Search

Objective: To gain an understanding of the experiences of pregnant women at risk of having a preterm birth (PTB) who were attending a specialist preterm antenatal clinic and to elicit their views on treatment to prevent PTB., Study Design: A qualitative interpretive approach was adopted, utilizing focus groups and one-to-one interviews. The semi-structured interview schedule focused on two main areas; risk and treatment for preterm birth. Fourteen pregnant women were recruited from a preterm antenatal clinic at a major tertiary referral centre in the North West of England. All interviews were audio recorded, with consent, and transcribed verbatim before carrying out thematic analysis., Results: Analysis revealed 3 main themes. Women struggled with 'balancing the risks' associated with the threat of preterm birth, they developed 'personal coping strategies to survive the pregnancy' and they watched as the strain made their 'whole family crumble'., Conclusion: Women's journey through pregnancy after a previous PTB experience is one of emotional and physical endurance. Women embrace the 'high risk' identity as it offers the opportunity for regular assessment and clinical reassurance. However, emotional and psychological needs must also be addressed to reduce stress and anxiety. By setting mutually agreed short term goals, significant milestones can be reached so that women feel they are successfully progressing through a high risk pregnancy through a series of 'baby steps'., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Isolated systolic hypertension occurs in about 15% of people aged 60 years or older. In 1989, the European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly investigated whether active treatment could reduce cardiovascular complications of isolated systolic hypertension. Fatal and non-fatal stroke combined was the primary endpoint., Methods: All patients (> 60 years) were initially started on masked placebo. At three run-in visits 1 month apart, their average sitting systolic blood pressure was 160-219 mm Hg with a diastolic blood pressure lower than 95 mm Hg. After stratification for centre, sex, and previous cardiovascular complications, 4695 patients were randomly assigned to nitrendipine 10-40 mg daily, with the possible addition of enalapril 5-20 mg daily and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25.0 mg daily, or matching placebos. Patients withdrawing from double-blind treatment were still followed up. We compared occurrence of major endpoints by intention to treat., Findings: At a median of 2 years' follow-up, sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures had fallen by 13 mm Hg and 2 mm Hg in the placebo group (n = 2297) and by 23 mm Hg and 7 mm Hg in the active treatment group (n = 2398). The between-group differences were systolic 10.1 mm Hg (95% CI 8.8-11.4) and diastolic, 4.5 mm Hg (3.9-5.1). Active treatment reduced the total rate of stroke from 13.7 to 7.9 endpoints per 1000 patient-years (42% reduction; p = 0.003). Non-fatal stroke decreased by 44% (p = 0.007). In the active treatment group, all fatal and non-fatal cardiac endpoints, including sudden death, declined by 26% (p = 0.03). Non-fatal cardiac endpoints decreased by 33% (p = 0.03) and all fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular endpoints by 31% (p < 0.001). Cardiovascular mortality was slightly lower on active treatment (-27%, p = 0.07), but all-cause mortality was not influenced (-14%; p = 0.22)., Interpretation: Among elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension, antihypertensive drug treatment starting with nitrendipine reduces the rate of cardiovascular complications. Treatment of 1000 patients for 5 years with this type of regimen may prevent 29 strokes or 53 major cardiovascular endpoints.

We have tested the concept that fewer patients are needed in trials of antihypertensive treatment if blood pressure is measured by ambulatory monitoring rather than by conventional sphygmomanometry. 233 patients (> or = 60 years old) with isolated systolic hypertension were randomly allocated placebo (n = 119) or active treatment (n = 114). Blood pressure measurements were compared by Wilcoxon's test and blood pressure profiles by ANOVA. With either method of measurement, the same number of patients (40 in each treatment group) was required to show a reduction after 1 year in clinic (13/8 mm Hg) or average blood pressure over 24 h (9/5 mm Hg). To detect that the decrease in systolic pressure was not steadily maintained through the day, 40 patients in each treatment group were needed for blood pressure profiles made up of 4-hourly or 2-hourly means and 60 for profiles of 1-hourly means. For diastolic pressure, the corresponding numbers were 80, 100, and more than the number of available patients, respectively. We conclude that parallel-group trials focusing on the average blood pressure over 24 h, rather than on conventionally measured blood pressure, cannot economise on sample size. Moreover, trials studying the full course of blood pressure throughout the day, require more--not fewer--patients than studies of only the conventional or average 24 h blood pressure.