Search

Introduction: In upper brachial plexus injuries (C5-C6-C7), selective nerve transfers appear as a favourable technique. For this purpose, transfer of an ulnar nerve fascicle to the biceps motor branch (Oberlin's procedure) is often used. In this paper we present our modified Oberlin technique, as well as a comparison of this method with the classic Oberlin procedure., Materials and Methods: We present two groups of patients that where operated by two different surgeons. The first group, consisting of 16 patients was treated with the classic Oberlin procedure. The second group included 5 patients treated with a modified Oberlin procedure, where two fascicles from the ulnar nerve were transferred to both the motor branch of the biceps and the motor branch of the brachialis muscles., Results: In the last follow-up of the 16 patients from the first group with the classic Oberlin procedure, 15 patients (93.75%) had Medical Research Council (MRC) grade of biceps strength 4 and 1 patient (6.25%) had MRC grade 3, whereas in the group where the modified Oberlin procedure was used the muscle strength was very durable with 4 out of 5 the patients reached MRC grade of 4+ and one MRC grade of 4, and with a mean elbow strength at 5.4 kg (3-8 kg). No sensitivity or motor problems were encountered on the ulnar territories for both groups., Conclusion: With the modified Oberlin technique, the median nerve is reserved and both elbow flexors are innervated. The results of this technique compare favourably with those of other methods. Thus, we propose using the double fascicle transfer from the ulnar nerve to both elbow flexors in order to restore a strong elbow flexion in patients with upper brachial plexus injuries., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Elbow flexion is the first goal in upper partial brachial plexus palsy treatment. However, elbow extension is essential for daily living activities. To recover this function, one fascicle of ulnar nerve can be transferred to the branch of the long head of the triceps, but this procedure has been previously published in only two patients. The goal of our study is to assess a larger series of transfers of one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps to help patients recover elbow extension. Ten male patients with C5, C6 and C7 brachial plexus injuries underwent operation. For shoulder recovery, we transferred the spinal accessory nerve and rhomboid nerve. For elbow flexion, one fascicle of median nerve was transferred to the nerve of the biceps. For elbow extension, we transferred one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps. Tendon transfers were performed for wrist and finger extension. Nine patients recovered M4 elbow flexion and extension. One patient had M3 elbow extension and flexion. Average active shoulder elevation was 85° and average active shoulder external rotation was 65° All patients recovered finger and wrist extension. The classical techniques of grafts or phrenic or intercostal nerve transfers to recover elbow extension are not always reliable, according to the literature. Because the harvested ulnar nerve motor fascicle is close to the branch of the long head of the triceps, the recovery time for this procedure is shorter than that of other described nerve transfers. The isolated recovery of the reinnervated long head of the triceps muscle excludes spontaneous recovery occasionally noted in upper root plexus injuries. The transfer of one fascicle of ulnar nerve to the branch of the long head of the triceps is reliable for active elbow extension recovery in C5, C6 and C7 brachial plexus palsies., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: In infant poliomyelitis or poliomyelitis-like paresis, there has been no means of treating residual paralysis and the policy has been to wait until an affected infant has grown sufficiently to enable tendon transfer or arthrodesis. However, recent reports have described relatively good results for early surgical intervention in the form of nerve transfer., Methods: In a 4-year and 6-month-old child we transferred a partial ulnar nerve for elbow flexor reconstruction even 3 years and 10 months after the onset of poliomyelitis-like palsy and also transferred partial accessory and radial nerves for shoulder function restoration 6 months after the first operation., Results: Elbow flexor restored M4 on the British Medical Research Council scale. The shoulder subluxation resolved, however, the strengths of the deltoid and infraspinatus remained almost M1. At the most recent clinical examination, the patient was 18 years old and the active range of motion of patient's left elbow was 0°-125°, and those of the whole shoulder girdle were abduction 35°, flexion 60°, extension 30° and external rotation 0°., Conclusions: The outcomes we achieved may support partial nerve transfer