Search

Background: False-positive scans and resultant needless early recalls can increase harms and reduce cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening. How LDCT scans are interpreted and classified may impact these metrics., Methods: The Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer risk calculator was used to determine nodule risk of malignancy on baseline screening LDCTs in the Alberta Lung Cancer Screening Study, which were then classified according to Nodule Risk Classification (NRC) categories and ACR Lung Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS). Test performance characteristics and early recall rates were compared for each approach., Results: In all, 775 baseline screens were analyzed. After a mean of 763 days (±203) of follow-up, lung cancer was detected in 22 participants (2.8%). No statistically significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, or area under the receiver operator characteristic curve occurred between the NRC and Lung-RADS nodule management approaches. Early recall rates were 9.2% and 9.3% for NRC and Lung-RADS, with the NRC unnecessarily recalling some ground glass nodules, and the Lung-RADS recalling many smaller solid nodules with low risk of malignancy., Conclusion: Performances of both the NRC and Lung-RADS in this cohort were very good with a trend to higher sensitivity for the NRC. Early recall rates were less than 10% with each approach, significantly lower than rates using the National Lung Screening Trial cutoffs. Further reductions in early recall rates without compromising sensitivity could be achieved by increasing the NRC threshold to 20% for ground glass nodules or by applying the nodule risk calculator with a 5% threshold to 6- to 10-mm solid nodules under Lung-RADS., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Smoking cessation activities incorporated into lung cancer screening programs have been broadly recommended, but studies to date have not shown increased quit rates associated with cessation programs in this setting. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of smoking cessation counseling in smokers presenting for lung cancer screening., Methods: This study is a randomized control trial of an intensive telephone-based smoking cessation counseling intervention incorporating lung cancer screening results versus usual care (information pamphlet). All active smokers enrolled in the Alberta Lung Cancer Screening Study cohort were randomized on a 1:1 ratio with a primary endpoint of self-reported 30-day abstinence at 12 months., Results: A total of 345 active smokers participating in the screening study were randomized to active smoking cessation counseling (n = 171) or control arm (n = 174). Thirty-day smoking abstinence at 12 months post-randomization was noted in 22 of 174 (12.6%) and 24 of 171 (14.0%) of participants in the control and intervention arms, respectively, a 1.4% difference (95% confidence interval: -5.9 to 8.7, p = 0.7). No statistically significant differences in 7-day or point abstinence were noted, nor were differences at 6 months or 24 months., Conclusions: A telephone-based smoking cessation counseling intervention incorporating lung cancer screening results did not result in increased 12-month cessation rates versus written information alone in unselected smokers undergoing lung cancer screening. Routine referral of all current smokers to counseling-based cessation programs may not improve long-term cessation in this patient cohort. Future studies should specifically focus on this subgroup of older long-term smokers to determine the optimal method of integrating smoking cessation with lung cancer screening (clinicaltrials.govNCT02431962)., (Copyright © 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common complication of advanced malignancy, but little is known regarding its prevalence and overall burden on a population level., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of MPE-associated hospitalizations using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HCUP-NIS 2012). Cases were included if MPE was coded as a primary or secondary diagnosis or if an unspecified pleural effusion was coded in addition to a diagnosis of cancer with either of these being the primary diagnosis., Results: A weighted sample of 126,825 admissions (0.35%) for MPE was identified among the 36,484,846 weighted admissions included in the database in 2012. Of these admissions, 70,750 (55.8%) were for female patients. The median age at admission was 68.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]), 58.4-77.2 years). Lung (37.8%), breast (15.2%), hematologic (11.2%), GI tract (11.0%), and gynecologic (9.0%) cancers were the most common primary malignancies associated with MPE. The median length of stay was 5.5 days (IQR, 2.7-10.1 days), and the inpatient mortality rate was 11.6%. Median hospitalization total charges were $42,376 (IQR, $21,618-$84,679). In the multivariate analyses, female sex, large fringe county residential area, Medicare insurance, and elective type of admission were independently associated with a lower risk of inpatient mortality., Conclusions: There is a considerable inpatient burden and high inpatient mortality associated with MPE in the United States, with potential demographic, geographic, and socioeconomic disparities., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT (LDCT) scan has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer mortality. Preliminary reports suggested that up to 20% of lung cancers may be CT scan occult but detectable by autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB). We evaluated the prevalence of CT scan occult, invasive, and high-grade preinvasive lesions in high-risk participants undergoing screening for lung cancer., Methods: The first 1,300 participants from seven centers in the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Study who had ≥ 2% lung cancer risk over 5 years were invited to have an AFB in addition to a LDCT scan. We determined the prevalence of CT scan and AFB abnormalities and analyzed the association between selected predictor variables and preinvasive lesions plus invasive cancer., Results: A total of 776 endobronchial biopsies were performed in 333 of 1,300 (25.6%) participants. Dysplastic or higher-grade lesions were detected in 5.3% of the participants (n = 68; mild dysplasia: n = 36, moderate dysplasia: n = 25, severe dysplasia: n = 3, carcinoma in situ [CIS]: n = 1, and carcinoma: n = 4). Only one typical carcinoid tumor and one CIS lesion were detected by AFB alone, for a rate of CT scan occult cancer of 0.15% (95% CI, 0.0%-0.6%). Fifty-six prevalence lung cancers were detected by LDCT scan (4.3%). The only independent risk factors for finding of dysplasia or CIS on AFB were smoking duration (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07) and FEV 1 percent predicted (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99)., Conclusions: The addition of AFB to LDCT scan in a high lung cancer risk cohort detected too few CT occult cancers (0.15%) to justify its incorporation into a lung cancer screening program., Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00751660; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)