Search

Background: Previous research in neurosurgery has examined academic productivity for U.S. medical graduates and residents. However, associations between scholarly output and international medical education, residency training, and fellowship training are scarcely documented., Methods: We identified 1671 U.S. academic neurosurgeons in 2020 using publicly available data along with their countries of medical school, residency, and fellowship training. Using Scopus, h-index, number of publications, and number of times publications were cited were compiled. Demographic, subspeciality, and academic productivity variables were compared between training locations using univariate analysis and multivariable linear regression., Results: Of the current neurosurgery faculty workforce, 16% completed at least 1 component of their training abroad. Canada was the most represented international country in the cohort. Academic productivity for neurosurgeons with international medical school and/or international residency did not significantly differ from that of neurosurgeons trained in the United States. Neurosurgeons with ≥1 U.S. fellowships or ≥1 international fellowships did not have higher academic productivity than neurosurgeons without a fellowship. However, dual fellowship training in both domestic and international programs was associated with higher mean h-index (β = 6.00, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 10.98, P = 0.02), higher citations (β = 2092.0, 95% confidence interval 460.1 to 3724.0, P = 0.01), and a trend toward higher publications (β = 36.82, 95% confidence interval -0.21 to 73.85, P = 0.051)., Conclusions: Neurosurgeon scholarly output was not significantly affected by international training in medical school or residency. Dual fellowship training in both a domestic and an international program was associated with higher academic productivity., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Large disparities in access to neurosurgical care are known, but there are limited data on whether geographic distribution of the neurosurgery workforce potentially plays a role in these disparities. The goal of this study was to identify the geographic distribution of neurosurgeons in the United States and to study the association of the per capita workforce distribution with socioeconomic characteristics of the population., Methods: The number of practicing neurosurgeons in the United States in 2016 was obtained from the 2017-2018 American Medical Association Masterfile contained within the Area Health Resource File. The association of the number of neurosurgeons per 100,000 population with socioeconomic characteristics was assessed through linear regression analysis at Hospital Referral Region (HRR) level., Results: The median number of neurosurgeons per capita across all HRRs was 1.47 neurosurgeons per 100,000 population (interquartile range, 1.02-2.27). Bivariable analysis showed that greater supply of neurosurgeons was positively associated with regional levels of college education, median income, and median age. The number of neurosurgeons per capita at the HRR level was negatively associated with unemployment, poverty, and percent uninsured., Conclusions: Regions characterized by low socioeconomic status have fewer neurosurgeons per capita in the United States. Low income, low number of college graduates, and high unemployment rate are associated with fewer numbers of neurosurgeons per capita. Further research is needed to determine if these geographic workforce disparities contribute to poor access to quality neurosurgical care., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: History has taught us that Mexican culture has been largely supported by women, despite gender prejudice from the society. Neurosurgery has not been the exception. Therefore, we investigated the challenges and influence of female neurosurgeons in Mexico., Methods: We conducted a review of the literature and an analysis of the internal database of the Mexican Society of Neurological Surgery focusing on 3 topics: 1) the historical presence of women and gender inequality in Mexico; 2) the life and legacy of the woman who became the first neurosurgeon in Mexico and in Latin America; and 3) the participation of women in neurosurgery in the past 3 decades., Results: In Latin America, the first woman in neurosurgery was María Cristina García-Sancho, who completed her neurosurgical training in 1951. Currently, women represent 6.2% of the total members of the Mexican Society of Neurological Surgery (MSNS). This percentage is still low, although data collected in this study suggest that it might increase in the next few years because 16.7% of Board Directors of the MSNS are women, the next elected president is a female neurosurgeon, and 14.5% of neurosurgery residents are women., Conclusions: Although a steady increase has occurred of women in neurosurgery in Mexico, there is still work to do, especially to overcome the barriers related to the old assumptions of the cultural and social roles of women., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) sought to expand access to health care for 46 million uninsured Americans. Increasing consumer coverage and ensuring affordability of care have raised concerns about ACA Marketplace plans with limited in-network physician coverage (narrow network plans). We assessed the neurosurgery coverage of ACA Marketplace plans in Arizona., Methods: The Health Insurance Marketplace website was used to identify ACA Marketplace plans in Arizona. Plan-specific details were examined to search for in-network neurosurgeons (2016-2019). Physician- and patient-level information was obtained using Intellimed health care databases, which provide specific neurosurgery diagnosis-related group information., Results: Although 5 insurance providers offered plans on the ACA Marketplace in Arizona, only 1 plan was available in 13 of 15 counties (87%). Evaluation of in-network coverage found that all in-network outpatient neurosurgery providers are in 5 of 15 counties (33%). Most of the other counties (9 of 10) have neurosurgery facilities, but do not have in-network access to neurosurgical care within the county (∼1.1 million people or 15% of the state population)., Conclusions: By narrowing the network of providers, insurance companies are attempting to maintain fiscal viability of their ACA Marketplace products. However, 10 of the 15 counties (67%) in Arizona do not have access to outpatient neurosurgical care through these plans despite the presence of neurosurgical facilities in most counties. Access to neurosurgical care requires consideration of network coverage in policies designed to expand coverage and coverage options for patients insured through the ACA Marketplace., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To provide the status of women neurosurgeons (WNS) in academic faculty and/or leadership positions in neurosurgery in the United States., Methods: Neurosurgery academic programs were defined as having an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) neurosurgery residency program (NSRP). Using a Google search, gender, academic rank, postgraduate degrees, academic and clinical titles, and subspecialty were recorded for each neurosurgery faculty. Officer gender was recorded for the top 7 neurosurgery U.S. organizations, 7 subspecialty sections, and 50 state neurosurgical societies., Results: WNS were faculty at 77% (89/115) of ACGME NSRPs and constituted 10% of the workforce (186/1773). WNS residents were in 92% of ACGME NSRPs and constituted 19% of the workforce (293/1515). Two NSRPs (8%) had neither WNS faculty nor WNS residents. Of NSRPs without WNS faculty, 52% (13/25) had a faculty size >10. WNS accounted for 3% of NSRP chair positions. Academic rank of WNS faculty was lower than academic rank of men neurosurgeons faculty (P < 0.05). WNS faculty had a higher number of postgraduate degrees (P < 0.05). Pediatrics was the most common subspecialty (30%) among WNS. Over time, WNS held 1% of the leadership positions within the top 7 U.S. neurosurgery organizations and 7% within the 7 subspecialty sections. Over the past 20 years, 28% (14/50) of U.S. state neurosurgical societies had WNS serve as president., Conclusions: In 2020, the gender gap for U.S. WNS faculty and residents still exists. By providing informed benchmarks, our study might help neurosurgery organizations, medical school leadership, hiring committees, editors, and conference speakers to plan their next steps., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Social media has become an important communication tool in modern life, and its use is undoubtedly increasing worldwide. Given the rising importance of social media in the health care system, little is known about neurosurgeons' social media use and interactions in the context of professional purposes. This study aimed to analyze social media usage and opinions among neurosurgeons in terms of age, gender, and practice setting., Methods: An online survey was administered to neurosurgeons worldwide. A total of 1119 neurosurgeons from 104 different countries responded to the questionnaire., Results: All respondents were members of at least 1 social media platform. Older