Search

Since the introduction of hormonal contraceptives in the 1960s, there have been a variety of both health benefits and safety concerns attributed to their use. In most instances, the noncontraceptive benefits of oral contraceptives (OCs) outweigh the potential cardiovascular risks. In fact, the probability of a patient experiencing a cardiovascular event while taking a low-dose OC is very low. However, smoking, hypertension, obesity, and diabetes are risk factors that must be taken into account when prescribing OCs. The neoplastic effects of hormonal contraceptives have been extensively studied, and recent meta-analyses indicate that there is a reduction in the risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer, a possible small increase in the risk for breast and cervical cancer, and an increased risk of liver cancer. Finally, many women will experience noncontraceptive health benefits with OCs that expand far beyond pregnancy prevention. Some of these benefits include reduction in menstrual-related symptoms, fewer ectopic pregnancies, a possible increase in bone density, and possible protection against pelvic inflammatory disease.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether women with a family history of ovarian cancer are at reduced risk of ovarian cancer from the use of oral contraceptives and to compare their risk with that of women with no family history of ovarian cancer., Study Design: A population-based case-controlled study was conducted from May 1994 through July 1998 in which 767 women aged 20 to 69 years with a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer were ascertained from 39 hospitals in 3 northeastern states. Personal interviews with the women and 1367 control subjects provided data that allowed us to estimate the relative risk of ovarian cancer in relation to a family history of cancer and total duration of oral contraception., Results: Among the 33 case patients and 24 control subjects with a first-degree family history of ovarian cancer, risk of ovarian cancer declined with increasing duration of oral contraception (P =.01). Risk reduction from short-term use of oral contraceptives (< or = 48 months) did not differ significantly by family history (combined estimate of odds ratio, 0.72; 90% CI, 0.59%-0.87%). Risk reduction from long-term use of oral contraceptives (>48 months) was greater in women with a positive family history of ovarian cancer (odds ratio, 0.12) than in women with a negative family history of ovarian cancer (odds ratio, 0.51; test of interaction, P =.04; 692 case patients, 1279 control subjects)., Conclusion: Four to 8 years of oral contraception may substantially reduce the risk of ovarian cancer by age 70 years in women with a family history of the disease, from approximately 4 women per 100 women who did not use oral contraceptives to only 2 women per 100 women who did use oral contraceptives.

The most frequent major adverse effect of hormonal contraception is an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. The effect on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) differs and is strongly influenced by smoking and the presence of other cardiovascular risks factors, such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus. The incidence of each disease rises with age and there are differences in risk among hormonal contraceptive preparations. This article provides a framework within which to assess the balance of risks among types of hormonal contraceptives according to individual circumstances. Data on cardiovascular disease mortality rates in women of reproductive age in different countries of the world were compiled from nationally reported statistics and supplemented where possible with reported disease incidence rates. Risks associated with current use of hormonal contraception were compiled from the most recent publications on the cardiovascular effects of steroid hormone contraception. These were combined to estimate the total cardiovascular incidence and mortality according to baseline cardiovascular risk and individual characteristics. Mortality rates for cardiovascular diseases are very low in women of reproductive age. Myocardial infarction mortality rates rise from < 0.4 per 100,000 woman-years at age 15-24 years to the range 2 to 7 per 100,000 woman-years at age 35-44 years. Stroke mortality rates similarly rise steeply with age and are between 3 and 5 times higher than those for MI. VTE mortality rates rise less steeply with age and are approximately one-tenth the MI mortality rates at age 35-44 years. The adverse effect of oral contraceptives (OC) on the risk of VTE is the most important contributor to the total number of cardiovascular cases attributable to OC use. The increased risk of stroke and MI dominate the patterns of mortality in OC users and smokers. The additional risks attributable to smoking are greater than the additional risks attributable to OC use. The risk attributable to OC use in women < 35 years of age is small, even if they smoke, but there are substantially increased risks in older women who both smoke and use OC. The additional mortality attributable to OC use can be reduced by screening users, as this results in lower relative risks of ischemic stroke and MI. Differences between OC types in the relative risk of VTE contribute little to the total cardiovascular mortality associated with OC use, even though the total number of cardiovascular events is increased. A potential reduction in the risk of MI with desogestrel and gestodene compared with levonorgestrel-containing OC would have little difference on overall mortality rates in women in their 20s and 30s, but may result in a net reduction in OC-attributable mortality in women aged 40-44 years who smoke. An overall quantification of the risks for different types of oral contraceptive users is necessary for an informed choice of contraceptive method, and any assessment of the balance of cardiovascular risks is complex. The model provides a tool to assess, at the level of the individual, the risks associated with use of different OC according to personal circumstances. It is important to consider the user's age and smoking status when determining OC attributable risks.

