Search

Purpose: Incorporating coronary CT angiographic (CCTA) imaging into emergency department (ED) workflows has been limited by the need for 24/7 real-time postprocessing. The aim of this study was to determine whether interpretation of transaxial CCTA images alone (limited axial interpretation [LI]) is noninferior to interpretation of combined transaxial and multiplanar reformation images (full interpretation [FI]) in assessing patients with acute chest pain in the ED., Methods: CCTA examinations from 74 patients were evaluated by two radiologists, one without dedicated CCTA training and one with basic CCTA experience. Each examination was evaluated three times in separate sessions, once by LI and twice by FI, in random order. Nineteen coronary artery segments were rated as having significant stenoses (≥50%) or not. Interreader agreement was assessed using Cohen's κ statistic. The primary analysis was whether the accuracy of LI for detecting significant stenosis was noninferior to that of FI at the patient level (margin = -10%). Secondary analyses included similar analyses of sensitivity and specificity, at both the patient and vessel levels., Results: Interreader agreement for significant stenosis was good for both LI and FI (κ = 0.72 vs 0.70, P = .74). Average accuracy for significant stenosis at the patient level was 90.5% for LI and 91.9% for FI, with a difference of -1.4%. The accuracy of LI was noninferior to FI, because the confidence interval did not include the noninferiority margin. Noninferiority was also found for patient-level sensitivity and for accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity at the vessel level., Conclusions: LI of the coronary arteries using transaxial CCTA images may be sufficient for the detection of significant coronary artery disease in the ED setting., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We sought to confirm, refute, or modify a 4-step process for implementing shared decision-making (SDM) in pediatrics that involves determining 1) if the decision includes >1 medically reasonable option; 2) if one option has a favorable medical benefit-burden ratio compared to other options; and 3) parents' preferences regarding the options; then 4) calibrating the SDM approach based on other relevant decision characteristics., Methods: We videotaped a purposive sample of pediatric inpatient and outpatient encounters at a single US children's hospital. Clinicians from 7 clinical services (craniofacial, neonatology, oncology, pulmonary, pediatric intensive care, hospital medicine, and sports medicine) were eligible. English-speaking parents of children who participated in inpatient family care conferences or outpatient problem-oriented encounters with participating clinicians were eligible. We conducted individual postencounter interviews with clinician and parent participants utilizing video-stimulated recall to facilitate reflection of decision-making that occurred during the encounter. We utilized direct content analysis with open coding of interview transcripts to determine the salience of the 4-step SDM process and identify themes that confirmed, refuted, or modified this process., Results: We videotaped 30 encounters and conducted 53 interviews. We found that clinicians' and parents' experiences of decision-making confirmed each SDM step. However, there was variation in the interpretation of each step and a need for flexibility in implementing the process depending on specific decisional contexts., Conclusions: The 4-step SDM process for pediatrics appears to be salient and may benefit from further guidance about the interpretation of each step and contextual factors that support a modified approach., (Copyright © 2023 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Advanced imaging examinations of emergently transferred patients (ETPs) are overread to various degrees by receiving institutions. The practical clinical impact of these second opinions has not been studied in the past. The purpose of this study is to determine if emergency radiology overreads change emergency medicine decision making on ETPs in the emergency department (ED)., Methods: All CT and MRI examinations on patients transferred to a level I trauma center during calendar year 2018 were routinely overread by emergency radiologists and discrepancies with the outside report electronically flagged. All discrepant reports compared with the outside interpretations were reviewed by one of four emergency medicine physicians. Comparing the original and final reports, reviewers identified changes in patient management that could be attributed to the additional information contained in the final report. Changes in patient care were categorized as affecting ED management, disposition, follow-up, or consulting services., Results: Over a 12-month period, 5,834 patients were accepted in transfer. Among 5,631 CT or MRI examinations with outside reports available, 669 examinations (12%) had at least one discrepancy in the corresponding outside report. In 219 examinations (33%), ED management was changed by discrepancies noted on the final report; patient disposition was affected in 84 (13%), outpatient follow-up in 54 (8%), and selection of consulting services in 411 (61%), and ED stay was extended in 544 (81%). Discrepant findings affected decision making in 613 of 669 of examinations (92%)., Conclusion: Emergency radiology overreading of transferred patients' advanced imaging examinations provided actionable additional information to emergency medicine physicians in the care of 613 of 669 (92%) examinations with discrepant findings. This added value is worth the effort to design workflows to routinely overread CT and MRI examinations of ETPs., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate receipt fidelity of communication training content included in a multifaceted intervention known to reduce antibiotic over-prescribing for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs), by examining the degree to which clinicians implemented the intended communication behavior changes., Methods: Parents were surveyed regarding clinician communication behaviors immediately after attending 1026 visits by children 6 months to < 11 years old diagnosed with ARTIs by 53 clinicians in 18 pediatric practices. Communication outcomes analyzed