Search

Introduction/objectives: Canine cardiovascular (CV) diseases are often managed in primary care settings. The objectives were to describe CV therapeutic agent (CVTA) prescribing patterns in primary care practices in the United Kingdom (UK) and to evaluate recorded clinical signs, diagnostic tests and justifications for use of torasemide, a recently marketed and authorised loop-diuretic in the UK., Animals, Materials and Methods: Electronic health records (EHRs) describing 3,579,420 consultations (1,043,042 unique dogs) were collated (1 April 2014 and 31 December 2018) by the Small Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network from 270 veterinary practices. Consultations prescribing at least one CVTA were identified. Annual variation in individual CVTA prescriptions was analysed using mixed-effects binomial regression models. Free-text clinical narratives were manually read to determine the first-prescribing event for torasemide., Results: Twenty-nine thousand and seven consultations (0.81% of all consultations, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.86) prescribed CVTA in 14,148 (1.36%) dogs. Furosemide (52.8% of CV-prescribing consultations, 95% CI 50.7-54.9) and pimobendan (51.9%, 95% CI 50.1-53.7) were most prescribed. Longitudinal analysis (2014-2018) showed a significant negative temporal trend for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (p < 0.001), and furosemide (p = 0.003) and a positive temporal trend for pimobendan (p = 0.020) and torasemide (p < 0.001). First prescriptions of torasemide were identified in 16.5% of torasemide-prescribing consultations. Where justification for prescription of torasemide was identified (32.5%), furosemide resistance was the most common (92.0%)., Conclusions: EHRs can be used to temporally monitor prescribing habits, including responses to market authorisations. Despite authorisation in the UK for torasemide use as a first-line diuretic, it was most commonly prescribed after furosemide resistance., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest Statement Small Animal Veterinary Surveillance Network (including Alan Radford and David Singleton) was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Research Council and Dogs Trust during this study and has received prior funding from the Veterinary Medicines Directorate and the British Small Animal Veterinary Association. Funding has also been received from various pharmaceutical companies in the past, but no funding was received for the work presented here. The other authors (EFB, EM and HHG) have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Growth hormone (GH) supplementation is an established therapy to increase stature in GH-deficient or short-for-age children, but comparatively little is known of its effects on the craniofacial skeleton., Methods: Using a mutant strain of Lewis rats (dw/dw) in which GH levels were 6% to 10% of normal, but other trophic hormones were unaffected, we investigated the differential susceptibility of craniofacial measures to GH supplementation, characterized their potential for partial or complete catch-up growth, and compared their growth changes with those in long bones. At 24 days of age and for 3 subsequent weeks, radiographs of the lateral head, upper limb, and lower limb were obtained from 3 groups of growing rats (n = 8-9 in each group): dwarf (experimental) with GH injection, dwarf (sham) with vehicle injection, and wild type (control) with vehicle injection. The x-ray images were scanned, standardized points digitized, and linear distances measured. Absolute growth curves were generated for each group by using multilevel modeling procedures and iterative generalized least-squares curve fitting., Results: For every measure, growth differences were evident between the experimental and the sham groups, but the treatment effect varied inversely with relative maturity of the measure. Although all craniofacial measures showed some catch-up growth, only 31% of craniofacial measures had complete catch-up compared with all limb measures. The percentage of catch-up varied inversely with relative maturity of the measure. Our results suggest that the effects of GH supplementation vary considerably, so that measures with the lowest relative maturity (greatest baseline potential) show the greatest treatment effect and catch-up, whereas more mature measures show less growth response to GH replacement., Conclusions: These results suggest that, depending on the timing of GH supplementation, there is potential for change in proportions or shape of the craniofacial complex.