Search

Background: Emerging evidence supports tumor tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Data on liquid biopsy-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) CGP are scarce and mainly retrospective. Prospective comparison between the two tests is not currently available., Materials and Methods: The CAPRI 2-GOIM trial investigates efficacy and safety of ctDNA-driven, cetuximab-based sequence of three treatment lines in patients with RAS/BRAF V600E wild-type (WT) mCRC, as determined by the local laboratory. Before first-line therapy, CGP is carried out with FoundationOne (F1) CDx and F1 Liquid (F1L) CDx (324 genes) on tumor tissue DNA and plasma ctDNA, respectively., Results: For 2/207 (0.96%) patients, no ctDNA was detected by F1L CDx. No patient displayed tumor fraction (TF) below 1%, whereas elevated ctDNA (TF ≥ 10%) was detected among 140/205 (68.3%) patients. One thousand and thirteen genomic variants were identified. F1L CDx found KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF V600E alterations in 19 patients, whose tumors were classified as RAS/BRAF V600E WT by the local laboratory. Both F1 CDx and F1L CDx were available for 164/205 (80%) patients. A concordance of 61.4% between the two tests was observed. The concordance increased to 72.7% for F1L CDx with TF ≥ 10%. Concordance for genes potentially involved in anti-epidermal growth factor receptor resistance was found in 137/164 (83%) patients, increasing to 91.5% for F1L CDx with TF ≥ 10%. A higher number of genomic alterations was detected by F1L CDx compared with F1 CDx, including six cases with KRAS and NRAS alterations. Overall, 109/205 (53.2%) patients displayed at least one actionable genomic alteration (I to IIIB), according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT)., Conclusion: Baseline liquid biopsy-based CGP is feasible, has high concordance with tumor tissue-based CGP, could better recapitulate tumor heterogeneity, and is clinically informative by identifying additional actionable genomic alterations in approximately half of RAS/BRAF V600E WT mCRC patients., (Copyright © 2024 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Optimizing chemotherapy to achieve disease and symptoms control is a noteworthy purpose in advanced breast cancer (ABC). We reported the activity and quality of life of a phase II study, comparing metronomic regimen with standard schedule as first line chemotherapy for ABC., Methods: Patients with HER2 negative ABC were randomized to non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD, 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) and cyclophosphamide (CTX, 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) (Arm A) or NPLD (20 mg/m2 day, on day 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks) and metronomic daily oral CTX 50 mg (ARM B). Primary end-points were overall response rate (ORR) and quality of life, secondary progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity., Results: From August 2012 to December 2017, 121 patients were enrolled, 105 evaluable. Median follow-up was 21.3 months. Most patients had hormone receptor positive. ORR was 43 % in arm A and 50 % in arm B. Median PFS was 8.9 months in arm A and 6,4 months in arm B. There was no difference in OS. Total score was not clinically different between the two arms. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 12 patients and 16 patients respectively; alopecia G2 in 41 % (77 %) vs 14 (27 %) in arm A and in arm B respectively. One cardiac toxicity was observed (arm A)., Conclusions: First line metronomic chemotherapy for HER2 negative ABC had similar clinical activity and quite better tolerability than standard schedule and could be considered a further treatment option when chemotherapy is indicated., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Despite several therapeutic efforts, lung cancer remains a highly lethal disease. Novel therapeutic approaches encompass immune-checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapeutics and antibody-drug conjugates, with different results. Several studies have been aimed at identifying biomarkers able to predict benefit from these therapies and create a prediction model of response, despite this there is a lack of information to help clinicians in the choice of therapy for lung cancer patients with advanced disease. This is primarily due to the complexity of lung cancer biology, where a single or few biomarkers are not sufficient to provide enough predictive capability to explain biologic differences; other reasons include the paucity of data collected by single studies performed in heterogeneous unmatched cohorts and the methodology of analysis. In fact, classical statistical methods are unable to analyze and integrate the magnitude of information from multiple biological and clinical sources (eg, genomics, transcriptomics, and radiomics)., Methods and Objectives: APOLLO11 is an Italian multicentre, observational study involving patients with a diagnosis of advanced lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC) treated with innovative therapies. Retrospective and prospective collection of multiomic data, such as tissue- (eg, for genomic, transcriptomic analysis) and blood-based