neurosurgeons and neurosurgeons in nonacademic settings spent less time on social media (P < 0.05). Communication with peers via social media decreased with age, while communication via e-mail increased (P < 0.05). Most respondents perceived the effect of social media to be beneficial to neurosurgery (very beneficial [28.73%], somewhat beneficial [35.55%]). More women than men considered that social media platforms provided a greater chance for networking opportunities, learning about a new study or conference, and providing rapid and widespread knowledge transfer (P < 0.05). False guidance (44.68%) and violation of privacy (41.64%) were thought to be the main disadvantages., Conclusions: Social media use, opinions, and attitudes among neurosurgeons vary depending on their age, gender, and practice setting. Most neurosurgeons stated that the use of social media could have beneficial and advantageous effects on neurosurgery practice, while the frequency of misleading information and lack of privacy were perceived as barriers., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Publication metrics such as the author-level h-index are often used to evaluate and compare research productivity in academia. The h-index, however, is not a field-normalized statistic and has been criticized as inappropriate for comparison of authors from different fields. For example, fields such as internal medicine have a larger audience and thus afford publications a higher likelihood of increased citations compared with a perhaps equally impactful paper in a smaller field such as neurosurgery. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has developed a new field-normalized article-level metric called the relative citation ratio (RCR) that can be used to more accurately compare author productivity between fields. Spine represents a distinct subset of neurosurgery with a designated fellowship and distinct differences in the RCR metrics. The authors look to analyze the unique results found in the academic spine neurosurgeon RCR values compared with all academic neurosurgeons., Purpose: The assessment of academic physicians should use field-independent publication metrics to measure the improvement of grant outcomes, promotion, and continued evaluation of research productivity. Here, we provide an analysis of RCR indices for 358 academic spine neurosurgeons in the United States, including the mean RCR of each author's total publications and the weighted RCR, which is the sum of all publication-level RCR values of an author. We further assess the impact of gender, career duration, academic rank, and Ph.D. acquisition on the RCR scores of U.S. academic spine neurosurgeons., Methods: The mean RCR is the total citations per year of a publication divided by average citations per year received by NIH-funded papers in the same field. A value of 1 is the normal NIH-funded standard. iCite database searches were performed for all physician faculty members affiliated with accredited neurological surgery programs who have subspecialized in spine as of November 1, 2019. Gender, career duration, academic rank, additional degrees, total publications, mean RCR, and weighted RCR were collected for each individual. RCR and weighted RCR were compared between variables to assess patterns of analysis., Results: A total of 358 fellowship-trained academic spine neurosurgeons from 125 institutions were included in the analysis. Exceptional research productivity was noted, with a median RCR of 1.38 (interquartile range = 0.94-1.95) and a weighted median RCR of 25.28 (interquartile range = 6.87-79.93). Overall, gender and academic rank were associated with increased mean RCR and weighted RCR values. Career duration and Ph.D. acquisition were not. All subgroups analyzed had an RCR value above 1.0, with professor-level faculty or department chair having the highest mean and weighted RCR values overall., Conclusions: Current academic spine neurosurgeons have high median RCR values relative to the NIH standard RCR value of 1.0. Relative to the field of neurological surgery overall, RCR values for the spine subspecialty are comparable. These data offer a more accurate means for self-evaluation of academic neurosurgeons as well as evaluation of faculty by institutional and departmental leaders., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Perioperative craniotomy practices depend mainly on neurosurgeon preferences. To investigate the variations in these preferences, we surveyed neurosurgeons in Poland regarding different aspects of their practices., Methods: Anonymous questionnaires were circulated in 2019 at the neurosurgery conferences in Poland. We then analyzed the responses, categorized in subgroups by sex, affiliation, and stage of training., Results: A total of 114 responses to the questionnaire were obtained. For surgical site exposure, regional hair shaving was the most common pattern (64.9%), followed by whole-scalp (19.3%) and strip line shaving (12.3%). Most respondents (65.8%) used clamp-based devices for bone flap fixation, and approximately one third (30.7%) reported using bone suturing. During cranioplasty, respondents most often used artificial bone implants (69.3%), followed by a preserved bone flap from the patient (24.5%). More than three quarters reported that they (77.2%) performed routine radiologic evaluation after uncomplicated brain tumor surgery. Most patients (64.0%) were discharged between the third and sixth postoperative days. Almost half of emergent surgeries (48.2%) and most elective surgeries (89.5%) were performed with the help of an assistant surgeon. No significant differences were found in practice between the sexes or by affiliation or training stage. We inferred an influence of regional economic status on some of the reported choices., Conclusions: Perioperative craniotomy practices among Polish neurosurgeons show a significant heterogeneity. Economic factors can explain some choices, but others trace to a conservative mindset. Further studies are needed to identify which factors are most relevant and to identify approaches to a standardized method of care., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To understand how physicians in the United States manage patients with small unruptured intracranial aneurysms and factors that influence the management., Methods: An online survey questionnaire was designed through SurveyMonkey and distributed electronically to The Society of Interventional Surgery, American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons Joint Section of Cerebrovascular Surgery, American Academy of Neurology, and Massachusetts Neurologic Association. All participations were voluntary and anonymous., Results: Among all the participants, 53.8% of them were neurosurgeons, 33.0% were neurointerventional radiologists, and 13.2% were neurologists. For management of aneurysms 2-4 mm, 87.8% of respondents favored routine surveillance with imaging follow-up, 3.8% preferred routine treatment, and 8.5% recommended routine treatment or follow-up only for high risk patients. In total, 25.5% preferred annual follow-up, and 67.9% liked follow-up once in a year and then space out at various intervals. For aneurysms between 5 and 7 mm, 73.6% supported routine treatment, 20.8% favored surveillance with imaging follow-up, and 5.7% recommended treating or follow-up only high-risk groups. In total, 58.5% preferred annual follow-up, whereas 34.9% liked follow-up once in a year and then space out at various intervals. For routine follow-up, 64.1% of the physicians chose magnetic resonance angiography without contrast, and 40.6% preferred computed tomography angiography., Conclusions: For aneurysms 2-4 mm, majority of the physicians preferred regular follow-up, whereas for aneurysms 5-7 mm, the majority favor treatment. There remains heterogeneity in practice among physicians in the United States regarding follow-up strategies for small unruptured aneurysms. Further studies are needed to evaluate the optimal management strategy, follow-up frequency and duration of imaging for small unruptured intracranial aneurysms., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The treatment of patients with ≥11 brain metastases (BMs) with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to compare results of SRS alone in patients with 5-10 BMs versus 11-20 BMs., Methods: This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study using our prospectively accumulated database including 1515 patients with 5-10 tumors and 804 patients with 11-20 tumors treated with Gamma Knife SRS by 2 experienced neurosurgeons between 1998 and 2018. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to determine post-SRS survival times, and competing risk analyses were used to estimate cumulative incidences of the secondary end points., Results: The post-SRS median survival time was slightly longer in the group with 5-10 tumors (7.7 months) than in the group with 11-20 tumors (6.5 months) (P < 0.0001). Median survival time differences were statistically significant for patients with lung cancers but not for patients with breast, gastrointestinal tract, kidney, and other cancers. Multivariable analysis revealed female sex, better Karnofsky performance scale score, controlled primary cancer, and absence of extracerebral metastases to be statistically significant predictors of longer survival in the 2 patient cohorts. Crude and cumulative incidences of local recurrences were significantly lower in the group with 11-20 tumors than in the group with 5-10 tumors, while those of other secondary end points were similar to or lower in the group with 11-20 tumors than in the group with 5-10 tumors. Post-SRS outcomes were relatively poor in patients with 11-20 tumors from kidney or other cancers., Conclusions: Carefully selected patients with 11-20 BMs are not unfavorable candidates for SRS alone., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We sought to determine the proportion and number of female neurosurgeons in the workforce at different stages of practice., Methods: The Physician Compare National Downloadable File data set was obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for physicians who indicated "neurosurgery" as their primary specialty. Physician duplicates, physicians with no listed medical school graduation year, and physicians expected to be in residency (graduation years 2013-2019) were removed, yielding 4956 neurosurgeons. Five-year intervals were used to measure the number of male and female neurosurgeons by different stages of their careers. For example, graduates from years 2008-2012 were expected to be in their first 1-5 years of practice., Results: There were 405 female (8.2%) and 4551 male (91.8%) neurosurgeons. At 1-5 years of practice, 13.8% (105/760) were women; 6-10 years, 11.5% (94/820) women; 11-15 years, 8.9% (64/720) women; 16-20 years, 8.7% (59/682) women; 21-25 years, 7.4% (46/619) women; 26-30 years, 3.8% (20/520) women; 31-35 years, 3.6% (15/413) women; and 36 years or more, 0.5% women (2/422). The number of female neurosurgeons varied among states, ranging from 0 in Hawaii to 53 in California. The states with the lowest percentage of female neurosurgeons were Hawaii (0%), Oklahoma (3.1%), and Nevada (3.6%). The states with the highest percentage of female neurosurgeons were New Hampshire (20.0%), Vermont (16.7%), and Rhode Island (15.8%)., Conclusions: The number of practicing female neurosurgeons within the United States is increasing, as shown by the growing percentage of women who are earlier in their surgical careers., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To perform an ecological study to analyze the geospatial distribution of neurosurgeons ≥60 years old and compare these data with the spread of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) across the United States., Methods: Data regarding distribution of COVID-19 cases were collected from the Environmental Systems Research Institute, and demographic statistics were collected from the American Association of Medical Colleges 2019 State Workforce Reports. These figures were analyzed using geospatial mapping software., Results: As of July 5, 2020, the 10 states with the highest number of COVID-19 cases showed older neurosurgical workforce proportions (the proportion of active surgeons ≥60 years old) of 20.6%-38.9%. Among states with the highest number of COVID-19 deaths, the older workforce proportions were 25.0%-43.4%. Connecticut demonstrated the highest with 43.4% of neurosurgeons ≥60 years old., Conclusions: Regional COVID-19 hotspots may coincide with areas where a substantial proportion of the neurosurgical workforce is ≥60 years old. Continuous evaluation and adjustment of local and national clinical practice guidelines are warranted throughout the pandemic era., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize the payments made by medical industry to neurosurgeons from 2014 to 2018., Methods: A retrospective study was performed from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018 of the Open Payments Database. Collected data included the total number of industry payments, the aggregate value of industry payments, and the mean value of each industry payment made to neurosurgeons per year over the 5-year period., Results: A total of 105,150 unique surgeons, with 13,668 (12.99%) unique neurosurgeons, were identified to have received an industry payment during 2014-2018. Neurosurgeons were the second highest industry-paid surgical specialty, with a total 421,151 industry payments made to neurosurgeons, totaling $477,451,070. The mean average paid amount per surgeon was $34,932 (±$936,942). The largest proportion of payments were related to food and beverage (75.5%), followed by travel and lodging (14.9%), consulting fees (3.5%), nonconsulting service fees (2.1%), and royalties or licensing (1.9%), totaling 90.4% of all industry payments to neurologic surgeons. Summed across the 5-year period, the largest paid source types were royalties and licensing (64.0%; $305,517,489), consulting fees (11.8%; $56,445,950), nonconsulting service fees (7.3%; $34,629,109), current or prospective investments (6.8%, $32,307,959), and travel and lodging (4.8%, $22,982,165)., Conclusions: Our study shows that over the most recent 5-year period (2014-2018) of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments Database, there was a decreasing trend of the total number of payments, but an increasing trend of the total amount paid to neurosurgeons., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aftermath of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) witnessed the rise of narrow networks, which feature fewer providers in exchange for lower premiums. Debate still continues on whether narrow networks provide adequate access to health care, especially in specialty care services such as neurosurgery. The objective of this article was to analyze the 2019 Marketplace plans' impact on delivering outpatient neurosurgical care in New Jersey., Methods: The 2019 Marketplace Public Use Files were queried for "silver" plans, identifying a total of 11 plans across 3 insurance companies. Online search engines were used to identify the number of in-network neurosurgeons within 20-25 miles of ZIP codes at the center of each county. The primary outcome was the number of neurosurgeon-deficient plans, defined as those having no in-network neurosurgeons within the assigned mile radius., Results: Of all individuals who purchased an insurance plan, 73% (185,797/255,246) opted for a silver plan. Out of 111 active neurosurgeons in New Jersey, 25% (28/111) did not participate in any of the silver plans. Analysis showed 8 plans as neurosurgeon-deficient in Sussex and Warren. Meanwhile, most of the silver plans provided access to >5 neurosurgeons within 20-25 miles of most (17/21) county centers., Conclusions: In more densely populated states such as New Jersey, the impact of narrow networks on neurosurgical coverage is less apparent. However, frustrations regarding access to care still exist because nearly 25% of neurosurgeons do not participate in the standard ACA insurance product. Furthermore, guidelines that define network adequacy in neurosurgery remain elusive, which calls for more robust parameters to monitor and ensure adequate access to health care., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Contributions from Latin America to the global literature are scarce; until 2011, spine surgeons had published 320 articles in indexed journals., Methods: This systematic review evaluates the scientific production of the Mexican Association of Spine Surgeons (Asociación Mexicana de Cirujanos de Columna-AMCICO) from its inception in 1998 to 2018 with the PRISMA statement using PubMed and Google Scholar search engines. The inclusion criteria were spine-related articles in indexed journals providing any (or no) level of evidence with ≥1 AMCICO member as an author. Journal metrics, article metrics, and author variables were analyzed using SPSS version 25., Results: Of the 444 surgeons historically belonging to AMCICO, only 126 members contributed a total of 441 articles between 1998 and 2018. An average of 21.00 annual publications with an annual scientific output per capita of 0.05 was found. The most frequent evidence level was III (211 articles, 48%), the highest level was I (12 articles, 3%). The main study objective was clinical research, with 308 articles (70%), and the main study foci was trauma, with 103 articles (23%). An average impact factor of 0.16 and 0.92 was obtained for publications in Spanish and English, respectively., Conclusions: Scientific publications by AMCICO members are scarce, with a per capita annual index of 0.05 from a total of 441 articles in indexed journals. Second, the impact factor of these journals is low, with a mean value of 0.53. Further strategies should be implemented to increase the number and track the record of Mexican contributions to the scientific literature., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for management of spinal trauma as a function of the availability of an MRI scanner across AO regions., Methods: A survey regarding MRI availability and/or accessibility was conducted across 6 global AO regions. Questions were formulated to 1) evaluate availability of an MRI scanner and 2) whether the availability of an MRI scanner influenced time taken to image patients with spinal trauma. Pairwise comparison of responses among