees from Astra Zeneca Canada Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim Canada Ltd, GlaxoSmithKline Canada Ltd, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, and Trudell, outside the submitted work. S. D. A. receives grants from CIHR. He has received speaking honoraria or has participated on advisory boards for GSK, AZ, Chiesi, and Sanofi. M-F. B. reports grants and personal fees from the Cercle du doyen (Faculté de pharmacie, Université de Montréal) and Astra Zeneca Canada Ltd. A. D. reports receiving research, consulting and lecturing fees from GlaxoSmithkline, Sepracor, Schering Plough, Altana, Methapharma, AstraZeneca, ONO pharma, Merck Canada, Forest Laboratories, Novartis Canada/USA, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd, Pfizer Canada, SkyePharma, and KOS Pharmaceuticals and Almirall, Sanofigenzyme and TEVA Canada, Valeopharma Canada. F. M. reports grants from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Sanofi, and Novartis, and personal fees for serving on speaker bureaus and consultation panels from GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, and Novartis. He is financially involved with Oxynov, a company which is developing an oxygen delivery system. S. M. reports grants outside the submitted work from Canadian Institute of Health Research and Canadian Lung Association in partnership with Boehringer Ingelheim Canada Ltd and Astra Zeneca Canada Ltd. E. P. reports personal fees from COVIS Pharma, Sanofi Genzyme, Boehringer Ingelheim Canada Ltd, Astra Zeneca Canada Ltd, GlaxoSmithKline Canada Ltd, and Novartis; and grants from the Canadian Institute Health Research, the Saskatchewan Research Foundation, the Respiratory Research Centre, and Astra Zeneca Canada Ltd, outside the submitted work. D. D. S. reports personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline Canada Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca outside of the submitted work. J. W. reports personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline Canada Ltd and Astra Zeneca Canada Ltd and a grant from Fisher & Paykel, outside the submitted work. B. L. W. reports personal fees from AstraZeneca Canada Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim Canada Ltd, GlaxoSmithKline Canada Ltd, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme and Covis Pharma Canada, outside of the submitted work. D. D. M. reports consultancy work with Alberta Health Services, Health Canada, Lung Saskatchewan, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatchewan Ministry of Health, Yukon Health and Social Services; reports grants (managed by University of Saskatchewan) from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Institute of Health Research, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols Therapeutics, Lung Saskatchewan, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation, Syneos Health, Schering-Plough; employee/roles with University of Saskatchewan, Deputy Editor - CHEST Journal, Board Member - Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation; outside the submitted work. None declared (A. L., A. V. D., S. B. K., J. D. M.)., (Copyright © 2023 Canadian Thoracic Society and American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: COPD increases susceptibility to sleep disturbances, which may in turn predispose to increased respiratory symptoms. The objective of this study was to evaluate, in a population-based sample, the relationship between subjective sleep quality and risk of COPD exacerbations., Methods: Data were obtained from the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) study. Participants with COPD who had completed 18 months of follow-up were included. Sleep quality was measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and a three-factor analysis. Symptom-based (dyspnea or sputum change ≥ 48 h) and event-based (symptoms plus medication or unscheduled health services use) exacerbations were assessed. Association of PSQI with exacerbation rate was assessed by using negative binomial regression. Exacerbation-free survival was also assessed., Results: A total of 480 participants with COPD were studied, including 185 with one or more exacerbations during follow-up and 203 with poor baseline sleep quality (PSQI score > 5). Participants with subsequent symptom-based exacerbations had higher median baseline PSQI scores than those without (6.0 [interquartile range, 3.0-8.0] vs 5.0 [interquartile range, 2.0-7.0]; P = .01), and they were more likely to have baseline PSQI scores > 5 (50.3% vs 37.3%; P = .01). Higher PSQI scores were associated with increased symptom-based exacerbation risk (adjusted rate ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.18; P = .02) and event-based exacerbation risk (adjusted rate ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00-1.21; P = .048). The association occurred mainly in those with undiagnosed COPD. Strongest associations were with Factor 3 (sleep disturbances and daytime dysfunction). Time to symptom-based exacerbation was shorter in participants with poor sleep quality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.09-2.03)., Conclusions: Higher baseline PSQI scores were associated with increased risk of COPD exacerbation over 18 months' prospective follow-up., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Patients with psychiatric disorders (depression, anxiety) are more likely to have poor health behaviours, including higher smoking and lower physical activity (PA) levels. Smoking is a major risk factor for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and PA is critical for COPD management. However, no studies have assessed associations between psychological distress and these behaviours among patients with vs without COPD. This is a sub-analysis of the CanCOLD study that assessed the relationships between psychological disorders (depression, anxiety) and poor health behaviours (smoking, PA)., Methods: 717 COPD and 797 matched non-COPD individuals from the CanCOLD study, completed the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) to assess anxiety and depression. Smoking behaviour was self-reported pack-years smoking. The CHAMPS PA questionnaire determined calorific expenditure as a PA measure. Regressions determined relationships between anxiety/depression and health behaviours, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, GOLD stage and COPD status., Results: Across the whole sample, we observed relationships between depression (β = 1.107 ± 0.197; 95%CI = 0.691-1.462; p < .001) and anxiety (β = 0.780 ± 0.170; 95%CI = 0.446-1.114; p < .001) and pack years. Higher depression (β = -0.220 ± 0.028; 95%CI = -0.275 to -0.165; p < .001) and anxiety (β = -0.091 ± 0.025; 95%CI = -0.139 to -0.043; p < .001) scores were related to lower PA. These associations were comparable across COPD and non-COPD patients., Conclusions: Results showed that higher levels of anxiety and depression were related to higher cumulative smoking and lower levels of PA in patients with and without COPD, suggesting symptoms of psychological distress is similarly associated with poorer health behaviours in COPD and non-COPD individuals. Future studies need to determine if treating symptoms of psychological distress can improve health behaviours and outcomes in this population., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is a valid disease-specific questionnaire measuring health status. However, knowledge concerning its use regarding patient and disease characteristics remains limited. Our main objective was to assess the degree to which the CAT score varies and can discriminate between specific patient population groups., Methods: The Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) is a random-sampled, population-based, multicenter, prospective cohort that includes subjects with COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] classifications 1 to 3). The CAT questionnaire was administered at three visits (baseline, 1.5 years, and 3 years). The CAT total score was determined for sex, age groups, smoking status, GOLD classification, exacerbations, and comorbidities., Results: A total of 716 subjects with COPD were included in the analysis. The majority of subjects (72.5%) were not previously diagnosed with COPD. The mean FEV 1 /FVC ratio was 61.1 ± 8.1%, with a mean FEV 1 % predicted of 82.3 ± 19.3%. The mean CAT scores were 5.8 ± 5.0, 9.6 ± 6.7, and 16.1 ± 10.0 for GOLD 1, 2, and 3+ classifications, respectively. Higher CAT scores were observed in women, current smokers, ever-smokers, and subjects with a previous diagnosis of COPD. The CAT was also able to distinguish between subjects who experience exacerbations vs those who had no exacerbation., Conclusions: These results suggest that the CAT, originally designed for use in clinically symptomatic patients with COPD, can also be used in individuals with mild airflow obstruction and newly diagnosed COPD. In addition, the CAT was able to discriminate between sexes and subjects who experience frequent and infrequent exacerbations., Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00920348; Study ID No.: IRO-93326., (Crown Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)