biologic material (eg, ctDNA, PBMC), in addition to clinical and radiological data (eg, for radiomic analysis) will be collected. The overall aim of the project is to build a consortium integrating different datasets and a virtual biobank from participating Italian lung cancer centers. To face with the large amount of data provided, AI and ML techniques will be applied will be applied to manage this large dataset in an effort to build an R-Model, integrating retrospective and prospective population-based data. The ultimate goal is to create a tool able to help physicians and patients to make treatment decisions., Conclusion: APOLLO11 aims to propose a breakthrough approach in lung cancer research, replacing the old, monocentric viewpoint towards a multicomprehensive, multiomic, multicenter model. Multicenter cancer datasets incorporating common virtual biobank and new methodologic approaches including artificial intelligence, machine learning up to deep learning is the road to the future in oncology launched by this project., Competing Interests: Disclosures Arsela Prelaj certifies that all conflicts of interest reported can be considered outside the present paper: consulting or advisory role for BMS, AstraZeneca; had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed by Roche, Italfarmaco; principal investigator of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals. Alessandra Laura Giulia Pedrocchi holds shares of Agade srl. Giuseppe Lo Russo has received fees for acting as a consultant from Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Amgen, Sanofi, Italfarmaco, Pfizer; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Amgen, Sanofi, has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche, BMS, MSD; has participated on data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, has acted as principal investigator in sponsored clinical trials for Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, GSK, Amgen, Sanofi. Rossana Berardi has received fees for acting as a consultant, for lectures and/or for participating to advisory board from BI, EISAI, GSK, Italfarmaco, Otsuka, Lilly, MSD; has received funding to Institution from AZ, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche; AMGEN. Giulia Galli declares the following conflicts of interest: Italpharma (advisory board); Roche (travel accommodation); Astra Zeneca, BMS, MSD (honoraria for lectures). Federica Bertolini has received consultant fees from MSD, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly, Eisai, Sanofi and speakers fee from BMS, MSD, Astra Zeneca. Filippo de Braud reports a patent for PCT/IB2020/055956 pending and a patent for IT201900009954 pending; and Roche, EMD Serono, NMS Nerviano Medical Science, Sanofi, MSD, Novartis, Incyte, BMS, Menarini Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Merck Group, Pfizer, Servier, AMGEN, Incyte. No disclosures were reported by the other authors., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Patient Reported Outcome for Fighting FInancial Toxicity (PROFFIT) questionnaire was developed to measure financial toxicity (FT) and identify its determinants. The aim of the present study was to confirm its validity in a prospective cohort of patients receiving anticancer treatment., Patients and Methods: From March 2021 to July 2022, 221 patients were enrolled at 10 Italian centres. Selected items of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire represented the anchors, specifically, question 28 (Q-28) on financial difficulties, and questions 29-30 measuring global health status/quality of life (HR-QOL). The study had 80% power to detect a 0.20 correlation coefficient (r) between anchors and PROFFIT-score (items 1-7, range 0-100, 100 indicating maximum FT) with bilateral alpha 0.05 and 80% power. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. FT determinants (items 8-16) were described., Results: Median age of patients was 65 years, 116 (52.5%) were females, 96 (43.4%) had low education level. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed goodness of fit of the PROFFIT-score. Significant partial correlation of PROFFIT-score was found with Q-28 (r = 0.51) and HR-QOL (r = -0.23). Mean (SD) PROFFIT-score at baseline was 36.5 (24.9); it was statistically significantly higher for patients living in South Italy, those with lower education level, those who were freelancer/unemployed at diagnosis and those who reported significant economic impact from the COVID-19 pandemic. Mean (SD) scores of determinants ranged from 17.6 (27.1) for item 14 (support from medical staff) to 49.0 (36.3) for item 10 (expenses for medicines or supplements). PROFFIT-score significantly increased with worsening response to determinants., Conclusions: External validation of PROFFIT-score in an independent sample of patients was successful. The instrument is now being used in clinical studies., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The combination of chemotherapy plus anti HER-2 agents is the mainstay of HER-2 positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) therapy. We conducted a phase II trial testing activity and safety of trastuzumab and metronomic capecitabine/cyclophosphamide (HEX) as first-line therapy in HER-2 positive ABC.