techniques as viable treatment options for persistent long-standing motor deficits following poliomyelitis-like palsy in children. However, we recommend performing partial nerve transfer as early as possible after recovery from flaccid paralysis and also use of nerves that derive from narrow spinal cord segments. After denervation, children's neuromuscular systems seem to have the ability to regenerate after a much longer period than has generally been believed. This speculation is based on only a single case report; thus, more experience is needed before this generalization can confidently be made., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Injury to distal portion of posterior cord of brachial plexus leads to palsy of radial and axillary nerves. Symptoms are usually motor deficits of the deltoid muscle; triceps brachii muscle; and extensor muscles of the wrist, thumb, and fingers. Tendon transfers, nerve grafts, and nerve transfers are options for surgical treatment of proximal radial nerve palsy to restore some motor functions. Tendon transfer is painful, requires a long immobilization, and decreases donor muscle strength; nevertheless, nerve transfer produces promising outcomes. We present a patient with proximal radial nerve palsy following a blunt injury undergoing triple nerve transfer., Case Description: The patient was involved in a motorcycle accident with complete palsy of the radial and axillary nerves. After 6 months, on admission, he showed spontaneous recovery of axillary nerve palsy, but radial nerve palsy remained. We performed triple nerve transfer, fascicle of ulnar nerve to long head of the triceps branch of radial nerve, flexor digitorum superficialis branch of median nerve to extensor carpi radialis brevis branch of radial nerve, and flexor carpi radialis branch of median nerve to posterior interosseous nerve, for restoration of elbow, wrist, and finger extensions, respectively., Conclusions: Our experience confirmed functional elbow, wrist, and finger extensions in the patient. Triple nerve transfer restores functions of the upper limb in patients with debilitating radial nerve palsy after blunt injuries., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to contrast the rate and types of complications and secondary surgeries for in situ cubital tunnel release and ulnar nerve transposition., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed by query of hospital billing records for all patients who underwent cubital tunnel surgery from August 2008 to July 2013, yielding 421 patients. Exclusion criteria were acute trauma, revision surgery, neoplasm, age younger than 18 years, incomplete records, and postoperative follow-up less than 3 months. Of the remaining 234 patients, 147 patients underwent 157 in situ cubital tunnel releases and 87 patients underwent 90 ulnar nerve transpositions., Results: In 157 in situ cubital tunnel releases, there were 6 complications (3.8%), including 3 cases (1.9%) of ulnar nerve instability, 2 cases (1.3%) of postoperative infection, and 1 case (0.6%) of a postoperative seroma. In 90 ulnar nerve transpositions, there were 2 complications (2.2%), including 1 case (1.1%) of postoperative infection and 1 case (1.1%) of medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury. The secondary surgery rate was 5.7% overall, 2.5% for in situ cubital tunnel release, and 11.1% for ulnar nerve transposition. Chronic kidney disease was associated with complication after cubital tunnel surgery. Prior trauma to the elbow and ulnar nerve transposition were associated with secondary surgery., Conclusions: The short-term complication rates of cubital tunnel surgery are low (3.2%), but higher for patients with chronic kidney disease. The secondary surgery rate after cubital tunnel surgery was 5.7% overall, but higher for patients with prior elbow trauma and for patients undergoing ulnar nerve transposition., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To analyze the anatomical feasibility of transferring a motor branch nerve to the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) to the triceps upper medial head motor branch (UMHM) and to report the resultant outcome of the restoration of elbow extension in 5 patients with extensive brachial plexus injury., Methods: The ulnar and radial nerves were dissected in 10 cadavers. We measured the length and diameter of the branches to the FCU and the UMHM branch and counted the axons. Then, 5 male patients, mean age 30 years, underwent FCU nerve branch transfer for reconstruction of elbow extension. Elbow flexion was restored via a median nerve branch to biceps transfer., Results: Mean UMHM nerve length and diameter were 86 and 1.5 mm, respectively. Mean number of branches to the FCU muscle was 2.9. Mean FCU nerve length and diameter were 50 and 1.0 mm, respectively. Mean number of myelinated fibers was 818 