Search

Purpose: We previously described a combined risk score (CRS) that integrates a multiple-ancestry polygenic risk score (MA-PRS) with the Tyrer-Cuzick (TC) model to assess breast cancer (BC) risk. Here, we present a longitudinal validation of CRS in a real-world cohort., Methods: This study included 130,058 patients referred for hereditary cancer genetic testing and negative for germline pathogenic variants in BC-associated genes. Data were obtained by linking genetic test results to medical claims (median follow-up 12.1 months). CRS calibration was evaluated by the ratio of observed to expected BCs., Results: Three hundred forty BCs were observed over 148,349 patient-years. CRS was well-calibrated and demonstrated superior calibration compared with TC in high-risk deciles. MA-PRS alone had greater discriminatory accuracy than TC, and CRS had approximately 2-fold greater discriminatory accuracy than MA-PRS or TC. Among those classified as high risk by TC, 32.6% were low risk by CRS, and of those classified as low risk by TC, 4.3% were high risk by CRS. In cases where CRS and TC classifications disagreed, CRS was more accurate in predicting incident BC., Conclusion: CRS was well-calibrated and significantly improved BC risk stratification. Short-term follow-up suggests that clinical implementation of CRS should improve outcomes for patients of all ancestries through personalized risk-based screening and prevention., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Brent Mabey, Elisha Hughes, Matthew Kucera, Timothy Simmons, Brooke Hullinger, Sarah Ratzel, Susanne Wagner, Jerry S. Lanchbury, Katherine Johansen Taber, Thomas P. Slavin, and Alexander Gutin were employed by Myriad Genetics, Inc. at the time of the study and received salaries and stocks as compensation. Holly J. Pederson and Monique Gary have received consulting fees from Myriad Genetics, Inc. Charis Eng has ownership interests in MyLegacy/MyFHH/Family Care Path. Judy Garber has received research funding from Ambry Genetics and Invitae and has other relationships, or an immediate family member with relationships, with AACR, Diana Helis Henry Medical Foundation, James P. Wilmot Foundation, Adrianne Helis Malvin Medical Research Foundation, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Facing our Risk of Cancer Empowered, Novartis, GTx, Aleta BioTherapeutics, H3 Biomedicine, and Kronos Bio. Ora Gordon has had a consulting or advisory role with GRAIL and Genetic Technologies, has received travel or accommodation expenses from GRAIL, and has received research funding from GRAIL. Jennifer R. Klemp has received consulting fees and speakers’ bureaus fees from AstraZeneca, has ownership interests in Cancer Survivorship Training, is employed by Caris Life Sciences, Inc, and has received a salary as compensation and consulting fees. Olufunmilayo I. Olopade has an ownership interest in 54Gene and Tempus, has an ownership interest and has received a salary from CancerIQ, and has other interests in Color Genomics, Healthy Life for All Foundation, and Roche/Genetech. Mark E. Robson has provided clinical trial services to AstraZeneca and Merck and has received consulting fees from and/or been on advisory boards for Change Healthcare, Intellisphere, MyMedEd, Physician’s Education Resources, and Research to Practice. Pat W. Whitworth has received consulting fees from or had contracted research with Agendia, Biotheranostics, Genomic Health, Impedimed, Myriad Genetics, Inc, Prelude, and Veracyte, and has an ownership interest in Medneon. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause is a condition describing the hypoestrogenic effects on the female genitals and lower urinary tract leading to symptoms such as vaginal dryness, vulvar and vaginal burning, dyspareunia and dysuria. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause is experienced by over half of postmenopausal women, and is even more pervasive in women with cancer. Due to treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and hormonal therapy, women may experience early menopause resulting in earlier and more severe symptoms. Understanding the scope of this issue in female breast and gynecologic cancer survivors and identifying treatment options for this complex patient population are paramount. Tailored patient treatments include nonhormonal therapies (vaginal moisturizers, lubricants, pelvic floor physical therapy, dilator therapy, counseling), systemic and local hormonal therapies. Consensus recommendations by medical societies and associated evidence are reviewed, with emphasis on safety and efficacy of local vaginal hormonal therapies, and management variations noted depending on cancer type and characteristics. With knowledge and understanding of the unmet need associated with under-recognition and under-treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause, providers caring for women with cancer are in a position to improve the quality of life of their patients by providing safe and effective treatments., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is accepted as a useful adjunct to screening mammography for women at high risk for breast cancer. Nevertheless, concerns about false-positive findings remain, and data about MRI harms and yields are limited. The aim of this study was to quantify harms and yields of breast MRI over time in a large series of patients., Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients at increased risk for breast cancer who underwent annual screening digital mammography and MRI from 2007 to 2013. Harms were defined as events not producing a breast cancer diagnosis (ultrasonography [US], imaging-guided core or surgical biopsy procedure, recommendation for short-term follow-up, or a combination)., Results: Of 350 high-risk patients offered MRI screening, 320 underwent 757 screening MRI procedures over time. The median age at the first MRI was 48 years. All patients met American Cancer Society criteria for annual screening breast MRI. Total harms were highest with the first MRI procedure and decreased with subsequent MRI screening. Of 75 biopsy procedures performed, including 58 US- or MRI-guided core biopsy procedures and 17 surgical biopsy procedures, 6 specimens were found to be malignant, including 2 resulting from biopsy procedures performed based on findings from the first MRI scan, 0 from the second MRI scan, 3 from the third MRI scan, and 1 from the fourth MRI scan., Conclusion: Among women followed with screening MRI, the number of harms was shown to decrease over time. Breast cancer continued to be detected in MRI studies performed over time. This study demonstrates the utility of MRI screening performed over time in high-risk women., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)