Search

Background and Aims: Utilising real-world data, we quantified the burden of cardiovascular risk factors and long-term residual risk of atherothrombotic events among routine care cohorts with coronary (CAD) or peripheral (PAD) artery disease or ischemic stroke (IS) on guideline-recommended antiplatelet monotherapy (APMT)., Methods: Retrospective cohort study using data (2010-2020) from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics, including adults with CAD, PAD or IS who were first prescribed APMT (CAD/IS: aspirin; PAD: clopidogrel). Primary outcomes (recurrent events): major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for CAD/PAD/IS cohorts, major adverse limb events (MALE) for PAD., Results: 266,478 CAD, 13,162 PAD, and 14,788 IS patients were included (mean age: 71 years; women 37.7%-47.5 %). Risk factor burden was high and attainment of recommended goals was low. There were 73,691, 3,121 and 7,137 MACE among CAD, PAD and IS patients, respectively (median follow-up: 89.9, 42.4 and 75.9 months, respectively), and 4,767 MALE among PAD patients. MACE incidence rate per 1000 person-years was higher in IS (268.7; 95%CI 265.3-272.0) than CAD (92.9; 95%CI 92.5-93.4) or PAD cohorts (97.2; 95%CI 94.6-99.8). MALE incidence rate was 195.9 (95%CI 192.2-199.6) per 1000 person-years. IS patients presented a lower rate of hospitalisations and longer time-to-first hospitalisation, but once hospitalised, they had a longer length-of-stay. PAD patients had the highest hospitalisation rate., Conclusions: Among a contemporary cohort with cardiovascular disease on APMT, long-term residual atherothrombotic risk remains high despite being on APMT. Greater attention to risk factor control and use of appropriate evidence-based therapy is required to reduce residual risk among this very high-risk population., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: AJVV: personal fees for consulting from Bayer, during the conduct of the study; current or past participation in research grants to Imperial College London from Pfizer, Amgen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi-Aventis, Daiichi Sankyo, and Regeneron, outside the submitted work; and personal fees for consulting from Regeneron and honoraria for lectures from Amgen, Mylan, Akcea, and Ferrer, outside the submitted work. KID: personal fees for consulting from Bayer, during the conduct of the study; grants from Pfizer, Amgen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi-Aventis, Daiichi Sankyo, and Regeneron, outside the submitted study; and personal fees from Regeneron, outside the submitted work. NN,CCand STF:Bayer plc employees. MJF,ETand CL: none to report. KKR: personal fees for consulting from Bayer, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Aegerion, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Pfizer, and Sanofi/Regeneron, and personal fees from Abbvie, Akcea, Algorithm, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cerenis Therapeutcics, Cipla, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Esperion, Kowa, Lilly, Novartis, Silence Therapeutics, Takeda, and Zuellig Pharma, outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare inherited disorder resulting in extremely elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Current guidance about its management and prognosis stems from small studies, mostly from high-income countries. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and genetic characteristics, as well as the impact, of current practice on health outcomes of HoFH patients globally., Methods: The HoFH International Clinical Collaborators registry collected data on patients with a clinical, or genetic, or both, diagnosis of HoFH using a retrospective cohort study design. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04815005., Findings: Overall, 751 patients from 38 countries were included, with 565 (75%) reporting biallelic pathogenic variants. The median age of diagnosis was 12·0 years (IQR 5·5-27·0) years. Of the 751 patients, 389 (52%) were female and 362 (48%) were male. Race was reported for 527 patients; 338 (64%) patients were White, 121 (23%) were Asian, and 68 (13%) were Black or mixed race. The major manifestations of ASCVD or aortic stenosis were already present in 65 (9%) of patients at diagnosis of HoFH. Globally, pretreatment LDL cholesterol levels were 14·7 mmol/L (IQR 11·6-18·4). Among patients with detailed therapeutic information, 491 (92%) of 534 received statins, 342 (64%) of 534 received ezetimibe, and 243 (39%) of 621 received lipoprotein apheresis. On-treatment LDL cholesterol levels were lower in high-income countries (3·93 mmol/L, IQR 2·6-5·8) versus non-high-income countries (9·3 mmol/L, 6·7-12·7), with greater use of three or more lipid-lowering therapies (LLT; high-income 66% vs non-high-income 24%) and consequently more patients attaining guideline-recommended LDL cholesterol goals (high-income 21% vs non-high-income 3%). A first major