and 743 for the UMHM and the longest branch to the FCU, respectively. Coaptation between nerves was possible without tension. All patients recovered functional active elbow extension at a mean follow-up of 19 months with a British Medical Research Council score of M4. After surgery, all patients retained a functional FCU with a British Medical Research Council score of M4., Conclusions: Nonselective ulnar nerve fascicles at the root of the limb might not be adequate to restore elbow extension when combined with a median nerve branch transfer for elbow flexion. A selective distal ulnar motor fascicle such as a FCU motor branch could be harvested and connected to a triceps branch to restore elbow extension. Such a nerve transfer would also allow for later transfer of the still functional FCU tendon to the digital extensors., Clinical Relevance: For patients with extensive brachial plexus injury and a preserved medial cord, transferring a motor branch nerve to the FCU is an effective technique for the reconstruction of elbow extension., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We report a case of a 10-month-old boy with a left extended upper type (C5-C7) obstetric brachial plexus injury that was treated with double nerve transfer (partial ulnar and partial median nerve transfer) to restore elbow flexion and spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve to restore shoulder abduction. At 60 months' follow-up, shoulder abduction was 0-150° (M4) and elbow flexion was 0-140° (M5). Elbow, wrist and finger extension improved to M5. However, shoulder external rotation was only 0-30° (from full internal rotation). No weakness on finger and wrist flexion was observed. Double nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion can be safely done in obstetric brachial plexus injuries with good results. Secondary surgeries may be needed to improve external rotation., (Copyright © 2012 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Restoration of elbow flexion is an important goal in brachial plexus injuries. Double nerve transfers using fascicles from ulnar and median nerves have consistently produced good results without causing functional compromise to the donor nerve. According to conventional practice, these double nerve transfers are dependent on the careful isolation of ulnar and median nerve fascicles, which are responsible for wrist flexion, using a handheld nerve stimulator. Here we suggest that fascicular selection by nerve stimulation might not be a necessity when executing double nerve transfers for restoration of elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries., Methods: This is a retrospective case control study in 26 patients with C5, C6 brachial plexus injuries that were managed with double nerve transfers between March 2005 and January 2008. Our technique consisted of transferring 2 fascicles, one each from the ulnar and the median nerve, directly onto the biceps and brachialis motor branches. Contrary to the standard practice, the ulnar or median nerve fascicles were selected without using a handheld nerve stimulator. Results were compared to 21 cases (control group) in which a nerve stimulator was used for fascicular selection. The denervation period ranged from 3 to 9 months., Results: Twenty-four patients of the study group experienced full restoration of elbow flexion, and 2 had an antigravity flexion of 120° and 110°. The EMG revealed the first sign of reinnervation of biceps and brachialis muscle at 9 ± 2 weeks and 11 ± 2 weeks, as compared to 9 ± 2 weeks and 12 ± 4 weeks in the control group. After surgery, the appearance of initial evidence of elbow flexion, the range and mean of elbow flexion strength, and the difference between preoperative and postoperative grip and pinch strengths were comparable in both groups. At 24 to 28 months follow-up, 19 patients of the study group had M4 power and 7 had M3, compared to 18 and 3 cases, respectively, in the control group. The P values for Medical Research Council grade, strength of elbow flexion, and range of elbow flexion between the 2 groups did not reveal any significant statistical difference., Conclusions: Double nerve transfer is a reliable technique for restoring elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries. There is no advantage of using a nerve stimulator in selecting fascicles before performing the nerve transfer., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In Oberlin's nerve transfer, a fascicle of the ulnar nerve is sutured end-to-end to the branch of musculocutaneous nerve to the biceps muscle in the arm. This transfer is commonly used in adult traumatic C5-C6 avulsion injuries of the brachial plexus. We report the successful use of Oberlin nerve transfer in an ulnar ray-deficient infant with brachial plexus birth palsy., (Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: Vascularized nerve grafts are indicated for the repair of large nerve defects. In brachial plexus injuries, the poor prognosis for functional hand reconstruction when the lower roots are avulsed makes the ulnar nerve a potential donor for vascularized nerve grafts. We report on the results we obtained with reconstruction of elbow flexion using long pedicled ulnar nerve grafts that connected the C5 root to the musculocutaneous nerve., Methods: We prospectively studied 8 young adults with complete brachial plexus palsy with avulsion of the lower roots, who had surgical repair an average of 4.6 months after trauma. Pedicled ulnar nerve grafts, averaging 30 cm long, connected the C5 root to the musculocutaneous nerve. In order to rescue misdirected axons that could have regenerated into the cutaneous branch of the musculocutaneous nerve, we transferred this branch to the motor branch of the extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle. Outcomes for all 8 patients were assessed an average of 26.7 months after surgery, focusing on recovery of muscle strength, categorized using the Medical Research Council scale., Results: None of the patients recovered elbow flexion or wrist extension greater than M2., Conclusions: In brachial plexus injuries, reconstruction of elbow flexion using a long, pedicled, vascularized nerve graft produces unsatisfactory results., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV.

We report 3 cases of successful vascularized ulnar nerve graft for reconstructing a large median or radial nerve defect after severe trauma of the upper extremity.

Purpose: To report the results of a surgical technique of nerve transfer to reinnervate the brachialis muscle and the biceps muscle to restore elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury., Methods: Retrospective review was performed on 6 patients who had direct nerve transfer of a single expendable motor fascicle from both the ulnar and median nerves directly to the biceps and brachialis branches of the musculocutaneous nerve. Assessment included degree of recovery of elbow flexion and ulnar and median nerve function including pinch and grip strengths., Results: Clinical evidence of reinnervation was noted at a mean of 5.5 months (SD, 1 mo; range, 3.5-7 mo) after surgery and the mean follow-up period was 20.5 months (SD, 11.2 mo, range, 13-43 mo). Mean recovery of elbow flexion was Medical Research Council grade 4+. Postoperative pinch and grip strengths were unchanged or better in all patients. No motor or sensory deficits related to the ulnar or median nerves were noted and all patients maintained good hand function. No patients required additional procedures to further improve elbow flexion strength., Conclusions: Transfer of expendable motor fascicles from the ulnar and median nerves successfully can reinnervate the biceps and brachialis muscles for strong elbow flexion. The reinnervation of the brachialis muscle, the primary elbow flexor, as well as the biceps muscle provides an additional biomechanical advantage that accounts for the excellent elbow flexion strength obtained using this technique. Direct coaptation of the nerve fascicles was performed without the need for nerve grafts and there was no functional or sensory donor morbidity.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report on the results of submuscular ulnar nerve transposition (SMUNT) for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome in a young, active duty, military population., Methods: Twenty patients (20 extremities) were evaluated retrospectively a minimum of 12 months after surgery. Outcome analyses were performed using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Bishop-Kleinman rating scales, physical examination, return-to-work analysis, evaluation of complication rate, and overall patient satisfaction., Results: At an average follow-up evaluation of 24 months (range, 12-38 mo), 19 patients had returned to full military active duty work status. The average duration of limited work capacity after surgery was 4.8 months (range, 3-7 mo). The DASH scores improved from an average of 32.5 points before surgery to 6.2 points after surgery. In 19 patients the functional outcome evaluated with the Bishop-Kleinman rating system was excellent. There were no poor outcomes using this rating score. Statistically significant improvements in both key pinch and grip strength were noted. Complications included one permanent and 2 transient neuropraxias of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve. Overall 19 of 20 patients were satisfied with the procedure and would have the surgery again if required., Conclusions: Submuscular ulnar nerve transposition for cubital tunnel syndrome provides a reliable rate of return to full active duty work in military personnel with good patient satisfaction and minimal complications.

