1. Systemic application of sirolimus prevents neointima formation not via a direct anti-proliferative effect but via its anti-inflammatory properties.
- Author
-
Daniel JM, Dutzmann J, Brunsch H, Bauersachs J, Braun-Dullaeus R, and Sedding DG
- Subjects
- Animals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents pharmacology, Cell Proliferation physiology, Cells, Cultured, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Male, Mice, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Neointima pathology, Random Allocation, Sirolimus pharmacology, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Inflammatory Agents therapeutic use, Cell Proliferation drug effects, Neointima prevention & control, Sirolimus therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: Systemic treatment with sirolimus, as used for immunosuppression in transplant patients, results in markedly low rates of in-stent restenosis. Since the underlying mechanisms remain obscure, we aimed to determine the molecular and cellular effects of systemic sirolimus treatment on vascular remodeling processes., Methods and Results: Systemic sirolimus treatment significantly reduced smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation 14days after wire-induced injury and neointima formation 28days after injury in C57BL/6 mice, while simultaneously impairing re-endothelialization. Interestingly, in vitro, sirolimus had no direct effect on the proliferation of SMC or endothelial cells (EC) at serum concentrations observed after systemic application. In contrast, sirolimus reduced the adhesion of leukocytes (CD45
+ ) and bone marrow-derived progenitor cells (CD34+ ) to activated EC by down-regulating the adhesion molecules ICAM-1 and VCAM-1. In addition, sirolimus treatment also significantly reduced the upregulation of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 and the recruitment of monocytic cells (MOMA-2+ ) in neointimal lesions in vivo., Conclusion: Our findings show that systemic sirolimus treatment effectively prevents SMC and EC proliferation in vivo without directly affecting these cells. Instead, sirolimus prevents neointima formation and re-endothelialization by attenuating the inflammatory response after injury with secondary effects on SMC and EC proliferation. Thus, despite a similar net effect, the mechanisms of systemic sirolimus treatment are largely different from the local effects achieved after application of sirolimus-eluting stents., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF