Koontz EL, Parker SM, Stearns AE, Roberts BJ, Young CM, Windham-Myers L, Oikawa PY, Megonigal JP, Noyce GL, Buskey EJ, Derby RK, Dunn RP, Ferner MC, Krask JL, Marconi CM, Savage KB, Shahan J, Spivak AC, St Laurent KA, Argueta JM, Baird SJ, Beheshti KM, Crane LC, Cressman KA, Crooks JA, Fernald SH, Garwood JA, Goldstein JS, Grothues TM, Habeck A, Lerberg SB, Lucas SB, Marcum P, Peter CR, Phipps SW, Raposa KB, Rovai AS, Schooler SS, Twilley RR, Tyrrell MC, Uyeda KA, Wulfing SH, Aman JT, Giacchetti A, Cross-Johnson SN, and Holmquist JR
Tidal wetlands can be a substantial sink of greenhouse gases, which can be offset by variable methane (CH 4 ) emissions under certain environmental conditions and anthropogenic interventions. Land managers and policymakers need maps of tidal wetland CH 4 properties to make restoration decisions and inventory greenhouse gases. However, there is a mismatch in spatial scale between point-based sampling of porewater CH 4 concentration and its predictors, and the coarser resolution mapping products used to upscale these data. We sampled porewater CH 4 concentrations, salinity, sulfate (SO 4 2- ), ammonium (NH 4 + ), and total Fe using a spatially stratified sampling at 27 tidal wetlands in the United States. We measured porewater CH 4 concentrations across four orders of magnitude (0.05 to 852.9 μM). The relative contribution of spatial scale to variance in CH 4 was highest between- and within-sites. Porewater CH 4 concentration was best explained by SO 4 2- concentration with segmented linear regression (p < 0.01, R 2 = 0.54) indicating lesser sensitivity of CH 4 to SO 4 2- below 0.62 mM SO 4 2- . Salinity was a significant proxy for CH 4 concentration, because it was highly correlated with SO 4 2- (p < 0.01, R 2 = 0.909). However, salinity was less predictive of CH 4 with segmented linear regression (p < 0.01, R 2 = 0.319) relative to SO 4 2- . Neither NH 4 + , total Fe, nor relative tidal elevation correlated significantly with porewater CH 4 ; however, NH 4 + was positively and significantly correlated with SO 4 2- after detrending CH 4 for its relationship with SO 4 2- (p < 0.01, R 2 = 0.194). Future sampling should focus on within- and between-site environmental gradients to accurately map CH 4 variation. Mapping salinity at sub-watershed scales has some potential for mapping SO 4 2- , and by proxy, constraining spatial variation in porewater CH 4 concentrations. Additional work is needed to explain site-level deviations from the salinity-sulfate relationship and elucidate other predictors of methanogenesis. This work demonstrates a unique approach to remote team science and the potential to strengthen collaborative research networks., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Erika L. Koontz, James R. Holmquist reports financial support was provided by NASA. Sarah M. Parker, Alice E. Stearns, Brian J. Roberts, Patricia Y. Oikawa, J. Patrick Megonigal reports financial support was provided by NASA. J. Patrick Megonigal, Amanda C. Spivak reports was provided by National Science Foundation. James R. Holmquist reports was provided by US Department of Energy. Andre S. Rovai, Robert R. Twilley reports was provided by US Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Amanda C. Spivak reports was provided by US Coastal Research Program. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)