Search

Background: Although it is recognized that a standardized approach to reporting weight change is essential to meaningful comparisons among cohorts and across studies, consensus is lacking. This study aimed to propose a method of reporting weight change that would allow meaningful comparisons among studies of patients who underwent bariatric surgery and to demonstrate its utility using an example from the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS)., Methods: Relationships among several measures of weight change are described. Results from an observational, longitudinal cohort study of adults undergoing bariatric surgery and from simulation studies are used to illustrate the proposed method., Results: Baseline weight is a critical parameter when assessing weight change. Men undergoing a bariatric procedure other than gastric bypass or adjustable band tended to have greater weight loss 12 months after surgery than men undergoing gastric bypass when not accounting for baseline weight, but the opposite was found when results were adjusted for baseline weight. Simulation results show that with relatively modest sample sizes, the adjusted weight loss was significantly different between the 2 groups of men., Conclusion: A consistent metric for reporting weight loss after bariatric surgery is essential to interpret outcomes across studies and among subgroups. The baseline weight adjusted percent of weight loss (A%WL) uses a standard population (e.g., the LABS cohort) to account for differences between cohorts with respect to baseline weight, and its use can change the interpretation of results compared with an unadjusted measure., (Copyright © 2013 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: The current National Institutes of Health guidelines have recommended bariatric surgery for patients with a body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m(2) or BMI >35 kg/m(2) with significant co-morbidities. However, some preliminary studies have shown that patients with a BMI that does not meet these criteria could also experience similar weight loss and the benefits associated with it., Methods: An institutional review board-approved protocol was obtained to study the effectiveness of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients with a low BMI. A total of 66 patients with a BMI of 30-35 kg/m(2) and co-morbidities (n = 22) or a BMI of 35-40 kg/m(2) without co-morbidities (n = 44) underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. These patients were compared with 438 standard patients who had undergone laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding who met the National Institutes of Health criteria for bariatric surgery. The excess weight loss at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months and the status of their co-morbidities were compared between the 2 groups., Results: The average BMI for the study group was 36.1 +/- 2.6 kg/m(2) compared with 46.0 +/- 7.3 kg/m(2) for the control group. Both groups had significant co-morbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, arthritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, stress incontinence, and obstructive sleep apnea. The mean percentage of excess weight loss was 20.3% +/- 9.0%, 28.5% +/- 14.0%, 44.7% +/- 19.3%, and 42.2% +/- 33.7% at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. This was not significantly different from the excess weight loss in the control group, except for at 12 months. Both groups showed similar improvement of most co-morbidities., Conclusion: Moderately obese patients whose BMI is less than the current guidelines for bariatric surgery will have similar weight loss and associated benefits. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is a safe and effective treatment for patients with a BMI of 30-35 kg/m(2)., (Copyright 2010 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Studies have shown that type 2 diabetes (T2DM) improves or resolves shortly after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Few data are available on T2DM recurrence or the effect of weight regain on T2DM status., Methods: A review of 42 RYGB patients with T2DM and >or=3 years of follow-up and laboratory data was performed. Postoperative weight loss and T2DM status was assessed. Recurrence or worsening was defined as hemoglobin A1c >6.0% and fasting glucose >124 mg/dL and/or medication required after remission or improvement. Patients whose T2DM recurred or worsened were compared with those whose did not, and patients whose T2DM improved were compared with those whose T2DM resolved., Results: T2DM had either resolved or improved in all patients (64% and 36%, respectively); 24% (10) recurred or worsened. The patients with recurrence or worsening had had a lower preoperative body mass index than those without recurrence or worsening (47.9 versus 52.9 kg/m2; P = .05), regained a greater percentage of their lost weight (37.7% versus 15.4%; P = .002), had a greater weight loss failure rate (63% versus 14%; P = .03), and had greater postoperative glucose levels (138 versus 102 mg/dL; P = .0002). Patients who required insulin or oral medication before RYGB were more likely to experience improvement rather than resolution (92% versus 8%, P

Background: Although gastric bypass is the most common bariatric procedure in the United States, it is has been associated with a failure rate of 15% (range 5-40%). The addition of an adjustable gastric band to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has been reported to be a useful revision strategy in a small series of patients with inadequate weight loss after proximal gastric bypass., Methods: We report on 22 patients who presented with inadequate weight loss or significant weight regain after proximal gastric bypass. All patients underwent revision with the placement of an adjustable silicone gastric band around the proximal gastric pouch. The bands were adjusted at 6 weeks postoperatively and beyond, as needed. Complications and weight loss at the most recent follow-up visit were evaluated., Results: The mean age and body mass index at revision was 41.27 years (range 25-58) and 44.8 +/- 6.34 kg/m(2), respectively. Patients had experienced a loss of 19%, 27%, 47.3%, 42.3%, 43%, and 47% of their excess weight at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after the revisional procedure, respectively. Three major complications occurred requiring reoperation. No band erosions have been documented., Conclusion: The results from this larger series of patients have also indicated that the addition of the adjustable silicone gastric band causes significant weight loss in patients with poor weight loss outcomes after gastric bypass. That no anastomosis or change in absorption is required makes this an attractive revisional strategy. As with all revisional procedures, the complication rates appear to be increased compared with a similar primary operation., (2010 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To describe the incidence, etiology, outcomes, and management of enteric leaks in patients who had undergone open or laparoscopic gastric bypass., Methods: From November 1996 to November 2006, 1133 patients underwent primary gastric bypass at Columbia University, New York-Presbyterian Hospital. A retrospective review of our prospective bariatric surgery registry identified 17 patients (1.5%) who developed a clinically apparent enteric leak after surgery. The demographic and outcome data were studied., Results: The mean body mass index was 52 kg/m(2) (range 35-65), and 15 (88%) of the 17 patients were women. The mean number of co-morbidities per patient was 1.3 and included hypertension in 11, diabetes in 9, and sleep apnea in 6. Ten patients had previously undergone abdominal surgery. The enteric leak was diagnosed by radiographic studies in 12 patients (9 of 12 by upper gastrointestinal series and 3 of 6 by computed tomography); the remaining 5 patients were diagnosed at re-exploration. Of the 17 patients, 12 (70%) were treated by laparoscopy and 5 (29%) by laparotomy. The mean time from completion of the index procedure to the diagnosis of the leak was 2 days (range 1-5) for patients treated by laparoscopy versus 4 days (range 1-6) for patients treated by laparotomy (P <.05). The patients treated by laparoscopy experienced a shorter hospital stay, but the difference was not statistically significant (mean 11.4 days, range 6-36, versus 18 days, range 7-33; P >.05). One of the laparoscopic patients (5.9%) died., Conclusion: Enteric leak is a significant complication after gastric bypass. Prompt treatment should be based on clinical suspicion, because contrast and cross-sectional imaging studies might not be reliable diagnostic tests. A laparoscopic index procedure might be associated with an earlier diagnosis.