A patient with no active elbow flexion because of poliomyelitis-like syndrome underwent functioning free muscle transfer for elbow flexion reconstruction in which a part of the ulnar nerve was used as a donor motor nerve. Fourteen months after surgery the patient had achieved 120 degrees of active elbow flexion against gravity without functional deficit of the donor ulnar nerve. A part of the ulnar nerve can be used as an alternative donor motor nerve for reconstruction of chronic C5-C6 (or C5-7) brachial plexus injury.

Thirty-two patients with absent elbow flexion secondary to brachial plexus injury underwent nerve transfer using 1 or 2 fascicles of the ulnar nerve to the motor branch of the biceps muscle. Twenty-six patients had root avulsion injury of C5 and C6; 4 had root avulsion injury of C5, C6, and C7; and 2 had lateral and posterior cord injury with distal injury of the musculocutaneous nerve. The follow-up period ranged from 11 to 40 months (average, 18 months). Thirty patients had biceps strength of M4 (flexion power ranged from 0.5 to 7 kg) and 1 had biceps strength of M3. All but 1 patient demonstrated signs of recovery of the biceps muscle. No notable impairment of hand function was observed.

From 1985 to 1990, 167 patients were treated for impaired elbow flexion caused by brachial plexus injury. Surgical procedures were divided into two categories: nerve reconstruction (128 patients) and muscle or tendon transfers (39 patients). Surgery in the nerve reconstruction group included direct suturing, nerve grafting of portions of the brachial plexus responsible for elbow flexion, or nerve transfer (intercostal, phrenic, or spinal accessory nerve) to the musculocutaneous nerve. The second category included tendon or muscle transfer or a functioning free muscle transplantation for biceps replacement. Results were assessed by the Medical Research Council grading system and weight-lifting evaluation. Functional results revealed that nerve reconstruction was superior to muscle tendon transfers, direct suturing was superior to nerve grafting, short nerve grafts (< 10 cm) were superior to long nerve grafts (> 10 cm), infraclavicular plexus injuries did better than supraclavicular injuries, vascularized ulnar nerve grafts (if indicated) were superior to conventional long nerve grafts, ruptured plexus injuries recovered better than root avulsions. Intercostal nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve has satisfactory results. In the muscle tendon transfer group, Steindler flexorplasty resulted in upgrading muscle strength from level one to level two. Functioning free muscle transplantation had results similar to the latissimus dorsi transfer.

The hypothesis that improved axonal regeneration occurs through nerve grafts when scarred tissue is removed and distal coaptation completed during a delayed, secondary operation was tested in a rabbit model. The ulnar nerve was used as a donor nerve graft to a final three-centimeter deficit of the contralateral median nerve. This was done either in one stage or in two stages, with resection of scar and coaptation at the distal site done ten weeks later. Evaluation included nerve conduction velocity, compound action potential area, muscle contraction force, muscle weight, and axon counts. Two-stage nerve grafts at 24 weeks were significantly inferior to one-stage grafts only in compound action potential area. Both nerve grafts showed significant improvement in function from twenty-four to sixty-two weeks as measured by nerve conduction velocity; two-staged grafts in addition showed a significant increase in compound action potential area and twitch contraction force. The data are inconclusive regarding the absolute superiority of two-stage versus one-stage grafting. Different timing for the second stage may be required.

A technique of nerve grafting is described whereby a nerve "graft" is raised, maintaining its blood supply via a vascular pedicle. It is then transposed to reconstruct a defect in an adjacent nerve. Although there is little clinical evidence that this technique results in better nerve regeneration when compared with conventional nerve grafting, the method has advantages which are discussed.