1. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: Results from an intermediate risk propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT study
- Author
-
D'Errigo, P, Barbanti, M, Ranucci, M, Onorati, F, Covello, R, Rosato, S, Tamburino, C, Santini, F, Santoro, G, Seccareccia, F, OBSERVANT research group, Ruvolo, G, Nardi, P, and Pisano, C
- Subjects
Male ,Cardiac Catheterization ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Aortic stenosis ,Intermediate risk ,SAVR ,TAVI ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Aortic Valve ,Aortic Valve Stenosis ,Cohort Studies ,Female ,Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ,Humans ,Italy ,Middle Aged ,Population Surveillance ,Prospective Studies ,Risk Factors ,Population ,Cardiac surgery ,clinical outcomes ,aortic valve stenosis ,Aortic valve replacement ,Internal medicine ,80 and over ,Medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,education ,Aortic valve regurgitation ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,Settore MED/23 - Chirurgia Cardiaca ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Stenosis ,Aortic valve stenosis ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Cohort study - Abstract
Background Few studies have yielded information on comparative effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) procedures in a real-world setting. The aim of this analysis is to describe procedural and post-procedural outcomes in a TAVI/SAVR intermediate risk propensity-matched population. Methods OBSERVANT is an observational prospective multicenter cohort study, enrolling AS patients undergoing SAVR or TAVI. Propensity score method was applied to analyze procedural and post-procedural outcomes. Pairs of patients with the same probability score were matched (caliper matching). Results The unadjusted enrolled population (N=2108) comprises 1383 SAVR patients, 602 transarterial-TAVI patients and 123 transapical-TAVI patients. Matched population comprised a total of 266 patients (133 patients for each group). A relatively low risk population was selected (mean logistic EuroSCORE 9.4±10.4% vs 8.9±9.5%, SAVR vs TAVI; p=0.650). Thirty-day mortality was 3.8% for both SAVR and TAVI (p=1.000). The incidence of stroke (1.5% SAVR and 0.0% TAVI; p=0.156) and myocardial infarction (0.8% SAVR and 0.8% TAVI; p=1.000) was not statistically different between groups, whereas a higher requirement for blood transfusion was reported across the surgical cohort (49.6% vs 36.1%; p=0.026). A higher incidence of major vascular damage (5.3% vs. 0.0%; p=0.007) and pacemaker implantation(0.8% vs 12.0%; p=0.001) were reported in the TAVI group. Conclusions Patients undergoing transcatheter and surgical treatment of severe aortic stenosis are still extremely distinct populations. In the relatively low-risk propensity-matched population analyzed, despite similar procedural and 30-day mortality, SAVR was associated with a higher risk for blood transfusion, whereas TAVI showed a significantly increased rate of vascular damage, permanent AV block and residual aortic valve regurgitation.
- Published
- 2013