adverse cardiovascular event occurred a decade earlier in non-high-income countries, at a median age of 24·5 years (IQR 17·0-34·5) versus 37·0 years (29·0-49·0) in high-income countries (adjusted hazard ratio 1·64, 95% CI 1·13-2·38)., Interpretation: Worldwide, patients with HoFH are diagnosed too late, undertreated, and at high premature ASCVD risk. Greater use of multi-LLT regimens is associated with lower LDL cholesterol levels and better outcomes. Significant global disparities exist in treatment regimens, control of LDL cholesterol levels, and cardiovascular event-free survival, which demands a critical re-evaluation of global health policy to reduce inequalities and improve outcomes for all patients with HoFH., Funding: Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location Academic Medical Center; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; and European Atherosclerosis Society., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SB declares no competing interests. DJB reports research grants from Amgen, Amryt, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, and Regeneron; lecture fees and personal fees from Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis and Novartis; participation in advisory board for Amryt (Chair of the LOWER study steering committee); and being member of the executive committee of the Lipid and Atherosclerosis Society of South Africa. MC reports institutional support for the conduction of clinical trials from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Akcea, and Regenxbio; consulting fees from Amryt Pharma; and support from NIH/NHLBI grant (P01HL059407). TF reports personal fees from Novartis, Sanofi, and Amgen; and that he was partly supported by the Ministry of Health, Czech Republic, grant number NU20-02-00261. MH-S reports research grants from Recordati and Kaneka; personal fees from Amgen, Astellas, Recordati, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Sanofi; being on the advisory board for New Amsterdam Pharma and Medicine Company and Scilence Therapeutics; being chairperson Primary Hyperlipidemia, Research on Measures against Intractable Diseases by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare; being chairperson of the Working Group by Japan Atherosclerosis Society for Making Guidance of Familial Hypercholesterolemia; and owning stock options of Liid Pharma. MLH reports lecture fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work. GKH reports research grants from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (vidi 016.156.445), CardioVascular Research Initiative, EU, and the Klinkerpad fonds; institutional research support from Aegerion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Ionis, Kowa, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, and The Medicines Company; speaker's bureau and consulting fees from Amgen, Aegerion, Sanofi, and Regeneron until April 2019 (fees paid to the academic institution); and part-time employment at Novo Nordisk, Denmark since April, 2019. FJR reports consulting fees, lecturing fees, and advisory board fees from Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Regeneron, Novartis and Lib Therapeutics outside the submitted work; and being member of the International Atherosclerosis Society. KKR reports institutional research grants from Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi Sankyo, Regeneron, and Pfizer; consulting fees and lecturing fees from Amgen, Sanofi, Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Kowa, Silence Therapeutics, New Amsterdam, Esperion, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Abbott, Resverlogix, Medicines Company, Eli Lilly, Algorithm, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, AbbVie, and Viatris, outside the submitted work. HS reports research grants from Amgen, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Synageva, Amryt, Alexion, and Akcea; consulting fees from Amgen, Alexion, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, and Akcea; and speaker fees from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, and Akcea. TRT declares no competing interests. AJV-V reports participation in research grants to Imperial College London or European Atherosclerosis Society, or both, from Pfizer, Amgen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi-Aventis, Daiichi Sankyo, and Regeneron; personal fees for consulting from Bayer and Regeneron; and honoraria for lectures from Amgen, Mylan, and Akcea; outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: We aimed to assess the prevalence of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) and to determine the incidence of cardiovascular events during a 10-year follow up in individuals with FH, compared to unaffected individuals in a working, middle-aged/young population., Methods and Results: 576,724 active workers (36 ± 10 years-old, 70% men) without cardiovascular disease were given regular health check-ups and followed for a median of 8.5 years (i.e., 4,123,927 person-years). The FH phenotype was defined according to validated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol thresholds, adjusted for age and sex. The primary outcome was a first cardiovascular event, whether fatal or non-fatal. We found that 707 workers (0.12% or 1 in 816 individuals) met the criteria for a heterozygous FH phenotype. During the follow-up, cardiovascular events occurred in 23 of 707 (3.25%) subjects with the FH phenotype and in 3297 of 576,017 (0.57%) subjects without the FH phenotype (p<0.001). The hazard ratio (HR, assessed with a Cox regression model) for the primary outcome was 5.7 (99% CI 3.33-9.78), before adjustments, and 4.7 (99% CI 2.62-8.58) after adjusting for sex, age, smoking, blood pressure, and diabetes. The HRs were significant for both men and women, but the magnitude of the effect was greater for men than for women., Conclusions: Our findings confirmed the high incidence of cardiovascular disease in individuals with untreated FH. We showed that regular health check-ups in an active, and mostly young, working population could contribute to the early identification of FH. Therefore, this approach may provide an opportunity for early treatment., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Several medications targeting PCSK9 reduce LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). We aimed to assess in patients diagnosed clinically as HeFH, whether LDL-C reduction varied by different therapeutic approaches to PCSK9-targeting or by the underlying genetic variant., Methods: We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials assessing PCSK9-targeting therapies, namely alirocumab, evolocumab and inclisiran, in patients with clinically diagnosed HeFH and restricted analyses to those patients in whom genotypic data were available. A search of MEDLINE and Embase identified eligible trials published between inception and June 29, 2020. We included trials of sufficient duration to allow for a stable treatment effect: ~12 weeks for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (alirocumab, evolocumab) and ~1 year for small interfering RNA (siRNA) (inclisiran). Single-moderator meta-regression comparing mean percentage LDL-C reduction between mAbs and siRNA as well as PCSK9-targeting therapies between different genotypes was used to assess heterogeneity., Results: Eight trials of HeFH met our inclusion criteria, including 1887 genotyped patients. Among monogenic HeFH cases (N = 1347) the LDL-C reduction from baseline was 46.12% (95%CI 48.4-43.9) for siRNA and 50.4% (59.3-41.4) for mAbs compared to control, without evidence of significant heterogeneity between treatment (Q M  = 0.32, df = 1, p = 0.57). Irrespective of therapeutic approach to PCSK9-targeting, reductions in LDL-C were generally consistent across genetic variants (LDL-Receptor variants, LDL-Receptor variants of unknown significance, Apolipoprotein B variants, two variants and no variant) (Q M  = 8.3, df = 4, p = 0.08)., Conclusions: Among patients with HeFH, the LDL-C-lowering effect of PCSK9-targeting medications did not show statistical heterogeneity across different drug-classes and across genetic variants., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Trial evidence for the benefits of cholesterol-lowering is limited for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients, since they have not been the focus of large outcome trials. We assess statin use in coronary artery disease (CAD) subjects with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥4.9 mmol/L with or without an FH phenotype., Methods: The 4S trial randomized hypercholesterolemic CAD patients to simvastatin or placebo. We first stratified participants into baseline LDL-C <4.9 and ≥ 4.9 mmol/L; next, based on the DLCN criteria for FH, the latter group was stratified into four subgroups by presence of none, one or both of "premature CAD" and "family history of CAD". Participants having both are defined as having an FH phenotype., Results: 2267 and 2164 participants had LDL-C <4.9 and ≥ 4.9 mmol/L, respectively. Mortality endpoints and major coronary events (MCE) were significantly reduced with simvastatin versus placebo in both groups over 5.4 years, but the latter derived greater absolute risk reductions (ARR) (4.1-4.3% for mortality endpoints, versus 2.5-2.8%). LDL-C reductions were similar among the 4 subgroups with levels ≥4.9 mmol/L. Participants with FH phenotype (n = 152) appeared to derive greater relative benefits with simvastatin than the other three subgroups (all-cause death: 84% relative risk reduction, p = 0.046; MCE: 55% reduction, p = 0.0297); statistical interaction was non-significant. Participants with FH phenotype derived greater ARR than any other group with simvastatin versus placebo (all-cause mortality: 6.6% ARR; MCE 13.2%; versus 3.8% and 8.3%, respectively, among participants with LDL-C ≥4.9 mmol/L but without features suggestive of