Search

Background: Reporting high-quality bariatric surgery outcomes depends on participant attrition and level of study participation among enrolled participants., Objectives: Our aims are to report participant attrition, active enrollment, and level of participation, and to evaluate pre-surgery sociodemographic, physical health, and psychosocial factors as predictors of attrition and level of participation through 5 years., Setting: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery-2 study which enrolled 2458 adults undergoing a first bariatric surgical procedure at 1 of 6 US cites from 2006 through 2009., Methods: In-person research assessments were conducted pre-surgery and annually for five years. Extensive retention strategies including offering remote assessments (telephone, email, mail, or a combination) were fully implemented in 2009. Among living participants, including those inactivated, annual follow-up assessments were categorized as in-person, remote or missed through 5 years., Results: By year 5, 1.7% of participants had died and 3.2% had withdrawn or were inactivated by the study staff; thus, attrition was 4.9% (n = 121). Controlling for site and calendar year, missed assessments increased from 14.7%-21.8% between years 1 and 2 and then stayed relatively stable (20.8%-19.6%) for years 3-5. Younger age, male sex, White race, lower body mass index, smoking, illicit drug use, and higher weight loss expectations preoperatively were independently associated with a higher likelihood of a missed versus in-person assessment across follow-up., Conclusion: The LABS-2 participant attrition was low. The percentage of missed assessments did not increase after year 2, perhaps due to implementation of a comprehensive retention plan. Predictors of missed assessments highlight subgroups to target for focused retention efforts., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Postbariatric hypoglycemia (PBH) can be a devastating complication for which current therapies are often incompletely effective. More information is needed regarding frequency, incidence, and risk factors for PBH., Objectives: To examine hypoglycemia symptoms following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and baseline and in-study risk factors., Setting: Multicenter, at 10 US hospitals in 6 geographically diverse clinical centers., Methods: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study of adults undergoing RYGB or LAGB as part of clinical care between 2006 and 2009 were recruited and followed until January 31, 2015, with baseline and annual postoperative research assessments. We analyzed baseline prevalence and post-operative incidence and frequency of self-reported hypoglycemia symptoms as well as potential preoperative risk factors., Results: In all groups, postoperative prevalence of hypoglycemia symptoms was 38.5%. Symptom prevalence increased postoperatively from 2.8%-36.4% after RYGB in patients without preoperative diabetes (T2D), with similar patterns in prediabetes (4.9%-29.1%). Individuals with T2D had higher baseline hypoglycemia symptoms (28.9%), increasing after RYGB (57.9%). Hypoglycemia symptoms were lower after LAGB, with 39.1% reported hypoglycemia symptoms at only 1 postoperative visit with few (4.0%) having persistent symptoms at 6 or more annual visits. Timing of symptoms was not restricted to the postprandial state. Symptoms of severe hypoglycemia were reported in 2.6-3.6% after RYGB. The dominant risk factor for postoperative symptoms was preoperative symptoms; additionally, baseline selective serotonin (SSRI) and serotonin-norepinephrine (SNRI) reuptake inhibitor use was also associated with increased risk in multivariable analysis. Weight loss and regain were not related to hypoglycemia symptom reporting., Conclusion: Hypoglycemia symptoms increase over time after RYGB, particularly in patients without diabetes. In a small percentage, symptoms can be persistent or severe and require hospitalization. Preoperative hypoglycemia symptoms and SSRI/SNRI use in RYGB patients without diabetes is associated with increased risk of symptoms., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The broad effects of bariatric/metabolic surgery on virtually every tissue and organ system remain unexplained. Weight loss, although a major factor, does not fully account for the rapid, full, and durable remission of type 2 diabetes, return of islet function, reduction of the prevalence of cancers, increase in gray matter of the brain, and decrease in all-cause mortality. This review supports the thesis that the metabolic syndrome is not a group of separate diseases but rather multiple expressions of a shared defect in the utilization of carbohydrates and lipids. That error is probably caused by a dysmetabolic signal from the foregut, stimulated by food, that limits entry of 2-carbon fragments into the tricarboxylic acid cycle, the accumulation of lactate and, in turn, increases in glucose and insulin. Surgery limits that signal by reducing contact between food and foregut mucosa. Speciation of that signal(s) may offer