Search

Introduction: The use of hydroxyapatite cranioplasties has grown progressively over the past few decades. The peculiar biological properties of this material make it particularly suitable for patients with decompressive craniectomy where bone reintegration is a primary objective. However, hydroxyapatite infection rates are similar to those of other reconstructive materials. Research question: We investigated if infected hydroxyapatite implants could be saved or not. Materials and methods: We present a consecutive series over a 10-year period of nine patients treated for hydroxyapatite cranioplasty infection. Clinical and radiological data from admission and follow-up, photo and video material documenting the different phases of infection assessment and treatment, and final outcomes were retrospectively reviewed in an attempt to identify the best options and possible pitfalls in a case-by-case decision-making process. Results: Five unilateral and four bifrontal implants became infected. Wound rupture with cranioplasty exposure was the most common presentation. At revision, all implants were ossified, requiring a new craniotomy to clean the purulent epidural collections. The cranioplasty was fully saved in one hemispheric and 2 bifrontal implants and partially saved in the remaining 2 bifrontal implants. A complete cranioplasty removal was needed in the other 4 cases, but immediate cranial reconstruction was possible in 2. Skin defects were covered by free flaps in 3 cases. Four patients underwent adjunctive hyperbaric therapy, which was effective in one case. Discussion and conclusion: In our experience, infected hydroxyapatite cranioplasty management is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Salvage of a hydroxyapatite implant is possible under specific circumstances.

Introduction: Conventional radiation therapy has been progressively replaced by fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and single fraction radiosurgery for dealing with benign intracranial lesions. Purpose of our study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of FSRT in a series of patients with benign intracranial tumors. Methods: 31 patients with benign intracranial lesions treated with FSRT between 2006 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Indications for treatment included post-operative residual tumor growth or symptomatic exacerbation in patients in whom surgery was not indicated. A clinical and radiological outcome evaluation was performed. Univariate analysis was executed to identify predictors for post-treatment neurological function and radiological tumor control. Results: Median age was 62 years (range 22–82). The lesions treated included 20 meningiomas, 2 vestibular schwannomas, 7 pituitary adenomas, 1 craniopharyngioma, 1 jugular-tympanic paraganglioma. Median clinical target volume was 14.59 cm3 (range 0.43–159.06) and median planning treatment volume was 18.16 cm3 (range 0.81–217.24). Median total dose was 45 Gy (range 25–54), and median daily fraction 4 Gy (range 1.8–9). At a median follow-up of 78 and 50 months, respectively clinical and neuroradiological, no tumor had larger dimensions, and only one lesion changed in a way other than size determining a concomitant clinical worsening. Other three patients deteriorated without evidence of radiological progression. Conversely, 12 patients improved clinically. No significant predictor for post-treatment neurological function or radiological tumor control was found. Conclusion: FSRT may represent, when indicated, a safe and effective treatment modality for benign intracranial tumors, especially for large/irregular lesions. Keywords: Clinical outcome, Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, Intracranial benign lesions, Tumor progression, Radiotherapy

Background: Neurosurgical task shifting and task sharing (TS/S), delegating clinical care to non-neurosurgeons, is ongoing in many hospital systems in which neurosurgeons are scarce. Although TS/S can increase access to treatment, it remains highly controversial. This survey investigated perceptions of neurosurgical TS/S to elucidate whether it is a permissible temporary solution to the global workforce deficit. Methods: The survey was distributed to a convenience sample of individuals providing neurosurgical care. A digital survey link was distributed through electronic mailing lists of continental neurosurgical societies and various collectives, conference announcements, and social media platforms (July 2018–January 2019). Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and univariate regression of Likert Scale scores. Results: Survey respondents represented 105 of 194 World Health Organization member countries (54.1%; 391 respondents, 162 from high-income countries and 229 from low- and middle-income countries [LMICs]). The most agreed on statement was that task sharing is preferred to task shifting. There was broad consensus that both task shifting and task sharing should require competency-based evaluation, standardized training endorsed by governing organizations, and maintenance of certification. When perspectives were stratified by income class, LMICs were significantly more likely to agree that task shifting is professionally disruptive to traditional training, task sharing should be a priority where human resources are scarce, and to call for additional TS/S regulation, such as certification and formal consultation with a neurosurgeon (in person or electronic/telemedicine). Conclusions: Both LMIC and high-income countries agreed that task sharing should be prioritized over task shifting and that additional recommendations and regulations could enhance care. These data invite future discussions on policy and training programs. Key words: Global health, Global neurosurgery, LMIC, Neurotrauma, Task sharing, Task shifting, Workforce

Background: Pineoblastomas are very rare malignant lesions with a bad prognosis and high mortality during the first five years from diagnosis. Report of cases: We present a retrospective review of three patients with histologically confirmed pineoblastomas consecutively operated on between 1997 and 2015. One of our patients died >14 years after surgery, and the other 2 patients are still alive and in good condition without recurrence of the disease >12 years after surgery. All of them underwent gross total resection and craniospinal radiotherapy. Individualized scheme of chemotherapy was administered in two cases. The cornerstones for the surgical resection of pineoblastomas are reported. Conclusions: A proper multidisciplinary management of pineoblastomas, which associates gross total microsurgical resection of the lesion and an adjuvant therapy determined by our neurooncology team based on accurate craniospinal adjuvant radiotherapy with boost of radiation on the tumoral bed, and when needed, an adequate but aggressive medulloblastoma-like chemotherapy, may improve the overall survival of these malignant lesions. Keywords: Chemotherapy, Microneurosurgery, Pineal region lesions, Pineoblastomas, Radiotherapy, Sitting position, Supracerebellar infratentorial approach