AO regions was performed., Results: The survey was sent to 5.813 AO Spine members and 561 completed surveys were obtained (Africa, 3%; Asia Pacific, 22.1%; Europe, 30.8%; Latin America, 25.7%; Middle East, 9.4%; and North America, 8.9%). On availability of MRI for spinal trauma, 31.9% reported that MRI was readily available at all times, 51.3% noted 24-hour availability, but more difficult to obtain during nighttime, and 8.7% reported not having an MRI at their hospital. On time taken to obtain scans if MRI is readily available, 32.4% responded that imaging was obtained within 1 hour, whereas 39.9% stated between 1 and 4 hours. On time taken to obtain scans when MRI is least available, 7% responded that imaging was completed within 1 hour whereas 31.4% stated between 1 and 4 hours. Responses from Latin America significantly differed (P < 0.05) from all other AO regions except Africa., Conclusions: MRI use varies across AO regions, with clinical decision making on obtaining MRI in spinal trauma being influenced heavily by the availability of an MRI scanner., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Historically, women have been underrepresented in medicine but nowadays the underrepresentation is more applicable to surgical disciplines. Many efforts have been made to decrease the attrition rate of women in neurosurgery and to even career opportunities to be comparable to those of male colleagues. However, it is unclear if gender disparities occur between female and male neurosurgeons. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to identify gender differences in the professional and private life of neurosurgeons., Methods: A survey consisting of 38 questions was sent to members of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons regarding demographics, career fulfillment, private life, and parenting. Comparison between female and male respondents was made., Results: A total of 870 members filled in surveys, which were analyzed. Working full time, days worked weekly, and gross salary did not differ between male and female neurosurgeons. However, female neurosurgeons rated their career fulfillment worse than did male neurosurgeons (P < 0.001) and were less likely to choose a career as a neurosurgeon again (P < 0.001). Furthermore, female neurosurgeons were less likely to be married or to have children than were male colleagues (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Despite efforts to increase the amount of women enrolling into neurosurgery and despite efforts to strive for equality, the results of the current study show gender disparities in professional and private careers among neurosurgeons. Practice patterns did not differ between male and female neurosurgeons, but perceptions of career and characteristics of private life did. Program directors and chairs should focus on measures to decrease gender differences and to strive for equal career satisfaction among female and male neurosurgeons., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) is of high mortality and morbidity. SICH in the basal ganglia is usually attributed to chronic hypertension. Postoperative rehemorrhage is a severe complication, and it is relative to surgical techniques., Methods: A retrospective survey was conducted on 123 patients with basal ganglia SICH who received surgery from January 2015 to January 2019. Postoperative rehemorrhage within 24 hours was recorded. Preoperative clinical parameters, surgeon experience (<10 and >20 years), operation time, surgical approach, and hemostasis technique were recorded and analyzed., Results: The total postoperative rehemorrhage rate was 12.2% (15/123). The univariable analysis showed general surgeons had a higher postoperative rehemorrhage rate than experienced surgeons (30.4% vs. 8.6%, respectively; P = 0.068). The operation time (minutes) in experienced surgeons was significantly longer (164.9 ± 53.5 vs. 137.7 ± 30.8, P = 0.016), but they had a higher chance to locate the responsible vessel (74.2% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.001), respectively. Logistic analysis indicated that experienced surgeons significantly reduced the risk of rehemorrhage (odds ratio [OR], 0.242; P = 0.021). Transsylvian approach was a protective factor for postoperative rehemorrhage (OR, 0.291; P = 0.045)., Conclusions: Surgeons' experience plays the most important role in postoperative rehemorrhage. Surgeons with rich experience were willing to spend more time to achieve definitive hemostasis in operation. The use of a transsylvian approach can significantly reduce the rehemorrhage rate. Packing hemostasis with gelatin sponge may increase complications., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The need for neurosurgical care across the globe remains a public health issue. The creation of sustainable neurological surgery departments and training programs will be indispensable in alleviating the burden of neurological disease in low to middle income countries (LMICs)., Methods: We reviewed the history of the neurological surgery department and residency program of Santarém in the state of Pará, Brazil, from 1999 to the present. We have described the epidemiology unique to the region and provided evidence of a sustainable practice in a LMIC. The challenges, limitations, and resources were explored., Results: We have provided a historical vignette of the evolution of neurological surgery in the Brazilian Amazon, including the creation of a sustainable neurological surgery practice and accredited residency program. In addition, we assessed the neurological surgery burden and epidemiology unique to the region, with an emphasis on the community and indigenous health in this remote area. We also explored the future directions of this example, which could affect the international neurological surgery community., Conclusion: A sustainable neurosurgery practice and training program is possible in a LMIC. Training neurosurgeons in developing regions of LMICs is a sustainable method to decrease the morbidity and mortality of neurological diseases and prevent the misdistribution of physicians in a country. We encourage adaptation of sustainable neurological surgery practices in similar regions across the world to increase access to necessary neurosurgical care., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Almost one half of currently practicing physicians in Europe are women. Despite advances in access to training positions and the entry of women into neurosurgery, it has remained a male-dominated field, with an underrepresentation of female leaders. We designed a 2-part study to better understand the current situation of European female neurosurgeons., Methods: The European Association of Neurosurgical Societies and its member societies were analyzed for female participation in leadership positions. Additionally, an online survey was designed, containing 33 questions about career choice, mentorship, family planning, and perceived obstacles, for women in neurosurgery., Results: A total of 116 responses were received. Most female neurosurgeons lacked same-gender role models (76%), although most reported that having a female mentor would be important (58%). An overwhelming majority (86%) believe family planning takes on a more important role for women, and 72% reported worrying their career prospects could be negatively affected by their desire to have children. The greatest obstacle perceived was the prevailing inequality in opportunities (30%) and attaining leadership positions (24%). Most (81%) reported that women have different concerns regarding their career from men, and 72% also reported feeling at a disadvantage as a woman. Most (66%) also believe should be a "Women in Neurosurgery" committee within the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies., Conclusions: Unfortunately, a gender gap still exists in European neurosurgery. The extent thereof has not yet been systematically analyzed. Our project offers a glimpse into the inequalities and obstacles women perceive in our field; however, more comprehensive data are required., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Women constitute a minority (9.2%) of academic neurosurgeons. We previously found that women in academic medicine are disadvantaged in funding and career advancement opportunities. We hypothesized that women are also underrepresented at neurosurgical society conferences., Methods: Programs from the 2014-2018 meetings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), American Association of Neurological Surgery (AANS), and North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) were analyzed. Demographic data, including name, gender, and geographic region of practice, were collected for speaker, moderator, or leadership positions. χ 2 statistical analysis was performed for difference in gender representation across all opportunity spots., Results: In the period 2014-2018, there was no female presidents or honored guest at any academic meetings analyzed; 53.8% of executive committees comprised all men. Women often constituted a minority (<15%) of speakers and moderators at CNS, AANS, and NASBS meetings: speakers (% female, range), 8.6 (5.5-11.7), 13.6 (10.1-19.7), and 10.5 (5.6-16.6); moderators (% female, range), 7.8 (0-14.3), 23.0 (81.3-91.3), and 13.0 (8.6-18.7). Conference panels frequently comprised all men (58% CNS, 20.7% AANS, 61% NASBS). χ 2 analysis found a disparity in male and female participation across all opportunity spots (P = 0.002). Additionally, female participants are often repeated, decreasing total number of unique women participating. There was no significant increase in female participation across the study period., Conclusions: In 2014-2018, underrepresentation of women in national neurosurgical conferences either matched or exceeded the baseline gender disparity seen in academic neurosurgery. We discussed potential causes of and strategies to address these findings., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Medical publications reflect the development of training, research, and health services. No objective data are available regarding neurosurgical publications from Morocco. Bibliometrics were used to evaluate the contribution of Moroccan neurosurgeons (MONSs) in neurosurgical journals worldwide and to discuss the strategies that can be applied to increase the quantity and quality of publications on this subject., Methods: A literature search of reports by MONSs was performed using the PubMed database. The number and quality of the reports were evaluated with the impact factor of the neurosurgical journals and the h-index of each first author., Results: The data from 174 identified studies reported from 1989 to 2018 were analyzed. MONSs have continued to report more studies every year worldwide. However, their contribution to neurosurgical journals has been gradually declining since 2012. Scientific publishing was limited to a few great neurosurgical departments and a few academic neurosurgeons in Morocco. Most of the reports were case reports, reported in the French language, included in non-neurosurgical journals, from single centers, and without international collaboration., Conclusions: Academic neurosurgeons in Morocco should prepare their residents and young researchers on research methodology and medical writing. Moroccan neurosurgical research should be more focused on modern neurosurgical topics by highlighting our particularities. More high level of evidence studies should be reported in English-language neurosurgical journals with a high impact factor and good scientific reputation. MONSs should continue to collaborate more often with each other and with foreign centers to further improve the quality and number of international publications, regardless of the difficulties they face., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Rabat Training Center was established in 2002 following the efforts of Dr. Abdeslam El Khamlichi. This institution has paved the way to guide tremendous change and to improve neurosurgery training in Africa, especially Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The center has enabled so far the training of more than 58 neurosurgical candidates, from approximately 18 countries in SSA, including 30 neurosurgeons who are already back in their respective countries, establishing and improving neurosurgical care. It is clear that this is the first successful example of the WFNS in increasing the neurosurgical workforce in SSA by well-trained and competent neurosurgeons. Consequently, this experience is worth depicting. We reviewed the profile of the neurosurgeons trained in this center and shortly summarized their reestablishment in their respective countries and their challenges to provide neurosurgical care in such source-limited countries., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Social media is evolving and growing at an exponential rate today. From a healthcare perspective, these platforms can be used to enhance professional networking, education, organizational promotion, patient care, patient education, and public health programs without the limitations of geographic and time-related access barriers. Given the possible importance of social media in medicine, and the conflicting reports in literature about its use in healthcare, it is important to identify its utility within the neurosurgical community. We set out to measure the use of social media platforms among neurosurgery faculty, fellows, and residents., Patients and Methods: An online survey using the SurveyMonkey platform was sent to the program directors of 102 accredited neurosurgery programs across the United States. Program directors then distributed these surveys to the residents, fellows, and attendings at their respective institutions once each month between October 2017 and December 2017. Neurosurgeons participated anonymously, voluntarily, and received no compensation for their participation. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY)., Results: 137 attendings, 96 residents, and 8 fellows responded to the survey (81% male). Most (70%) stated that they used social media for professional purposes. Sixty percent of all respondents believed that social media can be beneficial in terms of professional development. Younger neurosurgeons in training were more likely to read journal articles found via social media and were more likely to believe social media could be beneficial than older neurosurgeons at later stages in their career., Conclusions: Results point toward differences in social media use based on age or level of training. Further studies should include a larger sample cohort over a longer time period to determine whether these trends will change over time., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The degree to which extended length of stay (LOS) after surgery represents patient illness or postoperative complications is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of postoperative complications and patient comorbidities on variance in extended length of hospital stay after lumbar spine surgery., Methods: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were analyzed from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2014. Study participants were 23,102 patients undergoing a 1-level or 2-level lumbar decompression and fusion procedure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratio for risk-adjusted extended length of hospital stay, defined as patients with a hospital stay greater than the 75th percentile (LOS >5 days) for the cohort. The primary outcome was the extent to which extended LOS represented preoperative patient illness or postoperative complications., Results: Of 23,102 participants, 3794 (16.42%) had extended LOS. Most patients (2849 patients; 75.10%) with extended LOS did not have a documented postoperative complication. Only a minority of patients with extended LOS had a history of comorbidities known to influence outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery, including diabetes (24%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (7%), congestive heart failure (0.69%), myocardial infarction (0.20%), acute renal failure (0.26%), and stroke (2.23%)., Conclusions: This study suggests that much of the variation in LOS after lumbar spine surgery is not attributable to baseline patient illness or complications and most likely represents differences in practice style or surgeon preference., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Growing relationships between industry related financial payments and physicians have become an increasingly controversial topic as they relate to clinical judgment and patient care. Our objective is to analyze and quantify the effects of physician reported industry payments on the patient experience and patient satisfaction as defined by Physician Rating Websites (PRW)., Patients and Methods: We analyzed physician-reported industry payments received by neurosurgeons over four consecutive years as defined by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (PPSA). All board-certified neurosurgeons on three widely used PRWs were further identified. Data was collected on average rating, number of ratings and composite ratings. Demographic, training-related and practice-related data were also collected. Each physician was identified and matched to their individually reported payments from the PPSA database., Results: Receiving higher amounts of industrial payments had no correlation to average PRW ratings, however was associated with receiving higher composite PRW ratings (p = 0.0389). Higher composite ratings (p = 0.0389), decreasing age (p = 0.005), being male (OR 1.7960, p = 0.005), completing a fellowship (OR 1.3310, p = 0.0085), having a more complete profile (OR 1.1121, p = 0.0057) and speaking more languages (OR 1.1253, p = 0.03802) all were correlated with receiving more total monetary payments. Training at a top 25 residency program was predictive of being in the bottom quartile of total monetary payments received (OR 1.676, p = 0.0002)., Conclusions: Patient experience as defined by PRW ratings are likely not strongly influenced by industry related monetary payments, however some relationship may exist. Further study is needed to determine the true relationship between industry related monetary payments and the patient experience., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Innovation is a part of the daily practice