a new pathway for drug development., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Bariatric surgery reduces cancer risk in populations with obesity. It is unclear if weight loss alone or metabolic changes related to bariatric surgery cause this effect., Objective: We evaluated the relationship between surgical weight loss and serum biomarker changes with incident cancer in a bariatric surgery cohort., Setting: Ten U.S. clinical facilities., Methods: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery 2 (LABS-2) is a prospective multicenter cohort (n = 2458, 79% female, mean age = 46). We evaluated weight and serum biomarkers, measured preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, as predictors for incident cancer. Associations were determined using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for weight loss, age, sex, education, and smoking history., Results: Over 8759 person-years of follow-up, 82 patients reported new cancer diagnosis (936 per 100,000 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 749-1156). Cancer risk was decreased by approximately 50% in participants with 20% to 34.9% total weight loss (TWL) compared with <20% TWL (hazard ratio [HR] = .49, 95%CI: .29-.83). Reduced cancer risk was observed with percent decrease from baseline for glucose (per 10%, HR = .94, 95%CI: .90-.99), proinsulin (per 20%, HR = .95, 95%CI: .93-.98), insulin (per 30%, HR = .97, 95%CI: .96-.99), and leptin (per 20%, HR = .81, 95%CI: .68-.97), and per 15% percent increase in ghrelin (HR = .94, 95%CI: .29-.83)., Conclusions: After bariatric surgery, cancer risk is reduced >50% when weight loss exceeds 20% TWL compared with patients with <20% TWL. Weight loss alone may not explain the observed risk reduction, as improvements in diabetes, leptin, and ghrelin were associated with decreased cancer risk., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several studies have demonstrated that minorities and Hispanic ethnicities have disproportionally greater burden of morbid obesity in the United States. However, the majority of bariatric procedures are performed in the non-Hispanic white population., Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the weight loss and remission of obesity-related co-morbidities based on race and ethnicity., Setting: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery prospective, multicenter, observational study was used to collect patients from 10 different health centers across the United States., Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter, observational study over a 5-year follow-up., Results: All patients who underwent primary gastric bypass and provided racial/ethnic information were included in the study (n = 1695). Regardless of race or ethnicity, total weight loss was maintained over a 5-year follow-up, which included 87% of the original cohort. However, whites had on average 1.94% higher adjusted total weight loss compared with blacks (P < .0001). After adjusting for confounders there were no significant differences in resolution of co-morbidities, including diabetes., Conclusion: All patients regardless of race or ethnicity have significant and sustained total weight loss and resolution of co-morbidities after gastric bypass at 5-year follow-up., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lack of prospective trials have resulted in a dearth of information regarding postbariatric surgery conception rates in women with a preoperative history of infertility., Objective: To examine associations between preoperative history of infertility and postbariatric surgery conception., Setting: A multicenter cohort study at 10 United States hospitals (2006-2009)., Methods: Participants completed a preoperative reproductive health questionnaire, with annual postoperative assessments for up to 7 years until January 2015. This report was restricted to women 18- to 44-years old with no history of menopause, hysterectomy, or hormone replacement therapy. The primary outcomes were postoperative (0 to <90 mo) conception rate, early conception rate (0 < 18 mo), and postoperative unprotected intercourse with a male partner while not trying to conceive., Results: Of 740 eligible women, 650 (87.8%) provided required responses. Median interquartile range (IQR) preoperative age was 34 (30-39) years and follow-up was 6.5 (5.9-7.0) years. Nulliparous women with a preoperative history of infertility represented 8.0% (52/650) of the total cohort, 63.5% (33/52) of whom had never conceived. Compared with women without this history, these women had a higher postoperative conception rate (121.