Search

Background: Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) first pass perfusion maps are conventionally acquired with 3 short-axis (SAX) views (basal, mid, and apical) in every heartbeat (3SAX/1RR). Thus, a significant part of the left ventricle (LV) myocardium, including the apex, is not covered. The aims of this study were 1) to investigate if perfusion maps acquired with 3 short-axis views sampled every other RR-interval (2RR) yield comparable quantitative measures of myocardial perfusion (MP) as 1RR and 2) to assess if acquiring 3 additional perfusion views (i.e., total of 6) every other RR-interval (2RR) increases diagnostic confidence., Methods: In 287 patients with suspected ischemic heart disease stress and rest MP were performed on clinical indication on a 1.5T MR scanner. Eighty-three patients were examined by acquiring 3 short-axis perfusion maps with 1RR sampling (3SAX/1RR); for which also 2RR maps were reconstructed. Additionally, in 103 patients 3 short-axis and 3 long-axis (LAX; 2-, 3, and 4-chamber view) perfusion maps were acquired using 2RR sampling (3SAX + 3LAX/2RR) and in 101 patients 6 short-axis perfusion maps using 2RR sampling (6SAX/2RR) were acquired. The diagnostic confidence for ruling in or out stress-induced ischemia was scored according to a Likert scale (certain ischemia [2 points], probably ischemia [1 point], uncertain [0 points], probably no ischemia [1 point], certain no ischemia [2 points])., Results: There was a strong correlation (R = 0.99) between 3SAX/1RR and 3SAX/2RR for global MP (mL/min/g). The diagnostic confidence score increased significantly when the number of perfusion views was increased from 3 to 6 (1.24 ± 0.68 vs 1.54 ± 0.64, p < 0.001 with similar increase for 3SAX+3LAX/2RR (1.29 ± 0.68 vs 1.55 ± 0.65, p < 0.001) and for 6SAX/2RR (1.19 ± 0.69 vs 1.53 ± 0.63, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Quantitative perfusion mapping with 2RR sampling of data yields comparable perfusion values as 1RR sampling, allowing for the acquisition of additional views within the same perfusion scan. The diagnostic confidence for stress-induced ischemia increases when adding 3 additional views, short- or long axes, to the conventional 3 short-axis views. Thus, future development and clinical implementation of quantitative CMR perfusion should aim at increasing the LV coverage from the current standard using 3 short-axis views., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No declaration of interest for any of the authors., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Right ventricular (RV) dyssynchrony or post systolic contraction (PSC) causes inefficient pumping and has not been investigated as a prognostic marker in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The objective was to investigate if RV dyssynchrony and PSC are prognostic markers of transplantation-free survival in PAH and if multiple RV views improve prognostication., Methods: Patients with PAH undergoing cardiovascular magnetic resonance between 2003 and 2021 were included. For strain analysis, endocardial end-diastolic RV contours were delineated in RV three-chamber (RV3ch), four-chamber (4ch), and midventricular short-axis (SAX) slice. RV dyssynchrony was defined as the standard deviation of time to peak strain in the walls from one (4ch), two (4ch and SAX), or three views (4ch, SAX, and RV3ch). PSC was defined as peak strain occurring after pulmonary valve closure. Outcome was defined as death or lung transplantation., Results: One hundred and one patients (58 ± 19 years, 66% (67/101) women) were included. Median follow-up was 37 [51] months. There were 60 events (55 deaths and 5 lung transplantations). Outcome was associated with RV dyssynchrony from three views and with RV strain in 4ch. An increase in RV dyssynchrony-in three views-by 1% was associated with a 10% increased risk of lung transplantation or death. There was no association between outcome and RV dyssynchrony in one or two views nor with PSC., Conclusion: RV dyssynchrony in three views was associated with outcome in PAH, whereas assessing dyssynchrony from one or two views and PSC was not. This implies that assessment of multiple instead of single RV views could potentially be used for prognostication in PAH., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB) may receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but current selection criteria are imprecise, and many patients have limited treatment response. Hemodynamic forces (HDF) have been suggested as a marker for CRT response. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate left ventricular (LV) HDF as a predictive marker for LV remodeling after CRT., Methods: Patients with heart failure, EF < 35% and LBBB (n = 22) underwent CMR with 4D flow prior to CRT. LV HDF were computed in three directions using the Navier-Stokes equations, reported in median N [interquartile range], and the ratio of transverse/longitudinal HDF was calculated for systole and diastole. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and 6 months after CRT. Patients with end-systolic volume reduction ≥ 15% were defined as responders., Results: Non-responders had smaller HDF than responders in the inferior-anterior direction in systole (0.06 [0.03] vs. 0.07 [0.03], p = 0.04), and in the apex-base direction in diastole (0.09 [0.02] vs. 0.1 [0.05], p = 0.047). Non-responders had larger diastolic HDF ratio compared to responders (0.89 vs. 0.67, p = 0.004). ROC analysis of diastolic HDF ratio for identifying CRT non-responders had AUC of 0.88 (p = 0.005) with sensitivity 57% and specificity 100% for ratio > 0.87. Intragroup comparison found higher HDF ratio in systole compared to diastole for responders (p = 0.003), but not for non-responders (p = 0.8)., Conclusion: Hemodynamic force ratio is a potential marker for identifying patients with heart failure and LBBB who are unlikely to benefit from CRT. Larger-scale studies are required before implementation of HDF analysis into clinical practice., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

COVID-19 is associated with myocardial injury caused by ischemia, inflammation, or myocarditis. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the noninvasive reference standard for cardiac function, structure, and tissue composition. CMR is a potentially valuable diagnostic tool in patients with COVID-19 presenting with myocardial injury and evidence of cardiac dysfunction. Although COVID-19-related myocarditis is likely infrequent, COVID-19-related cardiovascular histopathology findings have been reported in up to 48% of patients, raising the concern for long-term myocardial injury. Studies to date report CMR abnormalities in 26% to 60% of hospitalized patients who have recovered from COVID-19, including functional impairment, myocardial tissue abnormalities, late gadolinium enhancement, or pericardial abnormalities. In athletes post-COVID-19, CMR has detected myocarditis-like abnormalities. In children, multisystem inflammatory syndrome may occur 2 to 6 weeks after infection; associated myocarditis and coronary artery aneurysms are evaluable by CMR. At this time, our understanding of COVID-19-related cardiovascular involvement is incomplete, and multiple studies are planned to evaluate patients with COVID-19 using CMR. In this review, we summarize existing studies of CMR for patients with COVID-19 and present ongoing research. We also provide recommendations for clinical use of CMR for patients with acute symptoms or who are recovering from COVID-19., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Petersen provides consultancy to and is a shareholder of Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Inc, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Dr Friedrich is board member, shareholder, and consultant of Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. Dr Kramer is a consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Nagel has received research support from Bayer AG, Neosoft, and Medis. Dr Pennell has received research support from Siemens. Dr Bluemke is a consultant to Bayer AG. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. Dr Petersen has received support from the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Barts. Dr Ferreira receives support from the British Heart Foundation, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Dr Raisi-Estabragh was supported by British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Training Fellowship number FS/17/81/33318., (Crown Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This document is a position statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) on recommendations for clinical utilization of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in women with cardiovascular disease. The document was prepared by the SCMR Consensus Group on CMR Imaging for Female Patients with Cardiovascular Disease and endorsed by the SCMR Publications Committee and SCMR Executive Committee. The goals of this document are to (1) guide the informed selection of cardiovascular imaging methods, (2) inform clinical decision-making, (3) educate stakeholders on the advantages of CMR in specific clinical scenarios, and (4) empower patients with clinical evidence to participate in their clinical care. The statements of clinical utility presented in the current document pertain to the following clinical scenarios: acute coronary syndrome, stable ischemic heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction, aortic syndrome and congenital heart disease in pregnancy, bicuspid aortic valve and aortopathies, systemic rheumatic diseases and collagen vascular disorders, and cardiomyopathy-causing mutations. The authors cite published evidence when available and provide expert consensus otherwise. Most of the evidence available pertains to translational studies involving subjects of both sexes. However, the authors have prioritized review of data obtained from female patients, and direct comparison of CMR between women and men. This position statement does not consider CMR accessibility or availability of local expertise, but instead highlights the optimal utilization of CMR in women with known or suspected cardiovascular disease. Finally, the ultimate goal of this position statement is to improve the health of female patients with cardiovascular disease by providing specific recommendations on the use of CMR.

The presentation and identification of cardiovascular disease in women pose unique diagnostic challenges compared to men, and underrecognized conditions in this patient population may lead to clinical mismanagement.This article reviews the sex differences in cardiovascular disease, explores the diagnostic and prognostic role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in the spectrum of cardiovascular disorders in women, and proposes the added value of CMR compared to other imaging modalities. In addition, this article specifically reviews the role of CMR in cardiovascular diseases occurring more frequently or exclusively in female patients, including Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, connective tissue disorders, primary pulmonary arterial hypertension and peripartum cardiomyopathy. Gaps in knowledge and opportunities for further investigation of sex-specific cardiovascular differences by CMR are also highlighted.