Search

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the proteins involved in dengue immunopathogenesis. It is overexpressed in severe dengue and contributes to vascular permeability and plasma leakage. In this study, we investigated the effects of VEGF and anti-VEGF treatments on endothelial cells in vitro, to assess the potential use of anti-VEGF antibodies in managing severe dengue. Methods: Human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells were treated with VEGF and a VEGF/anti-VEGF combination. The effects of the treatments were studied using an endothelial permeability assay and microarray gene expression profiling. In the permeability assay, the fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran fluorescence signal across the endothelial monolayer was recorded, and the cells were stained with PECAM-1 to detect gap formation. RNA was extracted from treated cells for microarray gene profiling and analysis. The results were analyzed for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and gene enrichment analysis. The DEGs were subjected to STRING to construct the protein-protein interaction network and then Cytoscape to identify the hub genes. Results: VEGF-treated endothelial cells showed greater movement of FITC-dextran across the monolayer than VEGF/anti-VEGF-treated cells. There were 111 DEGs for VEGF-treated cells and 118 DEGs for VEGF/anti-VEGF-treated cells. The genes upregulated in VEGF-treated cells were enriched in inflammatory responses and regulation of the endothelial barrier, nitric oxide synthesis, angiogenesis, and the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor signaling pathway. Top 10 hub genes were identified from the DEGs. Conclusions: VEGF treatment increased permeability across endothelial cells, while anti-VEGF reduced this leakage. Analysis of VEGF-treated endothelial cells identified hub genes implicated in severe dengue. The top 10 hub genes were TNF, IL1B, IL6, CCL2, PTGS2, ICAM1, CXCL2, CXCL1, CSF2, and TLR2. The results of this study show that using anti-VEGF antibodies to neutralize VEGF may be a promising therapy to prevent the progression of dengue to severe dengue.

Background: Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is one of the most severe complications of patients with cirrhosis. Although primary prevention drugs, including non-selective β-blockers, have effectively reduced the incidence of bleeding, their efficacy is limited due to side effects and related contraindications. With recent advances in precision medicine, precise drug treatment provides better treatment efficacy., Data Sources: Literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE and Web of Science for relevant articles published up to May 2022. Information on clinical trials was obtained from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ and http://www.chictr.org.cn/., Results: The in-depth understanding of the pathogenesis and advances of portal hypertension has enabled the discovery of multiple molecular targets for promising drugs. According to the site of action, these drugs could be classified into four classes: intrahepatic, extrahepatic, both intrahepatic and extrahepatic targets and others. All these classes of drugs offer advantages over traditional treatments in prevention of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension., Conclusions: This review classified and summarized the promising drugs, which prevent gastroesophageal variceal bleeding by targeting specific markers of pathogenesis of portal hypertension, demonstrating the significance of using the precision medicine strategy to discover and develop promising drugs for the primary prevention of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension., (Copyright © 2023 First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine in China. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Despite persistent inequities in access to care and treatments, advances in combined modality care have led to a steady improvement in outcomes for breast cancer patients across the globe. When estimating the magnitude of clinical benefit of therapies, providers and patients must contend with a multitude of factors that impact treatment decisions and can have long-term effects on quality of life and survival. These include commonly described early toxicities, like aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal syndrome and neuropathy. But longer-term comorbidities often observed among cancer survivors including weight gain, obesity, infertility, psychological distress, sexual dysfunction, second cancers, bone loss, and body image issues can have lasting effects on quality of life. Equally important, system-level factors such as access to care and resource allocation can have a systemic impact on survival and on the quality of survivorship. Financial toxicity including underemployment can have a lasting impact on patients and caregivers. The resulting disparities in access to treatment can help explain much of the observed variability in outcomes, even within high-income countries like the US. This article revisits some of secondary effects from therapies discussed in a prior 2015 review article, along with other impediments to the optimal delivery of breast cancer care that can affect patients anywhere., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)