1. Open-label, randomized study of individualized, pharmacokinetically (PK)-guided dosing of paclitaxel combined with carboplatin or cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- Author
-
Joerger M, von Pawel J, Kraff S, Fischer JR, Eberhardt W, Gauler TC, Mueller L, Reinmuth N, Reck M, Kimmich M, Mayer F, Kopp HG, Behringer DM, Ko YD, Hilger RA, Roessler M, Kloft C, Henrich A, Moritz B, Miller MC, Salamone SJ, and Jaehde U
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols pharmacokinetics, Carboplatin adverse effects, Carboplatin pharmacokinetics, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology, Cisplatin adverse effects, Cisplatin pharmacokinetics, Disease-Free Survival, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions classification, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions pathology, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Paclitaxel adverse effects, Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics, Carboplatin administration & dosage, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy, Cisplatin administration & dosage, Paclitaxel administration & dosage
- Abstract
Background: Variable chemotherapy exposure may cause toxicity or lack of efficacy. This study was initiated to validate pharmacokinetically (PK)-guided paclitaxel dosing in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to avoid supra- or subtherapeutic exposure., Patients and Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed, advanced NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive up to 6 cycles of 3-weekly carboplatin AUC 6 or cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) either with standard paclitaxel at 200 mg/m(2) (arm A) or PK-guided dosing of paclitaxel (arm B). In arm B, initial paclitaxel dose was adjusted to body surface area, age, sex, and subsequent doses were guided by neutropenia and previous-cycle paclitaxel exposure [time above a plasma concentration of 0.05 µM (Tc>0.05)] determined from a single blood sample on day 2. The primary end point was grade 4 neutropenia; secondary end points included neuropathy, radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Among 365 patients randomly assigned, grade 4 neutropenia was similar in both arms (19% versus 16%; P = 0.10). Neuropathy grade ≥2 (38% versus 23%, P < 0.001) and grade ≥3 (9% versus 2%, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in arm B, independent of the platinum drug used. The median final paclitaxel dose was significantly lower in arm B (199 versus 150 mg/m(2), P < 0.001). Response rate was similar in arms A and B (31% versus 27%, P = 0.405), as was adjusted median PFS [5.5 versus 4.9 months, hazard ratio (HR) 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.49, P = 0.228] and OS (10.1 versus 9.5 months, HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.81-1.37, P = 0.682)., Conclusion: PK-guided dosing of paclitaxel does not improve severe neutropenia, but reduces paclitaxel-associated neuropathy and thereby improves the benefit-risk profile in patients with advanced NSCLC., Clinical Trial Information: NCT01326767 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01326767)., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF