1. Reliability of a face scanner in measuring the vertical dimension of occlusion.
- Author
-
Srinivasan M, Berisha F, Bronzino I, Kamnoedboon P, and Leles CR
- Subjects
- Humans, Adult, Reproducibility of Results, Male, Female, Young Adult, Cephalometry methods, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted methods, Anatomic Landmarks anatomy & histology, Dental Occlusion, Software, Imaging, Three-Dimensional methods, Lip anatomy & histology, Lip diagnostic imaging, Nose anatomy & histology, Nose diagnostic imaging, Middle Aged, Vertical Dimension, Face anatomy & histology, Face diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the reliability of a face scanner in measuring the vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO)., Methods: Fully dentate volunteers (n = 20; mean-age = 30.0 ± 10.7 years) were recruited. Clinical facial measurements were obtained using a digital caliper and a face scanner (Obiscanner, Fifthingenium, Italy). The scans were imported into a mesh-processing software, and the distances were measured digitally. Measurements were obtained for each participant with the jaws positioned in maximal intercuspation (MI) and with increased vertical distances of 2, 4, and 6 mm. Vertical and horizontal measures were obtained using facial anatomical landmarks: Glabella (GL), Pronasale (PrN), Subnasale (SbN), inferior border of the right and left Alare, Labiale superius (Ls), right and left Cheilion (Ch), Soft Pogonion (SPg), right and left Tragus of the ear (Tr), for all selected vertical positions. Data analysis included intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), pairwise comparison tests, Bland-Altman plots, and Passing-Bablok regression., Results: 120 VDO measurements (clinical=60, digital=60) were recorded by two independent evaluators. Mean differences between digital and clinical measurements ranged from 0.054 ± 0.14 mm to 0.203 ± 0.13 mm. All parameters were strongly correlated (r > 0.93; p < 0.001). ICC estimates revealed excellent reliability, and the measuring procedure yielded the same results on repeated trials irrespective of the raters and measurement methods. Bland-Altman plots revealed a difference, between digital and clinical measurements, of 1.7 % for the vertical measurements. Regression analysis revealed no significant proportional difference between the two methods, so both can be used interchangeably., Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate that VDO can be measured accurately from face scans using 3D mesh-processing software and that even small changes in the VDO could be detected using the digital methods., Clinical Significance: Findings provide evidence about the reliability of a digital method for jaw relation registrations and may be applied towards incorporating this method into clinical workflows for computer-aided-design/ computer-assisted-manufacturing (CAD-CAM) dentures., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF