Search

Background: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a novel technique used in the treatment of subjects with severe refractory asthma. Radiofrequency is provided to airway walls during bronchoscopy in order to reduce airway remodeling. Several clinical studies have reported an improvement in subjects' symptoms following BT. However, how BT affects the airway architectures and inflammatory mediators in the airways has not been yet fully elucidated., Methods: Fourteen subjects with severe asthma were recruited in this study according to the criteria of ATS severe asthma definition. The study subjects undertook bronchial biopsy during the bronchoscopy procedure at baseline and 6 weeks after the initial BT treatment. The obtained samples were stained with antibodies for α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA); protein gene product (PGP) 9.5, a specific nerve marker; von Willebrand factor (vWF), a marker for blood vessels; interleukin-17A (IL-17A) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)., Results: The expression of α-SMA and PGP9.5 were significantly reduced post-BT. There was no significant difference in the number of blood vessels between baseline and post-BT. In addition, BT did not affect the production of IL-17A and TGF-β1 in the airways. The changes in the expression of α-SMA and PGP9.5 had no significant correlation with the improvement of pulmonary function., Conclusion: and Clinical Relevance: This study suggests that BT reduces airway smooth muscle mass and the airway innervation without affecting vasculature and the production of inflammatory mediators in the airways of subjects with severe asthma., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The role of interleukin 13 in airway inflammation and remodelling in asthma is unclear. Tralokinumab is a human monoclonal antibody that neutralises interleukin 13. We aimed to evaluate whether tralokinumab would have an effect on airway eosinophilic infiltration, blood and sputum eosinophil concentrations, eosinophil activation, and airway remodelling., Methods: We did a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial at 15 centres across the UK, Denmark, and Canada. We enrolled participants of either sex aged 18-75 years with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe asthma for 12 months or more, requiring treatment with inhaled corticosteroids at a stable dose. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to receive tralokinumab (300 mg) or placebo by an interactive web-based system or voice response system. Participants and study personnel were masked to treatment allocation. Both tralokinumab and placebo were administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to week 12 in bronchial biopsy eosinophil count. Secondary outcome measures included change in blood and sputum eosinophil counts. Exploratory outcomes included fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) and blood IgE concentrations. Safety analyses were carried out in all participants who received study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02449473, and with the European Clinical Trials Database, EudraCT 2015-000857-19., Findings: Between Sept 25, 2015, and June 21, 2017, 224 participants were enrolled and screened. Of these participants, 79 were randomly assigned to receive tralokinumab (n=39) or placebo (n=40). Tralokinumab did not significantly affect bronchial eosinophil count compared with placebo at week 12 (treatment effect ratio 1·43, 95% CI 0·63-3·27; p=0·39). Compared with placebo, tralokinumab did not significantly affect blood eosinophil count (treatment effect ratio 1·21, 95% CI 1·00-1·48; p=0·055) or sputum eosinophil count (0·57, 0·06-6·00; p=0·63), but FENO concentration (0·78, 0·63-0·96; p=0·023) and total blood IgE concentration (0·86, 0·77-0·97; p=0·014) were significantly reduced. 33 (85%) of 39 patients receiving tralokinumab and 32 (80%) of 40 receiving placebo reported at least one adverse event during the treatment period. No deaths in either treatment group were observed. Treatment-related adverse events occurred more frequently in the tralokinumab group than in the placebo group (11 [28%] of 39 vs seven [18%] of 40)., Interpretation: Tralokinumab did not significantly affect eosinophilic inflammation in bronchial submucosa, blood, or sputum compared with placebo, but did reduce FENO and IgE concentrations. These results suggest interleukin 13 is not crucial for eosinophilic airway inflammation control in moderate-to-severe asthma., Funding: AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Airway inflammation is a key pathological feature of asthma which underlies its clinical presentation., Objectives: To examine whether adding a leukotriene modifier to an inhaled corticosteroid produces further clinical and/or anti-inflammatory benefits in patients symptomatic on short-acting beta(2)-agonists., Methods: Patients uncontrolled on short-acting beta(2)-agonists were treated for 12 weeks with either fluticasone propionate (100mcg BD) or fluticasone propionate (100mcg BD) and montelukast (10mg QD) in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. Bronchoscopy with endobronchial biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed before and after treatment to compare effects on airway inflammation., Results: Of 103 subjects enrolled, 89 subjects completed treatment and 82 subjects had matched pair biopsy samples. Submucosal eosinophil counts, the primary endpoint, and asthma control improved to similar extents after both treatments (p

