8 results on '"Verdier, David D."'
Search Results
2. Contributors
- Author
-
Abbott, Richard L, primary, Adrean, Sean D, additional, Al-Muammar, Abdulrahman, additional, Akhtar, Jihan, additional, Alfonso, Eduardo C, additional, Allen, Richard C, additional, Almond, M Camille, additional, Alvarenga, Lênio, additional, Alward, Wallace LM, additional, Ambrósio, Renato, additional, Anwar, Mohammad, additional, Azar, Dimitri T, additional, Ball, James L, additional, Barney, Neal P, additional, Bartow, Rebecca M, additional, Baum, Jules, additional, Belin, Michael W, additional, Bell, Jason H, additional, Benetz, Beth Ann, additional, Berbos, Zachary, additional, Beuerman, Roger W, additional, Bhasin, Arpita Kadakia, additional, Bhat, Pooja V, additional, Biber, Joseph M, additional, Bidros, Maria, additional, Birnbaum, Andrea D, additional, Bouchard, Charles S, additional, Bradley, Jay C, additional, Brandt, James D, additional, Brasington, Richard D, additional, Brilakis, Harilaos S, additional, Burkat, Cat N, additional, Calatayud, Marta, additional, Cameron, J Douglas, additional, Campos, Mauro, additional, Carpel, Emmett F, additional, Cavanagh, H Dwight, additional, Chan, Cordelia, additional, Chang, Richard I, additional, Chang, Bernard H, additional, Chern, Kenneth C, additional, Ching, Steven, additional, Chodosh, James, additional, Choo, Phillip H, additional, Chung, Gary, additional, Ciolino, Joseph B, additional, Clayton, Janine A, additional, Cohen, Elisabeth J, additional, Comyn, Oliver, additional, Cortina, M Soledad, additional, Cowden, John W, additional, Croasdale, Christopher R, additional, Davidson, Richard S, additional, Davis, Elizabeth A, additional, Daya, Sheraz M, additional, Freitas, Denise de, additional, DeMill, David L, additional, de Oliveira, Lauro Augusto, additional, de Smet, Marc D, additional, de Sousa, Luciene B, additional, Djalilian, Ali R, additional, Dohlman, Claes H, additional, Donnenfeld, Eric D, additional, Dortzbach, Richard K, additional, Driebe, William T, additional, Dunn, Steven P, additional, Eagle, Ralph C, additional, Edelstein, Sean L, additional, Eiferman, Richard A, additional, Eliason, Joseph A, additional, Farid, Marjan, additional, Faulkner, William J, additional, Feder, Robert S, additional, Feiz, Vahid, additional, Feng, Matthew T, additional, Fingert, John H, additional, Florakis, George J, additional, Fontana, Luigi, additional, Forster, Richard K, additional, Foster, C Stephen, additional, Foster, F Stuart, additional, Foulks, Gary N, additional, Friedlander, Mitchell H, additional, Fukuda, Masahiko, additional, Galor, Anat, additional, Gan, Theresa J, additional, Garg, Prashant, additional, Garg, Sumit, additional, Glasser, David B, additional, Goins, Kenneth M, additional, Goldstein, Debra A, additional, Gottlieb, Chloe, additional, Grimmett, Michael R, additional, Gris, Oscar, additional, Groos, Erich B, additional, Gruzensky, William D, additional, Güell, Jose L, additional, Gupta, Preeya K, additional, Hamill, M Bowes, additional, Hammersmith, Kristin M, additional, Hamrah, Pedram, additional, Hannush, Sadeer B, additional, Hardten, David R, additional, Harrison, Andrew, additional, Heck, Ellen L, additional, Heidemann, David G, additional, Herman, David C, additional, Heur, J Martin, additional, Hodge, William G, additional, Hoffman, Carol J, additional, Holland, Edward J, additional, Holland, Gary N, additional, Honig, Marc A, additional, Hood, Christopher T, additional, Hoskins, Eliza N, additional, Huang, Andrew J W, additional, Huang, David, additional, Hui, Jennifer I, additional, Iuorno, Joseph D, additional, Jackson, W Bruce, additional, Jakobiec, Frederick A, additional, Jeng, Bennie H, additional, Jester, James V, additional, Jordan, David R, additional, Kaiura, Terry L, additional, Karp, Carol L, additional, Katz, Douglas G, additional, Kaufman, Stephen C, additional, Kersten, Robert C, additional, Khachikian, Stephen S, additional, Kim, Jennifer H, additional, Kim, Joung Y, additional, Kim, Stella K, additional, Kim, Terry, additional, Kirkness, Colin M, additional, Klyce, Stephen D, additional, Koch, Douglas D, additional, Kowalski, Regis P, additional, Krachmer, Jay H, additional, Laibson, Peter R, additional, Lane, Stephen S, additional, Lass, Jonathan H, additional, Lee, W Barry, additional, Lee, Olivia A, additional, Lemp, Michael A, additional, Lenhart, Phoebe D, additional, Li, Yan, additional, Liesegang, Thomas J, additional, Lim, Michele C, additional, Lin, Lily Koo, additional, Lin, Michael P, additional, Lindquist, Thomas D, additional, Lindstrom, Richard L, additional, Litoff, David, additional, Liu, Christopher, additional, Lowder, Careen Y, additional, Lubniewski, Anthony J, additional, McGee, Hall T, additional, McLean, Ian W, additional, Macsai, Marian S, additional, Manero, Felicidad, additional, Mannis, Mark J, additional, Mantopoulos, Dimosthenis, additional, Martinez, Carlos E, additional, Mártonyi, Csaba L, additional, Mashor, Raneen S, additional, Mathers, William D, additional, Mehta, Manisha N, additional, Meisler, David M, additional, Mian, Shahzad I, additional, Miller, Darlene, additional, Miller, Corey A, additional, Montoya, Monty, additional, Morral, Merce, additional, Moyes, Andrew L, additional, Murphy, Michael L, additional, Nassiri, Nariman, additional, Neff, Kristiana D, additional, Nelson, J Daniel, additional, Nerad, Jeffrey A, additional, Netto, Marcelo V, additional, Newton, Christopher J, additional, Nijm, Lisa M, additional, Nishida, Teruo, additional, Noble, Bruce A, additional, Nordlund, Michael L, additional, Nussenblatt, Robert B, additional, O'Day, David G, additional, Ongkosuwito, Jenny V, additional, Oxford, Karen W, additional, Palay, David A, additional, Palmon, Florentino E, additional, Paranjpe, Deval R, additional, Parikh, Mansi, additional, Park, David H, additional, Park, D J John, additional, Parsons, Matthew R, additional, Pavlin, Charles J, additional, Pearlstein, Eric S, additional, Perry, Alicia, additional, Petroll, W Matthew, additional, Pfister, Daryl R, additional, Pfister, Roswell R, additional, Pflugfelder, Stephen C, additional, Price, Francis W, additional, Price, Marianne O, additional, Probst, Louis E, additional, Purcell, John J, additional, Pyott, Andrew A E, additional, Raizman, Michael B, additional, Raju, Leela V, additional, Randleman, J Bradley, additional, Rao, Gullapalli N, additional, Rapuano, Christopher J, additional, Reilly, Charles D, additional, de Candelaria Renesto, Adimara, additional, Rezende, Renata A, additional, Robertson, Danielle M, additional, Rootman, David S, additional, Rothman, Jason S, additional, Rubinfeld, Roy Scott, additional, Sadowsky, Alan E, additional, Saika, Shizuya, additional, Sakhalkar, Monali V, additional, Salz, James J, additional, Sangwan, Virender S, additional, Scarpi, Marinho, additional, Scharf, Bradley H, additional, Schmidt, Greg, additional, Schmitt, Artur, additional, Schmitt, Fernanda Piccoli, additional, Schteingart, Miriam T, additional, Schwab, Ivan R, additional, Schwam, Brian L, additional, Schwartz, Gary S, additional, Sen, H Nida, additional, Shapiro, Michael B, additional, Shimmura, Shigeto, additional, Singal, Neera, additional, Skeens, Heather M, additional, Skolnick, Craig A, additional, Slomovic, Allan R, additional, Smith, Janine A, additional, Snyder, Michael E, additional, Solomon, Renée, additional, Soukiasian, Sarkis H, additional, Srinivasan, Sathish, additional, Stamler, John F, additional, Steinert, Roger F, additional, Stoller, Glenn L, additional, Streeten, Barbara W, additional, Stulting, R Doyle, additional, Sugar, Alan, additional, Sugar, Joel, additional, Tan, Donald, additional, Tauber, Joseph, additional, Terry, Mark A, additional, Tessler, Howard H, additional, Torrabadella, Marta, additional, Traboulsi, Elias I, additional, Trattler, William B, additional, Tsai, Julie H, additional, Tse, David T, additional, Tu, Elmer Y, additional, Ursea, Roxana, additional, Vaddavalli, Pravin K, additional, Van Meter, Woodford S, additional, Varley, Gary A, additional, Vasaiwala, Roshni, additional, Verachtert, Anthony J, additional, Verdier, David D, additional, Vieira, Ana Carolina, additional, Virasch, Vanee V, additional, Wang, Li, additional, Waring, George O, additional, Warner, Michael A, additional, Warrian, Kevin J, additional, Webster, Guy F, additional, Weikert, Mitchell P, additional, Weisenthal, Robert W, additional, Weiss, Jayne S, additional, Wichiensin, Pongmas, additional, Wilhelmus, Kirk R, additional, Wilson, Steven E, additional, Woodward, Maria A, additional, Yee, Richard W, additional, and Yoo, Sonya, additional
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Postoperative Endothelial Cell Density Is Associated with Late Endothelial Graft Failure after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.
- Author
-
Patel SV, Lass JH, Benetz BA, Szczotka-Flynn LB, Cohen NJ, Ayala AR, Maguire MG, Drury DC, Dunn SP, Jeng BH, Jones MF, Menegay HJ, Oliva MS, Rosenwasser GOD, Seedor JA, Terry MA, and Verdier DD
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cohort Studies, Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss etiology, Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty methods, Endothelium, Corneal pathology, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Proportional Hazards Models, Corneal Edema surgery, Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss pathology, Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty adverse effects, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy surgery, Graft Rejection pathology, Pseudophakia surgery
- Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether preoperative endothelial cell density (ECD) and postoperative ECD after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) are associated with late endothelial graft failure (LEGF) in the Cornea Preservation Time Study (CPTS)., Design: Cohort study within a multicenter, randomized clinical trial., Participants: A total of 1007 individuals (1223 study eyes), mean age 70 years, undergoing DSAEK for Fuchs' dystrophy (94% of eyes) or pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema (PACE) (6% of eyes) and followed for up to 5 years., Methods: Central ECD was determined by a central image analysis reading center. Preoperative ECD was determined for 1209 eyes that did not fail and 14 eyes that experienced LEGF. The ECD at 6 and 12 months after DSAEK, the change in ECD from preoperative to 6 and 12 months, surgeon-reported operative complications, and postoperative graft dislocation were investigated for an association with LEGFs unrelated to other postoperative events. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess associations., Main Outcome Measures: Late endothelial graft failure and its associations with pre- and postoperative ECD and operative complications., Results: The cumulative probability of LEGF was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8%-2.4%). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) preoperative ECDs were similar for eyes with LEGF (2523; 2367-3161) cells/mm
2 ) and eyes without failure (2727; 2508-2973) cells/mm2 ) (P = 0.34). The ECD at 6 months was associated with LEGF (P < 0.001) in time-to-event analyses, whereas preoperative ECD was not (P = 0.55). The cumulative incidence (95% CI) of LEGF was 6.5% (3.0%, 14.0%) for 97 grafts with a 6-month ECD less than 1200 cells/mm2 , 0.3% (0.0%, 2.4%) for 310 grafts with a 6-month ECD between 1200 and 2000 cells/mm2 , and 0.6% (0.1%, 2.7%) for 589 grafts with a 6-month ECD greater than 2000 cells/mm2 . In multivariable analyses, ECD at 6 months and operative complications were both associated with LEGF (P = 0.002 and P = 0.01, respectively), whereas graft dislocation was not (P = 0.61)., Conclusions: In eyes undergoing DSAEK, preoperative ECD is unrelated to LEGF, whereas lower ECD at 6 months is associated with LEGF. Early endothelial cell loss after DSAEK and intraoperative complications should be minimized to improve graft survival., (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated with Graft Success in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.