FH)., Conclusions: The FH phenotype appeared to be associated with greater clinical benefits from a given magnitude of LDL-C reduction as compared to individuals without FH phenotype., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Guidelines recommend high-intensity statins for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Subgroups with comorbidities that increase cardiovascular risk, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD) or polyvascular disease (PoVD), may derive greater absolute benefit from addition of non-statin therapies. We assessed the relationship between lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) risk reduction during alirocumab phase III ODYSSEY trials among these subgroups., Methods: Patient data were pooled from nine trials comparing alirocumab with control (placebo/ezetimibe), predominantly on background maximally tolerated statin. Patients with baseline ASCVD were stratified into subgroups with DM, CKD or PoVD, or without comorbidities, and between-group relative and absolute benefits were compared., Results: Among 3505 patients with ASCVD, 1573 had no comorbidities, 981 had DM, 660 had CKD and 943 had PoVD, with overlap between comorbidities; mean baseline LDL-C levels were 119 (ASCVD overall), 123, 117, 114 and 113 mg/dL, respectively. Overall, each 39 mg/dL lower on-study LDL-C was associated with a 25% lower MACE risk, hazard ratio 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.90, p = 0.0023), with a similar lower risk observed in each very high-risk subgroup (DM, CKD or PoVD; 30-35%) but not in the subgroup without these comorbidities (9%). Absolute benefits were greater for very high-risk subgroups; lowering LDL-C from 120 to 40 mg/dL would result in 2.76-4.35 fewer MACE/100 patient-years versus 0.3 for no comorbidities., Conclusions: Among patients with ASCVD and mean baseline LDL-C >100 mg/dL, patients with DM, CKD or PoVD appeared to derive greater absolute cardiovascular benefits from further LDL-C reduction than those without., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are considered a causal factor for cardiovascular disease. In phase 3 ODYSSEY trials, alirocumab reduced levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and Lp(a), with concomitant reductions in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We assessed whether lower on-study and greater percentage reductions in Lp(a) are associated with a lower risk of MACE., Methods: Post-hoc analysis of data pooled from 10 phase 3 ODYSSEY trials comparing alirocumab with control (placebo or ezetimibe) in patients (n = 4983) with cardiovascular disease and/or risk factors, and hypercholesterolemia despite statin/other lipid-lowering therapies., Results: Median (Q1, Q3) baseline Lp(a) levels were 23.5 (8.0, 67.0) mg/dL. Median Lp(a) changes from baseline with alirocumab were -25.6% vs. -2.5% with placebo (absolute reductions 6.8 vs. 0.5 mg/dL) in placebo-controlled trials, and -21.4% vs. 0.0% with ezetimibe (4.5 vs. 0.0 mg/dL) in ezetimibe-controlled trials. During follow-up (6699 patient-years), 104 patients experienced MACE. A 12% relative risk reduction in MACE per 25% reduction in Lp(a) (p=0.0254) was no longer significant after adjustment for LDL-C changes: hazard ratio per 25% reduction: 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.01; p=0.0780). In subgroup analysis, the association between Lp(a) reduction and MACE remained significant in a fully adjusted model among participants with baseline Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (p-interaction vs. Lp(a) < 50 mg/dL: 0.0549)., Conclusions: In this population, Lp(a) reductions were not significantly associated with MACE independently of LDL-C reductions. Reducing the risk of MACE by targeting Lp(a) may require greater reductions in Lp(a) with more potent therapies and/or higher initial Lp(a) levels., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Management of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) may vary across different settings due to factors related to population characteristics, practice, resources and/or policies. We conducted a survey among the worldwide network of EAS FHSC Lead Investigators to provide an overview of FH status in different countries., Methods: Lead Investigators from countries formally involved in the EAS FHSC by mid-May 2018 were invited to provide a brief report on FH status in their countries, including available information, programmes, initiatives, and management., Results: 63 countries provided reports. Data on FH prevalence are lacking in most countries. Where available, data tend to align with recent estimates, suggesting a higher frequency than that traditionally considered. Low rates of FH detection are reported across all regions. National registries and education programmes to improve FH awareness/knowledge are a recognised priority, but funding is often lacking. In most countries, diagnosis primarily relies on the Dutch