Search

Recurrent patellar dislocation is most commonly treated with an isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using autograft tissue. Harvest and fixation of these grafts have some theoretical disadvantages. With this Technical Note, we aim to describe a simple reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using high-strength suture tape with a soft-tissue fixation on the patellar side and an interference screw fixation on the femoral side, avoiding some of these possible disadvantages., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed (ACLR) athletes show increased hamstrings activation and decreased knee flexion moments (KFMs) during single leg landing tasks at time of return-to-sport (RTS). Although these landing alterations seem protective in the short term, they might become undesirable if they persist after RTS. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to investigate whether those landing alterations persist in the months following RTS., Methods: Sixteen athletes who had an ACLR performed five unilateral landing tasks at three different time points (at RTS, and at 3 and 6 months after RTS) while KFMs and hamstrings activation were recorded. The following clinical parameters were registered: isokinetic strength of quadriceps and hamstrings, ACL return-to-sport after injury scale (ACL-RSI), Tampa scale of kinesiophobia, self-reported instability and single leg hop distance. A one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess whether landing deficits changed over time. Additionally, an explorative analysis was performed to assess whether those athletes whose deficits persisted the most could be identified based on baseline clinical parameters., Results: The ANOVA showed no differences in landing deficits between sessions, indicating persisting reduced KFMs and increased hamstrings activation in the injured leg compared with the contralateral leg. A significant improvement of the quadriceps concentric strength (at 120°/s), ACL-RSI score and jump distance of the single leg hop was found over time., Conclusions: Landing alterations were not resolved 6 months after RTS. Additional interventions may be needed to normalize landing alterations prior to return to sport., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains the gold standard for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. The prevalence of stiffness after this procedure described in literature varies from 1.3% to 5.3%. The causes of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty are multifactorial. Revision TKA is a successful procedure when performed for loosening, instability, mechanical implant failure, or infection. The results of revision TKA for idiopathic arthrofibrosis and stiffening are however less favorable., Purpose: It has been the authors' impression that the poor results in arthrofibrosis could be in part related to the use of traditional PS or CCK-type revision implants. Our hypothesis is that better results can be achieved in case a rotating hinge design (RHK) is used. The reason could be that RHK designs allow for much more aggressive capsuloligament debridement and therefore more adequate fibrosis removal, while securing optimal implant stability, tibiofemoral rotational freedom, and flexion-extension space stability. The purpose of our study was to investigate in our database whether this hypothesis is correct., Methods: Retrospectively, 40 patients with the defined range of knee motion were identified. Patients with underlying mechanical malalignment, component malposition, soft-tissue imbalance or infections were excluded. Twenty-two patients received a hinged-type prosthetic device (18 Zimmer RHK, four Stryker RHK) and 18 patients received a less constrained condylar type prosthetic device (17 Legion CCK, one Vanguard CCK)., Results: Preoperative data were similar for RHK as CCK-type implants except for knee pain score, which was significantly worse for the RHK group (36 vs 44, p = 0.049). At two years of follow-up, compared to CCK, the RHK group demonstrated significantly better postoperative results for knee function scores (68.9 vs 54.2, p = 0.0015), knee function improvement (22.8 vs 4.8, p = 0.0015), knee pain improvement (26.4 vs 9.4, p = 0.0050), greater maximal flexion (99.9° vs 81.4°, p = 0.0005), better maximal extension (-1.9° vs -6.2°, p = 0.0447), greater flexion gain (35.8° vs 14.2°, p = 0.0002), and greater extension gain (8.6° vs 2.0°, p = 0.0083)., Conclusion: Our data show that revision arthroplasty of the stiff knee using a rotating hinged device can provide excellent results in selected cases. To date, this is the first study to describe the difference in outcome between revision total knee arthroplasty for idiopathic arthrofibrosis using a hinged or a constrained condylar knee device., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The purpose of this paper was to document the incidence of leg length changes after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and its effect on clinical outcome., Methods: Leg length difference (LLD) was prospectively measured in 85 patients using digital standing full leg radiography before and after revision TKA. Additionally the patient's subjective perception of LLD was assessed postoperatively. Linear regression models were used to study the correlation between each of these parameters and the clinical outcome after 1 year. Clinical outcome was evaluated by means of the Knee Society Score (KSS)., Results: Revision TKA resulted on average in an increased leg length of 5.3 mm. Sixty-five legs (76%) were lengthened with the procedure, 17 (20%) were shortened and three (4%) remained of identical length. Increased leg length after revision was positively correlated with clinical outcome at 3 months (Spearman r=0.22, p=0.044) and 1 year (Spearman r=0.26, p=0.027). The evidence for this correlation remained after correction for age, gender and diagnosis (p=0.012). The most important contributors to improved clinical outcome scores were improved pain score (Spearman r=0.19, p=0.09) and increased stability (Spearman r=0.13, p=0.24), rather than range of motion (Spearman r=-0.02, p=0.85)., Conclusions: The results from our work indicate that revision TKA tends to lengthen the leg by approximately 5mm. Contrary to what might be expected, leg lengthening after revision TKA is correlated with improved clinical outcome., Level of Evidence: Level 2b., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

A consecutive series of 115 cementless Profix (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, USA) Total Knee Arthroplasties performed in 113 patients were followed in order to determine the functional results and survivorship at 8 to 10 years. All patients were included in a prospective database and were reviewed annually until final follow-up. Patients overall satisfaction was excellent or good in 91.3% of cases. The mean Knee Society's knee and function scores increased respectively from 49.3 and 36.7 preoperatively to 93.1 and 82.2 postoperatively. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of implant survival at 10 years was 97.1%. Two patients underwent revision and were considered as failures. One patient had a fracture of the medial condyle at 4 days post-surgery, and the other was revised for aseptic loosening of the tibial component at 6 years post-surgery. On the basis of this long-term follow-up study, we can conclude that the Profix Total Knee System is effective and safe.

The aim of this study was to measure and compare the ultimate failure strengths and cyclic fatigue strengths of currently available meniscal suturing devices. No statistically significant difference in failure load was found between a vertical loop suture (mean 46.3 N), a horizontal mattress suture (52.5 N), the T-fix Device (47.5 N), and the 16-mm (39.2 N) and 13-mm (32.8 N) Bionix Arrow. Statistically inferior results were seen with the 10-mm Bionix Arrow (18.8 N), the S.D. Sorb Stapler (4.3 N), and the 12-mm Arthrex Meniscal Dart (10.5 N) (P<0.01). The Mitek Meniscal Repair System (28.1 N) performed intermediate, with significantly better results than the S.D. Sorb Stapler and the 12-mm Arthrex Dart, but significantly worse than the vertical and horizontal sutures, the T-fix and Bionix 16-mm Device (P<0.01). Cyclic fatigue strength was significantly less for the 10-mm Bionix Arrow, the S.D. Sorb Stapler, and the 12-mm Arthrex Meniscal Dart (P<0.01) compared to all other devices. We conclude that the 13- and 16-mm Bionix Arrow and the T-fix Device have comparable ultimate failure strengths and cyclic fatigue strengths to conventional meniscal suturing techniques. The 10-mm Bionix Arrow, S.D. Sorb Stapler, and the 12-mm Arthrex Meniscal Dart, however, have far inferior failure and cyclic fatigue strengths and their clinical application should be questioned.