- Author
-
Terry MA, Aldave AJ, Szczotka-Flynn LB, Liang W, Ayala AR, Maguire MG, Croasdale C, Daoud YJ, Dunn SP, Hoover CK, Macsai MS, Mauger TF, Pramanik S, Rosenwasser GOD, Rose-Nussbaumer J, Stulting RD, Sugar A, Tu EY, Verdier DD, Yoo SH, and Lass JH
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Cell Count, Cohort Studies, Corneal Edema physiopathology, Double-Blind Method, Endothelium, Corneal cytology, Eye Banks, Female, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy physiopathology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Period, Time Factors, Time and Motion Studies, Visual Acuity physiology, Corneal Edema surgery, Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty methods, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy surgery, Graft Survival physiology, Organ Preservation, Tissue Donors, Transplant Recipients
- Abstract
Purpose: To associate donor, recipient, and operative factors with graft success 3 years after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in the Cornea Preservation Time Study (CPTS)., Design: Cohort study within a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial., Participants: One thousand ninety individuals (1330 study eyes) with a median age of 70 years undergoing DSAEK for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (94% of eyes) or pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema (PACE; 6% of eyes)., Methods: Eyes undergoing DSAEK were randomized to receive a donor cornea with preservation time (PT) of 0 to 7 days (n = 675) or 8 to 14 days (n = 655). Donor, recipient, and operative parameters were recorded prospectively. Graft failure was defined as regraft for any reason, a graft that failed to clear by 8 weeks after surgery, or an initially clear graft that became and remained cloudy for 90 days. Failure in the first 8 weeks was classified further as primary donor failure or early failure, in the absence or presence of operative complications, respectively. Proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 99% confidence intervals (CIs) for graft failure., Main Outcome Measures: Graft success at 3 years., Results: One thousand two hundred fifty-one of 1330 grafts (94%) remained clear at 3 years and were considered successful. After adjusting for PT, tissue from donors with diabetes (RR, 2.35; 99% CI, 1.03-5.33) and operative complications (RR, 4.21; 99% CI, 1.42-12.47) were associated with increased risk for primary or early failure. Preoperative diagnosis of PACE (RR, 3.59; 99% CI, 1.05-12.24) was associated with increased risk for late failure by 3 years after surgery compared with Fuchs dystrophy. Graft success showed little variation among other factors evaluated, including donor age (RR, 1.19 per decade; 99% CI, 0.91-1.56 per decade), preoperative donor endothelial cell density (RR, 1.10 per 500 cells; 99% CI, 0.74-1.63 per 500 cells), graft diameter (RR, 1.22 per 1 mm; 99% CI, 0.39-3.76 per 1 mm), and injector use for graft insertion (RR, 0.92; 99% CI, 0.40-2.10)., Conclusions: Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty success in the early and entire postoperative period is more likely when the donor did not have diabetes and was without operative complications and in the long-term postoperative period in recipients with Fuchs dystrophy compared with those with PACE. Mechanisms whereby diabetic donors and PACE recipients reduce the rate of graft success after DSAEK warrant further study., (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Donor age and factors related to endothelial cell loss 10 years after penetrating keratoplasty: Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study.