Lipid Clinics Network criteria. Although available in many countries, genetic testing is not widely implemented (frequent cost issues). There are only a few national official government programmes for FH. Under-treatment is an issue. FH therapy is not universally reimbursed. PCSK9-inhibitors are available in ∼2/3 countries. Lipoprotein-apheresis is offered in ∼60% countries, although access is limited., Conclusions: FH is a recognised public health concern. Management varies widely across countries, with overall suboptimal identification and under-treatment. Efforts and initiatives to improve FH knowledge and management are underway, including development of national registries, but support, particularly from health authorities, and better funding are greatly needed., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a genetic disorder affecting the metabolism of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, leading to high LDL-cholesterol levels maintained over time and higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) early in life. Contemporary studies have challenged prior estimations of FH prevalence and suggest this condition to be more frequent than previously considered, with an overall prevalence rate of 1:200-300 individuals in the general population (1:160,000-300,000 for homozygous FH). However, prevalence of FH varies around the world. In part this is due to an artefact of approaches of detection and methods used to diagnose FH (e.g. lack of gold standard for diagnosis of FH, different criteria applied, availability of genetic testing). But also due to intrinsic characteristic of different populations, e.g. higher presence of founder effects or rates of consanguinity. Additionally, results from many regions are lacking and it is estimated that only a small percentage of subjects with FH would have been diagnosed overall. FH entails a significantly higher risk of CVD, reported to be higher than that estimated by conventional risk assessment tools for the general population. This risk is mainly driven by coronary heart disease. Despite this evidence, low rates of patients meet therapeutic targets for cardiovascular prevention, and implementation of therapy (high intensity statins, combination therapy) is needed. The introduction of novel lipid-lowering therapies may improve this situation. In the present review, we discuss the epidemiology of FH overall, with special attention to different aspects related to prevalence, cardiovascular risk and prognosis, and treatment of FH., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery reflects endothelium-dependent vasodilator function; since it correlates with coronary endothelial function, its reduction could predict cardiovascular events. Several studies have investigated the potential impact of fibrates therapy on endothelial function, but clinical findings have not been fully consistent. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials in order to clarify whether fibrate therapy could improve endothelial function. A systematic search in PubMed-Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases was performed to identify randomized placebo-controlled trials investigating the effect of fibrates on endothelial function as estimated by FMD. A random-effects model and generic inverse variance method were used for meta-analysis. Sensitivity analysis, risk of bias evaluation, and publication bias assessment were carried out using standard methods. Random-effects meta-regression was used to evaluate the impact of treatment duration on the estimated effect size. Fifteen trials with a total of 556 subjects met the eligibility criteria. Fibrate therapy significantly improves FMD (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 1.64%, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.13, p<0.001) and the result was confirmed in both subgroups with treatment durations ≤8 weeks (WMD: 1.35%, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.86, p<0.001) and >8 weeks (WMD: 2.55%, 95% CI: 1.21, 3.89, p<0.001). When the analysis was stratified according to the fibrate type, a significant effect was observed with fenofibrate but not with gemfibrozil, though difference between the two subgroups was not significant. Meta-analysis of data from trials where nitrate mediated dilation (NMD) was available did not suggest a significant change in NMD following treatment with fibrates. The results of this meta-analysis suggest that fibrates may exert beneficial effects on endothelial function, even over a short-term treatment course., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Whether adverse effect of statins on glycaemic indices is common to all statins remains controversial and as yet data for pitavastatin are limited. We sought to assess the effects of pitavastatin on glycaemia and new-onset diabetes (NOD) in non-diabetic individuals using data from RCT pooled together by means of a meta-analysis., Materials and Methods: We searched Medline, Cochrane, Embase and clinical trials registries websites until November-2014 for ≥12-week follow-up placebo or statin-controlled RCT of pitavastatin that included participants without diabetes and reported on fasting blood glucose (FBG), HbA1c or NOD. We additionally sought studies by consulting with Kowa Ph. Ltd. The association of pitavastatin with the outcomes were estimated by random-effects meta-analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I(2) statistic and sensitivity and subgroup analyses, and publication bias with funnel plots and Egger and Harbord Tests., Results: 15 studies (approx. 