Methods. Patients at first relapse or with synchronous metastasis were treated with trastuzumab (4 mg/kg, biweekly) plus oral capecitabine (1500 mg/daily) and cyclophosphamide (50 mg/daily). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), secondary endpoints progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR; PR + CR + SD for ≥ 24 weeks) and tolerability. Optimal two-stage design was applied., Results: Sixty patients with measurable ABC, tumors scored as +3 for HER-2 or FISH +, untreated for advanced disease were enrolled. Median age was 62.5 years, visceral metastases were present in most patients (57.9%). Median number of cycles was 16 (range 1-98). ORR was 56.7% (95% CI, 44.1-68.4%), with 5 CR (8.3%) and 29 PR (48.3%). Fifteen patients had SD (25%). The CBR was 78.2%. Nine progressions were observed (15%). Median PFS was 11 months. One year PFS was 47.7%. Median OS was 45.9 months. Worst toxicities were grade 3 hand-foot syndrome in 2 pts (3.3%), grade 3 anaemia in 2 pts (3.3%), grade 2 nausea in 2 pts (3.3%) and grade 3-4 diarrhea in 2 pts (3.3%). Cardiac toxicity grade 1 was reported in 1 pt., Conclusions: Combination of trastuzumab and metronomic oral chemotherapy has clinical activity. The tolerability was excellent and allowed the prolonged delivery of treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Biweekly schedule of XELOX-2 (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) showed interesting results in first-line therapy of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Bevacizumab plus FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and infusional 5-fluorouracil) is among standard first-line treatment options in this setting. We performed a phase II randomized trial in order to evaluate the activity of bevacizumab plus either FOLFOX-4 or XELOX-2 in first-line therapy of patients with mCRC., Materials and Methods: Patients with mCRC were randomized, in a 1:2 ratio, to first-line bevacizumab plus either FOLFOX-4 (Arm A), as calibration arm, or XELOX-2 (Arm B), up to 12 cycles. Patients without progression were further randomized to maintenance bevacizumab alone or with the same induction fluoropyrimidine. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. The study design was formally non-comparative, but exploratory comparison was performed., Results: Forty-five patients were randomized in arm A and 87 in arm B with an ORR of 55.6% versus 48.3% (P = .43), respectively. After a median follow-up of 47.2 months, progression-free survival was 10.0 versus 9.9 months (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.41; P = .84) and overall survival was 29.8 versus 25.0 months (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.92; P = .41), respectively. The main grade 3 to 4 toxicities (% A/B) were: neutropenia 15/3 and nausea 9/5., Conclusion: This exploratory analysis showed that biweekly XELOX-2 plus bevacizumab has a comparable ORR with FOLFOX-4 plus bevacizumab in patients with mCRC., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Liquid biopsy is an alternative to tissue for RAS testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients. Little information is available on the predictive role of liquid biopsy RAS testing in patients treated with first-line anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-based therapy., Patients and Methods: In the CAPRI-GOIM trial, 340 KRAS exon-2 wild-type mCRC patients received first-line cetuximab plus FOLFIRI. Tumor samples were retrospectively assessed by next generation sequencing (NGS). Baseline plasma samples were analyzed for KRAS and NRAS mutations using beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics digital PCR (BEAMing). Discordant cases were solved by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) or deep-sequencing., Results: A subgroup of 92 patients with available both NGS data on tumor samples and baseline plasma samples were included in this study. Both NGS analysis of tumor tissue and plasma testing with BEAMing identified RAS mutations in 33/92 patients (35.9%). However, 10 cases were RAS tissue mutant and plasma wild-type, and additional 10 cases were tissue wild-type and plasma mutant, resulting in a concordance rate of 78.3%. Analysis of plasma samples with ddPCR detected RAS mutations in 2/10 tissue mutant, plasma wild-type patients. In contrast, in all tissue wild-type and plasma mutant cases, ddPCR or deep-sequencing analysis of tumor tissue confirmed the presence of RAS mutations at allelic frequencies ranging between 0.15% and 1.15%. The median progression-free survival of RAS mutant and wild-type patients according to tissue (7.9 versus 12.6 months; P = 0.004) and liquid biopsy testing (7.8 versus 13.8 moths; P < 0.001) were comparable. Similar findings were observed for the median overall survival of RAS mutant and