Search

INTRODUCTION Circumferential deep burns carry a high risk for a burn induced compartment syndrome. It was recently shown that an enzymatic bromelain-based debridement with Nexobrid® is a safe and efficient procedure to release pressure in deep circumferential extremity burns reducing the need for surgical escharotomy. We therefore herein aimed to analyze the conceptual relation between Nexobrid® and surgical escharotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective study on all patients with circumferential deep partial-thickness or full-thickness burns requiring immediate escharotomy that was either performed by surgical incision or Nexobrid®. Medical records of 792 patients that were treated at the burn center of the University Hospital Zurich between 2016 and 2021 were analyzed. RESULTS Overall, 62 patients with circumferential deep partial-thickness or full-thickness burns who received preventive decompression either by Nexobrid® (N = 29) or surgical escharotomy (N = 33), were included. Whilst distribution of age, sex, BMI and type of injury showed no difference between the groups, the ABSI score, TBSA, percentage of third degree burns and mortality were significantly higher in patients who received a surgical escharotomy. CONCLUSION While the use of Nexobrid® to prevent burn induced compartment syndrome has steadily increased, surgical escharotomies were predominantly performed in severely burned patients with a high degree of full-thickness burns. Thus, higher mortality in this patient group needs to be considered with caution and is mainly attributed to the higher TBSA. Although evidence is lacking for the use of Nexobrid® for larger body areas exceeding 15%, escharotomy is also the more reliable and faster approach in such critically burned patients.

Robotic systems have recently been introduced into micro- and supermicrosurgery showing potential benefits for reconstructive surgery. After showing the feasibility and safety of using the Symani Surgical System® for lymphatic microsurgical procedures in humans, we present the results of the first twenty-two patients operated with the robot. The main goal of the study was to determine the learning curve using the Symani Surgical System® . In addition, we aimed at exploring the potential of robot-assisted anastomosis for lymphatic, free flap, and nerve reconstruction and defining the advantages and drawbacks of implementing the system into our daily routine. The operating times were compared between robotic-assisted and hand-sewn anastomoses. Moreover, outcomes and complications were recorded. In this first patient series, anastomotic times were significantly faster with the hand-sewn technique (14.1±4.3 min) when compared with the robot-assisted technique (25.3±12.3 min; p<0.01). However, the learning curve was very steep, and the time needed to perform the anastomosis has been consistently decreasing over time to the point where in the last operations, the times to perform particularly lympho-venous anastomoses were comparable between the two groups. Based on our experience up to date, robot-assisted surgery shows a promising potential in opening up new frontiers in reconstructive microsurgery, e.g., the reliable performance of anastomoses on even smaller blood and lymphatic vessels or on structures deeper within the body cavities, e.g., the thoracic duct.