Search

Objective: To evaluate the value of using both HMG and recombinant FSH (r-FSH) in the GnRH antagonist protocol for women with high AMH. Materials and methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted from January 2013 to December 2018. Of 277 GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles in women with anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) ≥5 μg/L, 170 cycles receiving the combination of r-FSH and HMG (77 with HMG added at the beginning of the GnRH antagonist cycle and 93 with HMG added after GnRH antagonist administration) and 107 cycles receiving r-FSH alone were analyzed. The dynamic hormone profiles and embryonic and clinical outcomes of the patients were evaluated. Results: We observed significantly lower serum LH levels in the r-FSH + HMG groups during ovarian stimulation. The serum estradiol and progesterone levels were lower in the r-FSH + HMG groups on the trigger day. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences with respect to the number of oocytes retrieved, maturation, fertilization, blastocyst formation rate or ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The implantation and live birth rates were increased in the r-FSH + HMG groups compared with the r-FSH alone group, with no statistical significance. Conclusions: HMG for LH supplementation in the GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with high AMH is not significantly superior to r-FSH alone in terms of ovarian response and pregnancy outcome. Nevertheless, HMG supplementation might be appropriate for women with an initially inadequate response to r-FSH or intracycle LH deficiency.

Objective: The current study tested the hypothesis that vascular endothelial function, as reflected by the reactive hyperemia index (RHI), and biochemical factors, including VEGF, TNFα, CRP, inhibin A, and inhibin B, were involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Materials and methods: This study was conducted between June 2010 and June 2012, enrolling 15 patients with OHSS and 6 healthy control subjects

Objective: To analyze the duration of gonadotropin hyperstimulation's impacts on oocyte quality and clinical outcomes in aged in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients. Materials and methods: This retrospective study was carried out using IVF records of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital IVF center from January 2017 to December 2019. A total of 308 IVF cycles with patients aged 40–44 years were included. Clinical characteristics of patients who received a short controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) (i.e., 6–7 days; s-COH group) or a long COH treatment (i.e., 9–10 days; l-COH group) were compared. In addition, analysis was conducted using data within two age subgroups: 40–42 years and 42–44 years subgroups. Results: The s-COH group received significantly lower total doses of gonadotropin and had smaller leading follicles at the time of ovulation trigger when compared to the l-COH group. The s-COH group also produced a significantly lower number of oocytes, mature metaphase II (MII) oocytes, and 2 PN zygotes compared to the l-COH group. However, there was no significant difference in the number of transferable and good-quality embryos between the two treatment groups. Likewise, the pregnancy rate and live birth rate were comparable in the s-COH and l-COH groups. Similar results were obtained when the analysis was limited to select age subgroups (i.e., 40–42 and 42–44 years subgroups). Conclusion: While a long COH generates more oocytes per cycle, a 6–7 days COH treatment, which is at the lower end of the recommended window of stimulation, could achieve a pregnancy outcome comparable to that applied 9–10 days of COH in aged patients.

Objective: Despite the great advance of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in recent decades, many IVF patients failed to achieve a pregnancy even after multiple IVF-ET attempts. These patients are considered to have repeated implantation failure (RIF). While exhausting efforts have been devoted to the improvement of pregnancy rate in RIF patients, it is not clear whether RIF patients have aberrant obstetric or perinatal outcomes after they eventually achieved a pregnancy. Materials and methods: Taking advantage of a relatively large database of IVF-ET cycles at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, we compared obstetric and perinatal outcomes of RIF patients who have a successful pregnancy after IVF-ET treatment(s) to those of control IVF-ET patients. Results: Because multiple pregnancies are associated with a high risk of obstetric complications, we restricted the analysis to patients who had singleton pregnancies. Analysis of a total of 596 control and 46 RIF cases showed the rates of almost all obstetric and perinatal outcomes investigated are not different between the two groups. However, the rate of placental abruption in the RIF group (4.35%) appeared to be significantly higher than that of controls (0.50%; OR = 8.99). This difference is still statistically significant after adjustment with the age (adjusted OR = 8.2). Conclusion: While the rates of a spectrum of obstetric and perinatal outcomes are normal in RIF patients, these patients could have an enhanced risk of placental abruption. However, investigations with a large sample size are needed to substantiate this inference. Keywords: RIF, Repeated implantation failure, Placental abruption, IVF, Embryo transfer