of neurosurgery. However, a clear definition of what constitutes innovation is lacking and opinions vary from continent to continent, from hospital to hospital, and from surgeon to surgeon., Methods: In this study, we distributed an online survey to neurosurgeons from multiple countries to investigate what neurosurgeons consider innovative, by gathering opinions on several hypothetical cases. The anonymous survey consisted of 52 questions and took approximately 10 minutes to complete., Results: A total of 355 neurosurgeons across all continents excluding Antarctica completed the survey. Neurosurgeons achieved consensus (>75%) in considering specific cases to be innovative, including laser resection of meningioma, focused ultrasonography for tumor, oncolytic virus, deep brain stimulation for addiction, and photodynamic therapy for tumor. Although the new dura substitute case was not considered innovative, there was consensus among neurosurgeons indicating that institutional review board approval was still necessary to maintain ethical standards. Furthermore, although 90% of neurosurgeons considered an oncolytic virus for glioblastoma multiforme to be innovative, only 78% believed that institutional review board approval was necessary before treatment., Conclusions: Our results indicate that innovation is a heterogeneous concept among neurosurgeons that necessitates standardization to ensure appropriate patient safety without stifling progress. We discuss both the ethical drawbacks of not having a clear definition of innovation and the challenges in achieving a unified understanding of innovation in neurosurgery and offer suggestions for uniting the field., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The 2013 Physician Payments Sunshine Act mandates that all U.S. drug and device manufacturers disclose payments to physicians. All payments are made available annually in the Open Payments Database (OPD). Our aim was to determine prevalence, magnitude, and nature of these payments to physicians performing neurologic surgery in 2015 and to discuss the role that financial conflicts of interest play in neurosurgery., Methods: All records of industry financial relationships with physicians identified by the neurological surgery taxonomy code in 2015 were accessed via the OPD. Data were analyzed in terms of type and amounts of payments, companies making payments, and comparison with previous studies., Results: In 2015, 83,690 payments (totaling $99,048,607) were made to 7613 physicians by 330 companies. Of these, 0.01% were >$1 million, and 73.2% were <$100. The mean payment ($13,010) was substantially greater than the median ($114). Royalties and licensing accounted for the largest monetary value of payments (74.2%) but only 1.7% of the total number. Food and beverage payments were the most commonly reported transaction (75%) but accounted for only 2.5% of total reported monetary value. Neurologic surgery had the second highest average total payment per physician of any specialty., Conclusions: The neurological surgery specialty receives substantial annual payments from industry in the United States. The overall value is driven by a small number of payments of high monetary value. The OPD provides a unique opportunity for increased transparency in industry-physician relationships facilitating disclosure of financial conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Life expectancy (LE) refers to the number of years that an individual is expected to survive. Emphasis is frequently placed on the relationship between LE and the conditions under which a population lives, but fewer studies have investigated the relationship between stress factors associated with specific professions and their effects on LE. The aim of this study is to evaluate Brazilian neurosurgeons' life expectancies (BNLEs) and compare them with those of physicians (both Brazilian and foreign) from other fields, as well as with Brazilian nondoctors., Methods: The Brazilian Society of Neurosurgery death registry was used to obtain data that compared LEs from non-neurosurgeon physicians, as described in the national and international literature. BNLEs were also compared with the LEs of Brazilian citizens., Results: Fifty-one neurosurgeons died between 2009 and 2016. All were males. The mean age at death was 68.31 ± 17.71 years. Among all-cause mortality, the breakdown was 20% cardiovascular diseases, 39% malignancies, 10% external factors, 6% gastrointestinal disorders, 12% neurologic illnesses, and 14% unknown causes. BNLE was shorter than LE of male Brazilian citizens., Conclusions: LE was similar among neurosurgeons and other doctors but shorter compared with Brazilian citizens. Further research is needed to provide data that can add to and confirm these results., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients are increasingly turning to online resources to inquire about individual physicians and to gather health information. However, little research exists studying the online presence of neurosurgeons across the country. This study aimed to characterize these online profiles and assess the scope of neurosurgeons' digital identities., Methods: Medicare-participating neurologic surgeons from the United States and Puerto Rico were identified using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician Comparable Downloadable File. Each physician was characterized by his or her medical education, graduation year, city of practice, gender, and affiliation with an academic institution. Using a Google-based custom search tool, the top 10 search results for each physician were extracted and categorized as 1 of the following: 1) physician, hospital, or healthcare system controlled, 2) third-party or government controlled, 3) social media-based, 4) primary journal article, or 5) other., Results: Among the physicians within the CMS database, 4751 self-identified as being neurosurgeons, yielding a total of 45,875 uniform resource locator search results pertinent to these physicians. Of the 4751 neurosurgeons, 2317 (48.8%) and 2434 (51.2%) were classified as academic and nonacademic neurosurgeons, respectively. At least 1 search result was obtained for every physician. Hospital, healthcare system, or physician-controlled websites (18,206; 39.7%) and third-party websites (17,122; 37.3%) were the 2 most commonly observed domain types. Websites belonging to social media platforms accounted for 4843 (10.6%) search results, and websites belonging to peer-reviewed academic journals accounted for 1888 (4.1%) search results. The frequency with which a third-party domain appeared as the first search result was higher for nonacademic neurosurgeons than for academic neurosurgeons., Conclusions: In general, neurosurgeons lacked a controllable online presence within their first page of Google Search results. Third-party physician rating websites constituted about half of the search results, and a relative lack of social media websites was apparent. Still, numerous opportunities exist for neurosurgeons to address this disparity., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The Centers for Disease Control have declared that the United States is amidst a continuing opioid epidemic, with drug overdose-related death tripling between 1999 and 2014. Among the 47,055 overdose-related deaths that occurred in 2014, 28,647 (60.9%) of them involved an opioid., Methods: The Part D Prescriber Public Use File, which is based on beneficiaries enrolled in the Medicare Part D prescription drug program, was used to query information on prescription drug events incurred by Medicare beneficiaries with a Part D prescription drug plan from 31 June 2014 to 30 June 2015. Only those providers with the specialty description of neurosurgeon, as reported on the provider's Part B claims, were included in this study., Results: A total of 271,502 beneficiaries, accounting for 971,581 claims and 22,152,689 day supplies of medication, accounted for the $52,956,428.40 paid by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for medication that the 4085 neurosurgeons submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Part D program in the 2014 calendar year. During the same year, 402,767 (41.45%) claims for 158,749 (58.47%) beneficiaries accounted for 6,458,624 (29.16%) of the day supplies of medications and $13,962,630.11 (26.37%) of the total money spent by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Part D that year. Nationwide, the ratio of opioid claims to total Medicare Part D beneficiaries was 1.48. No statistically significant regional differences were found., Conclusions: The opioid misuse epidemic is a complex and national issue with patterns of prescription not significantly different between regions. All neurosurgeons must be cognizant of their prescribing practices so as to best support the resolution of this public health crisis., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Smartphones and their apps are used ubiquitously in medical practice. However, in some cases their use can be at odds with current patient data safety regulations such as Canada's Personal Health Information Protection Act of 2004. To assess current practices and inform mobile application development, we