Search

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of primary nephrotic syndrome among adults. The identification of phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) as target antigen in most patients changed the management of MN dramatically, and provided a rationale for B-cell depleting agents such as rituximab. The efficacy of rituximab in inducing remission has been investigated in several studies, including 3 randomized controlled trials, in which complete and partial remission of proteinuria was achieved in approximately two-thirds of treated patients. Due to its favorable safety profile, rituximab is now considered a first-line treatment option for MN, especially in patients at moderate and high risk of deterioration in kidney function. However, questions remain about how to best use rituximab, including the optimal dosing regimen, a potential need for maintenance therapy, and assessment of long-term safety and efficacy outcomes. In this review, we provide an overview of the current literature and discuss both strengths and limitations of "the new standard.", (© 2021 Published by Elsevier, Inc., on behalf of the International Society of Nephrology.)

Primary forms of minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis are rare podocytopathies and clinically characterized by nephrotic syndrome. Glucocorticoids are the cornerstone of the initial immunosuppressive treatment in these two entities. Especially among adults with minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, relapses, steroid dependence or resistance are common and necessitate re-initiation of steroids and other immunosuppressants. Effective steroid-sparing therapies and introduction of less toxic immunosuppressive agents are urgently needed to reduce undesirable side effects, in particular for patients whose disease course is complex. Rituximab, a B cell depleting monoclonal antibody, is increasingly used off-label in these circumstances, despite a low level of evidence for adult patients. Hence, critical questions concerning drug-safety, long-term efficacy and the optimal regimen for rituximab-treatment remain unanswered. Evidence in the form of large, multicenter studies and randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to overcome these limitations., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest VA reports grants from ADDMEDICA, outside the submitted work; AB reports consulting fees from Chemocentryx, from Merck/MSD and from Astra Zeneca, outside the submitted work; MB reports lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, from Bristol-Myers Squibb, from Novartis, travel support from Hexal, lecture fees and travel support from Vifor Fresenius and lecture fee from Servier, outside the submitted work; CKC reports grants from GlaxoSmithKline, grants and consultancy fees from Retrophin, outside the submitted work; SF reports lecture fees from VIFOR Pharma, outside the submitted work; CK reports being funded by National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) as academic clinical fellow (ACF), during the conduct of the study. All the other authors declared no competing interests., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)