were whether clinicians: (A) provided both a combined (negative + positive) treatment recommendation and a contingency plan (full implementation); (B) provided either a combined treatment recommendation or a contingency plan (partial implementation); or (C) provided neither (no implementation). We used mixed effects multinomial logistic regression to determine whether these 3 communication outcomes changed between baseline and the time periods following each of 3 training modules., Results: After completing the communication training, the adjusted probability of clinicians fully implementing the intended communication behavior changes increased by an absolute 8.1% compared to baseline (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 2.4%, 13.8%, p = .005)., Conclusions: Our findings support the receipt fidelity of the intervention's communication training content., Practical Implications: Clinicians can be trained to implement communication behaviors that may aid in reducing antibiotic over-prescribing for ARTIs., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The ACR Council passed Resolution 47 at its 2020 annual meeting establishing a representative task force (TF) to explore the concept of the "multispecialty radiologist," previously proposed in 2012. The TF held eight virtual meetings over 8 months, considered data from a 2020 ACR Membership Tracking Survey, conducted a review of current literature, and collected anecdotal experience from TF members and ACR leadership. ACR legal counsel and a cross-section of ACR Commissions and Committees also provided input. The TF concluded that there is scant interest from the radiology community in the multispecialty radiologist title and no agreed-upon definition for the term. Radiologists may identify as diagnostic or subspecialty radiologists; however, the roles they fill in clinical practice include general, multispecialty, and subspecialized radiology. The TF proposes definitions for each of these terms to support radiologist recruitment aligned with optimal patient care in the practice community and to improve the quality of data collection about the field. To reduce ambiguity, the TF proposes adoption of the defined terms by the radiology community, including radiologist recruiters and employers, and suggests ways in which resident training and the ABR board examination can be adapted to support this new structure. Additionally, as part of an exploration of hyperspecialization and trainee preparedness for clinical practice, the TF discussed the challenges faced by community-based practices seeking to provide a full range of high-quality, radiologist-delivered diagnostic and interventional services to their patient populations., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Radiology. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: While several studies analyze radiology malpractice lawsuits, none specifically examines the site of service. The purpose of this study is to estimate the relative likelihood of a lawsuit arising from a radiology study performed in emergency (ED), inpatient (IP) and outpatient (OP) settings., Methods: Referrals from a malpractice review consulting company over a six year period were compared to the 2016 Medicare Part B file and stratified by site of service. The proportion of exams for each site of service was estimated, and using absolute differences in proportions and odds ratios (ORs), differences in the place of service were calculated., Results: The Cleareview cohort contained 25 (17%) IP, 56 (38%) OP, and 68 (46%) ED exams. In 2016, Medicare assigned benefits for 27,009,053 (20%) IP, 84,075,848 (62%) OP and 23,964,794 (18%) ED exams. The ORs (Cleareview: Medicare) of the ED to IP, OP, and IP+OP were 3.07 (95% CI: 1.56-6.03), 4.26 (95% CI: 2.76-6.59), 3.89 (95% CI: 2.60-5.83), respectively. By contrast, the OR for IP:OP between Cleareview and Medicare was not significantly different than 1 (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.68-2.83, P = .38)., Discussion: Radiological studies performed in the ED accounted for a disproportionate number of liability claims against radiologists. Further study is warranted to confirm this finding with a more robust data set., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The escalation of imaging volumes in the emergency department and intensifying demands for rapid radiology results have increased the demand for emergency radiology. The provision of emergency radiology is essential for nearly all radiology practices, from the smallest to the largest. As our radiology specialty responds to the challenge posed by the triple threat of providing 24-7 coverage, high imaging volumes, and rapid turnaround time, various questions regarding emergency radiology have emerged, including its definition and scope, unique operational demands, quality and safety concerns, impact on physician well-being, and future directions. This article reviews the current challenges confronting the subspecialty of emergency radiology and offers insights into preparing for continued growth., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Radiology. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Presumptive formats to initiate childhood vaccine discussions (eg, "Well, we have to do some shots") have been associated with increased vaccine acceptance after one visit compared to participatory formats (eg, "How do you feel about vaccines?"). We characterize discussion format patterns over time and the impact of their repeated use on vaccine acceptance., Methods: We conducted a longitudinal prospective cohort study of children of vaccine-hesitant parents enrolled in a Seattle-based integrated health system. After the child's 2-, 4-, and 6-month visits, parents reported the format their child's provider used to begin the vaccine discussion (presumptive, participatory, or other). Our outcome was the percentage of days underimmunized of the child at 8 months old for 6 recommended vaccines. We used linear regression and generalized estimating equations to test the association of discussion format and immunization status., Results: We enrolled 73 parent-child dyads and obtained data from 82%, 73%, and 53% after the 2-, 4-, and 6-month visits, respectively. Overall, 65% of parents received presumptive formats at ≥1 visit and 42% received participatory formats at ≥1 visit. Parental receipt of presumptive formats at 1 and ≥2 visits (vs no receipt) was associated with significantly less underimmunization of the child, while receipt of participatory formats at ≥2 visits was associated with significantly more underimmunization. Visit-specific use of participatory (vs presumptive) formats was associated with a child being 10.