Search

Background: During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare-associated transmission of respiratory viral infections (RVI) is a concern. To reduce the impact of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses on patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) we devised and evaluated a multi-tiered infection control strategy with the goal of preventing nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV2 and other RVIs across a large healthcare campus., Methods: From January-June 2020, a multi-tiered infection control strategy was implemented across a healthcare campus in Singapore, comprising the largest acute tertiary hospital as well as four other subspecialty centres, with more than 10,000 HCWs. Drawing on our institution's experience with an outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003, this strategy included improved patient segregation and distancing, and heightened infection prevention and control (IPC) measures including universal masking. All symptomatic patients were tested for COVID-19 and common RVIs., Results: A total of 16,162 admissions campus-wide were screened; 7.1% (1155/16,162) tested positive for COVID-19. Less than 5% of COVID-19 cases (39/1155) were initially detected outside of isolation wards in multi-bedded cohorted wards. Improved distancing and enhanced IPC measures successfully mitigated onward spread even amongst COVID-19 cases detected outside of isolation. COVID-19 rates amongst HCWs were kept low (0.13%, 17/13,066) and reflected community acquisition rather than nosocomial spread. Rates of healthcare-associated-RVI amongst inpatients fell to zero and this decrease was sustained even after the lifting of visitor restrictions., Conclusion: This multi-tiered infection control strategies can be implemented at-scale to successfully mitigate healthcare-associated transmission of respiratory viral pathogens., (Copyright © 2020 Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment with sorafenib, although associated with inhibition of tumour growth and angiogenesis in in vivo studies, leads to up-regulation of pERK. The addition of MEK inhibition could potentially abrogate this effect and potentiate anti-tumour activity. This phase I study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and biomarker correlates of selumetinib combined with sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Methods: Patients with Child-Pugh (CP) score ≤7 were treated with 400 mg twice daily of sorafenib with escalating doses of selumetinib in a 3 + 3 study design. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation period was 28 days. PK of selumetinib was determined. Angiogenic effect was evaluated with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)., Results: Twenty-seven patients of Asian ethnicity were enrolled. The MTD was selumetinib 75 mg daily with sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. DLT included grade 3 transaminitis, diarrhoea and fatigue. Most common treatment-related adverse events at MTD (all grades) were diarrhoea (85%), rash (59%), hypertension (44%), fatigue (30%), anorexia (22%) and hand-foot syndrome (22%). Four patients (15%) had PR and 13 (48%) had SD. PR or SD was observed for ≥6 months in seven patients. The median overall survival was 14.4 months. Selumetinib exposures in combination with sorafenib were comparable to other monotherapy studies. A reduction in permeability-surface area product noted in DCE-MRI with treatment correlated with worse survival outcomes., Conclusion: The MTD of selumetinib was 75 mg daily when combined with sorafenib 400 mg twice a day in CP ≤7 HCC. Acceptable adverse events and encouraging anti-tumour activity warrant further evaluation. DCE-MRI findings deserve prospective evaluation., Clinicaltrialsgov Identifier: NCT01029418., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Compared with intravenous chemotherapy, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been shown to improve survival in patients with recurrent colorectal disease confined to the peritoneum. We report our experience with CRS and HIPEC for colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, evaluating prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and perioperative morbidity and mortality., Methods: All patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC were included in our study. Clinical characteristics, operative data, and 30-day morbidity and mortality were collected and evaluated., Results: Between January 2001 and December 2012, there were 35 consecutive patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC at our institution. Thirty-three patients (94%) had optimal cytoreduction. No 30-day mortality was reported, but 14 patients had postoperative complications. The median DFS was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval 5.5-18.7 months), and DFS at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years were 43.8%, 22.3%, and 22.3%, respectively. The median OS was calculated to be 27.1 months (95% confidence interval 15.3-39.1), and the OS at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years were 83.7%, 38.2%, and 19.1%, respectively., Conclusion: CRS and HIPEC can provide survival benefit, with reasonable morbidity and mortality for Asian patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. Patient selection and perioperative management of the patients are key to the success of the procedure., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Taiwan.)

Background: An increasing number of patients are presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis and more centers are performing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). While morbidity and mortality are shown to be acceptable, quality of life after surgery should be assessed., Methods: 63 patients who had CRS and HIPEC from 2001 to 2012 and who were still alive and on follow up were included. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 was administered to the patients., Results: Median age was 53 years (14-71). 44% had ovarian primaries, 21% had appendicael primaries and 19% had colorectal primaries. Median follow-up was 1.08 years (0.06-9.8). The median time from surgery to the questionnaire was 1.3 years (0.24-10.18). There was no statistical difference in scores when comparing by age, gender, recurrence, gender, PCI score, presence of a complication and type of primary cancer. Scores were highest less than 6 months after surgery, dropped subsequently but rose again after 2 years. Our patients had better scores compared to a control group of outpatient cancer patients at our institution as well as the reference EORTC group., Conclusions: In keeping with previous quality of life studies done for CRS and HIPEC patients, we have shown that our patients can achieve a good quality of life after CRS and HIPEC even with recurrent disease., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Randomized placebo-controlled phase III trials failed to show a survival benefit with the addition of gefitinib to platinum-based combination chemotherapy as first-line therapy in unselected patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a retrospective analysis of the outcome in never smokers with advanced NSCLC who received gemcitabine-carboplatin-gefitinib (GCI) as first-line therapy and compared these patients with a historical control group who received gemcitabine-carboplatin (GC) alone in our center., Methods: Never-smoker patients with chemonaive stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were treated with GCI. These patients were compared with a historical control group of never smokers who had been treated with GC alone as the first-line therapy., Results: A total of 80 patients were reviewed: 51 patients were treated with GCI and 29 with GC. Most patients were women, and adenocarcinoma was the most common histologic subtype. The response rate for patients in the GCI group was 62.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 48.08-75.87), which was higher than that of the GC group, 27.6% (95% CI = 12.73-47.24). The GCI group showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival compared with the GC group (hazard ratio of 0.19, 95% CI = 0.105-0.351, p < 0.001). The median overall survival for the patients on GCI was 20.5 months compared 14.1 months (p = 0.05) for patients on GC., Conclusion: The addition of gefitinib to first-line chemotherapy improved progression-free survival and overall survival when used as a first-line therapy in never smokers with advanced NSCLC in this retrospective study. A prospective randomized phase III study is needed to confirm this finding.