Search

Read-across is a well-established data gap-filling technique applied for regulatory purposes. In US Environmental Protection Agency's New Chemicals Program under TSCA, read-across has been used extensively for decades, however the extent of application and acceptance of read-across among U.S. federal agencies is less clear. In an effort to build read-across capacity, raise awareness of the state of the science, and work towards a harmonization of read-across approaches across U.S. agencies, a new read-across workgroup was established under the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM). This is one of several ad hoc groups ICCVAM has convened to implement the ICCVAM Strategic Roadmap. In this article, we outline the charge and scope of the workgroup and summarize the current applications, tools used, and needs of the agencies represented on the workgroup for read-across. Of the agencies surveyed, the Environmental Protection Agency had the greatest experience in using read-across whereas other agencies indicated that they would benefit from gaining a perspective of the landscape of the tools and available guidance. Two practical case studies are also described to illustrate how the read-across approaches applied by two agencies vary on account of decision context., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The estimation and characterization of a cancer risk is grounded in the observation of tumors in humans and/or experimental animals. Increasingly, however, other kinds of data (non-tumor data) are finding application in cancer risk assessment. Metabolism and kinetics, adduct formation, genetic damage, mode of action, and biomarkers of exposure, susceptibility, and effects are examples. While these and other parameters have been studied for many important chemicals over the past 30-40 years, their use in risk assessments is more recent, and new insights and opportunities are continuing to unfold. To provide some perspective on this field, the ILSI Risk Science Institute asked a select working group to characterize the pertinent non-tumor data available for 1,3-butadiene, benzene, and vinyl chloride and to comment on the utility of these data in characterizing cancer risks. This paper presents the findings of that working group and concludes with 15 simple principles for the use of non-tumor data in cancer risk assessment., (Copyright 2003 Elsevier Science (USA))

Polymorphisms of several clotting factors have been associated during the past few years with an increased risk of both venous or arterial thrombosis. However, final proof for the existence of a pathogenetic relationship between a given polymorphism and an increased risk for thrombosis is still lacking. Particular emphasis has been placed recently on a 20210 G to A prothrombin polymorphism. A critical review of available data indicates that such an abnormality may be associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis but not arterial thrombosis (with a possible exception for myocardial infarction). However, this conclusion is based only on retrospective cohort studies which compared the prevalence of the abnormality in a group of patients with past venous or arterial thrombosis with a normal group (with no thrombosis). No prospective study has yet to show that patients with the abnormality, given similar additional acquired risk factors, have a higher incidence of thrombotic complications as compared with controls. The mechanism whereby the abnormality might cause thrombosis has been assumed to be an increase in prothrombin levels. Since an association between two phenomena does not necessarily mean that a causal relationship exists between the same events, it is important to be cautious before claiming that such abnormality is responsible for thrombosis. Therefore, although included commonly in the investigation profile, the search for the 20210 G to A prothrombin abnormality should not be considered yet to be an essential component in the routine study of hypercoagulable and/or thrombotic conditions.

The recent description of a factor V abnormality (factor V Leiden) associated with an increased incidence of thrombosis has considerably increased interest in this clotting factor. The discovery of this new clinical entity indicated the need for an updated classification of factor V defects. These should be divided into hemorrhagic and thrombotic disorders. A proper classification of hemorrhagic disorders should include: 1) homozygous and heterozygous 'true' factor V deficiency; and 2) combined factor V and factor VIII deficiencies. The latter should be subdivided in Type I (association type) and Type II (common defect). A suitable classification of the thrombotic factor V defects should include: 1) homozygous and heterozygous factor V Leiden; and 2) combined heterozygous factor V Leiden and heterozygous 'true' factor V deficiency. The presence of thrombosis in these latter patients, often as severe as those seen in homozygous patients with activated protein C (APC) resistance, allows important considerations on the functions of factor V. It would seem that half the normal level of factor V activity and antigen is unable to protect against thrombosis in patients with heterozygous APC resistance. An accurate evaluation of factor V activity and antigen is indicated in all patients with suspected factor V defects. The first suspicion may be obtained by the presence of a mild prolongation of prothrombin time and of partial thromboplastin time. The suspicion should then be immediately confirmed by specific factor V activity and antigen assays. This approach is of great importance even for the presumptive diagnosis of pseudohomozygosis for APC resistance. In fact, in these cases, factor V activity is about 50% of normal, whereas factor V antigen is 100% of normal. In heterozygous 'true' factor V deficiency both activity and antigen are about 50% of normal.

Rainbow trout (Onchorynchus mykiss) and Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) were exposed to the hypolipidemic drug gemfibrozil, a known rodent peroxisome proliferator. Trout were injected (i.p.) daily for 2 weeks at doses of 0, 46, 87, or 152 mg/kg/day. Medaka were exposed to the nominal concentrations of 0, 1.25, 2.5, or 5 ppm in water for 2 weeks in a static-renewal system. Peroxisome proliferation was assessed by measuring fatty acyl-CoA oxidase (FAO) activity, peroxisomal bifunctional enzyme (PBE) quantity, and changes in liver-to-body weight ratios (LWR). Results indicate that a mild peroxisome proliferative response was observed in rainbow trout (significant increases in FAO activity at all dose levels and in LWR at the highest dose level). Medaka demonstrated a significant increase in PBE at the highest dose level, while nonsignificant increases in FAO activity were observed at the mid- and high-dose levels.