- Author
-
Lass JH, Benetz BA, Gal RL, Kollman C, Raghinaru D, Dontchev M, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, Chow C, McCoy K, Price FW Jr, Sugar A, Verdier DD, and Beck RW
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cell Count, Child, Corneal Edema physiopathology, Corneal Edema surgery, Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss diagnosis, Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss physiopathology, Double-Blind Method, Endothelium, Corneal pathology, Eye Banks, Female, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy physiopathology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Young Adult, Aging pathology, Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss etiology, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy surgery, Graft Survival physiology, Keratoplasty, Penetrating, Postoperative Complications, Tissue Donors
- Abstract
Objective: To examine the effect of donor age and other perioperative factors on long-term endothelial cell loss after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP)., Design: Multicenter, prospective, double-masked clinical trial., Participants: We included 176 participants from the Cornea Donor Study cohort who had not experienced graft failure ≥ 10 years after PKP for a moderate risk condition (principally Fuchs' dystrophy or pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema)., Methods: Corneas from donors 12 to 75 years old were assigned to participants using a randomized approach, without respect to recipient factors. Surgery and postoperative care were performed according to the surgeons' usual routines. Images of the central endothelium were obtained preoperatively and at intervals for 10 years postoperatively. Images were analyzed by a central image analysis reading center to determine endothelial cell density (ECD)., Main Outcome Measures: Endothelial cell density at 10 years., Results: Among study participants with a clear graft at 10 years, the 125 who received a cornea from a donor 12 to 65 years old experienced a median cell loss of 76%, resulting in a 10-year median ECD of 628 cells/mm(2) (interquartile range [IQR], 522-850 cells/mm(2)), whereas the 51 who received a cornea from a donor 66 to 75 years old experienced a cell loss of 79%, resulting in a median 10-year ECD of 550 cells/mm(2) (IQR, 483-694 cells/mm(2); P adjusted for baseline ECD = 0.03). In addition to younger donor age, higher ECD values were significantly associated with higher baseline ECD (P<0.001) and larger donor tissue size (P<0.001). Forty-two of the 176 participants (24%) had an ECD of <500 cells/mm(2) at 10 years and only 24 (14%) had an ECD of >1000 cells/mm(2)., Conclusions: Substantial cell loss occurs in eyes with a clear graft 10 years after PKP, with the rate of cell loss being slightly greater with older donor age. Greater preoperative ECD and larger donor tissue size are associated with higher ECD at 10 years., (Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. The effect of donor age on penetrating keratoplasty for endothelial disease: graft survival after 10 years in the Cornea Donor Study.
- Author
-
Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, Gal RL, Dontchev M, Kollman C, Raghinaru D, Dunn SP, Schultze RL, Verdier DD, Lass JH, Raber IM, Sugar J, Gorovoy MS, Sugar A, Stulting RD, Montoya MM, Penta JG, Benetz BA, and Beck RW
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Child, Corneal Edema physiopathology, Corneal Edema surgery, Double-Blind Method, Eye Banks, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy physiopathology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Registries, Young Adult, Aging physiology, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy surgery, Graft Survival physiology, Keratoplasty, Penetrating, Tissue Donors
- Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the 10-year success rate of penetrating keratoplasty for corneal endothelial disorders is associated with donor age., Design: Multicenter, prospective, double-masked clinical trial., Participants: A total of 1090 participants undergoing penetrating keratoplasty at 80 sites for Fuchs' dystrophy (62%), pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema (34%), or another corneal endothelial disorder (4%) and followed for up to 12 years., Methods: Forty-three eye banks provided corneas from donors aged 12 to 75 years, using a randomized approach to assign donor corneas to study participants without respect to recipient factors. Surgery and postoperative care were performed according to the surgeons' usual routines., Main Outcome Measures: Graft failure defined as a regraft or, in the absence of a regraft, a cloudy cornea that was sufficiently opaque to compromise vision for 3 consecutive months., Results: In the primary analysis, the 10-year success rate was 77% for 707 corneas from donors aged 12 to 65 years compared with 71% for 383 donors aged 66 to 75 years (difference, +6%; 95% confidence interval, -1 to +12; P = 0.11). When analyzed as a continuous variable, higher donor age was associated with lower graft success beyond the first 5 years (P<0.001). Exploring this association further, we observed that the 10-year success rate was relatively constant for donors aged 34 to 71 years (75%). The success rate was higher for 80 donors aged 12 to 33 years (96%) and lower for 130 donors aged 72 to 75 years (62%). The relative decrease in the success rate with donor ages 72 to 75 years was not observed until after year 6., Conclusions: Although the primary analysis did not show a significant difference in 10-year success rates comparing donor ages 12 to 65 years and 66 to 75 years, there was evidence of a donor age effect at the extremes of the age range. Because we observed a fairly constant 10-year success rate for donors aged 34 to 71 years, which account for approximately 75% of corneas in the United States available for transplant, the Cornea Donor Study results indicate that donor age is not an important factor in most penetrating keratoplasties for endothelial disease., (Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Donor age and corneal endothelial cell loss 5 years after successful corneal transplantation. Specular microscopy ancillary study results.
