Search

Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) serves as a bridging intervention for subsequent definitive haemorrhagic control. This study compared the clinical outcomes of REBOA and resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) in patients with bleeding below the diaphragm., Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult trauma patients who presented to the Trauma Quality Improvement Program between 2020 and 2021 and who underwent either REBOA or RT in the emergency department (ED). Patients with severe head and chest injuries, characterised by an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score greater than 3, were excluded. The clinical data of patients treated with REBOA and those treated with RT were compared, and multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was employed to identify prognostic factors associated with mortality., Results: A total of 346 patients were enrolled: 138 (39.9 %) received REBOA, and 208 (60.1 %) received RT at the ED. Patients in the RT group underwent ED cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) more frequently (58.2 % vs. 23.2 %; p < 0.001) and had a higher mortality rate (87.0 % vs. 45.7 %; p < 0.001). Patients who died had lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores (6 [4.5] vs. 11 [4.9]; p < 0.001), underwent more ED CPR (58.6 % vs. 9.8 %; p < 0.001), and received RT more frequently (74.2 % vs. 26.5 %, p < 0.001). The MLR revealed that the major prognostic factors for mortality were systolic blood pressure (odds ratio [OR] 0.988, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.978-0.998; p = 0.014), ED CPR (OR 11.111, 95 % CI 4.667-26.452; p < 0.001), abdominal injuries with an AIS score ≥ 4 (OR 4.694, 95 % CI 1.921-11.467; p = 0.001) and RT (OR 5.693, 95 % CI 2.690-12.050; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: In cases of blunt trauma, prompt identification of the bleeding source is crucial. For patients with bleeding below the diaphragm, REBOA led to higher survival rates than did RT. However, it is important to consider the limitations of the database and the necessary exclusions from our analysis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Intensive care nurses may have an important role in empowering families by providing psychological support and fulfilling the family's pivotal need for information., Aim: To determine whether 'education of families by tab' about the patient's condition was more associated with improved anxiety, stress, and depression levels than the 'education of families by routine'., Research Design: A randomized control trial of 74 main family caregivers (intervention: 39; control: 35)., Setting: An adult intensive care unit., Main Outcome Measures: Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, and Communication and Physical Comfort Scale., Results: Although information need satisfaction was not significantly different between intervention and control groups, the former reported significantly better depression score on Depression Anxiety Stress Scale comparing to the control group (p<0.01; η 2 =0.09) with a medium effect size. Reduction of anxiety in the intervention group were clinically significant., Conclusion: The results suggest that use of 'education of family by tab' is promising for intensive care nurses to provide psychological support for family members. More studies are needed to investigate this aspect of family care for better psychological support and information need satisfaction that contributes to the evidence-based practice of intensive care nursing., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) extending to the adjacent organ(s) is sometimes encountered in patients with large, peripherally located tumours. Over a 4-year period, a total of 151 patients received curative resection of HCC at the Surgical Department of Veterans General Hospital-Taipei, Taiwan. Of these patients, 21 underwent hepatic resection combined with en-bloc resection of the adjacent organ(s) because tumour extension was found during operation. Subsequent histological examination of the resected specimens found evidence of HCC invasion into the resected adjacent organ(s) in only nine patients (group I), and the remaining 12 patients showed no evidence of extrahepatic HCC invasion (group II). Twenty-seven HCC patients with clinico-pathologically matched tumours but without extrahepatic extension were selected as controls (group III). One patient in group I died of hepatic failure after the operation. The morbidity rate was 48% in group I and group II patients, and 30% in group III patients. The difference was not statistically significant. On evaluating the clinico-pathological factors, including DNA ploidy status of the tumours, there were no significant differences between tumours with and without extrahepatic invasion. Patients with locally invasive HCC (group I) had disease-free and overall survival rates comparable with those of the patients without local tumour invasion (group II and III). We conclude that HCC with invasion to the adjacent organ(s) does not seem to be directly related to the 'aggressiveness' of the tumour, and extrahepatic infiltration of the tumour does not preclude a chance of cure. Our results underscore the need for en-bloc resection as treatment of choice for these patients.