Search

Background: Optimization of clinical pathways and logistics led to the introduction of outpatient joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee. Nevertheless, little is known about what these current protocols look like and how they differ from "standard" inpatient protocols. This study aimed to find preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative differences between outpatient and inpatient pathways., Methods: A questionnaire (ranging between 23 and 37 items) was developed and administered by email to orthopedic surgeons who were a member of the Dutch Hip Society and Dutch Knee Society. Survey response rate was 38% (N = 117)., Results: No significant differences were found in preoperative pathway characteristics. The administration regime for tranexamic acid significantly differed between outpatient and inpatient pathways ( P < .001 and P  = .002 for hip and knee arthroplasty, respectively), with outpatient pathways using a combined (eg, oral and intravenous) administration regime more frequently. The perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis regime also significantly differed between outpatient and inpatient pathways ( P < .001 and P  = .014, respectively), with outpatient pathways more frequently incorporating fewer antibiotic doses. Same-day postoperative mobilization significantly less often occurred if surgery took place later that day in inpatient hip arthroplasty pathways (24%; P  = .034). Postoperative hemoglobin-check occurred significantly more often on indication in outpatient than in inpatient hip and knee arthroplasty pathways (∼75% vs ∼25%; P  = .001)., Conclusions: Few intraoperative and postoperative differences in outpatient and inpatient pathways were found and probably mainly relied on logistical grounds. Nonetheless, findings suggested that outpatient pathways tended to be more up-to-date and innovative than inpatient pathways., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Predictors of patient satisfaction (PS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are not well known. This study investigated predictors of PS and whether PS was associated with pre-injury level of sport participation, patient reported knee function and quality of life after ACL reconstruction., Methods: Patients who underwent primary hamstring ACL reconstruction between January 2015 and December 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. An online survey was used to evaluate PS (yes = satisfied, no = unsatisfied), duration of supervised postoperative rehabilitation, timing of return to pre-injury level of sport, pre-injury level of sport participation, patient reported knee function and quality of life. Preoperative, operative and postoperative variables were collected from the medical records., Results: A total of 183 patients completed the survey at a median of 3.6 (1.5) years after ACL surgery. At final follow-up, 82% of patients were satisfied with the outcome. Preoperative (e.g. age) and operative (e.g. meniscal tear) variables were not predictors of PS (p > 0.05). Duration of supervised postoperative rehabilitation, timing of return to pre-injury level of sport and postoperative ACL injury were predictors of PS (p = 0.018, p = 0.016 and p < 0.001, respectively). Pre-injury level of sport participation was significantly higher in satisfied compared to unsatisfied patients: 44.7% (n = 67) versus 18.2% (n = 6) (p = 0.005). In addition, satisfied patients reported significantly higher patient reported knee function and quality of life compared to unsatisfied patients (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: This study provided data on predictors of PS after primary ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, PS was associated with pre-injury level of sport participation, patient reported knee function and quality of life., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Patient information holds an important role in knee arthroplasty surgery regarding patients' expectations and outcomes after surgery. The purpose of the present study was to explore the experiences and opinions of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty (KA) surgery on an information brochure provided preoperatively., Methods: A qualitative case study of 8 patients using individual semi-structured interviews was conducted to explore patients' opinions on an information brochure in KA surgery., Results: Patients rated the brochure as good and recommended its use. Unsatisfactory information regarding wound healing, pain expectations, postoperative exercises and use of walking aids was reported. Patients stated that the table of contents was insufficient and the size of the brochure (A4-format) too large. Patients reported to have no need for additional digital sources (e.g. applications, websites)., Conclusion: These opinions support the use of an information brochure. The reported opinions were used to improve the brochure. Future research should focus on the improvement of information sources by involving patients (and other users) in the development process in which the information is tailored towards patient needs., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The cruciate retaining lipped (CR-lipped) bearing is designed to provide more anterior-posterior (AP) stability and could be employed to resolve excessive intraoperative laxity during the cruciate retaining TKA (CR-TKA). The aim of the study was to determine whether the CR-lipped bearing in CR-TKAs with a perioperative excessive laxity allows equivalent functional results as compared to the standard CR articulation., Methods: A cohort of 111 TKAs with CR-lipped bearings was matched to a cohort of conventional CR bearings regarding age and sex. The CR-lipped bearing was used in patients with excessive knee AP laxity and the regular CR bearing was used in patients without excessive AP laxity during TKA. Various PROMs (WOMAC, KSS, SF-36) were assessed preoperatively and at 5-years postoperative in combination with revision rate and Range of Motion (ROM)., Results: PROMs did not differ significantly between both groups 5-years postoperatively. Mean ROM (flexion) 5-years postoperatively was not significantly different. The implant survivorship was 100% for both cohorts with revision for any reason as end point., Conclusion: Based on these results, the CR-lipped bearing is a safe and effective solution for mild interoperatively assessed PCL laxity during CR-TKA without loss of function or decreased survivorship at 5 years. Peroperative conversion to a PS-TKA in order to obtain satisfactory functional scores might therefore not be necessary when mild PCL laxity is observed during surgery. Further research should focus on verifying this approach and longer follow-up is needed to generate data on long term survivorship., Level of Evidence: Level IV therapeutic, retrospective, cohort study., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The self-assessment section of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASESq) is one of the most used patient-reported outcome measures for general shoulder problems. This study was performed to establish a valid Dutch version of the ASESq (ASESq-NL)., Materials and Methods: A clinical prospective, nonrandomized study was performed. Translation of the ASESq into Dutch was done following the guidelines of cross-cultural adaptation. Patients older than 17 years of age with shoulder problems were included. Patients who declined to participate or insufficiently completed questionnaires were excluded. For test-retest reliability analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated and an interval of 7-28 days between test and retest was set. Cronbach alpha was used to determine internal consistency. Dutch validated versions of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were completed and compared with the ASESq-NL to evaluate construct validity using a Spearman rank correlation coefficient calculation., Results: A total of 92 patients were included. Test-retest reliability was excellent with an ICC of 0.82. The mean test-retest interval was 13 days (standard deviation 4.4). Internal consistency was good, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.83. Construct validity of the ASES questionnaire was good. All domains of the ASESq-NL had significant ( P < .05) correlations with the domains of the SPADI and the SF-36, except for the SF-36 domains stability with "physical function and energy" and "emotional well-being.", Conclusion: The Dutch ASES questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for the evaluation of shoulder problems and is permissible for implementation into the Dutch health care system., (© 2019 The Authors.)