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 102.3-143.5]/1000 versus 47.0 [95%CI, 34.2-62.9]/1000 woman-yr; P < .001), early conception rate (115.4 [95%CI, 96.1-138.5]/1000 versus 33.9 [95%CI, 23.6-47.1]/1,000 woman-yr; P < .01), and a higher risk of unprotected intercourse (ARR 1.48 [95% CI, 1.14-1.90], P = 0.003)., Conclusion: After bariatric surgery, preoperative history of infertility and nulliparity was associated higher conception rates and unprotected intercourse., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Past research suggests self-harm/suicidality are more common among adults who have undergone bariatric surgery than the general population., Objectives: To compare prevalence of self-harm/suicidal ideation over time and identify presurgery risk factors for postsurgery self-harm/suicidal ideation., Setting: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery-2 is a cohort study with presurgery and annual postsurgery assessments conducted at 10 U.S. hospitals., Methods: Adults with severe obesity undergoing bariatric surgery between March 2006 and April 2009 (n = 2458). Five-year follow-up is reported. Self-reported history of suicidality assessed retrospectively via the Suicide Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) and self-reported self-harm/suicidal ideation assessed prospectively via the Beck Depression Inventory-Version 1 (BDI-1)., Results: The SBQ-R was completed by 1540 participants; 2217 completed the BDI-1 pre- and postsurgery. Over 75% of participants were female, with a median age of 46 years and body mass index of 45.9 kg/m 2 . Approximately one fourth of participants (395/1534) reported a presurgery history of suicidal thoughts or behavior (SBQ-R). The prevalence of self-harm/suicidal ideation (BDI-1) was 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-6.8) presurgery and 3.8% (95% CI, 2.5-5.1) at year 1 postsurgery (P = .06). Prevalence increased over time postsurgery to 6.6% (95% CI, 4.6-8.6) at year 5 (P = .001) but was not significantly different than presurgery (P = .12)., Conclusions: A large cohort of adults with severe obesity who underwent bariatric surgery had a prevalence of self-harm/suicidal ideation that may have decreased in the first postoperative year but increased over time to presurgery levels, suggesting screening for self-harm/suicidality is warranted throughout long-term postoperative care. Several risk factors were identified that may help with enhanced monitoring., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bariatric surgery usually results in substantial weight loss and a reduction in medical comorbidities. Many patients, as a consequence of the weight loss, subsequently evidence loose, redundant skin., Objectives: This investigation seeks to examine the prevalence of body contouring surgery (BCS) by patients approximately 4 to 5 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Demographics, change in BMI, and psychosocial variables were also used to predict body dissatisfaction, desire for BCS, and patients who reported obtaining BCS., Setting: The clinical sites involved in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery project, which included 10 hospitals across the United States., Methods: The sample comprised 1159 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and were enrolled in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery-2 study. Participants were surveyed using the Excessive Skin Survey and other psychosocial measures at their 4- or 5-year postoperative outcome. The participants were predominately women (80.5%), Caucasian (88.3%), and middle-aged (mean = 46.1 yr, standard deviation = 11.11 yr)., Results: Participants reported modest degrees of being bothered by excessive skin, primarily in their waist/abdomen, thighs, and chest/breasts body areas. Only 11.2% of the sample had undergone any BCS procedure, and a majority of those participants paid "out of pocket" for BCS. Desire for BCS and body dissatisfaction 4 to 5 years postsurgery was associated with higher depression scores and poorer quality of life scores., Conclusions: Excessive skin is associated with poorer psychosocial functioning. Despite reporting modest levels of being bothered by excessive skin and body dissatisfaction, only a small fraction of participants underwent BCS. Cost of BCS was reported to be a primary barrier for not obtaining BCS. All rights reserved., (Copyright © 2018 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The role of robotic assistance for gastric bypass remains controversial. Using a large nationwide cohort, we compared early outcomes after robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (Robot-RYGB) with the laparoscopic technique (LRYGB)., Objective: This study aimed to use a bariatric-specific, large, nationwide cohort with several years of data to compare the early postoperative outcomes of the Robot-RYGB and LRYGB., Setting: Nationwide register-based cohort study., Methods: The Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database from 2007 to 2012 was used to identify patients who underwent nonrevisional Robot-RYGB or LRYGB. Propensity matching was used to account for differences in age, body mass index, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, multiple preoperative co-morbidities, and procedural year. A second propensity score was calculated with adjustment of operative time in addition to the other adjusted variables., Results: We identified 137,455 patients who underwent Robot-RYGB (n = 2415) or LRYGB (n = 135,040) with a mean body mass