1. Comparison of ultrasound versus fluoroscopic guided rotator cuff interval approach for MR arthrography.
- Author
-
Ng AW, Hung EH, Griffith JF, Tong CS, and Cho CC
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Contrast Media administration & dosage, Female, Fluoroscopy methods, Humans, Injections, Intra-Articular methods, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Young Adult, Gadolinium administration & dosage, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Radiography, Interventional methods, Rotator Cuff pathology, Shoulder Joint pathology, Ultrasonography, Interventional methods
- Abstract
Our purpose is to compare ultrasound and fluoroscopic-guided approaches to the glenohumeral joint at the rotator cuff interval for magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography of the shoulder. Forty consecutive patients were prospectively studied. 20 patients underwent ultrasound-guided and 20 patients underwent fluoroscopic guided injection. Successful rate of ultrasound guidance is 95%. No significant difference in pain score and duration of injection between two methods (P>.05). Ultrasound-guided rotator cuff interval injection of the glenohumeral joint for MR arthrography is comparable with fluoroscopic-guided injection. Ultrasound is the preferred method as there is no ionizing radiation., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF