Search

Objective: Prolonged labor is the commonest indication for intrapartum cesarean section, but definitions are inconsistent and some common definitions were recently found to overestimate the speed of physiological labor. The objective of this review is to establish an overview of synonyms and definitions used in the literature for prolonged labor, separated into first and second stages, and establish types of definitions used. Data sources: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, and Academic Search Premier. Study eligibility criteria: All articles in English that (1) attempted to define prolonged labor, (2) included a definition of prolonged labor, or (3) included any synonym for prolonged labor, were included. Methods: Data on study design, year of publication, country or region of origin, synonyms used, definition of prolonged first and/or second stage, and origin of provided definition (if not primarily established by the study) were collected into a database. Results: In total, 3402 abstracts and 536 full-text papers were screened, and 232 papers were included. Our search established 53 synonyms for prolonged labor. Forty-three studies defined prolonged labor and 189 studies adopted a definition of prolonged labor. Definitions for prolonged first stage of labor were categorized into: time-based (n=14), progress-based (n=12), clinician-based (n=5), or outcome-based (n=4). For the 33 studies defining prolonged second stage, the majority of definitions (n=25) were time-based, either based on total duration or duration of no descent of the presenting part. Conclusions: Despite efforts to arrive at uniform labor curves, there is still little uniformity in definitions of prolonged labor. Consensus on which definition to use is called for, in order to safely and respectfully allow physiological labor progress, ensure timely management, and assess and compare incidence of prolonged labor between settings.

BACKGROUND: Maternal deaths from uterine rupture continue to occur globally, with particularly high rates in sub-Saharan Africa. Maternal death reviews have been shown to be an effective part of cohesive strategies to prevent future deaths. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct maternal death reviews for all deaths following uterine rupture in the study center, to assess preventability, and to synthesize key learning points that may help to prevent future maternal deaths following uterine rupture. STUDY DESIGN: Thorough case reviews of all maternal deaths from 2016 to 2018 at the study center (a national referral hospital in urban Uganda) were conducted by trained multidisciplinary panels of obstetricians and midwives. Medical records of women who died following uterine rupture (n=37, 10.6% of all maternal deaths) were extracted for further analysis. RESULTS: Most maternal deaths due to uterine rupture (36/37, 97%) were preventable, with most having been still potentially preventable after the women reached the study center (24/36, 67%). Obstructed labor was the leading cause of uterine rupture, accounting for 73% (27/37) of cases. Previous cesarean delivery was confirmed in 38% (14/37) of cases. The incidence of grand multiparity was 11% (4/37), and 11% (4/37) were primiparous. Most women (28/37, 76%) died within 24 hours of admission. On arrival at the study center, 19 (51%) were critically ill. Exploratory laparotomy was performed in 54% (20/37) of cases, and a further 35% (13/37) died while awaiting laparotomy. Four women died shortly after arrival at the study center (within 1 hour) and received basic resuscitative treatment; 27% (10/37) of women who died had received antenatal planning or preparation. CONCLUSION: Most deaths due to uterine rupture were preventable. The key lessons that emerged from the reviews were: (1) careful birth preparation and complication awareness for women with known risk factors, (2) early recognition of obstructed labor, (3) close monitoring of obstetrical interventions known to be associated with uterine rupture, and (4) treating incipient or suspected uterine rupture as a time-critical obstetrical emergency. The recommendations emerging from our narrative reviews are suitable for implementation in low-resource obstetrical settings, where high numbers of deaths involving uterine rupture occur.

