Search

Background: In last years the diffusion of carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) is increasing worldwide, mainly due to the expression of carbapenemases. Cefiderocol has molecular characteristics that ideally confers activity against all CR-GNB, but resistant strains have already been identified. We describe cefiderocol susceptibility profile among multi-drug resistant Gram-negative isolated from pediatric patients., Methods: Prospective, single pediatric center study, 1st January 2020-15th June 2023. All GNB carbapenemases producers or phenotypically carbapenem-resistant isolated in the study period were tested for cefiderocol susceptibility. Clinical and microbiological data were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed, comparing the groups of cefiderocol-resistant vs. cefiderocol-susceptible Enterobacterales and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB)., Results: Forty-seven GNB were tested for cefiderocol susceptibility; 38% were cefiderocol-resistant: 16/30 (52%) among Enterobacterales and 2/17 (12%) among NF-GNB. None of the patients were previously exposed to cefiderocol. Looking at Enterobacterales, resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was higher among cefiderocol-resistant vs. cefiderocol-susceptible strains (62% vs 36%, respectively), as MBL expression (67% vs. 36%, respectively). Too few NF-GNB were cefiderocol-resistance to draw any conclusion. No difference in ICU admission and mortality was identified comparing cefiderocol-resistant vs. susceptible strains. Patients colonized/infected by cefiderocol-resistant strains had been previously hospitalized more frequently., Conclusion: In our cohort cefiderocol resistance was mostly registered among Enterobacterales, and especially among MBL producers' strains (that were alongside resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam). This could be explained by the known possible cross resistance mechanism among ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol. Also, correlation of cefiderocol-resistance with previous hospitalization could be associated with horizontal resistance transmission. Looking at our data, we believe that cefiderocol should be use cautiously, especially empirically and in monotherapy, due to the high resistance rate., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background Aims: The clinical applications of in vitro manipulated cultured cells and their precursors are often made use of in therapeutic trials. However, tissue cultures can be easily contaminated by the ubiquitous Mollicutes micro-organisms, which can cause various and severe alterations in cellular function. Thus methods able to detect and trace Mollicutes impurities contaminating cell cultures are required before starting any attempt to grow cells under good manufacturing practice (GMP) conditions., Methods: We developed a multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay specific for the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer regions, for the Tuf and P1 cytoadhesin genes, able to detect contaminant Mollicutes species in a single tube reaction. The system was validated by analyzing different cell lines and the positive samples were confirmed by 16S and P1 cytoadhesin gene dideoxy sequencing., Results: Our multiplex qPCR detection system was able to reach a sensitivity, specificity and robustness comparable with the culture and the indicator cell culture method, as required by the European Pharmacopoeia guidelines., Conclusions: We have developed a multiplex qPCR method, validated following International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines, as a qualitative limit test for impurities, assessing the validation characteristics of limit of detection and specificity. It also follows the European Pharmacopoeia guidelines and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requirements.