- Author
-
Lass JH, Gal RL, Dontchev M, Beck RW, Kollman C, Dunn SP, Heck E, Holland EJ, Mannis MJ, Montoya MM, Schultze RL, Stulting RD, Sugar A, Sugar J, Tennant B, and Verdier DD
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cell Count, Child, Corneal Edema etiology, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Period, Prospective Studies, Pseudophakia complications, Age Factors, Corneal Edema surgery, Corneal Transplantation, Endothelium, Corneal pathology, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy surgery, Tissue Donors
- Abstract
Objective: To determine whether endothelial cell loss 5 years after successful corneal transplantation is related to the age of the donor., Design: Multicenter, prospective, double-masked clinical trial., Participants: Three hundred forty-seven subjects participating in the Cornea Donor Study who had not experienced graft failure 5 years after corneal transplantation for a moderate-risk condition (principally Fuchs' dystrophy or pseudophakic corneal edema)., Testing: Specular microscopic images of donor corneas obtained before surgery and postoperatively at 6 months, 12 months, and then annually through 5 years were submitted to a central reading center to measure endothelial cell density (ECD)., Main Outcome Measure: Endothelial cell density at 5 years., Results: At 5 years, there was a substantial decrease in ECD from baseline for all donor ages. Subjects who received a cornea from a donor 12 to 65 years old experienced a median cell loss of 69% in the study eye, resulting in a 5-year median ECD of 824 cells/mm(2) (interquartile range, 613-1342), whereas subjects who received a cornea from a donor 66 to 75 years old experienced a cell loss of 75%, resulting in a median 5-year ECD of 654 cells/mm(2) (interquartile range, 538-986) (P [adjusted for baseline ECD] = 0.04). Statistically, there was a weak negative association between ECD and donor age analyzed as a continuous variable (r [adjusted for baseline ECD] = -0.19; 95% confidence interval, -0.29 to -0.08)., Conclusions: Endothelial cell loss is substantial in the 5 years after corneal transplantation. There is a slight association between cell loss and donor age. This finding emphasizes the importance of longer-term follow-up of this cohort to determine if this relationship affects graft survival.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. The effect of donor age on corneal transplantation outcome results of the cornea donor study.
- Author
-
gal RL, Dontchev M, Beck RW, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, Kollman C, Dunn SP, Heck EL, Lass JH, Montoya MM, Schultze RL, Stulting RD, Sugar A, Sugar J, Tennant B, and Verdier DD
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Corneal Edema etiology, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pseudophakia complications, Treatment Outcome, Age Factors, Corneal Edema surgery, Corneal Transplantation, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy surgery, Graft Survival, Tissue Donors
- Abstract
Objective: To determine whether graft survival over a 5-year follow-up period using corneal tissue from donors older than 65 is similar to graft survival using corneas from younger donors., Design: Multicenter prospective, double-masked, controlled clinical trial., Participants: One thousand ninety subjects undergoing corneal transplantation for a moderate-risk condition (principally Fuchs' dystrophy or pseudophakic corneal edema); 11 subjects with ineligible diagnoses were not included., Methods: Forty-three participating eye banks provided corneas from donors in the age range of 12 to 75 with endothelial cell densities of 2300 to 3300 cells/mm(2), using a random approach without respect to recipient factors. The 105 participating surgeons at 80 sites were masked to information about the donor cornea including donor age. Surgery and postoperative care were performed according to the surgeons' usual routines. Subjects were observed for 5 years., Main Outcome Measures: Graft failure, defined as a regraft or a cloudy cornea that was sufficiently opaque as to compromise vision for a minimum of 3 consecutive months., Results: The 5-year cumulative probability of graft survival was 86% in both the <66.0 donor age group and the >/=66.0 donor age group (difference = 0%, upper limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval = 4%). In a statistical model with donor age as a continuous variable, there was no significant relationship between donor age and outcome (P = 0.11). Three graft failures were due to primary donor failure, 8 to uncorrectable refractive error, 48 to graft rejection, 46 to endothelial decompensation (23 of which had a prior, resolved episode of probable or definite graft rejection), and 30 to other causes. Distributions of the causes of graft failure did not differ between donor age groups., Conclusions: Five-year graft survivals for cornea transplants at moderate risk for failure are similar using corneas from donors >/= 66.0 years and donors < 66.0. Surgeons and patients now have evidence that corneas comparable in quality to those used in this study from donors through age 75 are suitable for transplantation.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.