Nogueira RG, Jovin TG, Liu X, Hu W, Langezaal LCM, Li C, Dai Q, Tao C, Mont'Alverne FJA, Ji X, Liu R, Li R, Dippel DWJ, Wu C, Zhu W, Xu P, van Zwam WH, Wu L, Zhang C, Michel P, Chen J, Wang L, Puetz V, Zhao W, Liu T, Audebert HJ, Chen Z, Pontes-Neto OM, Yi T, Moran TP, Doheim MF, and Schonewille WJ
Background: Trials of endovascular therapy for basilar artery occlusion, including vertebral occlusion extending into the basilar artery, have shown inconsistent results. We aimed to pool data to estimate safety and efficacy and to explore the benefit across pre-specified subgroups through individual patient data meta-analysis., Methods: VERITAS was a systematic review and meta-analysis that pooled patient-level data from trials that recruited patients with vertebrobasilar ischaemic stroke who were randomly assigned to treatment with either endovascular therapy or standard medical treatment alone. We included studies done between Jan 1, 2010, and Sept 1, 2023. The primary outcome was 90-day favourable functional status (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-3, with a score of 3 indicating moderate disability). Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and 90-day mortality., Findings: We screened 934 titles and abstracts. Of these, seven (<1%) full texts were screened. We included four trials (ATTENTION, BAOCHE, BASICS, and BEST). The pooled data included 988 patients (556 [56%] in the intervention groups and 432 [44%] in the control groups; median age 67 years [IQR 58-74]; 686 (69%) were male and 302 (31%) were female). 904 (91%) patients were randomly assigned within 12 h of estimated stroke onset. Three RCTs were done in a Chinese population and one included European and Brazilian patients. The proportion of patients achieving favourable functional status was higher in the endovascular therapy than control group (90-day mRS score 0-3 in 251 [45%] participants vs 128 [30%]; adjusted common odds ratio 2·41 [95% CI 1·78-3·26]; p<0·0001). Endovascular therapy led to an increase in functional independence (mRS score 0-2 in 194 [35%] participants vs 89 [21%]; 2·52 [1·82-3·48]; p<0·0001) as well as a reduction in both the degree of overall disability (2·09 [1·61-2·71]; p<0·0001) and mortality (198 [36%] of 556 patients vs 196 [45%] of 432; 0·60 [0·45-0·80]; p<0·0001) at 90 days, despite higher rates of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (30 [5%] of 548 vs two [<1%] of 413; 11·98 [2·82-50·81]; p<0·0001). Heterogeneity of treatment effect was noted for baseline stroke severity (uncertain effect in baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale <10) and occlusion site (greater benefit with more proximal occlusions) but not across subgroups defined by age, sex, baseline posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, presence of atrial fibrillation or intracranial atherosclerotic disease, and time from onset to imaging., Interpretation: VERITAS supports the robust benefit of endovascular therapy in patients with vertebrobasilar artery occlusion with moderate to severe symptoms, with approximately 2·5-times increased likelihood of achieving a favourable functional outcome. Despite a significant increase in symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage risk, endovascular therapy for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion was associated with a significant reduction in both overall disability and mortality. Although the benefit of endovascular therapy remains uncertain for patients vertebrobasilar artery occlusion presenting with mild stroke severity and extensive infarcts on neuroimaging, we found a significant clinical benefit across a range of patients with vertebrobasilar artery occlusion., Funding: None., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests RGN reports consulting fees for advisory roles with Anaconda, Biogen, Cerenovus, Genentech, Philips, Hybernia, Hyperfine, Imperative Care, Medtronic, Phenox, Philips, Prolong Pharmaceuticals, Stryker Neurovascular, Shanghai Wallaby, and Synchron; and stock options for advisory roles with Astrocyte, Brainomix, Cerebrotech, Ceretrieve, Corindus Vascular Robotics, CrestecBio, Euphrates Vascular, Vesalio, Viz-AI, RapidPulse, and Perfuze. RGN is one of the Principal Investigators of the Endovascular Therapy for Low NIHSS Ischemic Strokes (ENDOLOW) trial. Funding for this project is provided by Cerenovus. RGN is the Principal Investigator of the Combined Thrombectomy for Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke (DUSK) trial. Funding for this project is provided by Stryker Neurovascular. RGN is an investor in Viz-AI, Perfuze, Cerebrotech, Reist/Q'Apel Medical, Truvic, Tulavi Therapeutics, Vastrax, Piraeus Medical, Brain4Care, Quantanosis AI, and Viseon. TGJ is advisor and investor for Anaconda, Route92, Viz.ai, FreeOx, Blockade Medical, and Methinks. He received personal fees in his role on the data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) and steering committee from Cerenovus and on the screening committee for Contego Medical. He received stock as an advisory board member for Corindus. He received grant support for Medtronic and from Stryker Neurovascular in his capacity as principal investigator for DAWN and AURORA. FJAM reports consulting fees from Stryker, Microvention, and Balt. DWJD reports funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Netherlands Brain Foundation, the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, Penumbra, Stryker, Medtronic, Thrombolytic Science, and Cerenovus (all unrestricted grants for research), paid to his institution. VP reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations or educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim, Daichii Sankyo, AstraZeneca, and Bristol Myers Squibb, and support for attending meetings or travel from NoNo (travel reimbursement). WHvZ reports speaker fees from Stryker, Cerenovus, Microvention, Medtronic, and Nicolab, and consulting fees from Philips, all paid to institution; chaired the DSMBs of WeTrust (Philips) and ANAIS (Anaconda), all paid to his institution. WHvZ chaired the DSMB of InExtremis (CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France), for which no payment was received. PM reports consulting fees from Medtronic and steering committee fees from Penumbra, all paid to his institution. HJA reports consulting fees (speaker, Advisory Board, and Data Safety Board honoraria) from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Novo Nordisk. OMP-N reports fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, and Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)