wild-type patients based on tissue (22.1 versus 35.8 months; P = 0.016) and plasma (19.9 versus 35.8 months; P = 0.013) analysis., Conclusion: This study indicates that RAS testing of liquid biopsy results in a similar outcome when compared with tissue testing in mCRC patients receiving first-line anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: In the cetuximab after progression in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients (CAPRI) trial patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) received 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and cetuximab in first line followed by 5-Fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) with or without cetuximab until progression. Limited data are available on the efficacy and safety of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) agents on elderly patients with mCRC. In the current study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in age-defined subgroups., Methods: A post-hoc analysis was performed in CAPRI trial patients; outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), safety) were analysed by age-groups and stratified according to molecular characterisation. 3 age cut-offs were used to define the elderly population (≥65; ≥70 and ≥75 years)., Results: 340 patients with mCRC were treated in first line with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. Among those, 154 patients were >65 years, 86 >70 years and 35 >75 years. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in 182 patients. Among them, 87 patients were >65 years, 46 >70 and 17 >75. 104 of 182 patients were wild type (WT) for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA genes. In the quadruple WT group, 51 patients were ≥65 years; 29 were ≥70; 9 were ≥75. Median PFS was similar within the age-subgroups in the intention-to-treat population, NGS cohort and quadruple WT patients, respectively. Likewise, ORR was not significantly different among age-subgroups in the 3 populations. Safety profile was acceptable and similarly reported among all age-groups, with the exception of grade ≥3 diarrhoea (55% vs 25%, p=0.04) and neutropaenia (75% vs 37%, p=0.03) in patients ≥75 years and grade ≥3 fatigue (31% vs 20%, p=0.01) in patients <75 years., Conclusions: Tolerability of cetuximab plus FOLFIRI was acceptable in elderly patients. Similar ORR and PFS were observed according to age-groups. No differences in adverse events were reported among the defined subgroups with the exception of higher incidence of grade ≥3 diarrhoea and neutropaenia in patients ≥75 years and grade ≥3 fatigue in patients <75 years., Trial Registration Number: 2009-014041-81., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Background: Cetuximab plus chemotherapy is a first-line treatment option in metastatic KRAS and NRAS wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. No data are currently available on continuing anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy beyond progression., Patients and Methods: We did this open-label, 1:1 randomized phase II trial at 25 hospitals in Italy to evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab plus 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) as second-line treatment of KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic CRC patients treated in first line with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus cetuximab. Patients received FOLFOX plus cetuximab (arm A) or FOLFOX (arm B). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Tumour tissues were assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). This report is the final analysis., Results: Between 1 February 2010 and 28 September 2014, 153 patients were randomized (74 in arm A and 79 in arm B). Median PFS was 6.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.7-8.0] versus 4.5 months (95% CI 3.3-5.7); [hazard ratio (HR), 0.81; 95% CI 0.58-1.12; P = 0.19], respectively. NGS was performed in 117/153 (76.5%) cases; 66/117 patients (34 in arm A and 32 in arm B) had KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA wild-type tumours. For these patients, PFS was longer in the FOLFOX plus cetuximab arm [median 6.9 (95% CI 5.5-8.2) versus 5.3 months (95% CI 3.7-6.9); HR, 0.56 (95% CI 0.33-0.94); P = 0.025]. There was a trend in better overall survival: median 23.7 [(95% CI 19.4-28.0) versus 19.8 months (95% CI 14.9-24.7); HR, 0.57 (95% CI 0.32-1.02); P = 0.056]., Conclusions: Continuing cetuximab treatment in combination with chemotherapy is of potential therapeutic efficacy in molecularly selected patients and should be validated in randomized phase III trials., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Cisplatin with pemetrexed (CP) and carboplatin with paclitaxel and bevacizumab (CbTB) are standard first-line treatments for patients with advanced