Labour care must balance aspirations of parents with vigilance for unanticipated calamities. The 'on-site midwife-led primary care birth unit' facilitates this. The World Health Organization have replaced the traditional partograph with the 'Labour Care Guide'. An implementation project in Botswana included the mnemonic COPE: Companion, Oral fluids, Pain relief and Eliminate the supine position. The Parto-Ma project in Tanzania used guidelines, training and support to improve childbirth outcomes. We list labour practices supported by recent evidence, and highlight new developments. Foetal macrosomia increases risk but mistaken diagnosis increases caesarean births. Obstructed labour is a complex clinical diagnosis, and is difficult to predict. For shoulder dystocia prioritise delivery of the posterior shoulder, facilitated if needed by posterior axilla sling traction. 'Extended balloon labour induction' with two or three Foley catheters side by side, may reduce risks associated with uterine stimulants. Bedside ultrasound may facilitate the diagnosis of cephalic malpositions and malpresentations., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Documentation and assessment of progress in labour using a partograph is recommended by the World Health Organisation to assist in the timely recognition of labour dystocia. Recent studies have tested new designs of partographs that aim to account for more variable rates of labour progress. However, other studies have suggested that poor compliance in the completion of partographs affects utility. The objective of this study was to compare two types of partographs for compliance in documentation and use for managing labour., Methods: Low-risk nulliparous women in spontaneous labour (n = 228) were randomised to either an Action Line (control) (n = 114) or Dystocia Line partograph (intervention) (n = 114). Primary outcome was compliance with instructions for commencement of the partograph following a multifaceted training strategy. Secondary outcomes included compliance with the accompanying clinical management protocol for each partograph; and labour and birth outcomes., Results: The compliance rate for commencing the Action line partograph was 43.2% compared to 67.0% (p = 0.02) for the Dystocia line partograph. Other than a reduction in artificial rupture of membranes in the Dystocia Line group there were no other differences in labour management or birth outcomes. The use of centralised electronic display of labour progress may be a contributing factor., Conclusions: Compliance with the commencement and use of either partograph was low. There was little indication that the partograph was being utilized in the assessment and management of prolonged labour. Further studies are needed to explore the current utility of partographs in labour management and the effect of centralised monitoring of progress in high resource settings., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This chapter reviews and compiles the most recent published evidence assessing the overall labour duration and patterns of progression for both nulliparous and parous women, as well as the accuracy of the alert and action lines in the World Health Organization (WHO) partograph for the identification of women at risk of birth complications. Systematic reviews of observational studies reporting on the duration of the first and the second stages of labour, and on cervical dilatation patterns for women with low risk of complications with 'normal' perinatal outcomes were identified and updated. The accuracy of the alert (1 cm/h) and action lines of the cervicograph in the partogram to predict adverse birth outcomes among women in first stage of labour was also reviewed, questioning the appropriateness of considering cervical dilatation over time as an isolated indicator to define labour progression or arrest., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest JP, VD, MC, EA and JPS are authors or co-authors of some of the original studies and the systematic reviews summarized here. There are no other commercial or financial conflicts to declare., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The partograph (sometimes called partogram) is a labour monitoring tool that is used in countries worldwide to enable early detection of complications, so that referral, action or closer observations can ensue. While the partograph has received global support, from health professionals, there are concerns that it has not reached its full potential in improving clinical outcomes. This has resulted in several variations of the tool and a plethora of studies aimed at exploring the barriers and facilitators to its use. In this chapter, we will discuss the history of the partograph, outlining how it has evolved over time. We will also suggest reasons why the tool may not be meeting the needs of all practitioners. In particular, we will explore partograph use as a complex intervention, suggesting that its success is likely to be dependent on multiple contextual factors., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Both authors have published studies that have been included in this chapter., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The partograph is a tool used to record labour observations and support decision-making. Although used globally, it has not reached its full potential. We aimed to determine whether an educational board game can improve labour-monitoring skills and influence practice., Study Design: A quasi-experimental study, underpinned by Kirkpatrick's evaluation model, was used. Midwives and student midwives from Malawi, Kenya and Tanzania were given an identical hypothetical case-scenario of a woman in labour pre-and post-implementation of a game, to assess recording and interpretation abilities. This was supplemented by qualitative inquiry 3 months post-game-playing using semi-structured interviews (n = 24) and expert case-record reviews (n = 24). Quantitative data were analysed using the paired t-test and qualitative data were subjected to framework analysis., Results: 95 midwives and 97 students participated. In each country the mean test scores improved; Kenya from 86.5 (6.7) to 95.5 (3.7) (paired t = 11.82, p < 0.001), Malawi from 83.6 (6.7) to 94.6 (4.1) (paired t = 13.35, p < 0.001), and Tanzania from 83.8 (6.2) to 94.9 (4.1) (paired t = 15.27, p < 0.001). Qualitative findings revealed six themes: 'an enjoyable way of practicing,' 'learning and re-learning,' 'improved clinical decision-making', 'promoting team-work', 'a catalyst for additional learning' and 'barriers to transference of learning'. Expert case-record review demonstrated good adherence to recommendations., Conclusion: Board games have the ability to improve labour-monitoring knowledge. Retention of information was apparent and application of learning into practice was encouraging. Health-system barriers need to be resolved for midwives to apply theory to practice. Whether such application results in improved clinical outcomes is uncertain and requires further evaluation., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Partograph has been shown to be an efficacious tool for monitoring labor and identifying women in need of an obstetric intervention. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess knowledge and utilization of partograph among health care professionals in public health institutions of Bale zone, Southeast Ethiopia., Study Design: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from February 1st to March 30, 2014., Methods: Single population proportion sample size determination formula was used to calculate the sample size and it was 401. Simple random sampling was employed to select both the health facilities as well as study subjects. Data were collected using pretested structured questionnaire. It was analyzed by SPSS for windows version 16.0. Descriptive, binary and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. Statistically significant tests were declared at a level of significance of P value <0.05., Results: One hundred and forty (38.5%) and 224 (61.5%) study subjects have a poor and good level of knowledge about partograph, respectively. The magnitude of partograph utilization was 70.2%. Variables having statistically significant association with good level of knowledge about partograph were being midwives (AOR = 7.70, 95% CI = 2.38, 24.94), being nurses (AOR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.19, 0.85) and being graduated from governmental higher institution (AOR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.22, 3.42). Additionally, being female health professionals (AOR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.17, 4.89), being hospital staff (AOR = 17.78, 95% CI = 2.32, 135.98) and receiving training about partograph (AOR = 2.94, 95% CI = 1.15, 7.54) have statistically significant association with partograph utilization., Conclusions: More than half of the respondents have a good level of knowledge about partograph. A significant number of study subjects reported use of partograph to monitor women in labour. It is recommended to provide periodic on-job training on partograph to all obstetric caregivers especially for nurses and public health officers to improve their knowledge., (Copyright © 2016 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

"Normal" labor has been surprisingly little studied in the past 60 years even though it is a central axis in obstetrics. Standards were proposed 60 years ago by Emmanuel Friedman and adopted by many countries to become then, driven from Dublin school, the conditions allowing the management of labor: rupture of membranes and oxytocin with, in case of failure for dynamic dystocia, cesarean. Recent data have suggested that labor duration had changed since the 1960s. Changes in women's characteristics and in obstetric practice especially with the widespread use of oxytocin and realization of epidural may have an impact on labor duration. Current studies suggest that it may be possible to authorize longer labor duration without significant increase in maternal or neonatal morbidity. However, it is premature to change practices following the latest American recommendations without prior studies., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier SAS.)