sought to better understand mobile device usage patterns among Canadian neurosurgery residents., Methods: Through the Canadian Neurosurgery Research Collaborative, an online survey characterizing smartphone ownership and usage patterns was developed and sent to all Canadian neurosurgery resident in April of 2016. Questionnaires were collected and completed surveys analyzed., Results: Of 146 eligible residents, 76 returned completed surveys (52% response rate). Of these 99% of respondents owned a smartphone, with 79% running on Apple's iOS. Four general mobile uses were identified: 1) communication between members of the medical team, 2) decision support, 3) medical reference, and 4) documentation through medical photography. Communication and photography were areas where the most obvious breaches in the Canadian Personal Health Information Protection Act were noted, with 89% of respondents taking pictures of patients' radiologic studies and 75% exchanging them with Short Message System. Hospital policies had no impact on user behaviors., Conclusions: Smartphones are used daily by most neurosurgery residents. Identified usage patterns are associated with perceived gains in efficacy and challenges in privacy and data reliability. We believe creating and improving workflows that address these usage patterns has a greater potential to improve privacy than changing policies and enforcing regulations., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The proportion of women among neurosurgeons appears to be growing worldwide with time. Official data concerning the current situation across Europe have not yet been published. Thus, there are still concerns about gender inequality. The European Women in Neurosurgery Project 2016 was designed to recognize the current situation across Europe., Methods: The office holders of the national neurosurgical societies of 39 countries forming the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies were contacted to provide data stating the proportion of women in neurosurgery. Obtained data were supplied with the results of an online survey., Results: The response rate of national office holders was 90%. The number of reported neurosurgeons was 12,985, and overall proportion of women represented was 12%. Two hundred thirty-seven responses to online questionnaire were taken into account. The overall proportion of female respondents was 30%. There was no intergender variability in responses regarding amount of working time per week, exposure to surgeries, or administrative work. Male respondents reported dedicating significantly more time to scientific work and feeling more confident dictating own career direction. Female respondents reported being less often married, having fewer children, a stronger perception of gender significance level, and a higher appreciation of personal qualities., Conclusions: Neurosurgery is a challenging field of medicine. The results of our survey did not imply an overall feeling of gender inequality among European respondents, although women believe that the gender issue to be more important than men do and that they have to sacrifice more of their personal lives., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare the estimated resource utilization for non-operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy if managed by surgeons versus non-surgeons., Patients and Methods: A Cervical Spine Research Society-sponsored survey was administered at a national spine surgery conference to surgeons and non-surgeons, as classified above. The survey asked questions regarding resource utilization and perceived costs for the "average patient" with cervical radiculopathy managed non-operatively. Resource utilization and perceived costs were compared between surgeon and non-surgeon participants, and between private practice and academic and/or hybrid groups that combine academic and private practices., Results: In total, 101 of the 125 conference attendees participated in the survey (return rate 80.8%, of which 60% were surgeons). Surgeon and non-surgeon estimates for duration of non-operative care did not differ (3.3 versus 4.2 months, p=0.071). Estimates also did not differ for estimated number of physical therapy visits (10.5 versus 10.5, p=0.983), cervical injections (1.4 versus 1.7, p=0.272), chiropractic visits (3.1 versus 3.7, p=0.583), or perceived days off from work (14.9 versus 16.3, p=0.816). The only difference identified was that surgeon estimates of the number of physician visits while providing non-operative care were lower than non-surgeon estimates (3.2 versus 4.0, p=0.018). In terms of estimated costs, surgeon and non-surgeon were mostly similar (only difference being that surgeon estimates for the total cost of physician visits per patient were lower than non-surgeon estimates ($382 versus $579, p=0.007). Surgeon estimates for the percent of their patients that go on to receive surgery within 6 months were higher than non-surgeon estimates (28.6% versus 18.8%, p=0.018). Similarly, surgeon estimates for the percent of their patients to go on to receive surgery within 2 years were higher than non-surgeon estimates (37.8% versus 24.8%, p=0.013). Academic/hybrid and private practice group resource utilization estimates and costs were also compared, and no significant differences were found in any comparisons. Additionally, no significant differences were found in these groups for duration of non-operative care, or the estimates of the percent of patients who go on to receive surgery within 6 months or two years., Conclusion: These data suggest that patients with cervical radiculopathy managed by surgeons and those by non-surgeons have overall similar resource utilization during a non-operative trial. This suggests that relatively similar care is provided regardless of whom initiates the non-operative trial (surgeon or non-surgeon). Although surgeons thought their patients more likely to undergo surgery following a non-operative trial, this may be a bias due to patient referral-specifically, surgeons may be more likely than non-surgeons to manage patients with more severe or longer-standing radiculopathy., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: While oral anticoagulation (OAC) is universally indicated for patients with mechanical heart valves (MHVs), OAC resumption following anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is an area of uncertainty. We sought to determine the practice preferences of North American neurosurgeons and thrombosis experts on optimal timing of OAC re-initiation., Methods: A cross-sectional survey was disseminated to North American members of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Demographic factors, as well as a clinical scenario with 14 modifiable clinical risk factors were included in the survey., Results: 504 physicians completed our survey (response rate 34.3%). Majority of participants were affiliated with academic centres, and managed≤10 ICH patients with MHV per year. There was wide distribution in response in optimal timing for OAC resumption following an ICH: 59% and 60% preferred to re-start OAC between 3 and 14 days following the hemorrhagic event (median of 6-7 days). Smaller hemorrhages (<30cm 2 ). CHADS 2 score ≥2, concomitant venous thromboembolism, mitral valve prosthesis, caged-ball valves and multiple valves prompted earlier OAC resumption., Conclusion: Wide variation in the current practice of neurosurgeons and thrombosis specialists exist when they encounter patients with ICH and MHV, though decisions were influenced by patient- and valve-related factors. As our observed variation likely reflects the immense gap in current evidence, prospective randomized trials in this population are therefore urgently needed., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is a paucity of available strategies to increase visibility and engagement in social media (SM) within the neurosurgical community. The objective of this study was to investigate the possible factors for engagement and reach among SM users in neurosurgery., Methods: Data from Facebook and Twitter accounts of our institution were collected. We extracted data on demographics and attributes of our current users, including sex, country, age group, device used, and language. Attributes of SM posts were also collected, including time of post, type and content of post, impressions, and engagements. Nonparametric analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in metrics., Results: Metrics were obtained on 192 Facebook and Twitter posts, published online between October 1, 2013, and March 13, 2016. On both platforms, there was a greater representation of male users relative to female users. Facebook users were predominantly in the 18-34 years age range (83%), with most users being from outside of North America. Conversely, users from Canada and the United States comprised the highest proportion of Twitter users. On both platforms, posts containing photos or videos scored significantly higher in engagements and impressions (P < 0.05). Posts on weekdays and during work hours achieved higher visibility and engagements. Moreover, Facebook posts demonstrated higher SM metrics if they mentioned faculty with more than 16 