nonsquamous (NS) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Quality of life (QoL) is a key objective in the management of advanced NSCLC. Thus, effect on QoL could be an additional factor in the choice of treatment., Patients and Methods: Patients with untreated stage IIIB/IV NS-NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomized to receive first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks, for 6 cycles followed by maintenance pemetrexed; or carboplatin area under the curve 6, paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, every 3 weeks, for 6 cycles followed by maintenance bevacizumab. The primary end point was the difference in QoL between the 2 treatment arms after 12 weeks of maintenance, measured using the EuroQoL 5 Dimensions-Index (EQ5D-I) and EQ5D-visual analogue scale (EQ5D-VAS)., Results: One hundred eighteen patients were randomized to CP (n = 60) or CbTB (n = 58). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. The proportion of patients evaluable for the primary end point was lower than planned. After 12 weeks of maintenance, the difference between mean changes in EQ5D-I was 0.137, favoring CP (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.02 to 0.29, Wilcoxon P = .078), although not statistically significant; and the difference between mean changes in EQ5D-VAS was 0.97 (95% CI, -9.37 to 11.31, Wilcoxon P = .41)., Conclusion: Although the study was underpowered because of a small number of patients evaluable for the primary end point, QoL did not differ between treatment arms. Other factors such as comorbidities and schedule should be used when deciding on first-line treatment., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment with antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies has been restricted to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with RAS wild-type tumors. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows the assessment in a single analysis of a large number of gene alterations and might provide important predictive and prognostic information., Patients and Methods: In the CAPRI-GOIM trial, 340 KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC patients received first-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. Tumor samples (182/340, 53.5%) were assessed by NGS to search for mutations in 22 genes involved in colon cancer., Results: Objective responses in the NGS cohort were observed in 104/182 patients [overall response rate (ORR) 57.1%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 52% to 66.4%] with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 9.8 (95% CI 8.7-11.5) months. NGS analysis was successfully completed in all 182 samples. One or more gene mutations (up to five) were detected in 124/182 (68.1%) tumors within 14/22 genes for a total of 206 mutations. KRAS exon 2 mutations were identified in 29/182 (15.9%) samples, defined as wild type by local laboratory assessment. Frequently mutated genes were: TP53 (39.6%), KRAS exons 3/4 (8.8%), NRAS exons 2/3 (7.1%), PIK3CA exons 9/20 (13.2%), BRAF (8.2%). FOLFIRI plus cetuximab treatment determined ORR of 62.0% (95% CI 55.5% to 74.6%) with mPFS of 11.1 (95% CI 9.2-12.8) months in patients with KRAS and NRAS wild-type tumors. Conversely, ORR was 46.6% (95% CI 39.9-57.5%) with mPFS of 8.9 (95% CI 7.4-9.6) months in patients with KRAS or NRAS mutations. Similarly, the subgroup of patients carrying KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, or PIK3CA mutations showed a worse outcome, although this might be due to a prognostic effect., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that NGS analysis in mCRC is feasible, reveals high level of intra and intertumor heterogeneity, and identifies patients that might benefit of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab treatment., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

In advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), substantial similarities in terms of treatment efficacy and survival have emerged over the years between the different systemic chemotherapy regimens used. More recently, other topics such as histotype, maintenance therapy and quality of life have been explored to ameliorate this plateau. We present the treatment rationale and study design of the ERACLE (induction pEmetrexed and cisplatin followed by maintenance pemetRexed versus cArboplatin-paCLitaxel and bEvacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab) trial. Patients enrolled in the ERACLE trial are randomized between combination treatment arms: (A) cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 1 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) day 1, every 3 weeks for six cycles followed (in responders or with stable disease) by pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) day 1, every 3 weeks until progression; and (B) carboplatin AUC 6 day 1, plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) day 1 and plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, every 3 weeks for six cycles followed (in responders or patients with stable disease) by bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks until progression. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the difference in terms of quality of life between treatment arms. together with co-primary endpoints represented by the EuroQoL group (EQ-5D) questionnaire total score and the EQ-5D visual analog scale. Secondary endpoints are the evaluation of treatment activity and exploratory evaluation of treatment efficacy., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the last decade dramatic improvements have been obtained in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Thanks to the introduction in the clinical practice of new drugs such as Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin, and modern biological drugs such as Bevacizumab and Cetuximab, the response rate, progression-free and overall survival are about 50-60%, 9-11 and 20-24 months respectively. Despite this progress, many questions remain unsolved especially those related to the optimal duration of treatment and the role of maintenance therapy. To treat until progression (or unacceptable toxicity) is the classical way but in the common clinical practice is frequent to perform an induction therapy (until the maximum response is obtained) followed by a complete stop and restart on progression, or by a maintenance without the drug/s responsible of the major cumulative toxicities. The following report focus on the role of different strategies respect to the classic "treatment until progression"., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Capecitabine is an orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate which has been developed as a prodrug of 5-FU with the goal to improve its tolerability and intratumoral drug concentration. The review aims to provide an evidence-based update of clinical trials investigating the clinical efficacy, adverse-event profile, dosage and administration of this drug, alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapeutics and/or new target-oriented drugs, in the management of colorectal cancer patients., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and large cell carcinoma, accounting for about 85% of all lung cancer types with most of the patients presenting with advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. In this setting first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for no more than 4-6 cycles are recommended. After these cycles of treatment, non-progressing patients enter in the so called "watch and wait" period in which no further therapy is administered until there is disease progression. In order to improve the advanced NSCLC outcomes, the efficacy of further treatment in the "watch and wait" period was investigated. This is the "maintenance therapy". Recently, the results coming from randomized phase III trials investigating two new agents, pemetrexed and erlotinib, in this setting led to their registration for maintenance therapy. Here, we report and discuss these results., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), also called hand-foot syndrome or hand-to-foot syndrome, is a distinctive and relatively frequent dermatologic toxic reaction associated with certain chemotherapeutic agents. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), a long-circulating formulation of doxorubicin in which doxorubicin hydrochloride is encapsulated within pegylated liposomes, is approved to treat patients with metastatic breast cancer, advanced ovarian cancer, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related Kaposi's sarcoma. The incidence of PPE is increased in patients receiving PLD compared with conventional doxorubicin. In studies that utilized the currently approved dose of PLD (50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks), approximately 50% of all patients receiving PLD experienced PPE, and approximately 20% experienced grade 3 PPE. The pathophysiology of PPE, as it occurs with any drug with which it is associated, is not well understood. Studies evaluating the development of PPE specifically associated with PLD have not fully elucidated the mechanism; however, data support the roles of drug excretion in sweat and local pressure as contributors. When PPE develops, clinical interventions with respect to altering PLD administration include dose reduction, less frequent dosing, and ultimately, drug withdrawal with several consequences on treatment efficacy. This article will review the available data regarding the etiology and potential management strategies of PPE associated with PLD.