Rationale: Current guidelines suggest that asthma should be controlled with the lowest dose of maintenance medication required., Objectives: To evaluate the effects of a low dose of inhaled corticosteroid compared to a placebo, on airway inflammation and responsiveness in patients with mild symptomatic asthma., Methods: In this randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study, we looked at the influence of inhaled fluticasone propionate 250 microg/day for 3 months followed by 100 microg/day for 9 months on airway inflammation and methacholine responsiveness in non-smoking subjects with mild allergic asthma. Subjects were evaluated at baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatments; a 2-week evaluation of respiratory symptoms and peak expiratory flow measurements was done before each visit., Results: Fifty-seven subjects completed the 3-month study period. Airway responsiveness, expressed as the PC20 methacholine, increased by 0.27 and 1.14 doubling concentrations, respectively, in placebo-treated (n=33) and in fluticasone-treated (n=24) asthmatic subjects (p=0.03). An additional improvement in PC20 up to 2.16 doubling concentrations was observed in the fluticasone-treated group during the 9-month lower-dose treatment (p=0.0004, end of low-dose period compared with placebo). Sputum eosinophil counts decreased after 3 months of fluticasone 250 microg/day compared with placebo (p<0.0001) and remained in the normal range during the 9-month lower-dose treatment. Respiratory symptoms and peak expiratory flows did not change significantly throughout the study in both groups., Conclusion: In mild asthma, keeping a regular minimal dose of ICS after asthma control has been achieved, may lead to a further reduction in airway responsiveness and keep sputum eosinophil count within the normal range.

Background: Some studies of severe asthma suggest that persistence or alteration in the pattern of inflammation may be associated with the severity of the disease. Whether there are differences in the expression of the principal cytokines and chemokines relevant to eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation in the airway tissues of severe compared to moderate asthmatics has not been determined. The aim of this study was to compare the patterns of expression of representative T-helper (Th) type 1 (interferon [IFN]-gamma) and Th-2 cytokines (interleukin [IL]-4, IL-5) and the neutrophil- and eosinophil-associated chemokines (IL-8 and eotaxin) in the airway tissues of patients with severe and moderate asthma., Methods: Subjects with severe asthma (n = 24) and a comparison moderate asthma group (n = 26) were assessed using spirometry, induced sputum, exhaled nitric oxide, and bronchial biopsy. The expression of proteins of interest in the epithelium and subepithelium of the airway wall was examined by immunocytochemistry., Results: Subjects with severe asthma were more symptomatic, had a lower FEV(1), and had more sputum neutrophilia (p = 0.007) and eosinophilia (p = 0.001). Exhaled nitric oxide was similar between groups. IL-8 and IFN-gamma expression were increased and IL-4 expression was decreased in severe asthma compared to moderate disease (p < 0.001 for each comparison). Eotaxin and IL-5 expression did not differ between the groups., Conclusion: Patients with severe asthma have increases in neutrophils and eosinophils in the sputum, and differ in airway cytokine/chemokine expression from moderate asthmatics. Excess neutrophilia may be explained by increased expression of IL-8, but differences in eosinophilia do not appear to be associated with IL-5 and eotaxin expression.

Rationale: We still do not know why some subjects with airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) experience no respiratory symptoms., Objectives: Our aim was to compare pulmonary function, perception of bronchoconstriction, and airway inflammation in atopic subjects with mild recently diagnosed (<5 years, n=30) or longer-standing (5 years or more, n=30) symptomatic asthma in comparison with atopic subjects with asymptomatic AHR (n=27)., Methods: All subjects had measurements of expiratory flows, PC(20) methacholine, perception of breathlessness and induced sputum cell differential, eosinophil cationic protein and alpha(2)-macroglobulin levels., Results: Compared with the other groups, PC(20) was significantly lower in longer-standing asthma and perception score for breathlessness at 20% fall in FEV(1) was lower in asymptomatic subjects. Markers of airway inflammation were similar in all groups. There were no significant correlations between sputum eosinophils, alpha(2)-macroglobulin and/or eosinophil cationic protein levels and FEV(1), FVC or PC(20) in either group., Conclusion: Subjects with mild asthma or asymptomatic AHR are similar in regard to induced sputum markers of airway inflammation. Although perception of bronchoconstriction was slightly lower in asymptomatic subjects, additional factors are probably involved to explain why they report no respiratory symptoms. Further studies are needed to determine why these last are asymptomatic.