years' experience (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: The current study demonstrates that our SM users predominantly comprise a younger demographic and that content optimization with media materials may lead to higher visibility and engagement. The impact of high SM reach on academic neurosurgical programs remains to be determined., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Accurate prediction of surgical outcomes in patients suffering from metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is challenging. This survey aims to obtain expert opinion on which preoperative clinical factors are the most relevant predictors of survival, neurologic, functional, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL)., Methods: Members of AOSpine International were invited to participate in a 15-question electronic survey. Results from the entire sample and differences across geographic regions and between neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons were analyzed. Factors endorsed by over 50% of the respondents were considered key predictors., Results: Among AOSpine members, 438 responded. The absence of visceral metastasis (n = 335; 76.48%) and the site of primary tumor (n = 228; 52.05%) were identified as important predictors for survival. Frankel/American Spinal Injury Association grade D or E and the ability to walk were common to neurologic (n = 344; 78.54% and n = 238; 54.34%, respectively); functional (n = 269; 61.42% and n = 243; 55.48%, respectively); and HRQoL outcomes (n = 241; 55.02% and n = 242; 55.25%, respectively). While the absence of bowel/bladder/sexual dysfunction was common to neurologic (n = 260; 59.36%) and HRQoL (n = 229; 52.28%) outcomes, a high Karnofsky/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was common to functional (n = 237; 54.11%) and HRQoL (n = 221; 50.46%) outcomes. There was overall consistency across specialities and geographic regions., Conclusions: Neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons and respondents from different geographic regions generally identified similar preoperative clinical factors as key predictors of survival, neurologic, functional, and HRQoL outcomes in surgical MESCC patients. The results of this survey will inform the development of clinical prediction rules for survival and HRQoL in MESCC patients selected for surgery to maximize their clinical relevance., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recommendations that may help reduce adverse events outside the perioperative period are uncommon. We identified the primary factors that contributed to patient injury in neurosurgical practice both within the perioperative period and outside the perioperative period., Methods: Medical malpractice claims (n = 355) from The Doctors Company that were closed over 7 years were reviewed by neurosurgical medical experts. Objective neurosurgical expert analysis of the cases identified patient injuries and the primary factor that contributed to the patient injury., Results: Continued pain, nerve damage, and need for additional surgery were the most common injuries. In 145 cases (40.8%), the primary factor that contributed to patient injury occurred outside the perioperative period: assessment (evaluation and diagnosis), selection and management of therapy, and communication between the physician and patient/family. In 138 (38.9%) cases, the primary factor that contributed to patient injury occurred within the perioperative period. Surgical complication (a known risk of the procedure) was the primary factor in 99 cases (27.9%), and technical performance of surgery was the primary factor in only 39 cases (11.0%)., Conclusions: In addition to excellent surgical technique, checklists, teamwork, outcomes measurement, and regionalization of subspecialty care, improving patient safety in neurosurgical practice requires careful attention to care provided outside the perioperative period. Differential diagnosis, consideration of all relevant clinical data, active pursuit of good physician-patient relationships, and adequate monitoring of patients receiving nonsurgical treatment may also help improve patient safety in neurosurgical practice., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Vertebral body cement augmentation as a treatment option for osteoporotic or traumatic fractures has become increasingly popular during the past decade. However, these surgical procedures require numerous fluoroscopic examinations, resulting in high radiation exposure for the patient and the surgical team. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of radiation exposure of the spine surgeon and the patient during these percutaneous procedures., Methods: Forty-nine patients admitted for single- or 2-level vertebral compression fracture were prospectively included and treated with vertebral body cement augmentation. For each procedure, radiation dose was measured on the surgeon's whole body, lens, and extremities as well as patient irradiation. Each surgeon wore 2 thermoluminescent dosimeters to measure lens and extremities radiation exposure and 1 electronic personal dosimeter. Patient clinical and surgical data, effective dose to patient, and surgeon were analyzed., Results: Mean operative time was 31.5 ± 11.7 minutes. The average fluoroscopic time was 61.0 ± 27.1 seconds. The average whole-body radiation dose per procedure was 1.4 ± 2.1 μSv. The average equivalent dose to lens and extremities were 44 μSv and 59 μSv, respectively., Conclusions: Values of radiation doses for surgeon and patient were lower than those reported in the previous literature. The recommended annual dose limit is set to 500 mSv for extremities and 150 mSv for lens. According to our results, the exposure dose to the eye exceeds the annual limit after 3500 procedures. However, there is increasing concern among surgeons about radiation exposure, and there is still a need for solutions as preventive measures., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To measure the presence and popularity of neurosurgical departments, journals, and nonprofit organizations on 3 major social networks., Methods: A systematic 2-pronged search strategy was used in June 2015 to identify all accounts on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube that were relevant to neurosurgery. Online search was conducted by 2 independent authors. All accounts were ranked according to their popularity data., Results: Our search yielded 158 social media accounts (86 Facebook, 59 Twitter, and 13 YouTube) of neurosurgical private and academic practice departments. Of the 158 accounts we retrieved, 117 were for private practice centers (74%). Accounts of academic and private departments had a similar median number of "likes" and "followers" on Facebook and Twitter, respectively. Seven neurosurgical journals only had active Facebook and Twitter accounts (of 20 screened journals). When compared with studies of social media in other medical subspecialties, the use of these networks in neurosurgery followed a similar pattern in their presence and popularity., Conclusions: The current study shows different uses of social media platforms and numbers of users of the online neurosurgical community. Content optimization, advanced metrics of user engagement, and their subsequent effects on academic impact remain unanswered queries and require further prospective study., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The potential for radiation exposure during neurosurgical training has increased dramatically in the last decade. Incorporation of instrumented and minimally invasive spinal surgery and neuroendovascular procedures into the curriculum has led to increased potential for exposure to ionizing radiation. Contemporary neurosurgery residents' exposure to radiation has not been previously reported., Objective: To determine neurosurgery residents' exposure to radiation over the course of 7 years of training., Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained radiation database from July 2009 to July 2014 for all neurosurgery residents based on radiation dosimetry data. Standard radiation safety precautions were used (e.g., lead gowns or aprons), although compliance was not specifically monitored., Results: Thirty-eight neurosurgery residents were monitored from 2009 to 2014. Radiation exposure data were available for 34 residents for the final analysis. A total of 20,541 days of radiation monitoring data were available. The mean deep dose equivalent over this period was 0.67 ± 0.75 mrem per resident/day. The calculated maximum cumulative exposure during the course of residency training was 12.15 ± 13.50 mSv, approximately equivalent to 6 computed tomography head scans., Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study is the first to quantify radiation exposure for neurosurgery residents in the current era of training. From this work, efforts may be initiated to increase awareness and safety with regard to radiation exposure. Although the total dose is not high, a better understanding of the impact of radiation exposure on practitioners may help to drive institutional policies to reduce occupational exposure., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)