1. Narrowing the diagnostic gap: Genomes, episignatures, long-read sequencing, and health economic analyses in an exome-negative intellectual disability cohort.
- Author
-
Dias KR, Shrestha R, Schofield D, Evans CA, O'Heir E, Zhu Y, Zhang F, Standen K, Weisburd B, Stenton SL, Sanchis-Juan A, Brand H, Talkowski ME, Ma A, Ghedia S, Wilson M, Sandaradura SA, Smith J, Kamien B, Turner A, Bakshi M, Adès LC, Mowat D, Regan M, McGillivray G, Savarirayan R, White SM, Tan TY, Stark Z, Brown NJ, Pérez-Jurado LA, Krzesinski E, Hunter MF, Akesson L, Fennell AP, Yeung A, Boughtwood T, Ewans LJ, Kerkhof J, Lucas C, Carey L, French H, Rapadas M, Stevanovski I, Deveson IW, Cliffe C, Elakis G, Kirk EP, Dudding-Byth T, Fletcher J, Walsh R, Corbett MA, Kroes T, Gecz J, Meldrum C, Cliffe S, Wall M, Lunke S, North K, Amor DJ, Field M, Sadikovic B, Buckley MF, O'Donnell-Luria A, and Roscioli T
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Cohort Studies, Genetic Testing economics, Genetic Testing methods, Whole Genome Sequencing economics, Child, Genome, Human genetics, DNA Copy Number Variations genetics, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide genetics, Child, Preschool, Intellectual Disability genetics, Intellectual Disability diagnosis, Exome genetics, Exome Sequencing economics
- Abstract
Purpose: Genome sequencing (GS)-specific diagnostic rates in prospective tightly ascertained exome sequencing (ES)-negative intellectual disability (ID) cohorts have not been reported extensively., Methods: ES, GS, epigenetic signatures, and long-read sequencing diagnoses were assessed in 74 trios with at least moderate ID., Results: The ES diagnostic yield was 42 of 74 (57%). GS diagnoses were made in 9 of 32 (28%) ES-unresolved families. Repeated ES with a contemporary pipeline on the GS-diagnosed families identified 8 of 9 single-nucleotide variations/copy-number variations undetected in older ES, confirming a GS-unique diagnostic rate of 1 in 32 (3%). Episignatures contributed diagnostic information in 9% with GS corroboration in 1 of 32 (3%) and diagnostic clues in 2 of 32 (6%). A genetic etiology for ID was detected in 51 of 74 (69%) families. Twelve candidate disease genes were identified. Contemporary ES followed by GS cost US$4976 (95% CI: $3704; $6969) per diagnosis and first-line GS at a cost of $7062 (95% CI: $6210; $8475) per diagnosis., Conclusion: Performing GS only in ID trios would be cost equivalent to ES if GS were available at $2435, about a 60% reduction from current prices. This study demonstrates that first-line GS achieves higher diagnostic rate than contemporary ES but at a higher cost., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF