Search

The impact of nutrition and energy reserves on the fertility of ruminants has been extensively described. However, the metabolic factors and the molecular mechanisms involved in the interactions between nutrition and ovarian function are still poorly understood. These factors could be hormonal (either reproductive and/or metabolic) and/or dietary and metabolic (glucose, amino acids and fatty acids). In this review, we briefly summarize the impact of those nutrients (fatty acids, glucose and amino acids) and metabolic hormones (insulin/IGF-I, growth hormone, T3/4, ghrelin, apelin and the adipokines (leptin, adiponectin and resistin)) implicated in the development of ovarian follicles, oocytes and embryos in ruminants. We then discuss the current hypotheses on the mechanisms of action of these factors on ovarian function. We particularly describe the role of some energy sensors including adenosine monophosphate-activated kinase and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the ovarian cells.

Exposure of anoestrous ewes to rams induces an increase in LH secretion, eventually leading to ovulation. This technique therefore is an effective, low-cost and hormone-free way of mating sheep outside the breeding season. However, the use of this technique is limited by the variability of the ewes’ responses. In this study, our objective was to understand more completely the origins of this variability and to determine the relative roles of breed, the point in time during anoestrus and the depth of anoestrus on the response to the ‘ram effect’. In the first experiment, the pattern of anoestrus on the basis of the concentration of progesterone determined weekly, was determined in four breeds including two less seasonal (Mérinos d'Arles and Romane), one highly seasonal (Mouton Vendéen) and one intermediate (Île-de-France) breeds. Anoestrus was longer and deeper in Mouton Vendéen and Île-de-France than in Romane or Mérinos d'Arles. In the second experiment, we used the same four breeds and tested their hypophyseal response to a challenge with a single dose of 75 ng gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in early, mid and late anoestrus, and then we examined their endocrine and ovarian responses to the ‘ram effect’. Most (97%) ewes responded to GnRH and most (93%) showed a short-term increase in LH pulsatility following the ‘ram effect’. The responses in both cases were higher in females that went on to ovulate, suggesting that the magnitude of the hypophyseal response to a GnRH challenge could be a predictor of the response to the ‘ram effect’. As previously observed, the best ovarian response was in Mérinos d'Arles at the end of anoestrus. However, there was no relationship between the proportion of females in the flock showing spontaneous ovulation and the response to the ‘ram effect’ of anoestrous ewes from the same flock.

Seasonal effects on luteal activity during post partum were evaluated in two consecutive studies in 253 dairy cows in Northern Italy. In study 1, plasma progesterone concentrations were determined on days 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49 and 56 post partum and in study 2 cows were synchronized and inseminated at a fixed time using two regimes based on the ‘Ovsynch’ protocol. Study 1: Animals were classified as luteal (progesterone >1.5 ng/ml in at least two consecutive samples) or non-luteal (progesterone