index of 47.1 ± 8.4 kg/m 2 and age of 45.4 ± 11.7 years. In the propensity-matched cohorts, there were 30-day differences in operative time (150.2 ± 72.5 versus 111.8 ± 47.6, P<.001); 30-day rates of reoperation (4.8% versus 3.1%, P = .002); 90-day rates of reoperation (8.8% versus 5.3%, P<.001), complication (15.8% versus 12.5%, P = .001), readmission (8.5% versus 6.4%, P = .005), stricture (3.5% versus 2.0%, P = .001), ulceration (1.2% versus .6%, P = .034), nausea or emesis (6.4% versus 4.36%, P = .001), and anastomotic leak (1.6% versus .2%, P<.001) when comparing Robot-RYGB with LRYGB. After including operative time in propensity matching, there were no significant differences in rates of 30-day readmission or ulceration or 90-day readmission or ulceration; all other differences remained significant., Conclusions: Despite controlling for patient characteristics, patients undergoing Robot-RYGB developed higher rates of early morbidity compared with LRYGB, suggesting LRYGB may provide improved postoperative outcomes. Further studies are needed to definitively compare these 2 operative approaches., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limited evidence suggests bariatric surgery may not reduce opioid analgesic use, despite improvements in pain., Objective: To determine if use of prescribed opioid analgesics changes in the short and long term after bariatric surgery and to identify factors associated with continued and postsurgery initiated use., Setting: Ten U.S. hospitals., Methods: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery-2 is an observational cohort study. Assessments were conducted presurgery, 6 months postsurgery, and annually postsurgery for up to 7 years until January 2015. Opioid use was defined as self-reported daily, weekly, or "as needed" use of a prescribed medication classified as an opioid analgesic., Results: Of 2258 participants with baseline data, 2218 completed follow-up assessment(s) (78.7% were female, median body mass index: 46; 70.6% underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass). Prevalence of opioid use decreased after surgery from 14.7% (95% CI: 13.3-16.2) at baseline to 12.9% (95% CI: 11.5-14.4) at month 6 but then increased to 20.3%, above baseline levels, as time progressed (95% CI: 18.2-22.5) at year 7. Among participants without baseline opioid use (n = 1892), opioid use prevalence increased from 5.8% (95% CI: 4.7-6.9) at month 6 to 14.2% (95% CI: 12.2-16.3) at year 7. Public versus private health insurance, more pain presurgery, undergoing subsequent surgeries, worsening or less improvement in pain, and starting or continuing nonopioid analgesics postsurgery were significantly associated with higher risk of postsurgery initiated opioid use., Conclusion: After bariatric surgery, prevalence of prescribed opioid analgesic use initially decreased but then increased to surpass baseline prevalence, suggesting the need for alternative methods of pain management in this population., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Empirical evidence suggests Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) increases risk of developing alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, prospective assessment of substance use disorders (SUD) after bariatric surgery is limited., Objective: To report SUD-related outcomes after RYGB and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). To identify factors associated with incident SUD-related outcomes., Setting: 10 U.S. hospitals METHODS: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery-2 is a prospective cohort study. Participants self-reported past-year AUD symptoms (determined by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test), illicit drug use (cocaine, hallucinogens, inhalants, phencyclidine, amphetamines, or marijuana), and SUD treatment (counseling or hospitalization for alcohol or drugs) presurgery and annually postsurgery for up to 7 years through January 2015., Results: Of 2348 participants who underwent RYGB or LAGB, 2003 completed baseline and follow-up assessments (79.2% women, baseline median age: 47 years, median body mass index 45.6). The year-5 cumulative incidence of postsurgery onset AUD symptoms, illicit drug use, and SUD treatment were 20.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 18.5-23.3), 7.5% (95% CI: 6.1-9.1), and 3.5% (95% CI: 2.6-4.8), respectively, post-RYGB, and 11.3% (95% CI: 8.5-14.9), 4.9% (95% CI: 3.1-7.6), and .9% (95% CI: .4-2.5) post-LAGB. Undergoing RYGB versus LAGB was associated with higher risk of incident AUD symptoms (adjusted hazard ratio or AHR = 2.08 [95% CI: 1.51-2.85]), illicit drug use (AHR = 1.76 [95% CI: 1.07-2.90]) and SUD treatment (AHR = 3.56 [95% CI: 1.26-10.07])., Conclusions: Undergoing RYGB versus LAGB was associated with twice the risk of incident AUD symptoms. One-fifth of participants reported incident AUD symptoms within 5 years post-RYGB. AUD education, screening, evaluation, and treatment referral should be incorporated in pre- and postoperative care., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.)