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.3, 19.8; P = .04) more days underimmunized (amounting to, on average, 98 more days underimmunized for all 6 vaccines combined)., Conclusions: Presumptive (vs participatory) discussion formats are associated with increased immunization., (Copyright © 2018 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Soliciting patients' complete agendas of concerns (aka. 'agenda setting') can improve patients' health outcomes and satisfaction, and physicians' time management. We assess the distribution, content, and effectiveness of physicians' post-chief-complaint, agenda-setting questions., Methods: We coded videotapes/transcripts of 407 primary-, acute-care visits between adults and 85 general-practice physicians operating in 46 community-based clinics in two states representing urban and rural care. Measures are the incidence of physicians' questions, their linguistic format, position within visits, likelihood of being responded to, and the nature of such responses., Results: Physicians' questions designed to solicit concerns additional to chief concerns occurred in only 32% of visits (p<.001). Compared to questions whose communication format explicitly solicited 'questions' (e.g., "Do you have any questions?"), those that were formatted so as to allow for 'concerns' (e.g., "Any other concerns?") were significantly more likely to generate some type of agenda item (Chi(2) (1, N=131)=11.96, p=.001), and to do so more frequently when positioned 'early' vs. 'late' during visits (Chi(2) (1, N=73)=4.99, p=.025)., Conclusions: Agenda setting is comparatively infrequent. The communication format and position of physicians' questions affects patients' provision of additional concerns/questions., Practice Implications: Physicians should increase use of optimized forms of agenda setting., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Seeking to control advanced diagnostic imaging costs, health insurance plans have instituted broad-based utilization management systems. Most processes ultimately contain denial provisions, meaning that the health plans will refuse to pay for requested studies if performed. The aim of this analysis was to determine whether removal of a denial provision would result in increased utilization of imaging services., Methods: A major US health plan used a no-denial preauthorization system in all but 4 geographic markets for all CT, MRI, PET, and nuclear cardiac imaging studies, constituting the experimental group. This study consisted of a retrospective review of 247,117 advanced imaging requests 21 months before and 16 months after the elimination of the denial provision in the experimental group. A matched population with no such change in the review process served as the control group. Population-normalized utilization rates were measured for both pooled groups before and after the change., Results: Utilization decreased slightly more in the experimental group than in the control group (-0.10 requests per 1,000 covered lives; 95% confidence interval, -0.20 to 0.00; P = .050) after elimination of the denial provision. The rates of request approval, examination modification, withdrawal, and no consensus after peer-to-peer consultation did not significantly change., Conclusions: Eliminating denial provisions in utilization management for advanced diagnostic imaging does not result in increased utilization of such imaging., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients transferred for higher levels of care often arrive with medical imaging from the outside facility, with or without accompanying radiology reports. The handling of pretransfer studies by receiving radiologists introduces several concerns regarding resource utilization, medicolegal risk, and technical quality control. The authors review the current status of transfer patient imaging, with an emphasis on the role of the receiving emergency radiologist. Practice solutions developed at the authors' level I trauma center are described., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In the context of patients visiting cancer specialists, the objective is to test the association between both patient-centered communication (including Affective Behavior and Participation Behavior) and Instrumental Behavior and patients' post-visit satisfaction with a variety of visit phenomena., Methods: Meta-analysis of 25 articles representing 10 distinct data sets., Results: Both patient-centered- and instrumental behavior are significantly, positively associated with satisfaction, with patient-centered communication having a relatively stronger association., Conclusion: There is an evidence base for the efficacy of patient-centered care., Practice Implications: Cancer specialists need to train to improve their patient-centered communication.

Objective: To determine the association between the format of physicians' opening questions that solicit patients' presenting concerns and patients' post-visit evaluations of (i.e., satisfaction with) the affective-relational dimension of physicians' communication., Methods: Videotape and questionnaire data were collected from visits between 28 primary-care physicians and 142 adult patients with acute problems. Factor analysis resulted in three dependent variables derived from the 9-item Socioemotional Behavior subscale of the Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale., Results: Question format was significantly, positively associated with patients' evaluations of physicians' listening (p=.028) and positive affective-relational communication (p=.046)., Conclusion: Patients desire opportunities to present concerns in their own time and terms regardless of how extensively they act on this opportunity., Practice Implications: Visits should be opened with general inquiries (e.g., What can I do for you today?) versus closed-ended requests for confirmation (e.g., Sore throat, huh?).