Analyses of tumor size and breast cancer stage were used to determine whether biased detection of breast cancer could have materially influenced estimates of risk associated with use of oral contraceptives. In a population-based case-control study conducted from 1980-1982, surveillance for breast cancer by breast exams, but not mammography, was found to be strongly linked to use of oral contraceptives. Tumors were slightly smaller and less likely to be late-stage (TNM stage III or IV) in patients who had used oral contraceptives. The net effect of any diagnostic bias on advancing the date of cancer diagnosis, whether from breast exams or other sources, was estimated to be less than 8 weeks. This corresponds to spuriously increasing the risk of early-occurring breast cancer in oral contraceptive users by at most 2.4% (relative risk = 1.024).

Effects of oral contraception on neoplasia of the uterine corpus are reviewed on the basis of epidemiologic studies reported to date. A duration-related protective effect against endometrial cancer occurs from use of combined oral contraceptives, those in which each active pill contains both estrogen and progestogen. The risk before age 60 years is reduced by about 38% with two years of use; use of combined OCs for 4, 8, and 12 years, respectively, confers an estimated 51%, 64%, and 70% reduction in endometrial cancer risk. The protective effect appears not to be diminished by discontinued use, even 15 or more years after stopping. Whether protection continues throughout the entire postmenopausal period, even in the presence of long-term hormone replacement therapy, remains to be seen. Use of combined OCs may protect against uterine leiomyomas ("fibroids"), but the evidence is not conclusive. The few findings about effects of oral contraception on the risk of adenomatous hyperplasia are of uncertain validity. Only one study, with few patients, has considered oral contraception in relation to uterine sarcomas.

Among women in general the risk of breast cancer through 59 years of age does not appear to be affected appreciably by the use of oral contraceptives. Nonetheless, concern continues to be expressed about the effects of early age at first use, long-term duration of use, formulation, and a variety of other factors thought to influence breast cancer risk in the presence of oral contraception. A number of recent studies restricted to young women suggest that long-term use may increase the risk of disease occurring very early, but the present lack of consistent findings in well-conducted epidemiologic studies prevents any certain conclusion with regard to cause-and-effect. However, if an increased risk were indeed present, the most plausible interpretation is that long-term oral contraception promotes earlier clinical manifestation of breast cancer in some women while having no net impact on their lifetime risk of the disease.

Effects of oral contraception on cancers of the female breast and reproductive tract are critically reviewed from human studies reported since 1980. The cumulative risk of breast cancer through 59 years of age appears to bear no relationship to oral contraceptive (OC) use whatsoever. Studies restricted to women under age 45, however, raise concern about a possible adverse effect from OC use before a first-term pregnancy. A duration-related protective effect against endometrial cancer occurs from use of combined OCs. The risk is reduced by about 40% with 2 years of use, and by about 60% with 4 or more years of oral contraception. Oral contraception in excess of 3 years protects against ovarian cancer. Four years of use confers a 50% reduction in risk and 7 or more years of use confers a 60%-80% reduction in ovarian cancer risk. Studies of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ suggest elevated risks with 2 or more years of OC use, although results are difficult to interpret in view of numerous factors that might distort the findings. The risk of invasive cervical cancer appear to be unaffected by up to 5 years of oral contraception. Beyond this, there is evidence suggesting an elevated risk which approaches a 2-fold increase at 10 years of use. Cancers of the vagina and fallopian tube are extremely rare. Their risks have yet to be characterized in relation to oral contraception.

Characteristics of women with potential for modifying the relationship between use of oral contraceptives (OCs) and the risk of premenopausal breast cancer were investigated using data from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone study, a population-based, case-control study conducted in eight geographic areas of the United States. Cases consisted of 2945 women who were premenopausal and 20-54 years of age when breast cancer was diagnosed between December 1, 1980, and December 31, 1982; controls consisted of 2646 women with no history of breast cancer who were also premenopausal and 20-54 years of age when selected during the same period. Results are presented with the cases and controls divided into eight groups on the basis of age at diagnosis on selection (20-44, 45-54), parity (0, greater than or equal to 1), and age at menarche (less than 13, greater than or equal to 13). Among nulliparous women who experienced menarche before age 13, the relative risk of developing breast cancer in the age interval 20-44 years is estimated to be 1.0 for never-users of OCs (reference), 1.3 for greater than 0-3 years of use (95% confidence intervals 0.7-2.4), 1.3 for 4-7 years (95% CI 0.7-2.6), 2.7 for 8-11 years (95% CI 1.2-6.3), and 11.8 for 12 years or longer (95% CI 1.4-95.7). OC use is not significantly related to the risk of breast cancer among women in any of the other seven groups. These findings suggest that prolonged OC use may accelerate the onset of breast cancer for a small group of susceptible women while having no appreciable impact on overall risk. The findings should be regarded as tentative, however, since they are based upon numerous comparisons and because age of menarche was stratified at 13 years to highlight the concentration of breast cancer risk apparent in our data.

