Search

Objectives: To characterize the kinetics of humoral and T-cell responses in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-patients followed up to 4-6 weeks (T3) after the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster dose., Methods: Health care workers (HCWs, n = 38) and patients with RA (n = 52) completing the messenger RNA vaccination schedule were enrolled at T3. In each cohort, 25 subjects were sampled after 5 weeks (T1) and 6 months (T2) from the first vaccine dose. The humoral response was assessed by measuring anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) and neutralizing antibodies, the T-cell response by interferon-γ-release assay (IGRA), T cell cytokine production, and B cell phenotype at T3 by flow cytometry., Results: Patients with RA showed a significant reduction of antibody titers from T1 to T2 and a significant increase at T3. T-cell response by IGRA persisted over time in patients with RA, whereas it increased in HCWs. Most patients with RA scored positive for anti-RBD, neutralizing antibody and T-cell responses, although the magnitude was lower than HCWs. The spike-specific-cytokine response was mainly clusters of differentiation (CD)4 + T cells restricted in both cohorts and significantly lower with reduced interleukin-2 response and CD4-antigen-responding naïve T cells in patients with RA. Unswitched memory B cells were reduced in patients with RA compared with HCWs independently of vaccination., Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine booster strengthens the humoral immunity in patients with RA even with a reduced cytokine response., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest APD received fees for educational training or consultancy by Abbvie, Amgen, Novartis, Galapagos, and BMS. EN is a member of the advisory board of Gilead, Lilly, and Roche and received fees for educational training from Gilead, Lilly, and Roche. DG is a member of the advisory board of Biomerieux and Eli-Lilly and received fees for educational training or consultancy by Almirall, Biogen, Cellgene, Diasorin, Janssen, Qiagen, and Quidel. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to characterize the SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response detected by the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 research use only assay in terms of accuracy and T cell subsets involved compared with a homemade interferon (IFN)-γ release assay (IGRA)., Methods: We evaluated T cell response by the standardized QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 tubes (antigen [Ag]1 and Ag2) and a homemade IGRA quantifying IFN-γ response to SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides (homemade-IGRA-SPIKE test). We evaluated the T cell subsets mediating the specific response using flow cytometry., Results: We prospectively enrolled 66 individuals: COVID-19 or post-COVID-19 subjects and NO-COVID-19-vaccinated subjects, including healthy donors and immunocompromised subjects. The standardized kit detected 62.1% (41/66) of T cell responders. Ag2 tube showed a higher IFN-γ quantitative and qualitative response. Ag1 tube response was mainly mediated by CD4 + T cells; Ag2 tube response was mediated by CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. The homemade-IGRA-SPIKE test detected a higher number of responders (52/66, 78.8%) than the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 assay (P = 0.056). The response was found in both T cell subsets, although a higher magnitude and response rate was observed in the CD4 + T cell subset., Conclusion: The QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 response is mediated by CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. A lower number of responders is found compared with the homemade-IGRA-SPIKE test, likely because of the different peptide composition., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest CT and CG received honoraria for speaking, manuscript writing, or educational events from Merck, Biogen, Roche, Novartis Sanofi, Celgene, and Almiral. EN participates on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board and receives fees for educational training from Gilead, Eli Lilly, GS, SOBI, and Roche. EN has a patent pending for raloxifene use in COVID-19 with Dompè Pharmaceutical. DG is a member of the advisory board of Biomerieux and Eli Lilly and received fees for educational training or consultancy from Almiral, Biogen, Cellgene, Diasorin, Janssen, Qiagen, and Quidel. All the other authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Spondyloarthrits (SpA) share clinical, genetic and immunological features with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), and enteropathic SpA (eSpA) represent the clinical evidence of the association between gut and joint diseases. This cross-sectional study aimed to report data of eSpA patients collected from the first Italian database., Patients and Methods: A specific web-based interface has been created to insert and collect the main clinical, serologic and imaging data from patients with eSpA, as well as disease activity, comorbidities and treatment, in a real-life scenario., Results: Data were collected in 14 Italian centers (7 rheumatology and 7 gastroenterology units). A total of 347 eSpA patients were enrolled in the study. Type 1 peripheral eSpA was the most frequent form. Crohn' Disease (CD) was the most represented IBD. CD activity was similar among eSpA, whereas UC activity was slightly higher in the axial and mixed form than in the peripheral eSpA. The disease was active in less than half of axial eSpA patients and in only 18% of patients with peripheral eSpA. Furthermore, most of the patients had an inactive IBD. Nineteen percent of the total eSpA patients were free of therapy at the time of the enrollment and 61% of the patients were receiving biotechnological agents., Conclusions: The multidisciplinary management of eSpA patients, favored by this ad hoc created web-based platform, allowed to obtain data from the largest eSpA cohort. The information coming of this database might advance knowledge of eSpA and improve their standard of care., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Different modified sequential therapies have been proposed for Helicobacter pylori eradication. However, the efficacy of these regimens is controversial., Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature and pooled-data analysis to assess: (a) the efficacy of different modified sequential therapies for H. pylori eradication, (b) the eradication rates achieved by these regimens as compared to either standard triple therapies or standard sequential regimen when available., Results: Overall 21 trials met inclusion criteria. The most used modified sequential therapy was the seven plus seven tetracycline-based regimen which achieved an overall 73.3% eradication rate (6 trials). Such therapy was more effective than the 14-day triple therapy (77.2% vs. 63.6%; 3 trials). The most used five plus five levofloxacin-based sequential therapy achieved a 95.8% and 90% cure rates when 250 mg and 500 mg levofloxacin twice daily were used, respectively. These success rates were higher as compared to that of either standard sequential or triple therapies. Other modified sequential therapies did not achieved acceptably high cure rates. Contradictory results emerged from 2 studies assessing the efficacy of a levofloxacin-based sequential regimen as a second-line therapy., Conclusions: Both levofloxacin- and tetracycline-based sequential therapies have been proved to be more effective than standard triple therapies, confirming that the 'sequential' administration of drugs is a successful therapeutic procedure for H. pylori infection., (Copyright © 2012 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)