The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has traditionally been the most common bariatric procedure. Long-term data on the efficacy of RYGB demonstrate a long-lasting benefit in weight loss and control of the metabolic syndrome. Although observations of type 2 diabetes (T2D) resolution after RYGB have been reported for 3 decades, it was not until recently that multiple randomized trials comparing RYGB to medical therapy verified the same thing: RYGB leads to significantly greater diabetes control and remission. Even though T2D can relapse, there remains a significant overall benefit of bariatric surgery regarding the downstream effects of T2D: cardiovascular risk and micro- and macrovascular complications. Limited data are available on the comparative effectiveness of RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy in improving glucose homeostasis, but studies including both surgical procedures suggest that the benefit of RYGB in T2D may be more profound. Although further research is needed to examine closely any differences between these 2 procedures, multiple studies underscore the unprecedented value of bariatric surgery for the control and remission of T2D., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is gaining popularity over laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) within the United States. Data on readmissions after bariatric procedures are mostly based on LRYGB, with limited evidence regarding etiology of readmissions after SG., Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare 30-day readmission rate and etiology after SG and LRYGB., Setting: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) participating facilities, Methods: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic SG and LRYGB in 2012 and 2013 were identified from the ACS-NSQIP Participant Use Data File. Demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, and 30-day readmissions were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis evaluated variables with P<.1, using readmission as the dependent variable., Results: A total of 34,983 patients underwent bariatric surgery (46.0% SG, 54.0% LRYGB). Readmission was reported in 1773 (5.1%) patients. Readmission was more common after LRYGB compared with SG (6.1% versus 3.8%, P<.001, adjusted OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.44-1.76, P<.001). Nausea, vomiting, and dehydration were more commonly a reason for readmission after SG than LRYGB (30.4% versus 18.8%, P =<.001). Additionally, venous thromboembolism was a more frequent readmission cause for SG compared with LRYGB patients (7.2% versus 3.6%, P = .002). Postoperative pain, bleeding, intestinal obstructions, and wound occurrences were more commonly a readmission cause for LRYGB compared with SG., Conclusions: Hospital readmissions are more common after LRYGB than SG. Reasons for readmission differ between procedures. Given the progressive increase in the proportion of bariatric patients undergoing SG, hospital programs that aim to decrease readmissions after bariatric surgery need to focus on prevention and control of postoperative nausea and dehydration., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Complications following bariatric surgery are uncommon but potentially life threatening., Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the timing of gastrointestinal leaks (GIL) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery., Setting: Retrospective analysis of the nationwide American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2006 to 2011., Methods: Data on patient demographic characteristics, baseline co-morbidities, procedural events, and postoperative occurrences were analyzed. Thirty-day morbidity was assessed. Median (interquartile range) and frequencies are reported., Results: We identified 71,694 bariatric surgery patients; median age was 45 years (range 36-54 yr), and median body mass index was 44.8 kg/m(2) (range 40.8-50.3 kg/m(2)). Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was performed in 39,480 patients, laparoscopic adjustable band in 21,104, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in 3225, open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in 4243, duodenal switch in 1064, revisional surgery in 1182, and other procedures in 1396 patients. Of these patients, 95.2% had no complications. GIL was found in 441 (.6%), deep vein thrombosis in 184 (.3%), and PE in 134 (.2%). These complications occurred 10 (5-15), 13 (7-20), and 11 (4-19) days after surgery, respectively. GIL and PE developed after discharge in 275 (62.4%) and 96 (71.6%), respectively. Only 35 (26.1%) of the patients who developed PE had deep vein thrombosis. There were no differences in patient characteristics between the groups of early PE versus postdischarge PE. Patients diagnosed with in-hospital GIL were more obese with more severe systemic disease compared with patients with postdischarge diagnosis., Conclusions: The majority of GILs and PEs after bariatric surgery occur after discharge. This finding goes against the routine use of contrast studies to rule out GIL. The risk of PE remains after discharge from bariatric surgery., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limited data guide the prediction of weight loss success or failure after bariatric surgery according to presurgery factors. There is significant variation in weight change after bariatric surgery and much interest in identifying preoperative factors that may contribute to these differences. This report evaluates the associations of a comprehensive set of baseline factors and 3-year weight change., Setting: Ten hospitals in 6 geographically diverse clinical centers in the United States., Methods: Adults undergoing a first bariatric surgical procedure as part of clinical care by participating surgeons were recruited between 2006 and 2009. Participants completed research assessments utilizing standardized and detailed data collection on over 100 preoperative and operative parameters for individuals undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Weight was measured 3 years after surgery. Percent weight change for RYGB or LAGB from baseline to 3 years was analyzed as both a continuous and dichotomous outcome with cut points at 25% for RYGB and 10% for LAGB. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to identify independent baseline predictors of the continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively., Results: The median weight loss 3 years after surgery for RYGB (n = 1513) participants was 31.5% (IQR: 24.6%-38.4%; range, 59.2% loss to .9% gain) of baseline weight and 16.0% (IQR: 8.1%-23.1%; range, 56.1% loss to 12.5% gain) for LAGB (n = 509) participants. The median age was 46 years for RYGB and 48 years for LAGB; 80% of RYGB participants and 75% of LAGB participants were female; and the median baseline body mass index (BMI) was 46 kg/m(2) for RYGB and 44 kg/m(2) for LAGB. For RYGB, black participants lost 2.7% less weight compared with whites and participants with diabetes at baseline had 3.7% less weight loss at year 3 than those without diabetes at baseline. There were small but statistically significant differences in weight change for RYGB in those with abnormal kidney function and current or recent smoking. For LAGB participants, those with a large band circumference had 75% greater odds of experiencing less than 10% weight loss after adjusting for BMI and sex., Conclusions: Few baseline variables were associated with 3-year weight change and the effects were small. These results indicate that baseline variables have limited predictive value for an individual's chance of a successful weight loss outcome after bariatric surgery., Trial Registration: NCT00465829, ClinicalTrials.gov., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Even though the U.S. population is aging, outcomes of bariatric surgery in the elderly are not well defined. Current literature mostly evaluates the effects of gastric bypass (RYGB), with paucity of data on sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The objective of this study was to assess 30-day morbidity and mortality associated with laparoscopic SG in patients aged 65 years and over, in comparison to RYGB., Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for all patients aged 65 and over who underwent laparoscopic RYGB and SG between 2010 and 2011. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. P value<.05 was considered significant. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported when applicable., Results: We identified 1005 patients. Mean body mass index was 44 ± 7. SG was performed in 155 patients (15.4%). The American Society of Anesthesiology physical classification of 3 or 4 was similar between the 2 groups (82.6% versus 86.7%, P = .173). Diabetes was more frequent in the RYGB group (43.2% versus 55.6%, P = .004). 30-day mortality (0.6% versus 0.6%, OR 1.1, 95% CI .11-9.49), serious morbidity (5.2% versus 5.6%, OR .91, 95% CI .42-0.96), and overall morbidity (9% versus 9.1%, OR 1.0, 95% CI .55-1.81) were similar., Conclusion: In elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, SG is not associated with significantly different 30-day outcomes compared to RYGB. Both procedures are followed by acceptably low morbidity and mortality., (Copyright © 2014 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The existence of a relationship between surgeon volume and patient outcome has been reported for different complex surgical operations. This relationship has also been confirmed for patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study. Despite multiple studies demonstrating volume-outcome relationships, fewer studies investigate the causes of this relationship., Objective: The purpose of the present study is to understand possible explanations for the volume-outcome relationship in LABS., Methods: LABS includes a 10-center, prospective study examining 30-day outcomes after bariatric surgery. The relationship between surgeon annual RYGB volume and incidence of a composite endpoint (CE) has been published previously. Technical aspects of RYGB surgery were compared between high and low volume surgeons. The previously published model was adjusted for select technical factors., Results: High-volume surgeons (>100 RYGBs/yr) were more likely to perform a linear stapled gastrojejunostomy, use fibrin sealant, and place a drain at the gastrojejunostomy compared with low-volume surgeons (<25 RYGBs/yr), and less likely to perform an intraoperative leak test. After adjusting for the newly identified technical factors, the relative risk of CE was .93 per 10 RYGB/yr increase in volume, compared with .90 for clinical risk adjustment alone., Conclusion: High-volume surgeons exhibited certain differences in technique compared with low-volume surgeons. After adjusting for these differences, the strength of the volume-outcome relationship previously found was reduced only slightly, suggesting that other factors are also involved., (Copyright © 2013 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Anticoagulation, the use of sequential compression devices on the lower extremities perioperatively, and early ambulation are thought to reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) postoperatively and are recommended to reduce VTE risk. However, the evidence on which this recommendation has been based is not particularly strong. We have demonstrated that even a large, multicenter cohort with carefully collected prospective data is inadequate to provide sufficient evidence to support, or refute, this recommendation., Methods: Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery participants from 10 centers in the United States who underwent their first bariatric surgery between March 2005 and December 2007 constituted the study group. We examined the ability to address the question of whether anticoagulation therapy, in addition to sequential compression, reduces the 30-day incidence of VTE or death sufficiently to recommend the use of prophylactic anticoagulation, a therapy that is not without risk., Results: Of 4416 patients, 396 (9.0%) received sequential compression alone, and 4020 also received anticoagulation therapy. The incidence of VTE within 30 days of surgery was low (.25% among those receiving sequential compression alone and .47% when anticoagulation therapy was added), and the 30-day incidence of death was also low (.25% versus .34%, respectively, P = .76, for sequential compression alone versus sequential compression plus anticoagulation therapy). Estimates of the number of cases required to address the question of whether a difference exists in the outcome related to VTE chemoprophylaxis or whether the outcome rates are equivalent have ranged from 13,680 to ≥ 35,760 patients, depending on whether superiority or equivalence was being analyzed., Conclusion: Sufficient evidence from a clinical trial study to determine whether prophylactic anticoagulation added to compression devices further prevents VTE is not available, and such a trial is likely to be impractical. The data presented are insufficient to make a final recommendation concerning prophylactic treatment to prevent VTE in the 30 days after bariatric surgery., (Copyright © 2012 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bariatric surgery is technically demanding surgery performed on high-risk patients. Previous studies using administrative databases have shown a relationship between surgeon volume and patient outcome after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). We examined the relationship between surgeons' annual RYGB volumes and 30-day patient outcomes at 10 centers within the United States., Methods: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS)-1 is a prospective study examining the 30-day adverse outcomes after bariatric surgery. The outcomes after RYGB were adjusted by procedure type (open versus laparoscopic), functional status, body mass index, history of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and obstructive sleep apnea. The data were examined to determine the nature and strength of the association between surgeon volume and patients' short-term (30-day) adverse outcomes after RYGB., Results: The analysis included 3410 initial RYGB operations performed by 31 surgeons, 15 of whom averaged <50 cases annually. The crude composite adverse outcome (i.e., death, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, reintervention or nondischarge at day 30) incidence was 5.2%. After risk adjustment, a greater surgeon RYGB volume was associated with lower composite event rates, with a continuous relationship (i.e., varying cutpoints differentiated the composite event rates), such that for each 10-case/yr increase in volume, the risk of a composite event decreased by 10%., Conclusion: In the LABS, the patient's risk of an adverse outcome after RYGB decreased significantly with the increase in surgeon RYGB volume (cases performed annually)., (Copyright 2010 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mobilization of morbidly obese patients poses significant physical challenges to healthcare providers. The purpose of this study was to examine the staff injuries associated with the patient handling of the obese, to describe a process for identifying injuries associated with their mobilization, and to report on the need for safer bariatric patient handling., Methods: We performed our study at a 761-bed, level 1 trauma center affiliated with a U.S. medical school. The hospital's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 300 log was expanded to the "E-OSHA 300 log" to specifically identify injuries the staff attributed to bariatric patient handling. The 2007 E-OSHA 300 log was analyzed to identify and describe the frequency, severity, and nature of bariatric versus nonbariatric patient handling injuries., Results: The analyses revealed that during 2007, although patients with a body mass index of > or =35 kg/m(2) constituted <10% of our patient population, 29.8% of staff injuries related to patient handling were linked to working with a bariatric patient. Bariatric patient handling accounted for 27.9% of all lost workdays and 37.2% of all restricted workdays associated with patient handling. Registered nurses and nursing assistants accounted for 80% of the injuries related to bariatric patient handling. Turning and repositioning the patient in bed accounted for 31% of the injuries incurred. The E-OSHA 300 log narratives revealed that staff injuries associated with obese and nonobese patient handling were usually performed using biomechanics and not equipment., Conclusion: Manual mobilization of morbidly obese patients increases the risk of caregiver injury. A tracking indicator on the OSHA 300 logs for staff injury linked to a bariatric patient would provide the ability to compare obese and nonobese patient handling injuries. The E-OSHA 300 log provides a method to identify the frequency, severity, and nature of caregiver injury during mobilization of the obese. Understanding the heightened risk of injury associated with manual bariatric patient handling should help healthcare institutions identify deficiencies in their current injury prevention program and focus resources more precisely for safer, systems-based bariatric patient-handling solutions. Effective patient handling systems should also reduce the aura of fear that might be present in some caregivers when mobilizing a bariatric patient.