1600 person-years) were included. No significant differences associated with pitavastatin (vs. control) were observed for FBG (MD -0.01 mg/dL [95%CI -0.77, 0.74], I(2) = 0%), HbA1c (MD -0.03% [95%CI -0.11, 0.05], I(2) = 43%) or NOD (RR 0.70 [95%CI 0.30, 1.61]; RD 0.0 [95%CI -0.004, 0.003]; I(2) = 0%). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses (including type of control [placebo or other statin], pitavastatin dose or follow-up] did not yield significant results. Potential publication bias may occur for NOD., Conclusions: In the present meta-analysis pitavastatin did not adversely affect glucose metabolism or diabetes development compared with placebo or other statins., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Non-HDL cholesterol represents the pro-atherogenic, apo-B-containing lipoprotein fraction of circulating lipids, and represents a secondary target for CVD prevention in people with diabetes. We therefore assessed the proportion of individuals with diabetes and CVD who attain a non-HDL-C goal of <2.6 mmol/L, the extent to which triglycerides influence this goal attainment, and their relationship with HDL-C and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL)., Methods and Results: Of 2674 diabetic subjects with baseline CVD in the Hungarian MULTI-GAP programme (mean age 64.8 years, mean HbA1c 7.2%), an LDL-C goal <1.8 and non-HDL-C goal <2.6 mmol/L was attained in 13.5% and 17.7% individuals, respectively. Non-HDL-C goal attainment declined at higher triglyceride concentrations; and graphically this relationship appeared to be continuously and inversely associated with triglyceride concentrations. In contrast, the relationship between LDL-C goal attainment was inversely and continuously associated with triglyceride levels up to about 2.5 mmol/L, after which the graphical appearance plateaued such that no further difference in LDL-C were observed beyond triglyceride levels of 2.5 mmol/L. With increasing triglyceride concentrations, non-HDL-C increased continuously, HDL-C decreased initially but later plateaued (at 1.5-2.0 [men] or 2.0-2.5 mmol/L [women]), LDL-C levels plateaued at about 2.0-2.5 mmol/L, and TRL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C minus LDL-C) rose continuously. In multivariable-adjusted models, elevated triglyceride concentrations, non-specialist care and uncontrolled blood pressure were inversely associated with non-HDL-C goal attainment. Triglyceride levels were more strongly associated with non-HDL-C than with LDL-C goal attainment (ORs per 1-SD increase in log-triglycerides was 0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.89, for LDL-C goal attainment, and 0.49, 95% CI 0.38-0.61, for non-HDL-C goal attainment)., Conclusion: Non-HDL-C goal attainment was suboptimal in people with diabetes and co-existing CVD. This was most marked at higher triglyceride levels, possibly due to higher levels of TRL., (Crown Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To analyze the frequency of the different clinical presentations of the disease in women with HELLP syndrome and the most important factors that can predict a different maternal and fetal outcome., Study Design: This is a cross-sectional, consecutive, case-series study, the subjects being all patients with HELLP syndrome admitted to our Hospital within the last decade (1999-2009)., Results: The rate of maternal complications was 43.0% and perinatal mortality 14.1%. The severity of the syndrome, measured by The Mississippi Classification, influenced the rate of maternal complications but not fetal mortality: the rate of maternal complications among women in class 1 HELLP syndrome was 67.6%, compared to 49.3% in class 2 and 24.0% in class 3 HELLP syndrome, p<0.0001. In a 21.8% of women, the onset of the disease was after delivery. We highlight the fact that those cases with an early puerperium onset of the disease were those with a higher number of maternal complications (odds ratio: 2.38; CI: 1.05-5.44)., Conclusions: These results suggest the possibility of an increased complication rate when the onset of the syndrome appears after delivery and the necessity of having a high grade of suspicion in every case to diagnose the disease, even when the gestation and delivery were normal., (Copyright © 2011 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)