The consequences of a factory closure on future employment, disability and death were investigated in a 10-year prospective follow-up study in a general practice setting. The study population consisted of 85 persons who lost their jobs when a brisling sardine factory close to Bergen in Norway was shut down in 1975. The employees of a nearby "sister factory" within the same company were chosen as a control population, consisting of 87 persons. After the factory closure, the annual employment rate of the study group showed a steady rise to a maximum level of 44% within 6 years, but even after 10 years never matched the employment rate of the controls. The cumulative rates of disability pension, granted for medical conditions only, was more than three times higher in the study group than among controls from the second through the fourth year of follow-up. This excess of disabilities then stayed relatively constant at approximately 17 per 100 persons from 5 to 10 years after the shut-down. Given present days' unemployment, the results of this investigation point to the importance of acknowledging a long-term effect of job-loss on health and social readjustment.

The procedure of in vitro fertilization, including ova collection and embryo culture and transfer, raises concern about the risk of abnormalities arising from the technique. In vitro versus in vivo comparison might be made in the study of preimplantation embryos and spontaneous abortions, the results of amniocentesis, and the findings among fetal deaths and live births. In vivo, 40% to 50% of implantation blastocysts are estimated to have a chromosomal abnormality, over 99% of which are estimated to be eliminated during the course of pregnancy. In principle, the use of early spontaneous abortions can be more efficient than amniocentesis for detecting an increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities at birth. Unless in vitro fertilization in humans strongly contradicts the experience in domestic animal reproduction, which suggests no increased risk of abnormalities at birth, a large number of births would be required to provide a definitive assessment of risk.

The relation between use of oral contraceptives (OCs) by young women and their risk of breast cancer before 45 years of age was investigated by analysis of data from a population-based, case-control study conducted in eight geographic regions of the United States. 2088 women with breast cancer diagnosed between Dec 1, 1980, and Dec 31, 1982, were compared with 2065 controls selected during the same period. There was no significant increase or decrease in the risk of breast cancer for OC users according to age at first use or subsequent duration of use, even for women who first used OCs before the age of 20 years and who continued to use them for more than 4 years. Risk was not altered significantly for women who used OCs with high progestagen "potency" before the age of 25 years (even when duration of use exceeded 6 years), for those who used OCs before first-term pregnancy (even when duration of use exceeded 4 years), or for OC users according to age at diagnosis. These results suggest that use of OCs by young women in the United States has no effect on the aggregate risk of breast cancer before 45 years of age.

We report analyses designed to address the recent hypothesis that women who use combination-type OCs containing ethinylestradiol (EE) are at increased risk of breast cancer before age 45, if use of such OCs occurs prior to first term pregnancy (FTP). Our findings, based on data from 1679 cases and 1689 controls, 20-44 years of age, from the population-based Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study, are against the hypothesis. The relative risk of breast cancer by duration of exclusive use prior to FTP of OCs containing EE is estimated to be 1.0 (1-12 months EE use), 1.2 (13-48 months EE use), and 0.9 (49+ months EE use). There was no evidence of a latent effect. Among parous women with 49+ months exclusive use prior to FTP of EE-containing OCs, the relative risk of breast cancer was estimated as 0.9 (0-4 years after FTP) and 0.6 (5-9 years after FTP). Among nulliparous women with 49+ months exclusive use of EE-containing OCs, the relative risk of breast cancer was estimated as 1.0 (0-4 years since first use), 0.7 (5-9 years since first use), and 1.1 (10-14 years since first use). With regard to exclusive use of OCs containing mestranol, parous women who used such preparations long-term before their FTP showed no alteration of breast cancer risk, even 15 years or more after pregnancy. Nulliparous women with exclusive use of ME-containing OCs did show elevations in breast cancer risk, but the magnitude of risk in relation to duration of use and latent interval shows no pattern that suggests a cause-effect relationship.