Background: Obesity is a leading health concern in the United States. Because traditional treatment approaches for weight loss are generally unsuccessful in the long term, bariatric surgical procedures are increasingly being performed to treat extreme obesity. To facilitate research in this field, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases responded to this knowledge gap by establishing the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) consortium., Methods: A competitive National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grant process resulted in the creation of a group of investigators with expertise in bariatric surgery, internal medicine, endocrinology, behavioral science, outcomes research, epidemiology, biostatistics, and other relevant fields. These investigators have worked closely to plan, develop, and conduct the LABS study. The LABS consortium protocol is a prospective, multicenter observational cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing bariatric surgery at 6 clinical centers. LABS includes an extensive database of information systematically collected preoperatively, at surgery, perioperatively during the 30-day postoperative period, and longer term., Results: The LABS study has been organized into 3 phases. LABS-1 will include all patients > or =18 years of age who have undergone bariatric surgery by LABS-certified surgeons with the goal to evaluate the short-term safety of bariatric surgery. LABS-2, a subset of approximately 2400 LABS-1 patients, will evaluate the relationship of patient and surgical characteristics to the longer term safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery. LABS-3 will involve a subset of LABS-2 subjects who will undergo detailed studies of mechanisms involved in weight change. The rationale, goals, and approach to study bariatric surgery are detailed in this report, along with a description of the outcomes, measures, and hypotheses used in LABS-1 and -2., Conclusion: The goal of the LABS consortium is to accelerate clinical research and understanding of extreme obesity and its complications by evaluating the risks and benefits of bariatric surgery. LABS investigators use standardized definitions, high-fidelity data collection, and validated instruments to enhance the ability of clinicians to provide meaningful evidence-based recommendations for patient evaluation, selection for surgery, and follow-up care.

Background: Variations in the techniques of bariatric surgery, coupled with the lack of a common database, has led to variable and, sometimes negative, outcomes from bariatric surgery. Thus, in November 2003, the American Society for Bariatric Surgery established Surgical Review Corporation (SRC) as an independent nonprofit entity for quality control of bariatric surgery and as a resource for data collection and analysis., Methods: In November 2003, the leadership of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery founded SRC as an independent nonprofit entity for quality control of bariatric surgery and as resource for research. A national set of standards for the Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence program was developed using a meta-analysis of the relevant published English language data, a consensus conference at Georgetown University, and participation by stakeholders from industry, third-party payors, and malpractice carriers. A software program was developed to provide uniformity in data collection and ease of analysis., Results: SRC developed standards that have been accepted by the bariatric surgical community and put in place. A system was developed for the designation of two levels for the centers, provisional and full. The growth of the Centers of Excellence program has been rapid. At present, 135 hospitals and 265 surgeons have achieved full approval. The centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have recognized the program. On the basis of the reports of 55,567 patients from the first 176 applicants for full approval and confirmed by SRC during site inspections, the 90-day operative mortality rate was 0.35%., Conclusions: The first phase of development has gone well. Future steps include the development of a network of bariatric physicians and the development of a consortium for research.