1. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy in patients with IPMN-related recurrent pancreatitis: A single center experience.
- Author
-
Schepis T, Tringali A, D'aversa F, Perri V, Familiari P, Boškoski I, Nista EC, and Costamagna G
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Prospective Studies, Pancreas, Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic adverse effects, Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms surgery, Pancreatic Neoplasms surgery, Pancreatic Neoplasms complications, Pancreatitis, Chronic complications, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal surgery
- Abstract
Background: Acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) is a rare manifestation of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas; ARP is a relative indication for pancreatic surgery in the setting of IPMN. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy (EPS) has been described as a minimal invasive treatment to reduce the episodes of ARP secondary to mucus migration in IPMN., Methods: patients with IPMN-related ARP treated with ESP from January 2004 to December 2020 were retrospectively selected. Clinical and technical data were recorded. A clinical follow-up (minimum 12 months) was performed to assess the number of episodes of AP occurring after EPS., Results: 25 patients were included. The mean follow-up after ESP was 93.4 months (SD± 56.6). The mean number of AP before and after EPS were respectively 3.29 (SD ± 1.04) and 0.51 (SD ± 0.71). A complete response (no further episodes of AP) and a partial response (>50% reduction of AP episodes) were obtained in 64% and 24% of the cases, respectively, with an overall response rate of 88%. One post-EPS bleeding and one minor-papilla stenosis were reported and were endoscopically managed. Two patients underwent pancreatic resection for the occurrence of high-risk stigmata for cancer progression., Conclusions: EPS is a safe and effective treatment to reduce the number of episodes of AP in selected patients with IPMNs-related ARP. Prospective trials are needed to confirm these data., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Andrea Tringali is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Olympus. Ivo Boškoski is a consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Cook Medical, and Boston Scientific Corp., he holds a research grant from Apollo Endosurgery, and is on the scientific board of EndoTools. Guido Costamagna is on the advisory board for Cook Medical, Olympus, and Ethicon, and holds a research grant from Boston Scientific Corp. and Apollo Endosurgery. The other authors have no financial relationships with a commercial entity producing health-care related products and/or services relevant to this article., (Copyright © 2022 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF