Search

Runoff losses of herbicides have rarely been compared simultaneously under the same conditions. Our aim was to directly compare herbicide runoff losses, normalised for the amount present (relative runoff loads) and in absolute terms. Toxicity and runoff concentrations were combined to provide a risk ranking relative to diuron. Four rainfall simulation trials were conducted in sugarcane in the Great Barrier Reef catchment. Herbicides studied were older PSII residuals (atrazine, ametryn, diuron, hexazinone), alternative residuals (isoxaflutole, imazapic, metribuzin, metolachlor, pendimethalin) and knockdown herbicides (glyphosate, 2,4-D, fluroxypyr) and the tracer bromide (Br). Simulations were conducted two days after spraying, before differences due to half-lives were apparent. Two trials had bare soil and two had sugarcane trash. Herbicide runoff losses and concentrations were closely related to the amount applied, runoff amounts and partitioning coefficients. Relative runoff losses and absolute losses were similar for most older and alternative residual herbicides, 2,4-D and Br. Glyphosate and pendimethalin relative runoff losses were low, due to greater sorption. Isoxaflutole, imazapic, and fluroxypyr are applied at much lower rates and runoff losses were low. Herbicides were lost in the dissolved phase, except pendimethalin. There was a large range in toxicity relative to diuron. There is a range of herbicide choices posing less offsite risk than diuron and ametryn, which have high application rates and high toxicity. Herbicide choice should consider application rate, runoff losses, sorption, and toxicity., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest This work was supported by Australian and Queensland Governments' Paddock to Reef Integrated Monitoring, Modelling and Reporting Program, Australian Government's Reef Rescue Research and Development Program, Queensland Government's Reef Water Quality R&D Science Program, and Sugar Research Australia Ltd. and USQ (Project NCA011). Sediment partitioning was funded by Reef Rescue R&D Project RRRD038. The author has no competing interests., (Crown Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Modification of terrestrial sediment fluxes can result in increased sedimentation and turbidity in receiving waters, with detrimental impacts on coral reef ecosystems. Preventing anthropogenic sediment reaching coral reefs requires a better understanding of the specific characteristics, sources and processes generating the anthropogenic sediment, so that effective watershed management strategies can be implemented. Here, we review and synthesise research on measured runoff, sediment erosion and sediment delivery from watersheds to near-shore marine areas, with a strong focus on the Burdekin watershed in the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia. We first investigate the characteristics of sediment that pose the greatest risk to coral reef ecosystems. Next we track this sediment back from the marine system into the watershed to determine the storage zones, source areas and processes responsible for sediment generation and run-off. The review determined that only a small proportion of the sediment that has been eroded from the watershed makes it to the mid and outer reefs. The sediment transported >1 km offshore is generally the clay to fine silt (<4-16 μm) fraction, yet there is considerable potential for other terrestrially derived sediment fractions (<63 μm) to be stored in the near-shore zone and remobilised during wind and tide driven re-suspension. The specific source of the fine clay sediments is still under investigation; however, the Bowen, Upper Burdekin and Lower Burdekin sub-watersheds appear to be the dominant source of the clay and fine silt fractions. Sub-surface erosion is the dominant process responsible for the fine sediment exported from these watersheds in recent times, although further work on the particle size of this material is required. Maintaining average minimum ground cover >75% will likely be required to reduce runoff and prevent sub-soil erosion; however, it is not known whether ground cover management alone will reduce sediment supply to ecologically acceptable levels., (Crown Copyright © 2013. All rights reserved.)